 | |  |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jessica Simpson: Commercial Cutie in Los Angeles | | Added 11 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
She?s well on her way to having baby #2 but that?s not stopping Jessica Simpson from continuing to bring home the bacon!
The ?Dukes of Hazzard? hottie showed up on the set of a commercial in Los Angeles yesterday afternoon, donning a lovely leopard print maternity dress to show off her baby bump.
Also nearby were Jessica?s daughter Maxwell and fianc Eric Johnson who both looked happy to be hanging out with her in between takes.
Ms. Simpson is said to be about five months along, which would put her due date sometime this summer. How exciting!
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart Was Disheveled and Limping Last Night | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Last night at the Oscars, Kristen Stewart was walking the red carpet on crutches and looking pretty disheveled. Turns out it wasn’t date night with Chris Brown.
According to her makeup artist, Beau Nelson, Kristen “cut the ball of her foot, quite severely, on glass two days ago.” Adding that she’s in “a little bit of pain.”
Translation: Kristen Stewart got really high the other day, dropped her glass bong and accidentally stepped on shards of broken glass.
No explanation as to why she looked like she just rolled out of bed but looking like the dirtiest hippie in the room is sort of her calling card now.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Heidi Klum's Dress at Elton John's AIDS Foundation Viewing Party | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Heidi Klum showed up at Elton John’s AIDS Foundation Academy Awards Viewing Party yesterday wearing this amazing dress. It wasn’t so much a dress as it was two sequenced slings of gold holding up her magnificent breasts.I wonder how she felt the entire night with people just talking at her chest.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian Is Having a Girl | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon the fixed constant by which her hips are increasing relative to the distance of her gait, scientists have concluded that Kim Kardashian is having a girl. But figuring that out was a total waste of time because a source already told Us Weekly that she’s expecting a baby girl. *Throws graphs off desk in anger*
Says the source, “They’re over the moon! Kanye always wanted a girl.”
And now that Kanye thinks he’s a fashion designer, he’s going to custom make clothes for his baby. Said Kim, “So I don’t think hand-me-downs are going to work.”
The baby is due in July so expect that kid to be wearing a leather dress and diamond face mask by August. Then watch her be home schooled by the time she’s 7 after being given an immediate swirly on the first day of school.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | JWoww Hosted Dusk Nightclub With Her Sideboobs | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
JWoww’s claim to fame is appearing in that drunken mess of a reality showJersey Shore and having comically large breasts. Naturally, she was a perfect fit for hosting Dusk nightclub at Caesar’s in Atlantic City.
And if stereotypes have taught me anything, it’s that the streets of Atlantic City are littered with girls like her stumbling out of clubs at 4 am in the morning and going home with whichever guy will pay for their taxi. Their idea of a fancy date is one where no collars have been popped.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | It's Pink in a Bikini at the Beach | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Good news for people that like to see Pink in a bikini at the beach because I have pictures of Pink in a bikini at the beach. You’re welcome.
Anyway, Pink really does have the body of a pit bull. Short and stocky with a lot of muscle. If you ever got in a fight with her, you might actually have to stick your finger up her butt to get her to release. And no, that’s not some weird fetish and I’m not making it up. I have anecdotal evidence from the internet that this works and we all know the internet would never lie.
I had to break up the fight, but didn?t want to hurt either dog. I tried putting my hands in the attacking dog?s mouth trying to pry its teeth open. In doing so, I broke every nail and had my fingers were bit to the bone?not one of my best ideas. After that dumb maneuver, I started hitting the dog that was attacking. This was stupid idea #2, as this did nothing.
Finally, I got so desperate that I stuck my pointer finger up the attacking dog?s butt. Fortunately I didn?t need to go more than a knuckle deep, as this was enough of a shock. The attacking dog immediately released, giving me a chance to hold him down so the ?victim? could get away.
WARNING: When I stuck my finger up this dog?s butt, I knew there was a chance this would piss him off and he?d turn around and lash out at me. I made sure to put the dog in a choke hold and when the dog?s head was lodged between by bicep and forearm, I put my finger up its butt. The dog tried to turn its head to see what was going on, but wasn?t able to. If you have a 2nd or 3rd person around, this trick is much easier. Unfortunately, the other humans were literally paralyzed with fear and although I was shouting at them to help me, they were in such a state of shock that they physically couldn?t move.
See? See?!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian Tells Cosmo She Has It All | | Added 11 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian brags to the new edition of Cosmo that she has it all in her relationship with Kanye West. “The truth, the excitement and the passion.”
Well la-dee-da. Don’t you have a wonderful life. You know what I have? Food poisoning from Subway. Point. Me. I think.
Kim also talks about the possibility of marriage. It would be her third one.”Sometimes you’re just not ready. A person could have it all, and you’re not ready for it all. But this is where I probably always should have been?[marriage] is something I know that we both want in our future, but I don’t have this sense of urgency about it. I have this best friend who understands me and helps me through all my tough experiences, and vice versa, you know? It just feels like this is it for me.”
That last line. “This is it for me.” She’s so prescient. She’s like that kid fromMinority Report.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Stacy Keibler made it through her second awards season: will she last much longer? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Was anyone else surprised that Stacy Keibler made it through her second awards season as George Clooney?s official girlfriend? I mean, once she made it through January, you knew George Clooney was going to keep her through the Oscars, because he never breaks up with a girlfriend in the middle of the awards season. What surprised me wasn?t that Stacy made it through, it was that she made it through with such little fanfare. During the 2012 awards season ? when George was nominated for Best Actor ? Stacy was front and center, soaking up the attention and making everything about her Marchesa gowns and her fashion disasters. She was different this time around ? quieter, less attention-seeking. Perhaps she was on notice? Rumors have been swirling for months that George is tired/bored with her. So? we?ll see.
I?m including some photos of Stacy out and about in LA yesterday ? those are the photos where she?s in all-black (even black Uggs). Again, this isn?t a ?look at me, I made it to the Oscars two years in a row? look. This is a ?good God, I?m hungover? look. She probably is! Word is that after the Oscars and the Governors Ball, George, Stacy, the Afflecks, the Gerbers, and many more went to a private dinner at Craig?s where everyone was partying until all hours of the night. A witness said, ?Their Oscars were on the table, and they did shots of [Clooney?s] Casamigos tequila all night.? The couple that parties together stays together?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart was grumpy at the Oscars because 'she has insecurities' of course | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Everybody is still talking about Kristen Stewart?s grumpy, greasy, grunty appearance at the Oscars. Everybody is still analyzing what went wrong, although I think they?re asking the wrong questions. Like, people are too focused on the issue of her limp and this ?stepped on glass? story when we should be asking: why didn?t she just cancel her appearance? It?s not like she was nominated, you know. She was just a presenter! Another questions we should be asking: why does she always look so greasy? Why didn?t she wash her hair? Why did she look and act like she smoked a massive blunt before she came on stage? Hilariously, everyone who interacted with Kristen now has to comment about her. Daniel Radcliffe (who co-presented with Kristen) had some nice things to say:
Kristen Stewart didn’t really need to limp onto the stage when she presented with Daniel Radcliffe last night at the Oscars.
“I felt so bad,” Radcliffe said at the Governors Ball. “I just wanted to pick her up, put her in my arms and carry her onto the stage.”
Or maybe not. “I probably would have dropped her and opened her wound again,” Radcliffe added with a laugh, referring to K.Stew’s reason for hobbling on crutches: cutting the bottom of her foot on glass!
Kidding aside, the Harry Potter star said it was about time he and Stewart met.
“I felt like this was a long time coming. I feel like we’ve been meant to meet,” Radcliffe said. “This was the perfect way. And you know what? She is so nice?really, really nice.”
Radcliffe also dished on dancing during the show. At one point in the night, he said, he was backstage with fellow Oscar dancers Channing Tatum and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
“I looked at them and was like, ‘Remember your first day of work on your first job? Could you believe we’re doing this now?’” Radcliffe said. “They were actually thinking the same thing. The night has been surreal. I never thought I’d be doing any of this.”
[From E! News]
Kristen also met Anne Hathaway backstage, which would be an interesting pairing ? Anne is so cloying and Kristen is so grumpy. It would be like Franco/Hathaway all over again.
According to the Associated Press, the blockbuster actress encountered another A-list actress backstage before that presentation– Anne Hathaway, immediately after her Best Supporting Actress victory — and finally dispelled the mystery behind her unexplained injury.
“Oh no!” the Prada-clad Les Miserables star, 31, exclaimed in sympathy, seeing Stewart’s crutch.
“I know, I’m an idiot,” Stewart (stunning in a Reem Acra gown, Jimmy Choo heels and Fred Leighton jewelry) replied. “But congratulations!” she said, eyeing Hathaway’s hard-earned Oscar.
“Please tell me you’re going on stage with those [crutches],” Hathaway said, the AP reports. “Nope,” Stewart replied. “I’m gonna hobble.”
Quipped the “I Dreamed a Dream” singer: “Well, break a leg . . . Oops!” Stewart then explained that she cut her foot recently after stepping on glass. “I just hope [the wound] doesn’t open up right now.”
Indeed, Stewart’s glam squad told Us Weekly more about the young star’s injury. “She had sliced her foot and everyone was worrying about would she wear heels or flats or one heel, crutches or no crutches,” manicurist Ashlie Johnson told Us. “She tried so many options, she was really a trouper.”
“Kristen was nervous about her crutches so having her friends around playing music was just what she needed,” hairstylist Danilo said. “We all were trying to make her feel better and her friends were trying to tell her she’d be fine, she has insecurities about being in front of people so today was even tougher.”
[From Us Weekly]
?Break a leg! Oops.? Bitch move, Annie. I kind of love it. As for how Kristen was trying different options ? crutches or no crutches, flats or no flats ? seriously, why couldn?t she just cancel? They had plenty of celebrities who were already scheduled to appear, and one of them could have easily filled in.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Pink rocks a bikini on the beach in Miami with her family: lucky girl? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
It’s wicked cold here in Virginia, with sleet expected today. What I wouldn’t give to be somewhere warm and tropical, with a nice gentle breeze and a cute dude bringing me a margarita. We’re spoiled here though, it’s warm most of the year and sunny so I shouldn’t complain about a little cold snap. That’s what comes to mind when I see these photos of Pink in a bikini on the beach in Miami, with her man and babeh. How nice a vacation that must be. That and the fact that I need to hit the gym. Damn she looks great.
So I googled “Pink singer exercise routine” (it was a suggested phrase since just ‘pink’ is so vague) and I found this story in Shape, by her former personal trainer, detailing how she mixes it up and works out 90 minutes a day, five days a week. Damn. That may have been pre-baby Willow, who was born in June, 2011. Then I remembered that she was on Shape Magazine just a few months ago, revealing her incredible post-baby body as well as the details on how she achieved it. At that point she was working out five days a week with celebrity trainers Jillian Michaels and Jeanette Jenkins. She also ate a “mostly vegan” diet with healthy carbs like brown rice. It really shows and she looks incredible.
As for people who are going to say she looks too muscular, yada yada, Pink doesn’t care. She’s heard all that before and she has a really healthy attitude about it. She was asked by Redbook earlier this month what makes her feel beautiful. (Kaiser covered it but I’m just mentioning it again.) She said “Well, I was always considered butch. Feeling beautiful to me is when I feel good in my leather pants and my husband grabs my ass. Or when I?m sitting on a mat and my daughter runs to me with complete joy. Beautiful has never been my goal. Joy is my goal ? to feel healthy and strong and powerful and useful and engaged and intelligent and in love. It?s about joy. And there?s such joy now.” I love her! Honestly, I would love to look like her too.
Look at how tattooed Carey Hart is!
Photo credit: FameFlynet
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Cindy Crawford Goes For A Ride | | Added 11 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I know that Cindy Crawford‘s getting up there these days, but somehow she’s still looking just as hot as ever. Here she is out for a bike ride with her family and, more importantly, a nice tight pair of leggings. So go ahead and be jealous of that lucky bastard she calls a husband all
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Lindsay Lohan didn't pay taxes from 2009 to 2011, she was hit with a new tax bill | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This is going to shock you to your very core! Prepare yourselves ? Lindsay Lohan has just been hit with yet another tax lien! I KNOW. I cannot believe it. Not our upstanding crackhead, she would never! From what I remember, Lindsay?s tax situation was and is a mess in 2009 and 2010, and those are the back-tax liens she?s been dealing with so far. But now TMZ says that Lindsay?s tax situation was also pretty crackie in 2011. Shock!
If blowing off taxes was hockey … Lindsay Lohan would’ve scored herself a hat trick … ’cause the actress has just been hit with a tax bill for 2011 … the 3rd straight year she stiffed the government.
This time, it’s the State of California that’s trying to collect … claiming LiLo owes $56,717.90 for unpaid income tax for 2011.
In case you’re keeping score … the IRS was all over Lindsay’s ass for unpaid federal taxes for 2009 ($93,701.57) and 2010 ($140,203.30).
Lohan was able to clear her 2009 debt thanks to a $100k check from her old pal Charlie Sheen … but it seems like she’s on her own for 2010 and 2011.
We reached out to Lohan’s camp for comment — so far, no word back.
[From TMZ]
2011 was also the year she got paid for her Playboy pictorial too, right? Those photos were published in the January 2012 issue ? meaning she got paid in the tax year of 2011. And Playboy has been her biggest paycheck in years too ? reportedly, she got less than a million dollars, but it was something in the neighborhood of $900K. What do you want to bet that she?s also got unpaid federal taxes for 2011 as well? And 2012? Well? my taxes are still unpaid for 2012 too, so maybe I have something in common with crackie.
As for how Lindsay will ever crawl out of debt, the only person giving her any kind of chance these days is Charlie Sheen. Ol? Charlie has hired Lindsay to guest star on his dumb FX show Anger Management:
Charlie Sheen helped Lindsay Lohan pay off her IRS debt with a $100,000 check. Now the troubled actress will appear on his FX comedy series Anger Management. In her first TV gig since her universally panned starring turn in the Lifetime movie Liz & Dick, Lohan has signed on to guest star as herself in an upcoming episode of Anger Management slated to air in April.
In the episode, Lohan develops a romantic relationship with Sheen?s character after becoming his therapy patient. The casting reunites the two actors, who also co-star together in the upcoming Scary Movie 5 (photo on right) and appears to be a publicity stunt for the film, which also debuts in April. Currently in production on a 90-episode back order, Anger Management, produced by Lionsgate TV and distributed by Debmar-Mercury, airs Thursdays at 9:30 PM.
[From Deadline]
Ugh. I really do wonder about their relationship? is Charlie just taking an interest in a hot mess because she reminds him of himself? Or is Charlie?s interest in Lohan? dirtier? Grosser? I don?t even know.
Also ? TMZ has a weird story about how Lindsay?s new lawyer Mark Heller is screwing up her case royally. You can read that story here.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston reportedly pulling diva antics on the set of her new film | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston has been filming an Elmore Leonard film adaptation for about a month. Word is that Jennifer demanded that the movie change locations from Detroit to Connecticut because she didn?t want to be in Detroit and because she wanted to stay close to Justin Theroux, who has been staying in New York City, I guess. I always find it hard to believe that Jennifer Aniston gets to dictate those kinds of terms ? yes, she?s a self-styled ?America?s Sweetheart? with a dozen interchangeable rom-coms under her belt, but this Elmore Leonard project is an ensemble film in which no actor could or should pull rank. I bring this up because Radar has a story about Jennifer pulling rank all over the place while on set. Hunh.
Jennifer Aniston is an A-list movie star and RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned that?s exactly what she acts like on set. While in Connecticut filming the Untitled Elmore Leonard Project with other famous faces like Isla Fisher, Tim Robbins and Will Forte, a source close to the set says the former Friends actress doesn?t socialize with any of the cast or crew and purposely keeps herself removed as much as possible.
?Every day at lunch the entire cast and crew head to a cafeteria facility where they all sit down and eat lunch together for well over an hour,? the insider exclusively told RadarOnline.com. ?But the only person who doesn?t eat with everyone else is Jen. She quickly grabs a lunch to go and leaves.?
The source also claims Jen, 44, has fancier transportation than everyone else ? as well as a trailer that is much farther away from the set than anybody else?s.
?All the actors ride in normal production vans when they head to lunch, but Jen has her own luxury SUV,? the source said. ?And not only is Jen?s private trailer miles away from the set, but she heads all the way back there each day to eat her lunch away from everyone else.?
The source concluded by telling RadarOnline.com that Jen isn?t outwardly rude to anyone on set, but that she just acts like a diva and it?s off-putting to those around her.
?Her behavior is a clear indicator to everyone that she?s not approachable,? the source said. ?And it?s just unnecessary. There?s no reason why she has to act any better than anyone else on that movie set.?
[From Radar]
Eh. I?m not sure if I believe all of this ? Jennifer is tight with Isla Fisher, and I can?t see Jennifer acting like she was ?above? hanging out with Isla. But maybe she just want people to know that she eats the same chicken salad for lunch every damn day. Also, I could see her with the fancy trailer and making sure that people know she?s THE STAR (of an ensemble). And in case you have your doubts about Jennifer?s diva antics ? go back and watch that Aveeno commercial. She totally made Aveeno call her ?the beautiful Jennifer Aniston?. That?s one of her favorite things in the world, to remind people that she?s ?beautiful?. Her publicist drops that into millions of stories about Jennifer. Imagine that contract ? ?The company must refer to Beautiful Jennifer Aniston as ?Beautiful? at least twice.?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Amanda Seyfried in red Givenchy at the Vanity Fair party: lovely or silly? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Amanda Seyfried managed to surprise at the Vanity Fair Oscar party by changing out of her beloved, custom-made Alexander McQueen gown, which I found odd at first since it’s so rare to find Amanda in a red carpet dress that her stylist didn’t make her wear. But I do believe we’ve found the secret to Amanda’s sartorial happiness — dresses that are made just for her. Hence this tomato-red, custom-made Givenchy haute couture gown that Amanda seems quite pleased to be wearing.
I don’t hate this dress, and I even kind of like it to an extent. To begin, the color looks amazing next to Amanda’s pale skin, and the fabric is very interesting. The full skirt carries a certain charm, and the waist (the belt is kind of cool) and bust cut are very flattering to our girl’s body. Where things get a little bit sketchy are with hints of bondage-like details of the straps and built-in-choker. Of course, this is an unusual, one-of-a-kind dress for which (presumably) Amanda had a good deal of input, so I’m going to go with it. This dress looks good on Amanda, but I can’t think of another person who could get away with wearing it. Her makeup looks great, and the swept-back hair is just right too.
Isla Fisher looked gorgeous in a cobalt blue Monique Lhuillier dress that perfectly set off her ginger hair. The dress looks great from the front, and the fabric and train are quite lovely, but the way that the backless part of the dress is cut leaves much to be desired. Isla looks cute but worried that the dress might fall down. Or am I just imagining that part?
Minnie Driver went silver with a plunging neckline, but it’s not nearly as scandalous as Heidi Klum’s Oscar-party boob dress because Minnie’s pretty small busted compared to Heidi. So it’s no big deal that Minnie’s doing it. Remember when she was the “it” girl in the days of Good Will Hunting and Grosse Point Blank? Minnie’s still as gorgeous as always here.
Marisa Tomei (for whatever reason) chose to wear a taupe-colored, beaded pantsuit. This outfit is so shapeless and would be unflattering on pretty much everyone, but Marisa looks really good from the shoulders up.
Photos courtesy of WENN
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Amy Adams in fringed de la Renta at the VF Party: better than her Oscar dress? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
It feels like Amy Adams is always a bridesmaid at the Oscars, and that she’s constantly nominated but never wins anything. I checked her wiki and she’s been nominated for best supporting actress four times: at the 2006 Academy Awards for Junebug, in 2009 for Doubt, in 2011 for The Fighter and this year for The Master. She’s a staple at the Oscars and she always puts her game face on, even when she’s pre-taping reaction shots for dumb skits involving actresses’ boobs.
At the Vanity Fair Oscar Party (we’re getting to some late-breaking photos today) Amy donned this really incredible silver fringed Oscar de la Renta dress that was very 20s but just skirted the edge of “full flapper.” Does that make sense? Like this could have looked cheap and dated but it didn’t, Amy really worked it. (We don’t have full length photos, but here’s one on US’s site.) I wish she would have worn this dress to the Oscars instead of that pale Oscar de la Renta with the huge fluffy train, but a lot of you liked it.
Also in metallic, in shocking, eye-assaulting blue, we have Ginnifer Goodwin in Monique Lhuillier. Nina Dobrev just sported a green version of this dress to the Critics Choice Awards, and she wore it much better, IMO. Nina doesn’t take herself as seriously as Ginnifer and she doesn’t suffer from styling problems like having hair that resembles a Little Rascal.
Also with bad pre WW2-era hair we have Anna Paquin. She lost a lot of weight since having her twins and seems to have gone a little too far with it, but I guess that’s Hollywood. I really want to like these two and I’m a huge True Blood fan, but I’m still kind of miffed that we haven’t learned their babies’ names, or even their genders. At least they look happy here and aren’t sucking in their cheeks. I don’t have a designer ID on Anna’s dress but I’m going to guess it’s Rachel Comey, which made a similar dress that she wore about a year ago. It’s meh. Anna and Stephen hit up both the VF Oscar party and Elton John’s soiree. They were probably psyched for a date night.
And here’s Jane Fonda ruling the Vanity Fair carpet like she ruled the Oscars. She was in a very formfitting abstract spot print gown accented with the same killer clutch, awesome drop earrings and gold peeptoe shoes she wore earlier in the night. I know Jane has had some work done, she admits it, but she doesn’t look plastic or waxy and she just looks sexy as hell. She’s the best advertisement for her fitness DVDs.
photo credit: WENN.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Janet Jackson has been secretly married to Wissam Al-Mana for months | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
These are some photos of Janet Jackson and Wissam Al Mana at the Roberto Cavalli show in Milan on the 23rd. Janet and Wissam, her Qatari lover of several years, are frequent guests of fashion shows in Paris and Milan, so it was nice to see them out and supporting Cavalli. But an interesting thing happened: just days after their first coupled-up appearance in months comes word that Janet and Wissam were actually ?secretly married? for months! Back in December, sources claimed that they were engaged and planning a lavish wedding, but it looks like they went low-key:
Janet Jackson is a master of deception! The “Rhythm Nation” singer, 46, denied reports she recently wed Qatari billionaire Wissam Al Mana, 37 — because according to Jackson, they’ve been secretly married for months.
“The rumors regarding an extravagant wedding are simply not true. Last year we were married in a quiet, private and beautiful ceremony,” the couple told Entertainment Tonight in a statement on Monday, Feb. 25. “Our wedding gifts to one another were contributions to our respective favorite children’s charities. We would appreciate that our privacy is respected and that we are allowed this time for celebration and joy.”
Us Weekly broke the news of the pair’s engagement in December 2012. Jackson hasn’t worn her ring publicly, a source explained, because “she’s afraid it will get lost, so she keeps it locked up!”
This is the third marriage for Jackson, who split from longtime boyfriend Jermaine Dupri in 2009. She was previously wed to James DeBarge and Rene Elizondo. Similarly, Jackson attempted to keep those relationships hidden from the public.
A Jackson source recently revealed the multiplatinum star is eager to start a family with Al Mana, whom she began dating in the summer of 2010. “She wants kids,” the source told Us. “If she can’t have them, she will adopt.”
[From Us Weekly]
Aw. I kind of like that. I like that they were so private and that they managed to keep it a secret for months ? although that?s nothing new, Janet has always been able to keep a secret, sometimes for years. She?s super-private. So it?s interesting that she even bothered to confirm the news with such a personal statement, and I like that their wedding gifts were charitable contributions. Incidentally, am I the only one who finds Wissam to be rather hot? Hm. Anyway, congrats to Janet and Wissam!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Olivia Munn in revealing Versace at the VF Party: most 'look at me' gown' | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kaiser and I were on phone yesterday trying to coordinate Oscar party coverage after we realized that one of our photo agencies had released their Vanity Fair party pics in stages, and we’d missed the second wave. We were so tired we decided to cover these people today, hence these additional photos. One of the things we talked about was who bugged us the most at the Oscars. Kaiser was saying Zoe Saldana, because Zoe wore two dresses and seemed to be seeking attention, but I say Zoe pales in comparison to Olivia Munn here. At least Zoe was a presenter and had some kind of excuse.
Olivia, on the other hand, showed up for whatever reason looking like she was about to pop out of her Oscar Marchesa monstrosity (that dress is over here) with chest spillage that was approaching Brandi Glanville levels. When she changed up for the Vanity Fair party, and of course she changed, she wore this peach beaded Versace Atelier number that showed skin all over the place. I don’t know where to start with this dress, so I’ll let it speak for itself. You guys can probably come up with better adjectives than me, with “trashy” being at the top of my list.
In contrast we have Kate Beckinsale, who almost always wears ball gowns and overdoes it, but at least she’s not pulling back her hair, slapping on some cheap lipgloss, putting on her best wide-eyed “oh me?” look and showing us her goods. Ok I got that out of my system, thanks! Getting back to Kate, she’s so lovely and we know what we’re getting with her. She wasn’t at the Oscars this year but she came to the Vanity Fair Oscar party and classed up the joint. She was in a strapless black Monique Lhuillier gown with gold details. I like the geometric design on her gown but find the skirt a little too much. It’s the Oscars Vanity Fair party, it’s appropriate.
I’ll be damned, is Hillary Swank wearing the same red dress that Sally Field wore to the Oscars?! It’s also by the same designer, Valentino, and Hilary’s dress is sheer while Sally’s was much more opaque. The draping around the bodice and arms is very similar, as is the way the skirt falls into a long train. (Although Sally’s dress was more ruffled.) I’m not a fan of that sheer skirt over a mini combo and think that Sally’s dress worked better.
Valentino is the designer whom Anne Hathaway is chummy with, headed by the oompa loompa dude, and Anne ditched her Valentino Oscar gown at the last minute for that nipply Prada. Here we have two actresses at Oscar events in strikingly similar dresses from the same fashion house. I’m not an insider by any means, but this shouldn’t happen should it? As it turns out, Anne rejected that Valentino for being to similar to another gown, Amanda Seyfried’s Alexander McQueen. (Kaiser talked about that here.) So Valentino royally screwed up this awards season.
Again, Sally Field’s dress. It’s too close for comfort for me. I would be pissed if I was either of these women.
photo credit: WENN.com
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Selena Gomez in Atelier Versace at the Vanity Fair party: pretty or fug? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Selena Gomez worked it at the Vanity Fair Oscar party in a very adventurous nude Atelier Versace gown with bustier detail. She’s been attempting to grow up right before our very eyes for a couple of years now, and even though Selena is 20 years old, that baby face will probably haunt her for the rest of her life. When she’s 50, she’ll be able to laugh at all of us with our adult-looking visages, but for now, Selena will suffer the wrath of her own beautiful cherub likeness. Certainly, there are worse things to endure, but I can understand why it must be frustrating to not be able to push past her teenage image.
In very recent days, Selena’s mixed up some grown-up looks with a cute Gucci dress and a sexy Atelier Versace suit, but she doesn’t have as much luck with this dress. For one thing, her rack looks conspiciously larger than usual in those bustier cups. Can I start a rumor about a possible Selena boob job here? Done. Seriously though (and to borrow a term from Kaiser), has Selena invested in some bolt-ons to make herself appear more mature? I couldn’t say for sure, but her girls are suspiciously out there in a big way. Similarly, I also feel like those Lorraine Schwartz earrings are completely out of place, and some silver dangles would have been more appropriate. Her makeup looks good though — she’s so pretty. Obviously, I’m quite distracted by the boob mystery at hand. Witness:
Vanessa Hudgens tried her very hardest to bring it in this shimmering, bronze Moschino gown with Jacob & Co. jewels. I think she succeeds here, don’t you? She’s a very cute girl, and this dress looks great on her figure. Her hair and makeup are both youthful and slightly glamourous, and I think Vanessa is one of the rare people who can get alway with a bold, red lip color. Yes, this is a win for Vanessa! If I were to hit a red carpet, I’d probably wear a dress just like this. Then I’d trip and fall just like JLaw.
Chrissy Teigen and John Legend looked adorable together as always. I can’t find a designer ID on this gown anywhere and even trolled through her Twitter page only to find a photo of Sally Field standing on the dress. I tweeted Chrissy for the designer ID; she didn’t tweet me back, but she did follow me. Sadly, she might unfollow me if she ever learns that I don’t understand this gown at all. The black column skirt is sophisticated, but the gold top half is quite perplexing. Clearly, there’s a mesh overlay involved with the illusion effect, but it makes me cross my eyes trying to figure it out. Can I call this a statement dress? Is that allowed? So be it. I love Chrissy, but I’ll freely admit that she has much better taste in food than VF party dresses.
Alessandra Ambrosio wore a really awful gold, sheer gown by Zuhair Murad. There is so much going on here that I don’t see how anyone could point out a good aspect to this dress. It looks like a kaleidoscope threw up all over toilet paper. It’s completely awful, and not even a Victoria’s Secret model can get away with this mess.
Photos courtesy of WENN
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Were Diane Kruger & Joshua Jackson the cutest couple at the VF Oscar party? | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Some Vanity Fair Oscar party photos came in later on Monday, so long story short? we?re still doing some catch-up Oscar coverage! It?s nothing major, just the party photos! Let?s begin with Diane Kruger and Joshua Jackson just because they?re so adorable and happy and dear God, don?t you want her to get pregnant? Diane is wearing this absolutely enchanting Giambattista Valli mullet dress which would not work on nearly anyone else, but on Diane it?s great. She looks kind of 1960s, right? But it?s perfect. She did it perfectly. And Joshua is always adorable.
Next couple: Naomi Watts and Liev Schreiber. Naomi Watts changed out of her Armani Oscar gown into this Emilio Pucci party gown. This dress looks way more comfortable? but I think I might like the Armani better? Weird, right?
Kate Bosworth and Michael Polish. She?s wearing Giambattista Valli too. I actually like her dress a lot, I just hate the styling and her whole vibe of ?PAY ATTENTION TO ME OR I WILL EAT YOUR SOUL.?
Gina Carano and Henry Cavill. Again, I guess I?m the only one all over this couple. They?re so sexy together. But at this point, we?re going to have to do an intervention for Gina with that black hose and her consistently awful open-toe shoes. Dear Gina: Love you, but STOP IT. Her dress is Narciso Rodriguez ? it would look cuter without the hose and shoes.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Anne Hathaway's pink Prada disaster explained: why didn't she wear Valentino' | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
When Anne Hathaway?s Nips of Doom stepped onto the Oscar red carpet, everyone was shocked to see that she was wearing a pale Pink Prada (with sketchy darting). Annie was supposed to be wearing Valentino. Everybody said she would be wearing Valentino. Valentino?s people had already sent out the press releases. So a million fashion conspiracies were born! Did Anne and Valentino have a falling out? Did the original dress rip? Did Anne just want the night to be about her Nips of Doom? Well, the answer has come ? E! News says that Anne decided at the last minute to change out of the Valentino because she was worried Amanda Seyfried?s McQueen gown was too similar!
When it comes to selecting the Oscar gown, it’s no surprise that quite a bit of careful analysis goes into the strategic style selection. After all, an Oscar dress on a nominee, let alone a winner, will forever be remembered in history.
So upon seeing Anne Hathaway in a blush-pink Prada design on last night’s red carpet, we couldn’t help but wonder what happened to her trademark Valentino couture loyalty. After all, the star has consistently worn the designer on countless red carpets, and even had Mr. Valentino design her wedding dress months ago.
More peculiarly, Valentino even sent out a confirmation press release earlier in the afternoon declaring that the Les Misrables actress would be donning a design from the house, and shortly thereafter Fashion Police’s George Kotsiopoulos predicted on-air during the E! Oscars preshow that she’d wear an ivory embellished gown with a high neckline by the designer.
So what happened?
A source close to the actress confirms to E! News that shortly before Hathaway stepped out on the red carpet she learned that Amanda Seyfried’s Alexander McQueen Oscar gown was strikingly similar to her selected Valentino design, and opted for the Prada dress last minute.
A quick side-by-side comparison shows that both pale gowns were embellished with beautiful delicate floral embroidery?perhaps a little too close for comfort, in the opinion of the Oscar winner.
Hathaway explained to E!’s Ryan Seacrest on the red carpet that she “didn’t know what I was wearing until about three hours ago,” and said her work schedule was to blame. “This is the one that spoke to me in the end.”
[From E! News]
You can see the Valentino design at E! News ? the look was strikingly similar to Amanda?s McQueen. The biggest different was basically that Seyfried?s dress had that little ?cleavage window? and the Valentino didn?t. As I think I said yesterday ? this speaks more to how Sarah Burton is really screwing up the Alexander McQueen label. I seriously doubt that the late Alexander McQueen would have put a lacy, Valentino-looking gown out there? much less on Amanda Seyfried. Here’s Seyfried’s again:
After the Prada disaster, Anne changed into the grey-blue Saint Laurent gown for the parties. She looked way more comfortable and much less cloying. Speaking of ?cloying,? when Anne spoke to reporters after the Oscars, she answered questions about the backlash against her ?cloying? Oscar campaign:
Anne Hathaway is a world-famous movie star — and now an Oscar-winning actress — but that doesn’t mean she’s immune to insecurity. In fact, she may be more vulnerable than anyone. Though the 30-year-old star has been praised in recent months for her spectacular performance in the epic movie musical Les Miserables, she has also been criticized for what some believe is a false, cloying sense of earnestness in her awards show appearances.
Addressing the jokes about her emotional acceptance speeches after winning the Best Supporting Actress Academy Award on Feb. 24, Hathaway admitted to feeling hurt by the backlash. “It does get to me,” she confessed. “But you have to remember in life that there’s a positive to every negative and a negative to every positive. The miracle of the universe is that, as far as they know, there’s 51 percent matter versus 49 percent anti-matter — things tip in the scale of the positive,” she continued. “So that is what I focus on.”
The star — who beat out fellow nominees Sally Field, Jacki Weaver, Helen Hunt, and Amy Adams — then went on to say that she tries not to let other people’s criticism change the way she approaches her own relationships. “I live my life with love,” she explained. “I live my life with compassion. I live my life hoping the best for absolutely everyone, no matter how they feel about me. And when you live that way, it’s amazing how beautiful every day can be.”
[From Us Weekly]
For the love of God, Anne. ?The miracle of the universe is that, as far as they know, there’s 51 percent matter versus 49 percent anti-matter — things tip in the scale of the positive.? STFU!!! I love her and everything, but don?t you want to see her tip her head back and yell, ?Haters gonna hate, suck on my Oscar, bitches?? I don?t know why she thinks that we?ll only accept this cloying, too-sweet version ? show some spunk, show some chutzpah. And for the love of God, stop talking in that gaspy little-girl voice.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian doesn't 'have a sense of urgency' about marrying Kanye | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian covers the April of Cosmopolitan and Cosmo?s editors promise: ?The cover was shot just days before she announced her baby news.? So? the cover was done all the way back in December? Because we?ve known about Kim?s pregnancy for months now. That doesn?t seem like something to brag about, you know? Anyway, I guess the interview was done AFTER Kim?s baby news came out because she?s making references to babies and stuff. Blah.
Kardashian on being judgmental when Kourtney got pregnant in 2009: ?I was like, ?You?re not married! How could you do this?? I was really firm and strict. But she was like, ?Marriage isn?t what I want.? And later, I realized she had a better family life than I did.?
Kardashian on having a baby: ?I?ve always said that I wanted kids, but I don?t think I ever would have been ready until now.?
Kardashian on her relationship with Kanye West: ?Sometimes you?re just not ready. A person could have it all, and you?re not ready for it all. But this is where I probably always should have been?[marriage] is something I know that we both want in our future, but I don?t have this sense of urgency about it. I have this best friend who understands me and helps me through all my tough experiences, and vice versa, you know? It just feels like this is it for me.?
Kardashian on having it all in a relationship: ?I used to think, Well, can you really have it all? The truth, the excitement, and the passion? Now I know you can.?
Kardashian on taking your time: ?I saw fast marriages like Khloe and Lamar?s and that was what seemed to work. [Now] I say give it a good six months before you commit. Feelings change, even if it seems so lustful.?
[From Cosmopolitan]
?I was really firm and strict.? Because she?d already been married and divorced and become famous from a sex tape. I love how Kim tries to play the judgmental-conservative card like she?s some high moral authority. I mean, I understand that she?s explaining her train of thought and how she realized that there are many different ways to live? but it?s just a reminder that Kim is now and has always been a total hypocrite.
By the way, we got some photos of Kim coming out of her gym this weekend and the photos are? OMG. Now I feel bad for asking the paparazzi to get photos of Kim from behind. Be careful ? while these images are SFW, they will definitely hurt your eyes. And for the love of God, what will it take for Kim to wear underwear to the gym?!!?!?! That?s nasty.
Photos courtesy of Cosmo and WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | LeAnn Rimes wants you to know that she went to the Oscars too, you guys | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
LeAnn Rimes went to the Oscars TOO, you guys! No matter that no one got any photos of her at any of the Oscar parties or anything. No matter that the only photos of LeAnn in her Oscar gear are from her Twitter account. PAY ATTENTION!!! So, yes ? these are a few photos of LeAnn from her Twitter. It seems that she and Eddie got all dressed up so that she could appear on Piers Morgan? I guess Piers did some kind of ?Live After the Oscars? thing on CNN, and LeAnn was one of the guests. Sure. I tried looking for some coverage of it, but no one seems to care so I won?t either. LeAnn?s green dress is vintage (according to her). It looks nice on her.
We?ve also got some photos of LeAnn, Eddie and Eddie?s sons earlier on Sunday. According to Fame/Flynet, they were ?running errands and then watching her son play T-ball with husband Eddie Cibrian in Los Angeles.? STEP-son, Fame/Flynet. Step-son. LeAnn?s outfit in these photos is? um? I was going to say ?cracked-out? but that?s not it. Even a crackie like Lindsay Lohan wouldn?t have put this combination together. Maybe it?s just a case of LeAnn throwing together whatever was clean? but I think she actually looks like she was TRYING for some kind of interesting look.
As for those rumors that LeAnn would possibly join the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, Brandi Glanville told People Magazine: “That’s all a farce. She wouldn’t do it. They didn’t offer it. She squashed it on Twitter. My people would never do that to me. It wouldn’t happen.” As you know, Brandi was also at the Oscars, but she had a real job with ABC. You can see photos of Brandi here. She looked super-trashy, but at least she was following the biggest trend of the evening: boobs.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and LeAnn?s Twitter.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Victoria Justice Gets Freaky With Spongebob | | Added 11 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
So it was Victoria Justice‘s birthday last week, and to celebrate the big 2-0, my #1 Babe of 2012 tweeted out this picture. I’ve never wished I was a statue of a cartoon sponge on a children’s TV show more than I do right now. Hot.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.305.125
Photos Online+ 13.418 past week
1.455
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Tess Daly
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Kylie Jenner
Photos of Kylie Jenner will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
12 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
