| | | | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
| Drew Barrymore, after three divorces: 'Never, never. I will never get married again' | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Drew Barrymore covers the latest issue of People Magazine. I covered the first excerpts from her cover interview, where she was mostly talking about her new talk show and how she?s going to shy away from soapboxes and know-it-alls, which sounds foreboding. Beyond my apprehension of this talk show, I do sort of halfway like Drew though. I especially like the fact that she didn?t throw herself into some ill-fated romance following her divorce from Will Kopelman. That was her third marriage and I think when that one didn?t stick, Drew was like ?you know what, no mas.? She spoke with People about that too:
Hopeless romantic: I am a hopeless romantic, and everybody on this planet needs love in some form. And we are constantly contending with relationships. Love and those relationships may look differently for people. But its there at its core. So, I cant help but want to explore and examine that.
She?s tried online dating: Ive tried it. I went on a couple of dates. A lot of people totally ghosted me. And one time I was waiting to go on a date, and at the time we were supposed to meet he just wrote, Yeah, I can?t. But I?d rather hang out with my friends.
She won?t get married again: Never. Never, never, never. I will never get married again! And I also believe people should not say the word never, and I will never, with a capital N-E-V-E-R, never get married. It?s like I have two options: Cut it?this has not worked?or be Elizabeth Taylor. And I have too many more to go. I never want to be entwined with someone like that again ever. You break up, and you move on. You get divorced, and it?s just so different. I love that we are trying to hold on to an institution that [started] when the closest person to you for companionship was a three-day horse ride away and your life span was 30 years.
She?s not opposed to finding love again: It doesn?t mean that maybe I wouldn?t like to meet someone, especially when my kids go off to college. Or a year from now, I could be totally in love. I?m open to it; I?m not seeking it. My cup runneth over. I have so much love in my life.
[From People]
I kind of enjoy all of this? As someone with little interest in marriage, I enjoy it when someone who has been through it all marriage and divorce, three times ends up agreeing with me. Marriage was different back in the day, when people died from the plague at the age of 30 and women were little more than property or political props. OPT OUT! There?s nothing wrong with meaningful partnerships and tons of people have great, healthy marriages, of course. But there?s also nothing wrong with saying ?been there, done that, got the t-shirt and I never want to do it again.? There?s nothing wrong with saying ?that looks terrible and I never want that for myself.? I kind of think it?s funny that Drew believes she basically only has two options: done at three marriages or go Full Liz Taylor.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lindsay Lohan is being sued for the advance she got for a book she never wrote | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you even imagine drawing up a contract with Lindsay Lohan and expecting anything to come of it? Can you even imagine *wanting* to work with Lindsay in any capacity? We?ve known how unreliable and unprofessional she is for years now. I mean, she was an unhireable mess a decade ago, and little has changed since then. Still, HarperCollins thought it would be a brilliant idea to lock Lindsay into a contract for a memoir in 2014. They thought it would be a good idea to give her an advance!! They ended up cancelling the book deal and asking for the advance back. LMAO!
Lindsay Lohans art of the book deal consists of agreeing to write it, getting a huge sum of money and then failing to turn in a draft at least according to a new suit. Publishing company HarperCollins is going after Lohan, claiming she breached a contract she signed way back in March 2014 to write a book. According to the legal docs obtained by TMZ Lohan and her production company promised shed have it completed by May 2015 but it never happened.
Instead, HarperCollins claims it revised the due date to March 2017, and even paid her a $365,000 advance against future royalties.
However, HarperCollins claims the deadlines came and went, and Lindsay never delivered a manuscript. So, the publisher says it informed her in Sept. 2018 the book deal was off, and it wanted its money back. Theres a lawsuit, so you guessed it HC says LiLo never refunded the cash.
HarperCollins is suing Lohan for the $365k plus interest and legal fees. We reached out to Lindsay no word back so far.
[From TMZ]
I mean, obviously Lindsay Lohan should have returned the advance and all that. But I can?t help but think this is entirely a fool?s errand on the part of HarperCollins. What the hell did they think was going to happen? She?s a grifter and she hates anything resembling work! She was never going to write that memoir! And the fact that they still gave her an advance AFTER they had to revise the date (by two years LMAO) well, that?s on them! Just write off the $365K as a stupidity tax. And fire whoever thought it would be a great idea to give Lindsay Lohan a damn book contract.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Selena Gomez: Makeup isn't a joke it's actually beautiful and wonderful | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Selena Gomez has one of those awesome Vogue videos showing her routine. I was going to give this to Oya because she?s been so great at covering these (see her Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Kat Graham and Rihanna videos plus she?s a legit makeup artist) but then I watched the video and really wanted to talk about it. Plus Oya just covered Selenas cute video with Nikkie from Nikkie Tutorials. In her Vogue video Selenas skin looks so dewy and her makeup is so gorgeous afterwards! Selena is promoting her Rare Beauty makeup line, which is available on her website. (Not a paid promotion)
First of all, Selena is quite young so her skin is lovely but she also takes good care of it. She achieves this kind of aspirational glowy look that I?d love to copy. I don?t watch enough YouTube makeup tutorials because I find them intimidating honestly. When I do watch them they seem complicated and I feel like I have to buy so many products. So this helped me a lot. For face makeup she uses foundation and then liquid blush on her cheekbones followed by bronzer then highlighter. I haves similar products except for liquid blush, which I just bought. Everyone is talking about her technique for doing a perfect cat eye, which is just to outline the corners first then fill them in. That?s at 7 minutes into the video below, but for me the takeaway is her gorgeous face work. (A lot of that is beauty, genetics and youth but I?m still going to try.)
Here?s some of what she said and the video is below:
She has dry skin with acne in her t-zone.
She uses Tacha The Dewy Skin cream.
She follows that with The Drunk Elephant sunscreen. She needs to avoid the sun due to her lupus.
She uses her Rare Beauty line?s weightless foundation and concealer. She follows that with their liquid blush.
She uses Benefit Hoola bronzer to frame her face and under her chin.
Her eyeshadow palette is by Marc Jacobs. She then uses her Rare Beauty liquid eyeliner.
She applies her Rare Beauty Liquid Luminizer under her eyes and on her nose and in the little middle area above her lips. Then she blots with her Touch and Go kit and applies powder with a puff to set.
She uses one of her lip souffles in red and then a refresher spray.
[From YouTube]
I?m going to copy Oya?s format here and mention that my highlighter is Charlotte Tillbury?s Hollywood Flawless Filter, which is insanely expensive. That?s one of the products I just had to have after watching a makeup tutorial by Hot and Flashy, which is why I avoid YouTube tutorials so I wont buy all the things. There are plenty of other liquid highlighters that are less expensive and surely look just as nice, like L?oreal Lumi Glotion. Watching this inspired me to buy a liquid blush. Before this I only tried Elfs. It was too highly pigmented and I ended up looking like a clown so I threw it out. L?oreal Liquid Lift Blur looks really nice. Maybelline Cheek Heat is really inexpensive and I actually bought some in Nude Burn after watching this video. It adds a nice sheen and it was under $6, but it just adds a hint of color its not like regular blush. However I have to put it in the regular area on my cheeks. It looks weird when I put it on my cheekbones like Selena.
As for Selena?s thoughts on beauty and makeup, I felt like I really got to know her in this video. There?s something so intimate and relatable about women explaining their routines. She said makeup is important to her as it?s part of mental health. It?s ?part of your self esteem. Its a part of how you see yourself and you shouldnt have to have makeup for you to see yourself that way, but makeup isnt a joke. Its actually beautiful and its wonderful and it brings people together. I have so much respect for that community because it really is art.? YES! This is why I wear makeup every day and why I?ve worn it even in lockdown. Some people call that insecurity, but it makes me feel so much better about myself and like I?m ready for anything. Theres a ceremony and an art to getting ready. Plus you never know when you?re going to videochat now. Also Im going to wear red lips today, Ive decided.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Selena Gomez (@selenagomez) on Sep 1, 2020 at 11:00am PDT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hilary Swank sues SAG-AFTRA health plan for not covering ovarian cysts | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Hilary Swank stars in that new Netflix space drama Away which debuted last week to middling reviews. Heres a link to the trailer. The latest news about Hilary is that she?s decided to take on SAG-AFTRA. Hilary is suing the actors? union?s healthcare plan. Hilary, who was diagnosed in 2008 with ovarian cysts, has been denied coverage for treatment since 2015 because the brainiacs who run the health plan claim shes just trying to prolong her fertility. So Hilary?s had enough of their BS and is taking the matter to court. Good.
Hilary Swank is suing the SAG-AFTRAs antiquated, barbaric health plan after being denied coverage for the treatment of malignant ovarian cysts.
The Oscar-winning actress, 46, filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the board of trustees of the SAG-AFTRA health plan in which she said she had been denied coverage for the treatment of ovarian cysts, in court documents obtained by PEOPLE.
The actress claims the trustees stopped allowing Swanks claims for treatment of ovarian cysts in 2015, according to the court documents. Swank was diagnosed with ovarian cysts in 2008, around the time her left ovary was destroyed and removed during emergency surgery.
In a statement obtained by PEOPLE, the actress said she was truly exhausted by the way womens ovarian and cyclical health issues continue to be treated by healthcare insurance companies.
I have experienced it in my own life, and I continually read about it across social media and in the press, Swank said. Their policies are antiquated, barbaric and primarily view the role of womens organs solely as a means for procreation.
My hope is to create change for all woman suffering from womens health issues that have to battle with insurance companies who diminish the significance of their problems, dont believe the patient (or their doctors) explanations surrounding their suffering, and severely preclude coverage to only incredibly limited services and procedures.
She continued, Its painful enough having to deal with the nature of a female health issue, let alone having to wrestle with the stress of trying to get your insurance company to provide the coverage and care that their contract explicitly states they offer.
After years of experiencing my own health issues and the ensuing denials from my healthcare company for services that are medically proven to preserve my life, and seeing how expensive this is to support without the help of an insurance company, I decided to speak up, Swank said. Based on what I learned, I know that most women cant afford the medical treatments necessary to cover simple female health issues. I can only assume they either financially deplete their resources, or they forgo the treatments, quietly suffering in pain and risking their lives.
The actress added, My hope is to be a voice for them. SAG/AFTRA Healthplan claim they treat and protect all their members equally. I dont believe this is true. If youre a woman suffering from female health issues, I have no doubt youll agree with me. If youre a man, ask your mother, your daughter, your sister, or a girlfriend. I already know the answer.
Im suing SAG/AFTRA Healthplan, Swank concluded. Its time we are treated fairly.
[From People]
Hilary?s coverage was still denied even after her doctor wrote in on her behalf explaining her treatment had nothing to do with trying to get pregnant and everything to do with Hilary?s health. According to the article, the trustees for the healthcare plan doubled down, stating, there was no medically necessary reason to treat or monitor ovarian cysts other than for infertility treatment. I had one singular ovarian cyst burst on me in high school while running laps during gym. It only ever happened the one time but I vividly remember doubling over on the track thinking I?d been shot. If these bastards don?t think cysts are a problem, how about they grow some and see how that goes for them. Every day women are told their bodies don?t matter unless they are used to serve men. Hilary just turned 46 so I assume SAG/AFTRA?s health plan trustees decided she was too old to be having babies, so they denied the cyst coverage. But if that isn?t bad enough, we get back to Hilary?s point, one with which I cannot agree stronger ? It?s. Not. Always. About. Having. Babies. If cysts become problematic in any way, it could lead to very serious health problems for a woman. Why are women punished for wanting to live pain free?
Needless to say I hope Hilary is successful. Honestly, I wouldn?t care if she was just trying to extend her fertility, that?s her body, her choice ? no bureaucrat should get to decide if it?s her right.
This has nothing to do with Hilarys lawsuit but her IG is filled with many shots of her pups, like this one. OMG protect this woman at all costs!
View this post on Instagram
Getting ready for Halloween over at our house, what about yours? ?? #DogsOfInstagram
A post shared by Hilary Swank (@hilaryswank) on Oct 30, 2019 at 8:52pm PDT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie Holmes' new boyfriend Emilio Vitolo dumped his live-in GF by text last week | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
We discussed Katie Holmes? new relationship with Emilio Vitolo Jr. the other day. Katie has been surprisingly public with Emilio they were photographed on a wine-drinking date, and then days later, there were a number of ?exclusive? photos of Katie and Emilio kissing. He?s 33 years old and a chef/restaurateur and she?s 41 years old and a single mom. I was just happy that she was getting some and having fun. But did you know that Katie Holmes is a terrible homewrecker who forced her young lover to dump his fiancee? It?s true!
Katie Holmes new boytoy has been branded a cheater who was engaged to be married and callously dumped his fiance by text after pictures emerged of him canoodling with Holmes outside a New York restaurant, DailyMail.com can reveal. DailyMail.com published exclusive images of Holmes getting handsy with her new squeeze restaurateur, chef and aspiring actor, Emilio Vitolo Jr. yesterday.
Now DailyMail.com can reveal that for Rachel Emmons, 24, they were further painful proof of the relationship that first came to public attention last week and led to the devastating end of her engagement to the man she once described as ?her world.? According to a friend who asked not to be named: Up to this press coming out Rachel had no idea what was going on. He is a cheater, and this isnt a happy ending story.
The friend said the pretty designer had devoted her life to 33-year-old Vitolo and the couple not only lived together, but had shared a puppy together since last May.
Rumors that Holmes, who at 41 is almost ten years Vitolos senior, and the chef were romantically involved were first sparked when the pair were spotted outside the restaurant Peasant in New York last week. But, according to the friend, Emmons believed that she was getting married to Vitolo until his romance with Holmes ended that.
The friend said, They had concrete wedding plans in the works?now she is just left with bad press and forced to move home.
DailyMail.com understands that Vitolo texted Emmons the day the pictures were published, perhaps aware that his relationship with Holmes was about to be blown wide open.
[From The Daily Mail]
He sounds like a douche. I was just joking about the homewrecker thing, but in all seriousness, he gives off a starfker vibe, like the kind of guy who will dump a live-in girlfriend when he gets a shot with someone like Katie Holmes. Reminiscent of the way Justin Theroux tossed aside his live-in girlfriend Heidi Bivens for Jennifer Aniston, honestly. It does beg the question? is Katie Holmes doing an Aniston-esque boyfriend rollout with a shady dude? Hm.
Katie Holmes' toyboy Emilio Vitolo Jr. chats with his restaurateur father outside their family eatery in NYC https://t.co/abgonDvtvK
Daily Mail Celebrity (@DailyMailCeleb) September 10, 2020
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.597.991 Photos Online+ 35.576 past week 2.646 Users Online | | |
| | | | | | We Salute Madelyn Cline
Photos of Madelyn Cline will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in 9 hours | | |
| |
|