 | |  |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Valerie Bertinelli: Botox changed the shape of my eyebrows, hated it | | Added 304 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Valerie Bertinelli has been open about her struggle with weight and body image for many years. Shes spoken about realizing that she cant find happiness just from losing weight, and shes had her fair share of body-shamers on the internet. Shes responded to trolls in the past and called them out for being petty and cruel. Recently someone commented on one of Valeries TikToks, the Botox looks great, which was definitely meant as a snarky comment. So Valerie made a TikTok where she talked about why that type of comment hurts, and detailed her own experience with Botox. She had it before, but she didnt like how it turned out. Valerie comes across so genuine and sweet, it just makes me more annoyed that people are coming at her for the apparent crime of aging as a 62-year-old woman.
The ?One Day at a Time? alum posted a TikTok Sunday in response to a user who commented ?The Botox looks great? on one of her prior videos.
The Food Network star interpreted the comment as sarcasm, but decided to switch gears by responding to the mockery with mindfulness.
?I know you didn?t mean that as a compliment, but let?s talk about it, shall we?? Bertinelli began. ?I have tried Botox ? I hated it.?
The ?Hot in Cleveland? star then pulled up a photo of herself from six years ago when she did get Botox, and explained that the procedure ?changed the shape of my eyebrows? resulting in her not recognizing her own face.
?What I thought it was going to do was help me with my genetically puffy eyes,? Bertinelli explained. ?They?ve always annoyed me. I?ve always wanted those deep-set eyes. Don?t have ?em. Never going to get ?em. So, just live with it.?
But then Bertinelli got to the real reason why she wanted to talk about the comment.
?Because you?re trying to shame me, and you?re a woman. Like, what made you go out of your way to try to shame me?? Bertinelli said. ?And I?m not the first person to try to be shamed on TikTok or Instagram or any place. So, we?re women. We have to stick together, OK? Don?t shame somebody if they want to do something, anything, to make themselves feel better as they go out into this insane, flippin? crazy world, OK??
She then shattered any kind of stigma surrounding cosmetic procedures by admitting that if Botox helped her feel better about her appearance, she?d use it.
?Some people can do Botox, and it looks amazing on them,? she said. ?I am not one of them, unfortunately, or I would?ve kept doing it. But thankfully, it faded. I couldn?t wait for it to fade.?
[From The Huffington Post]
I wonder who told Valerie that Botox would help with puffy eyes because that just seems like bad advice. Botox in the forehead will slightly lift the tail of the brow in many cases, but it wont meaningfully change how your eye socket looks. Anyway, good for her for calling this person out. The stigma against women getting treatments like Botox is so annoying, and it does feel like women cant win. If they age naturally, people shame them, and if they get professional help, people shame them.
As for the person shaming her being a woman, Im not surprised at that. In my experience, women can shame each other worse than men sometimes. And I think women often shame each other because of envy, or because they feel threatened. I was raised in a very conservative church and I carried parts of modesty culture around with me even after I left the church. Id never say anything to other women, but I would judge them in my mind for wearing revealing clothes, and it would bother me so much. I had to examine why I was getting so activated, and I realized it was because I envied them. I wanted to be seen, I wanted to be desired, I wanted to own my femininity like they were. And the culture I was raised in told me I was a deviant and a Jezebel if I wanted any of those things, so I suppressed a lot of stuff. Now Im not triggered at all by other women wearing whatever the heck they want. In most cases when other women annoy me, its because theyre reflecting back something I havent accepted about myself. I think a similar dynamic is often at play when women shame each other for how they manage aging or treatments like Botox. Valerie has always looked great to me and I hope she doesnt let mean comments get to her.
Valerie Bertinelli replying to @ lisaweiss711 [TikTok]
I couldn't hear it that well so I cranked up the volume and had to shorten it for twitter. [1/2] pic.twitter.com/yU7DdQqKZO
aka stardust (@a_k_a_stardust) July 17, 2023
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Joe Manganiello ended his marriage because he wanted to be a dad | | Added 305 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
When Joe Manganiello and Sofia Vergara?s split was first announced this week, my first instinct/guess was ?I wonder if this was about kids.? Sofia was a young mother her son Manolo is already 31 years old. She has repeatedly expressed her lack of desire to do any of that again. Considering all of the crap she went through with Nick Loeb, I always assumed she put her cards on the table with Joe and let him know that she had no interest in having another kid.
Well, as TMZ reported, Joe was the one to file for divorce. His lawyer is Laura Wasser, there?s a prenup in place and neither party seems interested in contesting it. I would imagine there will be a minor fight over real estate, but overall this will probably be a pretty cut-and-dry divorce. At the end of TMZ?s piece, they noted: ?Speaking of kids, were hearing a big reason Joe has filed is their conflict over having children he wants them, she does not.? Page Sixs source said the same thing:
Joe Manganiello chose to end his seven-year marriage to Sofa Vergara because they disagreed on the topic of children, Page Six has learned. A source close to the ?True Blood? star, 46, tells us he?s always wanted to be a dad and that those feelings have only intensified in recent years.
It?s unclear where Vergara, 51, stood on the subject when the two said ?I do? in November 2015, but we?re told she may have been open to it at the time. The ?Modern Family? star is already mom to 31-year-old son Manolo, whom she shares with her ex-husband, Joe Gonzalez.
She was also dragged into a lengthy court battle over custody of two frozen embryos from her 2013 IVF treatments with then-fianc Nick Loeb, who sought to bring them to term. Though a judge ultimately ruled in the actress? favor in March 2021, we?re told the experience may have affected her view on having more kids.
Our insider tells us this disparity in the estranged couple?s relationship is the real reason for the split, noting that the ?irreconcilable differences? Manganiello cited in his divorce petition ? which he filed Wednesday ? is accurate. Despite reports claiming the actor?s longtime sobriety negatively impacted the marriage, our source does not believe that to be the case.
[From Page Six]
In case you?ve blocked out the Nick Loeb saga, that ahole kept dragging Sofia into court for years after she broke off their engagement. Loeb wanted ?custody? of the embryos they created while they were together he wanted to implant the embryos into another woman and raise Sofia?s biological children as a single father. It was truly bonkers. Loeb?s other aim was to be a nuisance, a thorn in Sofia?s side, and attempt to do damage to her marriage to Joe. If Sofia was originally open to having a kid with Joe, and then the Loeb stuff affected her, I don?t really blame her. Although, as I said at the beginning of the post, I kind of think Sofia was always done with having kids. That?s her right. And Joe can change his mind too.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Shakira is facing a second 'tax fraud case' in Spain but they haven't notified her | | Added 305 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Back when Shakira was with Gerard Pique, she owned a home in Barcelona and that was her main residence and where she raised her children. She also owns homes in her home country of Colombia, the US, Uruguay and other countries. Now that Shakira and Pique are over, she?s moved to Miami full-time and she?s cut her ties with Spain. Except the Spanish tax authorities are still trying to drag her to court over her time spent in Barcelona. This has been going on for a few years now and, from the beginning, it sounded like the Spanish tax authorities are the scammers, not Shakira. Even by the most basic Spanish reporting on the issue, Shakira paid what she owed plus interest. Shakira has also spoken about the tax issue at length in interviews, getting very specific about how many days a year she spent in Spain and how thorough her tax specialists are she?s worked with PricewaterhouseCoopers for years. Well, funny story?
Shakira is facing a second tax fraud case in Spain. Almost 10 months after the singer, 46, was ordered to stand trial in her $13.9 million tax evasion case in the country, she has now been hit with another investigation.
According to Reuters, a Spanish court said Thursday that it has started a new investigation against the Colombian star linked to alleged fraud on personal income tax and wealth tax in 2018. The court, which is in the town of Esplugues de Llobregat near Barcelona, said it had no information on how much money was in question, according to the Associated Press.
Per a translation from Spanish media outlet El Pais, the court opened a second case as a result of a complaint by the Barcelona Economic Crimes Prosecutor regarding Shakira allegedly defrauding the Tax Agency. Another local outlet, El Periodico, reported that the prosecutor?s office has filed a complaint for two alleged tax crimes.
A representative for Shakira told PEOPLE in a statement Thursday that she ?defends having always acted in accordance with the law and under the advice of the best tax experts. She is now focused on her life as an artist in Miami and is confident that there will be a favorable resolution of her tax issues.?
Her representative also said she is yet to receive any formal notification of the second probe regarding the 2018 financial year. The statement continued. ?The singers legal team will not make any comments until the notification reaches them through the official and legally established channels.?
?As it is publicly known, and as the Spanish Treasury was officially notified, Shakira is now living in Miami, so she must be notified personally at her new address, in strict accordance with the provisions of the Law.?
[From People]
I feel sorry for Shakira and I?m glad she got the hell out of Spain. They?re trying to make an example out of her, they?re trying to tie her up in court for years, they?re trying to wear her down and jam her up. It also looks like they?re mad that she left the country. It?s very Meghan Markle-coded, right? The anger towards a ?foreigner,? the otherizing, the need to make an example out of her. Shakira has been handling all of this the right way, in my opinion she?s been open about what they?re doing and she?s provided details through her reps and in her own interviews. She also believes that the Spanish government has executed a smear campaign against her, and it?s easy to see why she believes that.
Photos courtesy of Cover Images.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ariana Grande already has a new boyfriend & he's married with a baby at home | | Added 305 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I knew Ariana Grande had someone waiting in the wings as soon as she turned up at Wimbledon without her wedding ring, and within 24 hours, we found out that she was divorcing her husband of two years, Dalton Gomez. The only thing I was wrong about was my theory that the jumpoff was Andrew Garfield. It?s NOT Garfy!! Please, Ariana doesn?t have that kind of taste in men. She likes um, dudes who dont have the raw sexual magnetism of Andrew Garfield. Her jumpoff is very much her type, with a new twist. The new guy, as confirmed by TMZ and People, is Ethan Slater. Y?all, he?s married with a baby at home.
Ariana Grande is moving on after her split from husband Dalton Gomez. The ?Thank U, Next? singer, 30, is dating Broadway alum Ethan Slater, her costar in the upcoming film adaptation of Wicked, sources confirm to PEOPLE.
?Ariana and Dalton separated in January, one source says. She and Ethan recently began dating, and he is separated from his wife.
Reps for both stars have not returned multiple requests for comment. TMZ was first to report the news. Grande is set to play Glinda in Universal?s film adaptation of the beloved Broadway musical, while Slater, 31, will play Boq, the love interest of Elphaba?s sister Nessarose.
The movie began shooting in the U.K. last year and was scheduled for release in November 2024, though it remains unclear if the SAG-AFTRA strike will affect its premiere.
[From People]
Ariana basically moved to London late last year to work on Wicked, which is when (we now know) her marriage was pretty much over. Dalton apparently tried to win her back, but she was done with him. So? I wonder when Ari and Ethan Slater started? They?re established/comfortable enough of as a couple where Ari?s people are openly telling People Magazine that he left his wife. The same wife he gushed over just two months ago. The wife?s name is Lilly Jay. Lilly and Ethan married in 2018 they were high school sweethearts. Lilly gave birth to their son last year. This is giving me strong Miranda Lambert vibes!! Oh, Ariana, what the hell did you do???
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Fran Drescher finally got the Covid vaccine 'because I kept losing work!' | | Added 305 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Those of us who are older than, what? 35 years old? We remember all of the highs and lows of Fran Drescher?s life. So it?s especially wild to see her as the president of SAG-AFTRA, summoning every nuance of her outer-borough accent to sound every bit like a tough union boss. Drescher has been giving tons of interviews since she broke off the ?negotiations? with the AMPTP and called for a strike last week. She spoke to Variety this week about what led to the strike, how she came to the position of union boss and what SAG-AFTRA is trying to do. She also talked about vaccines and it got a little bit nutty, but Fran fans know that about her too. Some highlights:
Whether she thinks she was initially too optimistic about AMPTP negotiations: ?This is my first negotiation. In hindsight, I could see how we were being manipulated. But at the time, I came into it with a certain level of trust, that we would actually be able to make a contract. But whenever we start getting to the meat of these situations, we start to see that we?re getting stonewalled. We?re coming back with open response counter proposals, and so, actually, in earnest we still gave them an unprecedented 12-day extension to come back with something really meaningful. And during that time, they canceled our negotiation meetings. And, again, I thought, maybe they?re duking it out behind closed doors, maybe they?re gonna come back with something that we can really start to roll up our sleeves. They just wanted to get more time to promote their summer movies and they had no intention of using that extension for anything else.
Whether she has regrets about being duped: ?I?m always going to try and give a person the truth. I hoped to avert a strike ? that is the ideal. Going on strike is not the original point. That?s when you feel like you can?t make a deal. But if you feel like you can make a deal? Hindsight is always 20/20. But even during that period when they woke up, they said, ?We?re still in our room,? talking about how to counter your proposal. So, it?s like, OK, well, maybe that?s good. We wanted to avert a strike, if at all possible.?
The journeyman actors were the ones pushing for a strike: ?Remember, Tom Cruise and top people make their own deals. That?s not who we are striking for. We?re striking for the journeyman?they?re the ones that were pushing us to strike, OK? They?re the ones that are living this level of oppression. They feel like they can?t take any more of it, because they are being economically squeezed out of their livelihoods. If they?re willing to take this huge step of sacrifice, then we?re in it to win it. If this was a different point in history, where the business model didn?t change so dramatically, and suddenly with streaming and digital and AI. It?s a whole new game! If you think that we don?t have to unpack the old contract and change it exponentially I don?t know what to say.
Whether she worries about being blacklisted as an actress: ?My speech at that press conference reverberated around the world. It spoke to workers everywhere; it is bigger than the sum of its parts. I?m not going to worry about my career. I?ve had a fantastic career. If anybody in this industry wishes to blacklist me or being on the side of right and good, then whatever. I follow Buddhist teaching or call myself a Jew Bu. I let life unfold. I don?t have a crystal ball. I?m not going to speculate. I don?t know where this will lead. All I know is in the now, which is what Buddhism teaches you, to remain present. This is my calling and I?m going to meet this moment.
Figuring out the longer vision: ?The greed of these entities and the shiny baubles that they put before the shareholders, obliterates a longer vision, a far sightedness of where this should go or how to manage it correctly. And they just jump in. They sell the shareholders, and all of this is bullsh-t. Then when they really get into the trenches with the costs, what do they do? They look right away to the performer to squeeze them, because God forbid they should take away from the CEOs. Do they do character driven smaller stories. No! They got all these flying dragons and bullsh-t and it?s expensive and all the big stars and it?s very expensive and all of that is what they wanted to do. The idea that if you spend 80% on production, maybe spend 79% and we can get our fair share. And the money that?s paid for all this, including the CEO salaries, is in subscriptions! It?s not in episodes or seasons anymore.
On Covid protocols & vaccine mandates: ?I felt like the COVID protocols, pre-vaccine, were successful. People went back to work. It was a manageable situation. Then, with the advent of the vaccine, it turns into something else. In California, private business can determine their own health policy. And they decided that rather than constantly be shut down, everybody had to be vaccinated if they wanted to work. Even though there was constant information coming out that you can still get it. And once you got it, are you as good as inoculated by the virus. There was a lot of ifs ands or buts. And the dangerous aspect of it all was that people were being fed different news. There wasn?t one narrative. And since 80% of all ad dollars on most broadcasts comes from big pharma.
Whether she got vaccinated: ?I did because I kept losing work! I did it, in spite of the fact that I was a little scared to do it. Because I have my own health issues, cancer survivor, all of this stuff, but I decided to just let the universe help me through this because I don?t know what to do. All I know is that I want to work. But a lot of people it was just that they didn?t have a choice. And they didn?t have a career during that time, either as a result, and I always felt like I?m not a dictator. I can only keep bringing the conversation to the board. I?m trying to get them to see that we should push back on this. I was not successful at that.
[From Variety]
The vaccine stuff was totally cringe and she should have just left it at something like ?I was trying to advocate for all actors, even the anti-vaxx dumbasses.? Unfortunately, it sounds like she was one of the anti-vaxx dumbasses who only got vaccinated because, oh right, those vaccine mandates actually did work. As for the rest of it while I?m not a SAG member, I think it?s fine that she did the 12-day extension, even if it turned out to just be a scam. It showed that she was operating in good faith and she was willing to do what she could to avoid a strike and make a deal. When the scam was laid bare, that?s when she showed her backbone and walked away. Anyway? I hope she continues to burn the sh-t down.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Joe Manganiello's 21-year sobriety 'played a role in his split from Sofia Vergara' | | Added 306 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Is anyone else still bummed about Joe Manganiello and Sofia Vergara? I thought they were the real deal! I also thought Joe approached the marriage in a very grown-up, cards-on-the-table way. He was already sober (he?s been sober for over two decades) and working a program when they met, and he didn?t make his sobriety his entire personality either it was just part of who he was. Sofia, on the other hand, was still a social drinker and I?m sure she kept alcohol in the house. Well, reportedly, that was an issue:
Joe Manganiello?s sobriety journey reportedly played a role in his split from Sofa Vergara.
?Of course the fact that Sofa is not sober had an impact on their marriage,? a source told Daily Mail Tuesday. ?He was warned about this when he started dating her and again before marrying her.?
The insider added that the ?Magic Mike XXL? star ?did not think? he was going to ?change? Vergara in any way ? but also ?didn?t think about the implications? her drinking habits could have on their marriage. However, a second source told the outlet that Vergara ?could not have been more supportive? of her estranged husband?s sobriety over the years.
[From Page Six]
I don?t think anyone is saying that Sofia is an alcoholic she seems like a social drinker and someone who enjoys a glass of wine with dinner and she can keep it to one glass. But yeah, the sober spouse/not-sober spouse dynamic is always going to be tricky. Also tricky? The money. They spoke about signing a prenup before they married, as Sofia is the wealthier one. Page Six?s legal consultant explains what the prenup was all about:
Despite their relatively lengthy union and exorbitant wealth, high-profile divorce attorney Frederic J. Siegel ? who is not representing either party and has no affiliation with the case ? tells Page Six that the duo will likely have a clean break financially. Before she married the ?Magic Mike? star in November 2015, Vergara revealed that the two were signing a prenuptial agreement, which typically outlines how a couple?s finances and assets will be handled should they divorce later on.
?He said, ?Do whatever you want. I?ll sign whatever you want,? the actress, 51, told Howard Stern that May. Siegel theorizes that Vergara and Manganiello?s marital contract ?probably had what is called a walkaway.?
?She keeps what she has and what she earns, and he keeps what he has and what he?s earned,? Siegel, the founding member of family law firm Siegel, Colin & Kaufman, explains. ?So with a prenup ? and without kids [together] ? it becomes a much simpler case.?
As for marital property, Vergara and the ?True Blood? star moved into a shared home in May 2015, six months before they said ?I do.? According to TMZ, she?s the one who purchased the seven-bedroom, 11,000-square-foot Beverly Hills pad for $10.6 million.
Last July, the outlet reported that the pair put the fully renovated estate ? equipped with a chef?s kitchen, gym, movie theater and pool with a spa ? on the market for a staggering $19.6 million.
The then-couple was simultaneously building a bigger and better home in the same area, per TMZ.
?My belief is that they probably are at a more advanced stage [in their divorce] than people would think, because usually when people make the announcement like they made yesterday, they?ve already done some of the preliminary work,? Siegel tells us. ?It doesn?t look like it?s messy ? yet,? he adds. ?It?s a good sign when people issue the kind of statement that they did, saying that they wanted to do this amicably, but it doesn?t always work out that way.?
[From Page Six]
I would also imagine that the terms of the pre-nup are upheld and that they?ll both walk away with whatever they earned separately within the marriage, and Sofia will probably get the real estate (since she was the one paying for their homes). Joe is a working actor and he probably has a nice nest egg, but Sofia is very rich.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gigi Hadid was arrested for marijuana possession in the Cayman Islands | | Added 307 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The marijuana laws have loosened (if not completely disappeared) in so many states in the US, we barely hear about celebrities getting arrested on drug charges. I figure pretty much everyone in half of the country (if not more) has easy access to pot, whether it?s through medical dispensaries or simple open-to-anyone sales. Young people don?t know what it was like in the 1980s and 1990s, when marijuana was considered a ?gateway drug,? and being arrested for possession could mean some really terrible sh-t for your future. All of which to say, Gigi Hadid was arrested for possession in the Cayman Islands. She was carrying marijuana in her bag at the airport! Good lord.
Gigi Hadid had a bumpy start to her summer vacation. The supermodel was embarking on a girls trip to the Cayman Islands on July 10 when she was arrested at Owen Roberts International Airport, E! News has learned.
According to local outlet Cayman Marl Road, shortly after Hadid and her pal arrived via a private plane, custom officials allegedly found ganja and utensils used for the consumption of ganja in their luggage.
Hadid and her friend were then arrested on suspicion Importation of Ganja and Importation of Utensils used for the consumption of ganja, the outlet reports, adding that they were then taken to the Prisoner Detention Center, where they were released on bail.
Two days later, on July 12, Hadid and her pal were formally charged during a court appearance, where they pleaded guilty and were both fined $1,000, according to Cayman Marl Road. They are not facing any charges.
Gigi was traveling with marijuana purchased legally in NYC with a medical license, her rep tells E! News. It has also been legal for medical use in Grand Cayman since 2017. Her record remains clear and she enjoyed the rest of her time on the island.
E! News has reached out to authorities has not heard back.
[From E! News]
I mean? I would never carry on any flight, especially an international flight, regardless of medical license and regardless of the medical-use laws. That?s another thing ?90s kids will tell you: you never carry drugs on commercial flights! Don?t assume you know all of the drug laws of other countries! There are too many horror stories. That being said, my feeling is that Gigi got off lightly, probably because of her celebrity. I hope this will be a lesson learned don?t carry drugs internationally. Especially when you?re rich and famous, you?ll be able to find a dealer wherever you go.
Her vacation was barely interrupted the Cayman Islands probably got thousands of dollars in free tourism advertising from this incident. Gigi posted photos and videos from her vacation too, nary a mention of her arrest.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Gigi Hadid (@gigihadid)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Tori Spelling and Her 5 Kids Living in a Motel After Split With Dean McDermott | | Added 307 days ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron Spelling died years ago leaving $800,000 to Tori Spelling. He was worth $600m, but $800,000 seems reasonable. Not good enough though. Because Tori Spelling and Dean McDermott have split, leaving Spelling to stay in a cheap motel with her 5 kids. No sarcastic comment about that from me, lol. A mother looking out for []
The post Tori Spelling and Her 5 Kids Living in a Motel After Split With Dean McDermott appeared first on The Blemish.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ariana Grande & Dalton Gomez are headed for divorce after a two-year marriage | | Added 308 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
My gossip radar pinged on Sunday, when Ariana Grande turned up at the Wimbledon men?s final, looking blonde, single and ringless. I just didn?t think we would get this announcement right away! So, just before the pandemic hit, Ariana started dating Dalton Gomez. They basically went into lockdown together and their love blossomed. They got engaged by the end of 2020 and they were married in May 2021. Two years later, they?re headed for a divorce.
Ariana Grande and her husband Dalton Gomez have been separated since January, and they are heading toward divorce sources connected to the couple tell TMZ. As we reported, Ariana was not wearing her wedding ring at Wimbledon over the weekend in fact, shes been ringless a lot these days.
Were told a few months back the 2 tried a reconciliation, but it failed.
One source with direct knowledge told TMZ, their relationship is heading for divorce.
Ariana and Dalton have been thousands of miles apart since December, when she started filming Wicked. Our sources say they were having problems even before that. Were told they remain friends and still talk on the phone regularly, but, according to sources, the marriage is kaput.
[From TMZ]
People Magazine had a confirmation of the news too, with a source telling the magazine that Ari and Dalton separated earlier this year and ?have been quietly and lovingly working on their friendship.? Ariana has been in London for months and Dalton did NOT join her (although he reportedly flew in for one last-ditch effort to win her back). Now the Wicked production has been halted because of the SAG-AFTRA strike? and she?s still in London. Anyway, I think this was a pandemic romance which ran its course. I also believe ?I need to be married by such-and-such an age? played a part.
At Wimbledon, she was sitting in between Andrew Garfield and Jonathan Bailey. Bailey is a gay man, so on that level, of course Ariana would dump her husband and then go drink Pimms at Wimbledon with her gay BFF. But so few people are talking about the fact that she was sitting next to Andrew too. Andrew is single, last time I checked. Something to keep your eye on.
Embed from Getty Images
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sofia Vergara & Joe Manganiello are divorcing after seven years of marriage | | Added 308 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Ariana Grande divorcing her starter husband was not shocking at all to me, but THIS? This floored me. I thought Sofia Vergara and Joe Manganiello were happy together! Joe and Sofia are divorcing after seven years of marriage. They first met when she was with that utter douchebag Nick Loeb. There was an infamous photo, at the time, of Joe eyefking Sofia while she was on Nick?s arm. Soon after, Sofia and Nick were done and Sofia and Joe were together. They seemed especially well-suited for each other they are close in age (she?s 51, he?s 46), he made it clear that Sofia was his dream girl, she enjoyed being adored, and they actually seemed to have a fun relationship and a lot of compatibility. More than most Hollywood couples. Well, it?s over now.
Sofa Vergara and husband Joe Manganiello have separated and are divorcing after seven years of marriage, Page Six can exclusively reveal.
The couple tell Page Six in a statement: ?We have made the difficult decision to divorce. As two people that love and care for one another very much, we politely ask for respect of our privacy at this time as we navigate this new phase of our lives.?
The ?Modern Family? beauty is currently celebrating her 51st birthday in Italy with a posse of friends ? but with no Manganiello or her wedding ring.
A source added: ?Sofa and Joe have been growing apart for a while now and are taking some distance from each other to contemplate their future.?
The couple was last seen together last month in Hoboken, N.J., as Vergara visited Manganiello, 46, on the set of his new project ?Nonnas? with Vince Vaughn. Vergara, a judge on the NBC hit ?America?s Got Talent,? is in Capri with her best friends and living her best life, posting a series of sexy photos on Instagram. But Manganiello?s absence has not gone unnoticed by fans on Instagram, as Vergara later posted a photo with the message: ?When life gives u lemons u come to Italy to squeeze them.?
[From Page Six]
I cant even imagine having the dual heat-score of these two and deciding to throw away this collective sexiness. This was sexiness for the people! As I said, this news floored me because they always presented as happy and well-suited for each other. The Mail has a very weird piece about what went wrong and it basically sounds like Joe is getting his side out there that he loves fun and adventure, while Sofia is kind of stuck-up and obsessed with a luxury lifestyle? I dont know, yall.
Embed from Getty Images
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.357.057
Photos Online+ 50.744 past week
1.673
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Charlotte Lawrence
Photos of Charlotte Lawrence will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
2 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
