| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Doutzen Kroes Talks 10-Year Plan: 'Maybe I?ll Do Movies' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
She?s worked hard to establish herself as a smart and sexy poser, and Doutzen Kroes is stunning in her cover story for the WSJ Spring Fashion Issue.
The Victoria?s Secret model opens up about everything from her early career to her future aspirations. ?Ten years ago, I had no idea I?d be here. Maybe I?ll do movies?I dream of working with particular directors?or maybe I?ll just live someplace quiet where I can grow my own vegetables.?
Along with her intriguing interview, 30-year-old Kroes show off her sultry edge in a variety of stellar styles that showcase her flawless physique.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Micaela Schaefer Topless At The Opening Of Berlinale 2015 | | Added 9 years ago | Source: Dickism |
|
|
|
|
|
Here is Micaela Schaefer baring her breasts at the Boulevard of Stars in Berlin to draw attention to Berlin’s international film festival, Berlinale.
The model was accompanied in her photo shoot by two large golden bears, symbols of the annual event. She took the opportunity to express her attraction to the former chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schroeder, who she said she “cuddles.”
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Mila Kunis Tells 'Conan?: I Love My Post-Pregnancy Boobs! | | Added 9 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
She?s always been easy on the eyes, but Mila Kunis is thrilled to have a fuller bust following the birth of her daughter Wyatt.
While promoting ?Jupiter Ascending? on ?Conan? last night (February 4), the ?Forgetting Sarah Marshall? star confessed that her lady pillows are all kinds of awesome these days.
?Boy did these things grow! I don?t know how to deal with them because I?ve never had them. So, I always dress for a flat chested girl and all of a sudden I?m busty and I?m like, ?Whoa check it out!? This is amazing for me! It?s a whole new world. Men actually look at my boobs, I?ve never had that happen before, because they?re just there!?
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Taylor Swift won't perform at the Grammys, will dance in the audience though | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Taylor Swift out and about in Hollywood on Tuesday and Wednesday. She had two costume changes for the paps, and both costumes involved legs for days. If I had Tay-Tay?s legs, I would be showing them off too. But I worry about her miniskirts. That brown suede mini is WAY too short. I?m assuming she has, like, bloomers or hot pants on underneath, because how could she not? How can you wear a skirt that short and not be constantly worried that your butt is literally hanging out?
So, what?s up with Swifty this week? Lots. This week she became the second woman in history to have TWO albums on the top of the Billboard charts for ten weeks. The first was Whitney Houston. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you feel about Swifty?s live performances), Swifty will not be performing any of her hit songs at the Grammys on Sunday. She wrote on her Tumblr this week:
Hey guys! A lot of you have been asking about the Grammys this week and I just wanted to give you an update. I?m really excited to be nominated for 3 Grammys this year and even more excited that I?ll be there having a dance party/rage fest in the audience. I will also be presenting the award for Best New Artist. Since my whole life is wrapped up and entangled in the planning of The 1989 World Tour right now, I?m not going to be performing on the Grammys this year. I need this time to focus only on the tour.
I hope I?ll see you out there at one of the stadiums this summer having a rage fest of your own!
Love you.
Taylor
[From Swifty?s Tumblr]
I don?t think there?s any conspiracy with this. I believe her ? she?s prepping her tour and Swifty?s tours are very important to her (and that?s how she makes most of her money too), so she didn?t have the time or energy to put together a Grammys performance. But she?ll be there, dancing in the audience.
Last story: you know how Taylor applied to trademark ?This Sick Beat?? Yeah. Well, people are freaking out about it and one punk musician named Ben Norton wrote a protest song using phrases from Swifty?s album, like ?This sick beat,? ?party like it?s 1989? and ?cause we never go out of style.? You can hear his song here. The New Yorker also ran a hilarious parody of other phrases Swifty could try to trademark, like: ?Welcome to Newark?; ?I Am an American Citizen?; ?My Name is Hillary Clinton, and I Approve This Message?; ?How Did You Get This Number??; ?Taylor Gyllenhaal?. YES!!!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Justin Timberlake & Jessica barely spoke to each other on their babymoon | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Who would have thought that the man who would not even include his wife?s head in their pregnancy announcement photo would be sort of a douche during her pregnancy? I?m often asked why I dislike Justin Timberlake so much. First off, he?s not really on my ?I totally hate this guy? list, like Chris Brown. JT is mostly an annoyance to me, and I?m more pissed off at the coverage around him. Justin gets away with too much by the press and his fans. He?s acted like a dick so many times, he openly cheated on Jessica Biel when they dated (and probably now that they?re married too) and everything is always all about Justin. So, what’s new? JT and Jessica weren’t speaking to each other during their babymoon.
Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel were skiing in Montana on Jan. 24 ? but it looked like their marriage was heading downhill just as fast! The superstar couple acted more like strangers while dining in Big Sky Country, a witness revealed to The National ENQUIRER.
?There seemed to be some tension between them,? the Montana spy reported. ?They were not talking at all ? Justin was on his phone the entire time, looking down.?
Jessica, 32, is six months pregnant with her first child with Justin, 34, but they weren?t acting like expectant parents. Could the pair?s current cold condition be
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | LeAnn Rimes loves seeing Eddie 'engage in every aspect of his sons' lives' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of LeAnn Rimes out and about in LA a few days ago. We had these photos yesterday and I was going to write up something, but LeAnn has been pretty bland lately. I already mentioned ? in the Brandi Glanville post yesterday ? that LeAnn is still Twitter-stalking Brandi and Single-White-Female-ing her. When Brandi tweeted something about #Cookingforfamily, LeAnn had to copy her within a few hours. The whole thing, after all these years, is both funny and pathetic.
Anyway, while Brandi Glanville was in NYC this week to promote Celebrity Apprentice and RHOBH, I guess LeAnn and Eddie had his two boys. I was able to discern that from LeAnn?s Twitter, where she bragged about donating all of her food for Jake?s school project. #selfless #blessed #HowWillTheyKnowImSelflessIfIDontGetCreditForIt
I'll be shopping for canned soups & beans to replace the ones we just unloaded for Jake's school project He's loaded down #feedingfamilies
— LeAnn Rimes Cibrian (@leannrimes) February 4, 2015
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ryan Reynolds & Blake Lively probably named their baby Bathsheba, okay? | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
LaineyGossip has a good theory for why Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively are playing this stupid game with not announcing what they?ve named their baby girl. Just for the record, if you don?t want to announce your baby?s name, that?s fine. But don?t make it into a guessing game like you?re so clever. It?s pretty annoying. Anyway, Lainey?s theory is that Ryan is promoting The Voices and it?s not a big enough film to spill the tea on the baby name, and that they might wait until Blake is promoting The Age of Adaline in April to announce the name. Sounds possible. I bet Blake announces it on Preserve before then though.
Anyway, Ryan was on The Late Show last night (you can see the full interview here) and David Letterman grilled him on the baby name. Like, they spent the bulk of the interview talking about the name and playing this silly game. Once again, Ryan said they didn?t name the baby Violet: ?People said that the name was Violet, which was a very pretty name. But, that’s Ben Affleck’s daughter’s name … we would never steal another celebrity’s baby name, so we went with Shiloh.” Ryan also dropped some hints: it?s a family name, it?s not Blake?s mother?s name and it?s ?maybe kind of, yeah? a Biblical name. Bathsheba Reynolds. DONE. He also said this about Blake:
“It’s amazing. I’m not one for vomiting declarations of sentiment out across the airwaves, but when we had that baby, I fell more in love with my wife than I’d ever been in my entire life. I couldn’t even believe it. I used to say to [Blake], ‘I would take a bullet for you. I could never love anything as much as I love you.’ I would say that to my wife. And the second I looked in that baby’s eyes, I knew in that exact moment that if we were ever under attack, I would use my wife as a human shield to protect that baby. [As] the guy, I’m just like a diaper-changing facility hooked up to a life-support system. But my wife, she’s breakfast, lunch, and dinner. She’s a human Denny’s, all day long and all night long. Romantic right? She’s the most beautiful Denny’s you’ve ever seen, though.”
[From Us Weekly]
I?ll admit it, I liked what Blandy Reynolds had to say about Blake. I mean, of course he loves his wife. But it?s nice to hear him gush about her like this because we?ve never really heard that from him before. Oh well? I hope they?re a real love match. And I hope we find out this godforsaken baby?s name soon.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Rihanna is a Sexy Shark Swimmer for Harper's Bazaar March 2015 | | Added 9 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
She?s never afraid of a challenge, and Rihanna decided to try swimming with sharks in her new cover feature for the March 2015 issue of Harper's Bazaar.
The ?We Found Love? songstress posted a few images to her Instagram account on Wednesday (February 4), sporting orange and white swimsuits as she floats in the crystal clear water.
Earlier this week, Rihanna shared a pair of sneak peeks from her music video for ?FourFiveSeconds? featuring Kanye West and Paul McCartney. She explained, ?This is the first song that my fans are going to hear from the new album and the first visual they see.?
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Rihanna swam with sharks in her Harper's Bazaar cover shoot: stunning' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Rihanna covers the March issue of Harper’s Bazaar, which is perfect timing for this week’s Grammys. RiRi will perform at the show, along with Kanye West and Paul McCartney, in a rendition of their new “iconic” single. I still don’t dig the song, which makes me sad after jonesing for more Rihanna music. If you’re checking out the white background of this cover and wondering if Uncle Terry shot it, you can rest easy. Photographer Norman Jean Roy landed this feature, and he loves water shoots. Norman shot Kristen Stewart in a shallow pool, and he goes to town with Rihanna. You can see more of the editorial on Rihanna’s Twitter, but here’s the impressive shot. Rihanna swam with sharks!
Rihanna really did this. Harpers also posted a behind the scenes video to prove that the shark wasn’t photoshopped in next to Rihanna. The vid is slightly NSFW for Rihanna’s thong, but you can see it here. The video is a bit confusing because Rihanna’s wearing an orange swimsuit, and you can see a white one in the above shot. Maybe she changed suits. Rihanna swam with sharks in Hawaii a few years ago too. That’s definitely her kicking past a shark in the Bazaar video. It looks terrifying, doesn’t it?
We should get a fair dose of Rihanna soon. Dazed Digital says Rih is planning to tour with Kanye later this year. Here are some photos of Rihanna with designer Jeremy Soctt at the the Daily Front Row’s fashion event last week.
Photos courtesy of Harper’s Bazaar, Norman Jean Roy & WENN
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Beyonce & Jay-Z have permanently relocated to LA, on Goop's advice | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jay-Z is to New York like? Oprah is to Chicago. You know? Some people are synonymous with their cities. Jay could travel the world, he could live for years in the middle of nowhere and he would still be a New Yorker, he would still rap about Brooklyn and New York would still be in his blood. I always thought he was probably pretty happy calling Manhattan his homebase, but as it turns out, Jay-Z and Beyonce have already relocated to the West Coast. For months now, TMZ has been tracking Bey and Jay?s attempts to purchase major real estate in LA, and now TMZ says that they?re already living out of a hotel in LA and have been for a month or so. And they already enrolled Blue Ivy in pre-school!
Beyonce and Jay Z are moving to L.A. and they’ve already enrolled Blue Ivy in school … TMZ has learned. We’ve learned … Beyonce and Jay Z are currently living in a hotel in Beverly Hills and actively looking for an estate to buy on the westside of L.A., which includes Beverly Hills, Holmby Hills and Bel-Air. We’re told they have already discreetly looked at a number of homes, but so far none fit the bill.
We’ve also learned the famous couple enrolled their 3-year-old into a toddler program at an elite private school — we know which one but we’re not naming it. But we will tell you, the tuition is $15,080 a year. We’re told Blue Ivy was admitted halfway through the school year, which is unusual. The school generally only accepts students at the beginning of the school year.
As for why they’re moving, sources connected with the couple tell us they want “a change in lifestyle.” You’ll re recall, Bey and Jay spent the summer in a $200K a month rental near Bev Hills. We do not know but assume they will keep their New York digs.
[From TMZ]
This is just? weird. Right? I mean, Beyonce and Jay-Z are the Queen and King of New York. Blue Ivy is a New York baby! Is this all part of the sketchiness that went down between Bey and Jay last year? Is this part of the deal? Like, we?ll stay together and try for another baby but only if we move to a city so I don?t have to keep running into all of your New York side-pieces?
According to Us Weekly, it wasn?t about the side-pieces though. Their sources say Gwyneth Paltrow ?heavily influenced? the move. A source says:
?Beyonce and Jay Z are making L.A. their permanent home based a lot on the advice of their friends. The friend that really influenced them to move was Gwyneth Paltrow. Gwyneth was telling Jay and Bey about the quality of life for her kids in L.A. and really swayed Beyonce and Jay to make the move. It?s all for Blue Ivy.?
[From Us Weekly]
The source also says that Bey and Jay will keep their New York property (properties, I believe) but LA will become their homebase. I can sort of understand moving to LA for a change of pace, and being able to move around with more freedom. What I don?t understand is moving to LA because Goop suggested it. I know Gwyneth likes to name-drop her friendship with Beyonce, but I really doubt that they?re close enough for Beyonce to uproot her family to be closer to Goop, you know?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin are still 'haggling' over the pre-nup & setting a date | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here on update on this ^^ outfit that Jennifer Aniston wore to the Santa Barbara International Film Festival over the weekend. I said at the time that it looked like Saint Laurent, but it?s actually Tom Ford. Now you know! While at the SBIFF, Aniston spoke to Extra ? you can see the video here. The only thing I found interesting was that she?s apparently a huge fan of House of Cards? Has she name-checked that show? I only remember her talking about The Bachelor and how she enjoys that. Aniston also spoke to Empire magazine recently about aging and how it?s been more than a decade since Friends went off the air. She said:
?In a selfish, greedy way I could have kept doing it [Friends] until today. It feels really odd when people say, ?Oh, that was in 1995 or ’94.? This is why I say everything moves so quickly. I still feel like I’m a 28-year old kid.?
[Via The Daily Mail]
I do think that forever-28 thing is one of the defining characteristics of Aniston. Instead of making her seem forever young, it kind of makes her look dated though. Like, she?s Totally ?90s. Same hair, same references, same conversation.
Meanwhile, Us Weekly (via the DM) claims that Jennifer and Justin Theroux are ?haggling? over the pre-nup. So many haggles that they still haven?t set a wedding date.
They have been engaged since 2012 but have yet to set a date for their wedding. Still, Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux are ‘haggling’ over the final details of their over $110m prenup, according to UsWeekly. On the table is the subject if her 43-year-old beau should deserve a cut of the money she will receive from Netflix from Friends royalties, it was claimed.
‘The prenup is pretty much done,’ a source told the weekly. ‘Jen won’t see money from Netflix for about a year, so there has been back and forth about whether her earnings will be considered from during or before their marriage.’ The insider then noted that Aniston – who turns 46-years-old on February 11 – ‘prefers the latter.?
The two actors have different incomes. While Theroux makes about $75,000 an episode on his show The Leftover (it is not known how much he makes from script writing), the ex-wife of Brad Pitt can make millions for just one film. The blonde Horrible Bosses 2 star also has ad deals with Aveeno and is a co-owner of Living Proof.
Though the two have yet to set a date, there has been talk that they want a ‘small beach wedding,’ another source said to UsWeekly.
[From The Daily Mail]
I?ll take Jennifer at her word that she already feels married to Justin and that she?s not in some crazy rush to get married, but I also think if she had her way, the wedding would have gone down YEARS ago. I think Justin is really and truly gun-shy about marriage in general and marriage to Aniston specifically. He?s the common-law husband type, or at least that?s how he sees himself. Like he?s too cool and hip to, like, wear a tux and say some vows. Once they get the pre-nup finalized, what will Justin use as an excuse then?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Is Ellen Barkin engaged to a British barrister she met at Clooney's wedding' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Can you believe that it’s already been four months since George Clooney and Amal Alamuddin got married? I cannot. It seems like I just figured out how to spell Amal’s maiden name, and she’s already changed it. Well four months is long for Clooney to be married, but relatively short in the scheme of some things, like engagements. Wedding guests Ellen Barkin, a friend and co-star of the groom, and Ben Emmerson, a friend and colleague of the bride, made a love match at the reception and are reportedly already engaged.
I’m surprised that Barkin, 60, is allegedly engaged again. No shade on her age at all, it’s just that I still remember how she sold all her jewelry after her high profile divorce from billionaire Ron Perelman in 2006. She made around $20 million for her jewels, and said that she sold them “so I ? and my children and my mother ? would be taken care of.” It was unknown if she made any kind of settlement in her divorce. After that she scored Oceans 13 and a bunch of other acting gigs. Plus Barkin was dating a much younger man for years. In 2011 she had a boyfriend who was just 26 at the time and she had reportedly been with him for four years at that point. So that’s another reason why I’m surprised.
Here’s more on Barkin’s maybe-engagement, thanks to US Magazine:
Ellen Barkin has found love again ? and she has George Clooney and Amal Alamuddin to thank. The Sea of Love star is engaged to Alamuddin?s colleague, British barrister and Queen?s counsel Ben Emmerson, a source reveals exclusively to Us Weekly.
?She is so happy and in love again,? the source confirms to Us, adding that the actress and lawyer got engaged over the holidays, after meeting at Alamuddin and Clooney?s September 2014 nuptials.
?Ellen met him at George and Amal?s wedding and they totally hit it off,? the insider explains. ?It happened quickly but she?s totally fallen for him and flies to see him all the time.?
Aside from intelligence ? Emmerson specializes in human rights law, public international law, and international crime law, among a bevy of other accolades ? the source tells Us that Barkin, 60, fell in love with the 51-year-old?s charm.
?He is really handsome and smart and charming and swept her off her feet,? the insider says.
As for their celeb BFFs Clooney and Alamuddin? The insider says they couldn?t be happier for their friends.
?George and Amal love them together! They both love Ellen and Ben so they think this is so great and love that they made a great match happen,? the source says.
[From US Magazine]
Human rights lawyers for all the celebrities! Impressive that he’s a lawyer for the queen too. I wish Barkin well for her third marriage. (She was also married to actor Gabriel Byrne from 1988 to 1998.) Maybe she should enjoy her engagement and not rush to make it official after less than a year with someone. Especially when they’re living in different countries. Still, this guy seems much more suited to her than her last boyfriend, a director who was over 30 years younger than her.
After I wrote this story, Kaiser pointed me to E!, which has a denial from Emmerson’s camp. All the statement says is that “Mr. Emmerson is not engaged to Ellen Barkin.” So, maybe they’re dating and not engaged then? It’s bizarre, because US Magazine would not have run this story without a solid source. They’re usually very good about that.
I couldn’t find any photos of Emmerson at our agencies, but you can see a photo of him on US’s site.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Johnny Depp, 51, & Amber Heard, 28, married in a surprise home ceremony | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This news is a surprise! The last time we talked about Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, the big story was that the two lovebirds were due to marry this weekend on Johnny’s private Bahamas island. They must have been throwing us off the gossip scent because Amber and Johnny got married yesterday. The ceremony took place at Johnny’s home. I wonder if they’re still heading out to the island this weekend? Maybe they’ll throw a party for their celeb friends on Johnny’s yacht. Whatever goes down, Amber is officially Mrs. Depp now. Us Weekly just published the exclusive announcement:
They just couldn’t wait! Johnny Depp and Amber Heard have officially tied the knot, sources reveal to Us Weekly. The couple decided to say “I do” just days before their scheduled ceremony in the Bahamas.
An insider tells Us that the bride and groom married at Depp’s West Hollywood home on Tuesday, Feb. 3. They will next jet off to his private island in the Bahamas for a second service.
“It will be a really simple ceremony,” a source previously told Us of the tropical getaway. “Things are in a great place with them.”
[From Us Weekly]
Us also got the first scoop on the engagement, so this is a done deal, folks. Can you believe it? I honestly had some major doubts about whether serial proposer Johnny would ever walk down the aisle again. But Amber nailed it down, and good for her. Also practical: Johnny in close proximity to his scarf closet before the ceremony. You know it took him forever to get dressed. Congrats to the happy couple!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet & WENN
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.526.573
Photos Online+ 10.804 past week
1.591
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Victoria Justice
Photos of Victoria Justice will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
2 days | | |
| | |
|
