 | |  |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Madonna did 'Carpool Karaoke' with James Corden: boring or amazing' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in Cavalli at the 'Office Christmas Party' premiere: too beachy' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos from the premiere of the ?raunchy? holiday movie, Office Christmas Party. The film actually has a decent ensemble including Jason Bateman, Jennifer Aniston, Courtney B. Vance, Olivia Munn, Kate McKinnon and more. I mean, I?m not going to see it, but I bet it will be a decent hit for an R-rated comedy. The star of the premiere was probably Jennifer Aniston in this Roberto Cavalli Spring 2017 gown. I?ve been looking at so many photos from European and New York premieres, I had gotten used to seeing celebrities bundled up in heavier clothes, plus most people are wearing Christmas-y clothes now. So it?s weird to see Jennifer wear a dress that would look at home at a beach party in July. I think it?s a cute enough dress, but just not for a December premiere of a holiday movie? I also don?t understand why Aniston insists on flat-ironing her hair. Ugh.
Olivia Munn in Jonathan Simkhai. This gown is overworked, right? There?s too much going on with the ruffles and the crochet down the front and all of the straps. EDIT. That?s a note to the designer: EDIT. Olivia also just looks so different. And no, it?s really not the potatoes. Chica got a new face.
Katy Perry in the Cinqa Sept “Nahla” halter gown and point de esprit tights/hosiery. What is going on with Katy?s style these days? She?s relying too much on Marchesa and ?90s looks. This dress would have totally looked at home on a red carpet in 1995.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it’s just because I’m a grinch when it comes to the holidays, but I’ve never really understood the whole “ugly Christmas sweater” fad. I mean, Victoria Justice is one of my all-time favorite hotties and even she can’t make me like these things. So forget the stupid cheesy sweaters, ladies. “Sexy Christmas lingerie” would […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sofia Vergara & Nick Loeb's embryo drama took a really strange turn | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the strangest stories of 2015 was Nick Loeb?s lawsuit against his ex-fiance Sofia Vergara. Sofia and Nick were together, on and off, for years, and at one point, they were going to have a child together via surrogacy. Nick?s sperm fertilized Sofia?s eggs in a lab, and two separate implantations were attempted, and neither stuck. In the end, Nick and Sofia broke up and she moved on with Joe Manganiello. But there were still some embryos left in the freezer, and Nick sued Sofia for ?custody? of the embryos. He wanted to implant them in another surrogate and raise the daughter (they were gender-selected girl embryos) by himself. The whole thing was an absolute mess, and Loeb ended up cozying up to the anti-choice crowd in a big way. Sofia maintained that the embryos belonged to both she and Nick, and until they could agree, the embryos would stay in the freezer.
Loeb?s original lawsuit was filed in California, and there are still motions and judgments and filings and whatever. Basically, that part of the craziness has not been settled. But then in one of the strangest twists ever, the embryos are now suing Sofia. I sh-t you not. A rabid anti-choice group has sued Sofia on behalf of the embryos, and the group has even NAMED the embryos (Emma and Isabella). The lawsuit was filed in Louisiana, a state which has a much heavier anti-choice record across the board. Page Six has the whole breakdown of the crazy new lawsuit here. It?s too stupid and disturbing to even excerpt, honestly. When media outlets went to Sofia?s lawyer, Fred Silberberg, for a comment about this new crazy lawsuit, Silberberg said:
“Next week the judge presiding over the case was to rule on Ms. Vergara?s request for sanctions against Mr. Loeb for refusing to comply with a court order, and on her motion for summary judgment-seeking dismissal of the case he filed against her, attempting to get control of pre-embryos that he created with Vergara. That genetic material was created pursuant to a written agreement that required both parties written consent to attempt to create a pregnancy. ? Reports are out that Mr. Loeb has caused a lawsuit to be filed on behalf of the pre-embryos in Louisiana, essentially trying to get the same relief that he was trying to get through his failed legal attempt in California.?
“The media reports contend that Mr. Loeb has caused a lawsuit to be initiated claiming that the pre-embryos ? which are not embryos, but rather frozen fertilized ova, have been given names by him and have a right to live.? Silberberg went on to say he believes this new lawsuit will ?result in failure? for Loeb, and that Vergara is ?happily married? and should be spared ?another unnecessary legal battle.?
[From Us Weekly]
If this all wasn?t so dystopian, it would be an interesting legal dilemma. The main thrust of Loeb?s argument is that by refusing to implant the two embryos (or ova), Sofia is effectively ?killing? them. But that?s not true ? those embryos can be frozen indefinitely, right? She never said ?throw them out.? She just said, ?Keep them on ice until further notice.?
Another legal argument against Loeb is that he?s only come-to-Jesus on the ?right to life? issue recently, and that (allegedly) at least two of his previous girlfriends had abortions when they were with him. Sofia?s lawyers tried to get Loeb to identify those two women, but HE ACTUALLY SAID ?I would rather go to jail than reveal the names. I believe we have to protect a woman’s right to privacy.” Yes, he has so much respect for a woman?s right to privacy. That?s why he?s suing his ex for her intimate genetic material, attempting to emotionally blackmail her, and cozying up to the ultra-right-wing anti-choice fringe. Because he has so much respect for a woman?s right to privacy.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Us Weekly: Kim Kardashian 'wants a divorce, doesn't want to stay married' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Over the past few days, People Magazine and Us Weekly have had competing stories about the Kimye marriage. I believed that people deep within the Kardashian camp ? perhaps even Kris Jenner ? were leaking stories about Kim Kardashian and Kanye West?s marriage for the past few weeks, but the competing narratives have sort of fallen off a cliff and now I don?t know what to believe. People Mag?s story has sources saying things like ?Kanye and Kim had a stressful few months. It?s been a tense time.? Tense is an understatement. Kim is also described as ?the dutiful, responsible, loving spouse that one would expect.? And sources insist that Kanye is doing better, that he has a lot of people around him, supporting him, and that he has seen North and Saint since he returned home. But Us Weekly says there are bigger issues going on and that Kim ?wants a divorce.?
Kim Kardashian is considering a new story line for 2017. Two and a half years after she and Kanye West wed in a multimillion-dollar affair at a 16th century Italian fortress, ?she wants a divorce,? a Kardashian friend claims in the new issue of Us Weekly. Previously married to record producer Damon Thomas and basketball pro Kris Humphries, the 36-year-old isn?t rushing to file papers just yet, adds the pal, but she is planning her next steps.
?It will take some time before she can do anything,? claims the friend, alleging that she?s trying to build a case for full custody of kids North, 3, and Saint, 12 months, ?but she doesn?t want to stay married.?
The Keeping Up With the Kardashians star is already distancing herself from the ?Fade? rapper, 39. Since his November 30 release from UCLA Medical Center?s Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital ? following a nine-day stay for what his physician Michael Farzam dubbed an episode of ?temporary psychosis? ? West has been receiving outpatient treatment at an L.A.-area rental, multiple sources tell Us. Kardashian, who has remained with the children at their 9,000-square-foot spread in L.A.?s Bel Air, ?is being very protective and doesn?t want Kanye around the kids right now,? explains the friend.
The Kardashian friend says she won?t make any decisions until West is fully recovered. Until then, adds the pal, ?she?s being a supportive wife.? And the reality star ? who has been in self-imposed seclusion since being robbed in Paris October 3 ? is happy the musician is on the mend. ?She cares about Kanye and feels relieved he?s getting the help he needs,? continues the friend, ?but she?s felt trapped for a while.?
[From Us Weekly]
Basically, they?re making it sound like Kim has already decided to file for divorce once Kanye gets back on his feet. There?s a PR angle to that too ? Kim would look so bad if she ?abandoned? her husband when he was struggling with mental health issues so publicly. Of course, she?s going to be villainized no matter what, all you have to do is look at the pretzel logic people used to attack Kim for being the victim of an armed robbery. My guess is that Kim probably has considered divorce, but I also think she probably just wants time to breathe, to reassess, and to figure out her next steps after a horrendous few months.
Also: since Us Weekly published their story, “sources” have gone to TMZ and People Mag to say that divorce is not on the table in any way.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.304.767
Photos Online+ 26.430 past week
1.185
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Tess Daly
Zoe Mclellan
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Kylie Jenner
Photos of Kylie Jenner will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
13 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
