| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Cara Delevingne Has No Panties | | Added 7 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve never been the biggest fan ofCara Delevingne, and now she went and cut off all her hair for some reason, making her look even more like a dude. But apparently me and Cara have more in common than I realized. We’ve both got the same taste in women, and we both hate wearing pants. […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Alessandra Ambrosio Gets In On The Tongue Action Game | | Added 7 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve really been diggingAlessandra Ambrosio‘s transition from professional Victoria’s Secret model to amateur Instagram model. She’s a total natural, if you ask me. It’s almost like she was born to lay around in a bikini all day. Anyway, here she is practicing her tongue action, an important talent […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Christie Brinkley changes her story about what she does to her face, but that changes too | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Why I first saw this story I thought “Christie Brinkley sure changes her story about what she gets done to her face.” Then I realized that her face changes so much she probably is telling the truth – she varies her procedures, she’s just not reminding us about her past work while trying to take advantage of the next news cycle and our forgetfulness. (But really, only gossip nerds like me remember the things she’s said.) So here’s Christie’s latest anti-aging procedures, which seem to be accumulating over time to give her a comical look in motion. She’s into a Botox alternative called Xeomin which is being touted as similar to Botox but allowing for more movement. This is the first I’m hearing about it. She’s also into Ultherapy, which is ultrasound for your face. (I have the Nuface mini, which is an at-home microcurrent machine and I swear it works to lift, at least temporarily. It’s a slight different treatment than ultrasound.)
Here’s what Brinkley said about her latest treatments, and FYI in 2015 she said she’d “tried” Botox in her forehead and wouldn’t ever do it again, then later in 2015 she said she gets Botox in her neck and laser resurfacing. In 2016 she denied getting Botox and said she had fillers in “tiny doses”. (That was around the time she put out a skincare line.) She’s never copped to invasive plastic surgery, which would explain how her eyes changed shape the past ten years. Of course Christie is a spokesperson for both of these new treatments, which probably didn’t do much given everything she’s had done to date.
?I wondered if people would think I?m phony and fake,? Brinkley, 63, exclusively tells PEOPLE of using the treatments in a new interview featured in this week?s issue, on newsstands Friday. ?But it?s better to be honest and say, ?Yeah, this is what I do.??
Her goal was ?never to look different,? says the model and author of Timeless Beauty, who has become the spokeswoman for both products, which are owned by the pharmaceutical company Merz North America. ?But I?m almost 64. At a certain point, you might need a little something extra. When I look in the mirror, I want to feel like I look as good as I feel. And if you can have something done to feel more confident and better about yourself, then you feel like your face matches your spirit?and my spirit is enthusiastic and energetic.?
First, she got Xeomin (pronounced ZEOmin), which is an injectable that temporarily improves the look of frown lines between the eyebrows. It works by blocking the transmission of signals from nerves to the muscles, which causes muscles to relax and appear smoother. ?It?s similar to other botulinum toxins [like Botox],? says Brinkley?s dermatologist Dr. Patricia Wexler of Wexler Dermatology in New York City.
However, it?s a more ?purified toxin,? says the dermatologist because it doesn?t use accessory proteins like other products. ?Given correctly, you?ll have a very natural look of lift in the area.? A single treatment ranges from $300 to $500 and lasts up to four months.
?I was so afraid to do it,? Brinkley says of trying Xeomin. ?But I still feel like myself. I could still move my eyebrows and I feel like I have all my same funny faces. It was like a non-invasive pick-me-up.?
[Her dermatologist also touts Ultherapy which costs around "$1,800 per area treated, and it takes between two to three months to see full results."]
If there are naysayers to her latest beauty secret reveal, she?s ignoring them. ?There are always going to be the people who build themselves up by pulling you down,? she says. ?But then there are the women who are supporting women. And if there are little things that I can do that are going to make me feel great, make me look good for my job and that would be selfish of me not to share it,? she says.
[From People]
This is what she always says, that she doesn’t want to look different but she does look different. She looks good (I think she looked better a few years back when she was using treatments sparingly), just different and obviously enhanced. I wonder if People is running these stories as needed filler or if they’re actually getting paid by Merz to include Christie’s endorsement. (We’re not getting paid.)
Photos are from this summer. The photos at the US Open are the newest and they’re from September. Credit: WENN
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Cattrall never wanted to do SATC3, says SJP 'could have been nicer' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week, Sarah Jessica Parker announced that the Sex and the City 3 movie wasn?t happening. I thought the film was still in the ?development hell/don?t have a script? phase, but apparently they did have a script and everyone was on board except for Kim Cattrall. SJP actually didn?t mention Cattrall by name when she spoke to Extra – SJP only said that ?we?re not doing it? I?m disappointed.? Of course, the Daily Mail got an exclusive in which unnamed sources did the heavy lifting for Sarah Jessica Parker. Those sources claimed Cattrall made outrageous demands in exchange for her agreement to do SATC3, and that Cattrall wanted a lot of money, etc, etc, diva this, ?playing the victim? that. That DM article was incredibly harsh to Cattrall. And so now Cattrall is addressing the claims that SATC3 isn?t happening because she?s a diva and an a–hole.
Elaborating on her side of the story during an interview taped for Piers Morgan’s ITV show, Life Stories, Kim Cattrall denounced claims against her conduct and turned the tables on her co-star.
“And now, now at this very moment it’s quite extraordinary to get any kind of negative press about something that I’ve been saying for almost a year of ‘no’ that I’m demanding or a diva,” Cattrall told Morgan, according to The Daily Mail. “And this is really where I take to task the people from Sex and the City and specifically Sarah Jessica Parker in that I think she could have been nicer. I really think she could have been nicer,” she reiterated. “I don’t know what her issue is, I never have.” However, Cattrall also said, “There is genuine affection and there has been over the years.”
As she elaborated to Morgan, according to The Daily Mail, “This is extenuating circumstances and in the past I’ve felt, wow, especially with the fans I don’t want to in any shape or form ruin an ideal of it, because it does stand for empowerment and it does stand for women sticking up for each other, but not always.”
Overall, it seems Cattrall has lost touch with her castmates. “They all have children and I am ten years older and since specifically the series ended I have been spending most of my time outside of New York so I don’t see them,” she said during the interview. “The common ground that we had was the series and the series is over.”
While questions remain over what caused the third film’s demise, Cattrall insisted she always rejected the project. “The answer was always no and a respectful, firm, no,” Cattrall told Morgan, according to The Daily Mail. “I never asked for any money, I never asked for any projects, to be thought of as some kind of diva is absolutely ridiculous.”
According to The Daily Mail, Cattrall explained during the interview that she had received sporadic calls since December about the project with offers to meet with producers, all of which she said she declined. “This isn’t about more money, this is not about more scenes, it’s not about any of those things,” she told Morgan. “This is about a clear decision, an empowered decision in my life to end one chapter and start another. I’m 61. It’s now.”
While she reportedly declared to Morgan we will never see her on screen as Samantha Jones again, she’s not opposed to recasting the character or introducing a new one entirely.
“I want them to make the movie, if that’s what they want to do. It’s a great part. I played it past the finish line and then some and I loved it and another actress should play it,” she suggested during the interview. “Or bring in another character. It can be another character. This is what I really believe that this franchise needs another point of view and this could be it.”
[From E! News]
*shrug* I believe her. I believe that she had been saying no from the beginning. Kim and Sarah Jessica never got along, but they made it work together professionally through the course of the TV show. Kim probably did get nice paychecks for the two movies, and she was done. She?s 61 years old, she doesn?t want to still be playing the sex-starved Samantha at this point. And I admire her for sticking up for what she believed was right for the characters and the story. The second film was an appalling mess and there is no good reason why a third film should be made.
Photos courtesy of WENN and HBO.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.461.586
Photos Online+ 3.009 past week
1.806
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Charisma Carpenter
Photos of Charisma Carpenter will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
10 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
