| | | | Sarah Jessica Parker News & Gossip
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker Teams Up with Mr. Big | Added 15 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing on her first day of filming, Sarah Jessica Parker was spotted doing scenes with Chris Noth on the set of “Sex and the City part 2” today (September 1).
The Carrie Bradshaw actress and her Mr. Big cohort looked to be enjoying themselves as they laughed and chatted in between scenes as the nearby paparazzi snapped up plenty of pics.
And though there’s widespread speculation as to the plotline of the much-anticipated sequel, SJP is staying decidedly tight-lipped about the details.
Parker told press, “In a million years I’m not going to give you an indication. I want someone to show up that first weekend.” “Sex and the City Part 2” hits theaters May 28th, 2010.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker in a see-through dress on the NY set of SATC 2 | Added 15 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker spent most of this morning running around Manhattan revising her famed role as Carrie Bradshaw. Of course she did this in a possibly mildly see-through dress, but I think it’s just due to the inherent issues with wearing white. No word on whether it was an accidental wardrobe malfunction or part of the plot, but she looked fabulous. Especially in her gold Christian Louboutins.
I?m starting to think Sarah Jessica should seriously consider sticking to Carrie Bradshaw roles, because she?s gotten nothing but heinous reviews for everything else she?s done. And nothing but fabulous reviews for her ?Sex &the City? work. This weekend I saw ?Julia & Julie? (like the reviewer below) and was forced to endure the trailer for SJP?s next film “Did You Hear About The Morgans” with Hugh Grant. To say it was the most abysmal part of my night is an understatement: and I was wearing really painful shoes that left me with over 11 huge blisters. But I?d gladly suffer another dozen just to have walked out before I had to sit through that awkwardness. Here we go:
Over the weekend a friend and I were forced to sit, “Clockwork Orange”-style, through the painfully unfunny trailer for “Did You Hear About The Morgans” before we could enjoy the butter-soaked fun of “Julie & Julia.” The trailer features Hugh Grant doing what Hugh Grant thinks Hugh Grant does best — playing a yippity man-boy who can’t quite grasp the concept of love — and Sarah Jessica Parker as his humorless wife who’s moments from leaving him when they witness a murder.
Then, as if out of a movie, (oh, wait) the two are shuttled into a Montana-based witness protection program where they inevitably learn about horse riding, small town mentalities and themselves. Bad film aside, there is one major problem that will prevent “Morgans” from being super successful: Sarah Jessica Parker isn’t a movie star. She a square peg in cinema’s round hole. After starring as the small screen’s greatest dater ever, I get why Sarah Jessica thinks romantic comedies are her best bet for big screen success — but it’s a catch-22.
Because Carrie Bradshaw is who most rom-com inclined ladies aspire to be, any character short of her is a failure. And since SJP very intentionally opts for very un-Carrie-like women to play on the big screen, everyone is continually disappointed. Which is assuming audiences show up in the first place, which history says they don’t. Most of her non-”SATC” big screen adventures have been as profitable as they have been entertaining — which is to say, not very. In her 25-year career, only one other film has crossed the million dollar mark (”First Wives Club”) while none of her post-Bradshaw roles have lit the box office on fire.
And while other rom-com staples, like Kate Hudson or Katherine Heigl, can push a subpar script past $100 million based almost solely on sex appeal, SJP comes up short. I mean, the website Sarah Jessica Parker Looks Like A Horse.com offers enough supporting evidence to qualify her for The Breeder’s Cup. Don’t take this as me calling SJP fugly, I’m simply saying that to play the lead in a romantic comedy, an actor must be desirable to the opposite sex. And I’m not sure at this point, Sarah Jessica (or Hugh) is really fitting that mold.
So without the support of straight men, SJP has to rely solely on her single ladies — a demo that spends the entire movie wishing they were watching Carrie Bradshaw. Which is why, although I hate the idea, another “Sex and the City” is the smartest move she can make. Because at the end of the day, Sarah Jessica Parker isn’t a movie star … but Carrie Bradshaw is!
[From the NY Post]
I feel more at peace knowing others feel exactly the same way I do. I see Sarah Jessica in any movie and I want to smack her, I?m so annoyed with her for picking such bad roles. Then I see her in ?Sex and the City? and want to be her BFF forever. Yeah I know what I just said. And I mean it. Her aversion to Carrie-type characters really isn?t doing her career any favors. Playing a bunch of cold, shrill women doesn?t endear her to anyone. At one point during the trailer I accidentally laughed when there was a comedic pause obviously meant to force people into an uncomfortable chuckle. Which is exactly what I did in my knee-jerk reaction. I was so mortified I clasped my hands over my mouth as if trying to grab that laugh and shove it back in. I can?t imagine how harshly I was judged for that. I felt cheap and tricked, and really, why would I want to pay $12.50 for that when I can get it for free?
Here?s Sarah Jessica in New York City today. You be the judge on the dress. Oh and the trailer for her film; but I’m warning you, you’re going to be angry. Images thanks to WENN.com and Fame Pictures .
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker Gets to Work on 'sex and the City 2' | Added 15 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
It’s finally happening- “Sex and the City 2” began filming today (September 1) in New York City and none other than Sarah Jessica Parker was spotted reporting for duty.
The “Failure to Launch” babe looked lovely as she strolled around the Manhattan set, sporting a white dress with animal print heels and a super-voluminous hairdo.
“Sex and the City2” comes after a massively successful “Sex and the City: The Movie” which gave fans a chance to see what their four favorite ladies had been up to since the HBO series ended.
And all of the usual suspects will return in the new flick, scheduled to hit theaters nationwide on May 28th, 2010.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| S.S. Sarah Jessica Parker Gets Her Vein On | Added 15 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
You know you’ve officially entered the realm of “disgusting old crone” when you have more visible veins than Slim Goodbody. All Sarah Jessica Parker’s missing in these pictures is a bubbling cauldron and a cupboard full of eye of newt.
Leaving her West Village apartment this afternoon:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker: West Village Vixen | Added 15 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Getting an early start to the day, Sarah Jessica Parker was spotted leaving her West Village apartment on Thursday (August 20).
Wearing a cute little black dress and shades, the “Sex and the City” star strutted her stuff as she met up with a friend at Moran’s.
Meanwhile, rumors of a possible split between SJP and hubby Matthew Broderick have been stirring up after the pair canceled their annual trip to Ireland – with Parker then being spotted dining out with her “Two Week’s Notice” co-star Hugh Grant just last night.
Nonetheless, sources close to the couple deny the claim, saying the trip to their European cottage was nixed following the recent addition of two children to the family.
“Everyone here is disappointed but we understand,” a local told Ireland’s Sunday World. “She and her husband Matthew have been coming here for the past six or seven years and they have got to know quite a few people in the locality.”
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker and Hugh Grant: Dinner Mates | Added 15 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Out for a delicious dinner, Sarah Jessica Parker and Hugh Grant were spotted eating at the Minetta Tavern in New York City last night (August 19).
The “Sex and the City” actress and her “Two Weeks’ Notice” pal looked to be enjoying each other’s company as the paparazzi snapped up pics.
SJP and Grant just recently wrapped filming a new movie called “Did You Hear About The Morgans?” during which they had to share their screen time with a grizzly bear named Bart.
Joking about the hairy costar, Hugh told press, “He wouldn’t come out of his trailer until he had 12 cans of iced tea and had been hosed down from head to foot. And then the crew had to applaud and say, ‘Yay, Bart, you’re so great.’ Sarah Jessica and I got jealous, so the crew had to do that for us as well. If the bear was doing particularly well, its trainer would wrestle him on the floor in this crazy, wrestley cuddle. So I made [director] Marc [Lawrence] do that to me if I ever did a scene well.”
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker's Perfume Problems | Added 15 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker may be in a smelly situation – as Universal Perfumes and Cosmetics of Farmingdale, a company in Long Island, is facing a lawsuit for trademark infringement by the makers of Parker’s perfumes.
The perfume manufacturer, Coty, who has the trademark, claims the company sent cease-and-desist letters to Universal Perfumes and received no response.
Universal Perfumes Vice President Danim Islam has no comment on the filed suit and says, “We’re not even aware of this case.”
The “Sex and the City” star put out her fragrance “Lovely” in 2005, and have had five other fragrances under her name since.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker are living apart | Added 15 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Broderick may have had enough of Sarah Jessica Parker or vice versa. Nine MSN says they’re living apart despite only recently bringing home newborn twins. Sarah Parker is rumored to be moving out of their New York home and into a nine-bedroom home she bought in Brooklyn.
?It would be a surprising decision to make so soon after the arrival of their twins,” a source was quoted as saying by Hollyscoop.
“Having the babies born healthy and happy was a dream come true, so it?s strange that they might have to spend some time apart at this stage.
?No one can quite believe it, but it?s clear they?re making the right decision for all the right reasons.?
Thus ends this saga of equine love. That guy who wanted to marry his dog had high hopes for these two. This has set inter-species relationships back a few years.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker Living Apart | Added 15 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
After 12 years of marriage and three children together, Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker have gone their separate ways. Nine MSN says
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are reportedly living in separate houses - right after they welcomed twin babies into their family via a surrogate.
SJP is rumoured to be the one moving out of their New York pad, after reportedly purchasing a nine-bedroom home in Brooklyn.
Now I know why Prince Charming is never a closeted gay and the damsel in distress is a never an American Saddlebred]. It just doesn’t work in classic fairytales!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick show off their twins | Added 15 years ago | Source: Seriously OMG WTF |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are celebrating the one week birthday of their twin girls, Marion Loretta Elwell and Tabitha Hodge, by releasing a picture of them to AP. How awwwdorable is James Wilkie looking over at his baby sister! What a great family picture! Good for them for not selling their baby pictures like other celebrities!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.508.973 Photos Online+ 5.904 past week 1.993 Users Online | | |
| | | | | | We Salute Paris Hilton
Photos of Paris Hilton will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in 4 days | | |
| | | |
|