 | |  |  | Sarah Jessica Parker News & Gossip
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker in Prabal Gurung in London: lovely or tacky? | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker is in London now to promote I Don?t Know How She Does It. It?s a one-woman promotional tour for some reason, which is weird because the film is an ensemble (although SJP does have the lead role). SJP was just in Moscow earlier this week for a photo call and premiere, and now London is getting the same treatment. These photos - the ones with SJP in the black and yellow dress - are from the IDKHSDI photo call. I HATE the dress, which I haven?t gotten an ID on yet. The dress looks really cheap and tacky, and it?s not flattering on SJP at all. But! I do think her hair and makeup look really good here. The light even flatters her crazy, veiny arms. UPDATE: The dress is Prabal Gurung. Still hate it.
By the way, did you hear about SJP?s Russian bodyguard who tried to kiss her? First, SJP signed his furry chest, and then she posed for photos with him, and then he tried to kiss her and she screamed. There?s video!
So crazy. At least it was outside, with witnesses. It could have been a lot worse.
Here are some photos of SJP just out and about in London, probably on her way to do some interviews. I really like this business look on her, and I would love to see her dress like this on red carpets. The jacket is Chanel, the bag is Louis Vuitton. That pale yellow is flattering on her.
Photos courtesy of Fame and WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker's photo call in London: lovely or tacky' | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker is in London now to promote I Don?t Know How She Does It. It?s a one-woman promotional tour for some reason, which is weird because the film is an ensemble (although SJP does have the lead role). SJP was just in Moscow earlier this week for a photo call and premiere, and now London is getting the same treatment. These photos - the ones with SJP in the black and yellow dress - are from the IDKHSDI photo call. I HATE the dress, which I haven?t gotten an ID on yet. The dress looks really cheap and tacky, and it?s not flattering on SJP at all. But! I do think her hair and makeup look really good here. The light even flatters her crazy, veiny arms.
By the way, did you hear about SJP?s Russian bodyguard who tried to kiss her? First, SJP signed his furry chest, and then she posed for photos with him, and then he tried to kiss her and she screamed. There?s video!
So crazy. At least it was outside, with witnesses. It could have been a lot worse.
Here are some photos of SJP just out and about in London, probably on her way to do some interviews. I really like this business look on her, and I would love to see her dress like this on red carpets. The jacket is Chanel, the bag is Louis Vuitton. That pale yellow is flattering on her.
Photos courtesy of Fame and WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker in Prabal Gurung: hideous or quirky-cute? | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker and her crazy arms are still in Moscow, promoting I Don?t Know How She Does It. I just saw a new commercial for the film which I found very interesting. In previous trailers and commercials for it, SJP was featured heavily, to ensure that viewers knew that SJP had a starring role and that the film was probably just like Sex and the City. I guess some marketing genius finally figured out that the SJP-centric plan was probably doing more harm than good, and new commercials make the film seem ensemble-heavy, with more air time for Christina Hendricks, Seth Meyers, Pierce Brosnan and Greg Kinnear.
Anyway, SJP did the Moscow photo call for the film in this totally odd Prabal Gurung lace print dress from the Fall 2011 collection. I really, really dislike the fabric and the pattern, but I?ll give SJP credit for a few things - the dress is cut beautifully, it looks good on her figure, and her hair looks pretty good. Yesterday, SJP wore that weird, caped, orange-red gown that I was also pretty meh on.
Any thoughts as to why IDKHSDI?s promotion has begun in Moscow of all places? There hasn?t been an American premiere or a European premiere. I wonder what?s up with that? The film doesn?t look very good (to me), but I suspect it will have a decent box office. Here?s the trailer and the poster for the film again:
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker in Giambattista Valli: pretty or fug? | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
These are new photos of Sarah Jessica Parker at the Moscow premiere of I Don?t Know How She Does It. SJP is wearing Giambattista Valli - which is okay. I don?t really think it?s her color, but I like the dress a lot. It would have looked great on SJP in a blue or purple, not this orange-red. Also: I dislike her hair here - she looks so much better with soft hair, and I have no idea why she scrapes everything back like this. And the cape is a bit much, but I think I know the reason for it, which I will get to in a moment. First, SJP wants us to know that all of those rumors about a third Sex and the City film are just that - rumors. Nothing more:
Sarah Jessica Parker may have recently said there?s more of the story to tell for ?Sex and The City,? but as of right now, there are no plans to share that vision wide with a third big screen installment.
?I don?t know of a movie in the imminent, or near, or even distant future,? Sarah Jessica Parker told Access Hollywood on Thursday in New York City as she promoted her upcoming box office feature, ?I Don?t Know How She Does It.?
Sarah Jessica said she and the ?SATC? team would know when the time is right.
?I?ve always trusted that we?ve had a sense of when that timing, what is the right timing for a movie,? she said.
?Honestly, I?m not being cagey,? she continued. ?There is no discussion currently of a ?Sex and The City 3. Do I hold it out in my future in some way as a possibility? Of course.?
As for when it might take shape, Sarah Jessica had no answers, but she does know when it won?t happen.
?I don?t see it within the next year or so,? she said.
[From Access Hollywood]
So, we can all breathe a sigh of relief on that one. Hopefully, nothing will happen and we?ll be spared another cat-faced monstrosity masquerading as feminism.
Which brings me back to SJP and why she?s wearing a cape. A few days ago, paparazzi got shots of SJP in a sleeveless top, and HER ARMS. The photos are below, but just beware: you cannot un-see this. Whatever is happening with her arms is much, much worse than Madonna. And Angelina. And whoever else you?re thinking of. Now, I?m not saying every woman over a certain age should cover her arms - I?m seriously NOT saying that. I?m just saying that for SJP, she might think about wearing sleeves more consistently. And putting on a little weight too.
Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker: 'I?m less Pollyanna now. That's probably healthy.' | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker is still engaging in wall-to-wall promotion for her upcoming movie, I Don’t Know How She Does It, which (as Kaiser points out) looks exactly like “SATC” only she’s Miranda. So while she’s not busy actively refusing to split the atom of her marriage to Matthew Broderick, SJP is doing more interviews about what it was like to grow up poor and how wonderful it is to be rich now. Okay, she doesn’t actually talk about how great it is to a Salma Hayek degree or anything, but SJP clearly does reside within a wealth bubble despite her humble upbringing. Still, SJP insists that she’s not all about the money because, as she puts it, the goal was always to be a “great actor” instead of thinking about the cash, which is just an incidental benefit, right? You be the judge:
On Her Acting Philosophy: “I didn’t plot a future like this, although I know some people do. When Matthew and I started working, all we knew is that we wanted to be great actors. I don’t think I ever thought about money or that people would know my name.” Her face electric with enthusiasm, she adds, “I loooove the work!”
On Growing Up Poor: Money was tight. “We were very aware of it,” says [SJP's Brother]. “We saw the guy come to turn off the electricity, and my mother had to convince him not to because of the children.” As Parker says, marveling at her own financial transformation, “When I was a little girl getting free lunches in Cincinnati, could I imagine being on a list in Forbes magazine?”
On SJP’s Real-World Suggestions On Set: “She’s so personable and friendly, a very solicitous kind of person,” says Doug McGrath, the director of I Don’t Know How She Does It, adding that Parker offered real-world suggestions on the set, like “most mothers would hold on to a stroller with both hands.” The actress says she relates to the character she plays in her new film, especially the “coordination on the level of a military operation” required to run both career and family.
On Juggling Family & Work: “We’ve had two occasions recently where both Matthew and I were working, and it was so hard on the kids,” Parker says. “Especially James Wilkie, because he can really articulate how he feels about our absence. On the other hand, there are big chunks of time when we’re home a lot more than conventionally working parents. So you hope to make up for it.” She and Broderick employ babysitters, but they don’t have live-in help. “We love closing the door and having the only people in the house be our three children and us. It’s such a good feeling to know that we?re competent and capable and that it’s private,” she says. A typical evening at their Greenwich Village townhouse goes like this: “I give the girls their bath every night. Matthew cooks amazing things-last Saturday, pasta amatriciana and broccoli rabe, plus fennel sausage that he made. He does complex things, and I make simple things for the children.”
On How SJP & Broderick Have Changed Each Other: Parker laughs, ticking off a disparate list of things Broderick has helped her appreciate: baseball, Parmesan cheese, color (”Matthew’s mother was a painter, and he taught me to love colors and break all the rules”). She also says that “he’s given me a little cynicism,” noting that she used to take the world at face value but that her husband is more skeptical. “I’m less Pollyanna now. That’s probably healthy.”
On Refusing To Do Nudity: “When I did Sex and the City, I told Darren [series creator Darren Star], ‘I’m just not comfortable with it. It’s not some righteous thing, I’m thrilled if other people do it.’ He said, ‘Great, no problem.’ And on another movie, it came up and I said no and they said fine. There might have been [a role] I lost because of it, but I don’t think so-I think people would have said, ‘Would you reconsider?’ Now I’m so old, I think I should have done it when I was young.”
[From Parade]
Well, I can heartily agree with SJP that on-screen nudity is definitely not for her, and I promise that my opinion has nothing to do with her age or her looks otherwise. She’s just so skinny that, no, I really don’t have any desire to see her naked. However, I do find the “Pollyanna” remark to be quite strange, but perhaps it’s just a word that she uses a lot. In her August Vogue profile, SJP also made a “Pollyanna” reference about borrowing expensive clothes by saying, “Not to sound too Pollyanna about it…” Yet now, she’s claiming to be not-so-Pollyannaish. What does it all mean? Also that bit about how most mothers use both hands to push strollers seems rather tedious at best. Did the filmmakers really need to be told this information? Who knows. Anyway, I hate to nitpick (really), but most mothers also wouldn’t leave their infant twin daughters behind while they jetted off to Europe for a few months to film Sex and the City 2. Just saying.
Here’s SJP looking like a clothes hanger on the New York City set of I Don’t Know How She Does It. Matthew might very well be an “amazing” cook, but I doubt that his wife eats hardly any of that wonderful food.
Photos courtesy of Fame
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker: Matthew & I don't 'split the atom of our marriage' | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, CB covered the first excerpts from Sarah Jessica Parker?s Marie Claire cover piece for September. In a funny twist, especially considering CB is the one who usually gives SJP the benefit of the doubt much more than me, CB seemed as annoyed with SJP as I usually am. The thing about Sarah Jessica is that you want to like her, and you might actually have some residual warmth for her after all of those years of watching Carrie Bradshaw, and then she opens her mouth and ruins it. SJP?s interviews are the worst. She just tries too hard to project an image of a working mother who is all at once the best, most precious mother in the world as well as the one of the world?s busiest actresses and multi-taskers. It?s all a bit much. Anyway, in the Marie Claire interview, SJP gets all Goopy about her marriage:
With a hectic work schedule, three young children and a fourteen year marriage to nurture, Sarah Jessica Parker has a lot on her plate. The 46-year-old Sex And The City star has revealed that she has a fairly unusual way of dealing with all the pressures that life throws at her and her husband, actor Matthew Broderick. They chose not to discuss their marriage.
‘We don’t talk about our marriage a lot, which is probably wise,’ she admitted to Marie Claire magazine in their September issue. ‘There are so many other things in our lives that take precedence over the splitting of the atom of our marriage.’
Sarah and Ferris Bueller star Matthew, 49, married in May 1997 and have three children together - James Wilke, 8, and two-year-old twins Tabitha and Marion.
The I Don’t Know How She Does It star also discussed how she balances life with her family and work.
‘I love, love, love being an actor,’ she says.
‘It’s still the hardest and scariest thing I do, outside of parenting. But I’ve always been someone who likes a busy day. I love the opportunities, and if I can manage my time and the children are okay and we’re okay, it’s hard to say no?’
[From The Mail]
?Splitting of the atom of our marriage???? Girl. I feel like this is SJP?s way of saying that Matthew is never around and when he is, he doesn?t even want to speak to her. I bet he doesn?t want to split the atom of child-rearing. I bet he doesn?t want to split the atom of fidelity. I bet he doesn?t want to split the atom of two careers. And I bet SJP doesn?t want to split the atom of divorce. What is with these women who stay in these horrible marriages?
Photos courtesy of WENN, Marie Claire.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker defends her street cred: I work hard not to trade on my celebrity | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here we go again with Sarah Jessica Parker declaring how she’s so normal and multi-tasking. This seems to be her preferred topic of conversation, and in case you think I’m exaggerating you can read all about it in these interviews. Parker is on the cover of Marie Claire this September, and I guess she’s promoting I Don’t Know How She Does It with Pierce Brosnan, which is out on September 16 in the US.
In the interview, Parker takes offense at a NY Post story that claimed that she tried to ditch jury duty and called it “character assassination.” She also said that she works hard not to trade on her image or take favors because she’s famous.
On a Page Six item claiming she complained about being called for jury duty: “For Page Six to be so cavalier - I was so outraged by the character assassination! I have served so many times, I was asked to come speak at Jury Appreciation Day! I expect I should be more calloused by now, but I am so sensitive about not ever living up to anybody’s worst idea about an actor who is well-known.”
On not wanting to be a celebrity: “I never wanted to be a celebrity; I never wanted to be famous. And in my daily life, I work really hard to not trade on it in any way. I am so desperately worried about anybody saying, ‘She cut in line’ or ‘She took our table’ or She got out of jury duty’ or ‘She doesn’t do her own grocery shopping.’ The things that bother me are counter to who I am and the way I live. It’s not like it’s hard to be decent and respectful and well-behaved. I do wait in line, and I do take the subway, and I do do my own grocery shopping, and I do take the kids to school.”
[From Marie Claire]
Parker is part of the rarefied set in New York, where people like Linda Evangelista claim they need $48k a month in child support so they never have to be alone with their kids. To her it is laudable to have nannies that don’t stay overnight and to walk her child to school when it’s not like she has to be somewhere for eight hours that day. She wants some credit for that because her friends aren’t doing it and it’s going above and beyond what’s expected of parents in that world of the obscenely rich. It sounds insincere to the rest of us who do it on our own and hold down regular jobs, though. It only serves to reveal how disconnected Parker is from the people she supposedly strives to emulate. It’s like she wants credit for doing normal things, because that makes her so different and somehow more real.
Also isn’t that cover kind of fug?
Photos thanks to Marie Claire
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker and Her Twins in Vogue | | Added 12 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
46-year-old Sarah Jessica Parker poses with her two-year-old twin daughters Marion and Tabitha, son James Wilkie, and even husband Matthew Broderick in a Mario Testino photo shoot for next month’s Vogue magazine. Just to be clear, Sarah Jessica’s the one on the left in the above photo, not the one drinking out of the bowl the little girl is holding on the right. You’d think the editors at Vogue would know better than to put a horse in the same shot.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker: 'We don't have any live-in help, we?re hands-on parents' | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, I covered the first excerpts from Sarah Jessica Parker?s Vogue cover profile for the August issue. The problem I have with SJP is that the more she talks, the more I dislike her. If she keeps quiet, and I?m just looking at photos of her, I usually have affection for her. In this case, the photo shoot is pissing me off as much as the interview. Vogue and other fashion magazines have the nasty little habit of using small children in their photo shoots. It?s not a simple matter of photographing kids - it?s that the kids are often used as ?props? or ?accessories? in the fashion shoot. Such it is with this SJP shoot - I?m guessing that Testino shot SJP in her home, with her kids and her husband, but that Anna Wintour didn?t just want ?candid?-type photos of a realistic family. Instead, SJP is all dolled up to the nines, standing amongst the ?prop? messy house, messy babies, etc. Also: considering that SJP is promoting a film about ?the myth? of a woman having it all, it seems hypocritical that the photo shoot merely reinforces the myth. You can read the whole Vogue piece here, and here are some additional highlights that I haven?t covered already:
On the paparazzi, fame and why she?ll never move away from NYC: The paparazzi may stalk her every single time she walks James Wilkie to school or takes the girls out??They follow every move I make until I?m back inside the house??but she refuses to withdraw. ?You do start to understand the behind-the-gate mentality, the getting in the car in your driveway,? she says as she pours herself tea, ?but I can?t imagine living in seclusion. We flirted with it. We went outside the city and troubled all these Realtors and stood in these homes and fantasized, and then I kept picturing nine o?clock at night and??she breaks into mime, drumming her fingers on her crossed knees and staring into the middle distance. ?The beautiful thing about New York is, you have to expose yourself to other people the minute you step outside the door. There is no choice. And I love that.? Plus, of course, there?s the cultural life. Broderick, a born-and-bred New Yorker, works mostly on Broadway. Next spring he will star in Nice Work if You Can Get It, directed by Kathleen Marshall. As for Parker, ?If I didn?t have kids,? she says, ?I would be at the theater or the ballet every single night of my life.?
Borrowing beautiful clothes, like vintage McQueen: ?I love the opportunity to wear something really special and go to a wonderful event at some great cultural institution,? she says. ?Not to sound too Pollyanna about it, but I really didn?t imagine when I was a little girl that I would be there to see it all myself.?
On-Set, first week jitters and Pierce Brosnan: ?I lose my appetite,? she says. ?By Wednesday of the first week on I Don?t Know How She Does It, I was sobbing, I was apologizing. I was feeling so awful and ashamed, like I had let the director down. If only they would not tell me when the camera was running, I would be OK. I?m like that two weeks into every movie. But the beauty of nerves is that you can always find a comrade in it. When Pierce came??Pierce Brosnan plays her colleague and potential romantic interest??he was a nervous wreck! Of course, by then I was really relaxed, but I was so comforted by it.? Even James Bond gets the jitters.
The end of her own Sex & the City experience: Parker knew it was time to move on. The 20-hour days on set, during which she also worked as producer, were no longer viable once she became a mother. ?It wasn?t hard when I didn?t have children,? she says. ?I loved it. But I ultimately chose to stop doing the television series because I felt like it required, and deserved, a lot of time when I really wanted to be a parent.? Also, she says, circumstances had changed. ?It was such a different time in the city, culturally, socially, economically . . . the kind of liberty that Carrie Bradshaw had. You couldn?t start off with a story like that today.?
Her crazy schedule: ?It?s a pretty simple setup,? she says of the domestic situation she shares with her husband, Matthew Broderick. There?s a nanny for their toddler twins, Loretta and Tabitha, and someone else to help with the logistics of eight-year-old James Wilkie?s schedule. ?We don?t have any live-in help. We?re pretty hands-on parents. That?s something that?s important to both of us, and we don?t shirk it, because what?s the point in having a family if you?re not going to really participate in it, you know?? For now, she schedules her meetings after walking James Wilkie to school but tries to be home after the twins? afternoon nap. ?I feel like if I?m only missing up until 3:30, when they wake up, that?s not so awful.? She doesn?t use a cell phone, except in emergencies; for her it?s e-mail or texts, ?otherwise it?s one more thing I?m trying to keep up with.?
The twins: After her much-publicized struggles with fertility, Parker had her daughters via a surrogate, and, in their white sandals, slightly outgrown smock dresses, and hair ribbons, they couldn?t be more adorable. Loretta is bigger and fairer than Tabitha, who is tiny and olive-skinned, with enormous brown eyes. ?Tabitha?s very, very outgoing, but physically she?s very shy,? says Parker. ?She shakes in elevators; it?s very sweet, like Bambi. And then Loretta is pale, like my husband, with piercing blue eyes. But she?s physically bold.? Watching them, she marvels at how they could be so different and yet so recognizably related. ?I think it?s funny how much she looks like my husband,? she says of Tabitha. ?Except then I look at Loretta and she has my husband?s mouth and sort of sad eyes, you know the kind that go down? The Broderick eyes. They both really look like him.?
Being an older parent: ?I guess I think there are things about it that I hope have made me a better mother,? she says. ?I?ve had a lot of opportunities to do the things that I wanted to do, like sleep. I have slept till 11:00 for a lot of years. Honestly, the only thing that I?m concerned about is the energy: I hope I can maintain the energy. I think about all the years I?ve spent parenting James Wilkie and everything I put into it, and there are two of them.?
[From Vogue]
At the end of the day, I think I?m consistently put off by SJP because she?s just one of those women who are self-perpetuating hurricanes of multi-tasking, and I just don?t see how she finds the time to do any of it, or understand WHY she feels the need to wear so many hats when she could just sit down, calm down and focus on one thing at a time, which is my general approach to life (?Slow and steady wins the race? is one of my favorite sayings). I don?t even have kids, and some days I?m so busy that I skip taking a shower. So how does SJP do it? I have no idea. THAT should be the point of the film and the press for the film - that SJP is just a woman on the verge, like me and like so many of us. But that?s not SJP?s message, at least that?s not the way I?m reading it. Her message seems to be: ?See a movie where I play a woman who juggles everything in her life, often unsuccessfully, but in real life I have it all and then some.? It?s off-putting.
Photos courtesy of Testino/Vogue, slideshow here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sarah Jessica Parker covers Vogue: 'I?m a bitter-ender' | | Added 12 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Sarah Jessica Parker at last night?s Harry Potter premiere. SJP brought her husband, Matthew Broderick, who looks comically, cartoonishly depressed, and her son James, who is a cutie. SJP wore this Oscar de la Renta Resort 2012 dress that I? well, I don?t hate it. I don?t really love it, either. It looks like a decent summery dress, but I don?t get why SJP paired it with a structured blazer. It?s not her worst red carpet appearance, though.
Meanwhile, SJP is the cover girl for the August issue of Vogue, ?The Age Issue?, likely to promote her new film, I Don?t Know How She Does It (which looks like it sucks). Here are some highlights from the Vogue interview, courtesy of Wonderwall:
SJP on her juggling: Between raising three children, working for Halston and keeping a healthy onscreen career, the actress says her life these days is “like a ship avoiding icebergs.”
On the end of “Sex and the City”: “I loved it. But ultimately chose to stop doing the television series because I felt like it required, and deserved, a lot of time when I really wanted to be a parent.”
On starting new jobs: “I lose my appetite. By Wednesday of the first week on ‘I Don’t Know How She Does It,’ I was feeling so awful and ashamed, like I had let the director down.”
On being an older mother: “There are things about it that I hope have made me a better mother. I’ve had a lot of opportunities to do the things that I wanted to do, like sleep.”
On acting in her 40s: “I assumed that at this point in my life I would be feeling frustrated, left behind, or marginalized, playing parts I was reluctant to. But I’ve been so busy, I’m not sure that I see this fallow period yet.”
On comparing herself to Carrie Bradshaw: “Bradshaw’s life is nothing, nothing like mine. I loved playing her, and it changed my life in lots of wonderful ways, but I’m not a crazy shoe lady. I don’t think about fashion all day long, although I have a great respect for the industry.”
On her work ethic: “It’s kind of all I’ve known. I’m a bitter-ender. It’s potentially my fatal flaw that I do not give up on something. I will not rest. I work and work and work until I can no longer and someone has to remove me from the premises.”
[From Wonderwall/Vogue]
I?m prepared to like Sarah Jessica Parker until she starts in about her career choices, all of the stuff she?s signed on to do, and then talks about how she?s the super-focused parent. I absolutely HATED her in her last Vogue interview, last year, when she kept pushing the issue of how involved she was as a parent - while she sat in London, after not seeing her newborn twin girls for two months while she traveled to make Sex & the City 2. She just bugs.
Photos courtesy of WENN & Wonderwall/Vogue/Testino.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.317.707
Photos Online+ 3.981 past week
1.425
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Rihanna
Photos of Rihanna will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
3 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
