| | |  | Angelina Jolie News & Gossip
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie on her faith: 'There's something greater than all of us' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Angelina Jolie has never been very religious. She?s never made public statements about her faith or lack thereof, and I always got the feeling that she approached religion in the same way she approaches party politics: make some general statements about the subject at hand, but never give away how you really feel. She just plays that stuff close to the vest. We still, to this day, have no idea if she identifies as Democratic or Republican. We don?t know who she voted for in the last presidential election. And we don?t know when she last went to church. But? meeting (and falling in love with) Louis Zamperini changed her. It was obvious in Unbroken that Jolie was drawn to the religious/spiritual aspects of Zamperini?s story, and now she?s even comfortable saying (in so many words) that she believes there is a God.
Angelina Jolie credits the late Louis Zamperini with teaching her to embrace spirituality. When PEOPLE asked the mother of six what she learned from Zamperini, the World War II hero who’s the inspiration for her film Unbroken, she had an answer ready.
“When there is an obstacle, you have to rise to the challenge, not be overwhelmed by it,” she replied. “And we’re not alone in the world.”
Jolie added: “I don’t know if there’s a name for that ? religion or faith ? just that there’s something greater than all of us, and it’s uniting and beautiful.”
Zamperini became close friends with Jolie while they worked on the film together.
“Angelina is a human dynamo,” said the war hero, who was 97 when he died earlier this year.
“It is a loss impossible to describe,” Jolie said in a statement at the time of his death. “We are all so grateful for how enriched our lives are for having known him. We will miss him terribly.”
Unbroken exceeded box office expectations in its first weekend of release, earning $46.05 million over four days.
[From People]
How lovely for Saint Jolie to minister to her faithful. Blessed be the Jolie!!! No, I understand what she?s saying. Zamperini made her think about faith and the endurance of the human spirit in ways she never had before. She sounds more like a deist?
Our Lady of Sack Dresses (the holiest of garments) was also out and about in LA on Monday ? go here to see the photos. She didn?t look pox-y, which is good. Hopefully, her pox was pretty mild and she?s doing a lot better now.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Does Angelina Jolie deserve credit for the box office success of 'Unbroken?' | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As we discussed last Friday, Angelina Jolie?s Unbroken is performing very well at the box office. Unbroken wasn?t the #1 film at the long holiday weekend box office (#1 was The Hobbit), but it performed better than expected, and came in at a respectable #2 with about $47.6 million over four days. So how did Angelina manage to do it? Variety had a good story analyzing why so many holiday audiences might have been drawn to Unbroken ? basically, the film is a religious-audience-friendly vehicle about faith, redemption, hope and the human spirit. Plus, bonus points because the story is true? and a well-known story amongst Evangelical audiences. Some key points from the Variety piece:
?At this time of year stories about faith and how strong the human spirit is do huge numbers,? said Jeff Bock, an analyst with Exhibitor Relations. Bock compares ?Unbroken? to ?The Blind Side,? which also drew crowds in the big cities and Middle America by emphasizing uplift. ?Unbroken? debuted to $31.7 million over the weekend and has made $47.3 million since opening on Christmas, stunning box office prognosticators who had expected it to make $10 million less than it collected. The oft-repeated mantra in trailers and other promotional materials, ?If you can take it, you can make it,? gave the film a quasi-religious, redemptive aura that made it seem seasonally appropriate.
?It?s an inspirational film that played to all the quadrants,? said Nikki Rocco, Universal?s distribution chief. ?The studio did an incredible marketing job telling the story of this hero.?
But ?The Blind Side? had Sandra Bullock, while ?Unbroken? is grounded by newcomer Jack O?Connell. That left Jolie to do the heavy lifting when it came to promoting the picture on ?Today? and on the cover of magazines such as Variety. After ?Maleficent? became the third biggest film of the year on a global basis, ?Unbroken?s? success helps solidify her status as one of the industry?s preeminent movie stars ? something that had been questioned given her four-year absence from screens.
?Angeline Jolie, along with Louis Zamperini, is the biggest star of the movie,? said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst with Rentrak. ?Her name on the film raised awareness higher than it otherwise would have been.?
[From Variety]
I heard that several religious leaders in America endorsed Unbroken as well ? likely because of Zamperini?s close affiliation with Billy Graham ? and it feels like the film was well-marketed to cross-generational adults. When I went to see it on a Sunday afternoon, I saw a lot of young adults there with their moms, dads, grandmas and grandpas. Box office prognosticators are now revising their previous low-ball predictions and saying that Unbroken could easily break $100 million during its theatrical run. As for what I thought about it?
SPOILERS FOR UNBROKEN?.
I liked the film but I didn?t love it. I don?t really blame Angelina for that, and not just because I?m a Brangeloonie. I think there were script issues, which is weird because I would have thought that Joel and Ethan Coen (both of whom have screenwriter credits) could have punched up the last hour significantly.
I?ve seen a lot of critics complain about the torture, and yes, it was hard to watch. It was difficult to read in Laura Hillenbrand?s book as well, but Hillenbrand managed to break up the torture scenes with interesting details about life in a POW camp. Hillenbrand also took pains to emphasize that some Japanese guards actually looked out for the POWs, and that The Bird was loathed/disrespected by many of his coworkers. All of that was missing from the film. You could try to explain it with ?Angelina just couldn?t find a way to work that stuff in without bloating the run time,? but honestly? I could have cut 15 to 20 minutes out of the last hour, easily, and it still would have been the same film? with the same torture problem. Why not use those 15 minutes to show different aspects of the camp and even bulk up Garrett Hedlund?s character, who was one of my favorite characters in the book?
I also think the film short-changed some of the funnier, cooler moments from the book. I personally could not believe that Louis?s handshake with Adolf Hitler was left out. I would have loved to spend more time with Louis in Hawaii, build more about his friendships within his crew. I didn?t mind that the film didn?t include Gaga the duck though ? Angelina explained to Entertainment Weekly why they couldn?t do the Gaga scenes and I don?t think the film is poorer for it. And this really bugged me, but maybe I?m off my rocker: were those the correct Japanese flags? If you?re a WWII history expert, please tell me. Because I feel pretty confident that the flags being flown at the POW camp ? a camp operated by the Japanese military during wartime! ? should have been this one, the Rising Sun flag.
Now that I?ve bitched and moaned about everything, let me just say: I actually do think it?s a good movie and I was impressed with Angelina?s direction at several moments, especially in aerial scenes in the bomber and in the pre-devastation of Tokyo. Jack O?Connell gave an incredible performance, as did Domhnall Gleeson and Garrett Hedlund. Miyavi played a good psycho, but I also understand why Miyavi has been left off of many Best Supporting Actor lists, and once again, that’s on the script. And I?m glad someone finally had the balls to make this movie, you know? It?s been sitting around various studios for decades and Angelina finally made it happen.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie talks Christmas plans, Hillary Clinton & military interventions | | Added 9 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Angelina Jolie has some new interviews out, and I have no idea if she did these weeks ago, before the pox on her house, or whether she has reporters coming to her home while she?s recovering from the chicken pox, or perhaps she?s giving phone interviews while she?s recovering. This NYDN piece suggests that the reporter was actually in the room with Jolie, so take that as Brangeloonie Proof of something. You can read the full NYDN piece here. Some highlights:
Filming By the Sea with Brad: ?It brought us closer? The last time we worked together, it was a lighter movie. So sharing something in a deep artistic way, it?s something I think is necessary for artistic couples. I hadn?t realized how good it would be for us.?
She & Brad yell at each other a lot in the movie: ?The scenes on ?By the Sea? were so tense that we let out (any stress) on camera. There?s really heavy fighting in it, so I think sometimes the crew felt like, ?Mom and Dad are having a fight!? ? because Brad and I are the producers too. Success or failure, it?s all on us. But it was all oddly freeing. We both wanted to do something as artists … and push each other. So we got this opportunity to go out there and play. I had missed being that free as an actor, and to do that depth of work, and what a pleasure it was to do it with Brad, because I really saw him as an actor, not just the man I loved. In the end, it was an amazing thing, because there?s no actor who wants to help me more, or push me more as an actress, or give me more as a director or writer than my husband, and there?s no man I want to see succeed more than him. We were so there for each other.?
Her Christmas plans: ?Our tradition is, well, being somewhat traditional,? Jolie reveals, even cozily referring to herself and Pitt as ?Mom and Dad? when detailing their household holiday. ?Dad is the main one to deal with the tree, Mom and the kids help decorate, and then we put all the kids to bed. And, as anybody who has a big family knows, [the gifts] take a really long time! You have to be very organized when you?re wrapping them and putting presents around the tree. And you have to make sure no one gets up and leaves before everyone else is done. It?s all a bit military! We?re constantly cleaning up the wrapping paper and getting coffee, like any other parent.?
Do the kids get crazy presents? ?We make a point not to spoil them, but there?s usually that one item they’ve been wanting for a long time that we?ve held back until Christmas. They?ve each got that big thing.?
On soldiers and war: ?Any time a soldier goes to war it should be supported, and they should be able to feel good about their service to their country, regardless of what the government?s choices are. But there are certain wars that I would be very hesitant about, wars that aren?t clear on the need for the soldiers on the ground and the tactics being used. It?s very difficult for soldiers today, because they?re not seeing the outcomes promised. We haven?t been able to focus on prevention of conflict, on political solutions. We owe them that, so we?re not putting them in harm?s way to solve problems that we are not solving politically.?
If Hillary Clinton becomes President, will Jolie serve as Secretary of State? ?Who could say anything but ?Yes??? she replies with a grin.
[From the NY Daily News]
Calm your jets, Angelina didn?t just endorse Hillary Clinton! If anything, when Angelina talks about finding political solutions to problems rather than military solutions, she sounds surprisingly dove-ish (while Hillary is certainly more hawkish). I?ve always thought Angelina?s foreign policy is probably more neoconservative, in that she thinks Western countries should be more involved (militarily, politically, economically) in so-called third world countries. She?s the polar opposite of the recent rise in neo-isolationism (which we?re going to hear more about if Rand Paul runs, which I think he will).
As for their Christmas plans? I feel like she?s making an effort to sound more traditional than they really are. I?ll buy that that they do the tree and that the kids don?t have mountains of presents and all that, but I bet they?re not roasting chestnuts on an open fire, etc.
There?s also a new interview with Women?s Weekly, an Australian mag. The quotes are blah ? go here to read. She says the same old stuff, nurturing their family, blah blah.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Critics Choice noms: Angelina Jolie & Ralph Fiennes finally got nominated, yay | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I didn?t cover this yesterday! In my defense? these are just the nominations for the Critics Choice Awards. It?s not like these are some big Oscar harbinger. And in my defense, they nominated EVERYBODY. Every single person who had a film out this year got a nomination. The Critics Choice people want everyone to come to their party. And finally, Angelina Jolie got nominated for Best Director. And Brad Pitt got nominated for Fury. And Bendy is in there, as is Eddie Redmayne, Julianne Moore, Rosamund Pike and? of course, Jennifer Aniston. You can see the full Critics Choice nominee list here. Some highlights:
BEST PICTURE
Birdman
Boyhood
Gone Girl
The Grand Budapest Hotel
The Imitation Game
Nightcrawler
Selma
The Theory of Everything
Unbroken
Whiplash
BEST ACTOR
Benedict Cumberbatch ? The Imitation Game
Ralph Fiennes ? The Grand Budapest Hotel
Jake Gyllenhaal ? Nightcrawler
Michael Keaton ? Birdman
David Oyelowo ? Selma
Eddie Redmayne ? The Theory of Everything
BEST ACTRESS
Jennifer Aniston ? Cake
Marion Cotillard ? Two Days, One Night
Felicity Jones ? The Theory of Everything
Julianne Moore ? Still Alice
Rosamund Pike ? Gone Girl
Reese Witherspoon ? Wild
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Josh Brolin ? Inherent Vice
Robert Duvall ? The Judge
Ethan Hawke ? Boyhood
Edward Norton ? Birdman
Mark Ruffalo ? Foxcatcher
J.K. Simmons ? Whiplash
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Patricia Arquette ? Boyhood
Jessica Chastain ? A Most Violent Year
Keira Knightley ? The Imitation Game
Emma Stone ? Birdman
Meryl Streep ? Into the Woods
Tilda Swinton ? Snowpiercer
BEST DIRECTOR
Wes Anderson ? The Grand Budapest Hotel
Ava DuVernay ? Selma
David Fincher ? Gone Girl
Alejandro G. Inarritu ? Birdman
Angelina Jolie ? Unbroken
Richard Linklater ? Boyhood
BEST ACTOR IN AN ACTION MOVIE
Bradley Cooper ? American Sniper
Tom Cruise ? Edge of Tomorrow
Chris Evans ? Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Brad Pitt ? Fury
Chris Pratt ? Guardians of the Galaxy
BEST ACTRESS IN AN ACTION MOVIE
Emily Blunt ? Edge of Tomorrow
Scarlett Johansson ? Lucy
Jennifer Lawrence ? The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1
Zoe Saldana ? Guardians of the Galaxy
Shailene Woodley ? Divergent
[From Deadline]
There are also a bunch of comedic performance nominees, but you get the idea. I love that Ralph Fiennes is finally getting some recognition for his crazy-weird performance in The Grand Budapest Hotel, because whoever thought of putting Ralph in a Wes Anderson film is a GD genius. As for everything else? sigh. Is it weird that I still think Best Director and Best Picture are crazy-competitive this year? Boyhood has won a lot of the critics? awards, but I think Birdman is a contender. And Selma is picking up major steam too. And seriously, who is going to win Best Actor? A lot of people think Keaton has it locked up, but I think he?s far from a sure thing. Last thing: YES Tilda Swinton FOR EVERYTHING.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | 2015 Golden Globes film noms: Angelina Jolie got majorly snubbed! | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
HOLY CRAP. Angelina Jolie got completely shut out of the Golden Globes. Who did she piss off? My God. That?s one of the biggest stories coming out of this morning?s Golden Globes nominations, which? just FYI, were disorganized as hell. If you?re going to split up the announcement, make one part TV and one part film. It?s not that difficult. Anyway, Jolie got shut out in a major way. No nominations for Unbroken. No nomination for Maleficent. Nothing. That?s really rough. And to cap off a horrible week for Jolie, Jennifer Aniston got another major nomination for CAKE. Here are the film nominations:
Best Motion Picture, Drama
Boyhood
Foxcatcher
The Imitation Game
Selma
The Theory of Everything
Best Comedy or Musical
Birdman
The Grand Budapest Hotel
Into the Woods
Pride
St. Vincent
Best Actor, Drama
Steve Carell, Foxcatcher
Benedict Cumberbatch, The Imitation Game
Jake Gyllenhaal, Nightcrawler
David Oyelowo, Selma
Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything
Best Actress, Drama
Jennifer Aniston, “Cake”
Felicity Jones, “Theory of Everything”
Julianne Moore, “Still Alice”
Rosamund Pike, “Gone Girl”
Reese Witherspoon, “Wild”
Best Actress, Comedy
Amy Adams, Big Eyes
Emily Blunt, Into the Woods
Helen Mirren, The Hundred-Foot Journey
Julianne Moore, Maps to the Stars
Quvenzhane Wallis, Annie
Best Actor, Musical or Comedy
Ralph Fiennes, “Grand Budapest Hotel”
Michael Keaton, “Birdman”
Bill Murray, “St. Vincent”
Joaquin Phoenix, “Inherent Vice”
Christoph Waltz, “Big Eyes”
Best Supporting Actress:
Patricia Arquette
Emma Stone
Meryl Streep
Keira Knightley
Jessica Chastain
Best Supporting Actor:
Robert Duvall (The Judge)
Ethan Hawke (Boyhood)
Edward Norton (Birdman)
Mark Ruffalo (Foxcatcher)
JK Simmons (Whiplash)
I?m actually super-excited for JK Simmons ? what a long, brilliant career he?s had and he?s so deserving of all of this recognition. I still don?t get why Robert Duvall is getting nominated though. Let?s see? still no Laura Dern, that?s interesting. I?m glad to see Keira, Emma Stone and Patricia Arquette on the list. I?m happy for Bendy and for Ruffalo. Still disappointed that there?s no Charming Potato. Huh. But a mixed bag ? I guarantee the biggest story of the day is going to be Jolie?s shut-out. Jesus, she?s having a terrible week.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie: 'Men get a little more sensitive when the daughter gets a tattoo' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Angelina Jolie at the Writer?s Guild Theater in Beverly Hills on Tuesday night. We had these photos yesterday, but I just didn?t get a chance to post them because of the giant clusterwhoops with the Sony hack story. It?s worth noting that this little black dress has a cape!! YAY! It?s like a casual cape, I think. A cape for every day. Anyway, more interviews and quotes from Angelina?s press machine. We?ll find out later today if Unbroken got any Golden Globe nominations! The way she?s hustling, I?ve got to think they nominate the film for something. Here?s Angelina talking about tattoos and her kids with the Radio Times:
Both Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt boast a collection of tattoos, but the director of upcoming WWII film Unbroken has revealed her new husband is against their kids sharing their love of body art. Of the couple’s children ? Vivienne and Knox, both six, Shiloh, eight, and their adopted siblings Zahara, nine, Pax, 11, and Maddox, 13 ? the actress has already turned down her eldest’s request, but now Zahara is getting inquisitive, a prospect that is horrifying her father.
“They’re already asking me about tattoos,” Jolie tells Radio Times. “How do I say ‘No’? It’s especially hard for dads and girls. For some reason men get a little more sensitive when the daughter gets a tattoo. And Brad thinks the girls can do no wrong. He’s mush in their hands!”
The couple also have strong opinions on whether or not their brood will follow their famous parents into the acting profession. “We’ve always said, if they want to act, we won’t let them only act, because it’s not enough. They’ll have to find a real job at the same time. But I’m hoping that when they see all the other things in the world, they’ll be inspired to be writers, politicians, activists. They’re very individual people. So I imagine they’re not going to follow their mum and dad.”
Jolie and Pitt’s next project is By the Sea, a film penned and directed by the actress who will star opposite her real-life husband. It will mark the first time the pair have acted on screen together since 2005?s Mr and Mrs Smith, when, as Pitt’s marriage to Jennifer Aniston fell apart, they fell in love.
“It feels a little daunting,” says Jolie. “We haven’t worked together for ten years. But all of the reasons why people say we should be scared of it, we feel that’s exactly why we have to do this ? because we can. So we’re going to go boldly.”
Is Jolie anxious about the prospect of being Pitt’s boss on set? “He’s a pretty strong actor! It’s going to be interesting. He’s a really great artist, such an interesting artist, and of course he’s the man I love, so I think we’re going to have a great time.”
[From Radio Times]
?For some reason men get a little more sensitive when the daughter gets a tattoo. And Brad thinks the girls can do no wrong.? Ha, that?s adorable. Angelina used to let Maddox have temporary tattoos, so that?s not a surprise to me that the kids are interested in tatts. I wonder which of the girls wants some ink? Shiloh, probably.
Also, in Angelina?s People Mag interview this week, she talks about her lack of technological awareness, and how she and Brad had to hire someone to do all of the online monitoring of the kids:
Jolie calls herself “old-school” (she doesn’t use social media), although she understands that her kids are growing up in a more technologically advanced era than she did. As such, she’s made using the internet as safe as possible. “For the kids, we have someone who monitors that,” she explained. “It’s so beyond what we understand. We wouldn’t even know what to look for. It’s a scary new world. I can only imagine the trouble I would’ve gotten into. I got in enough trouble. It just would have been very documented.”
[From E! News]
Yes, she would have gotten into SO much trouble if she had come up in the digital age and been more social media-savvy. She would have been posting kissy-selfies with Jenny Shimizu and she would have posted photos of a knife on a bed with the message ?#DateNight?. It would have been a glorious mess.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie is Cautious About Showing Her Children 'Unbroken' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Fans are eager to see her latest film ?Unbroken? when it hits theaters on Christmas Day, and Angelina Jolie is still thinking through whether all of her kids are ready for a viewing.
The ?Gone in 60 Seconds? starlet told E! News, "It's PG-13. My boys?one is 13, one is 11 but he's a mature 11?will see it, but I think I might actually show my younger children."
As for the younger ones, "I think they could handle it because they understand film. They know the difference of what is real and what isn't, because it's heavy for [kids] under 13. But they all knew Louis [Zamperini]. They want to see it because it's Louis."
Previously, Angelina gushed over her relationship with Zamparini- "He was like a father and grandfather to me. I hope [the movie] gave him peace to know that he could pass away knowing that his message was strong, knowing that his life was long and full."
As for her toughest critic, Jolie declared, "My Maddox, the oldest. It's his job. He's a teenager."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie's 'Unbroken' is 'racist' according to Japanese nationalists | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Angelina Jolie sat down for yet another interview over at NBC. You know why she?s doing so much NBC-
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie 'was not eating much' during the 'Unbroken' filming, says Miyavi | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Angelina Jolie at the Director?s Guild in NYC on Friday evening, which is where she screened Unbroken. I keep forgetting that Angelina isn?t just interested in an Oscar nomination for Best Director ? she?s probably interested in a DGA nomination too. Anyway, the photo agencies are making a big deal about how much time she spent mingling with her fans. She did the same thing outside The Daily Show Thursday night ? she even took a few minutes to comfort a Brangeloonie having a panic attack!
In these pics, Angelina spent time on the rope line, taking selfies with fans and posing with ?Radio Man,? the famous homeless man who does appearances in film and TV (he?s always on The Late Show, isn?t he?). You know what the selfies reminded me of? The famous ?Oscar selfie? from earlier this year, where Angelina actually WAVED to the camera, because she doesn?t get the whole selfie thing. Well, she?s a quick learner, isn?t she? As for her outfit here ? I?m sure she chose the coat because it?s a sack in coat-form, and she has consistently excellent taste in boots.
Meanwhile, Angelina?s Unbroken men did a Q&A with HuffPo ? you can see the video here. The most interesting reveal is that Miyavi said that Angelina was ?not eating much? during the production. He said: ?It was surprising how much she trusted me, all of us, on the set. She was so determined. I was also surprised how skinny she got. You know, she was not eating much. I felt so bad I was the only one who got fat during filming.? Oh no, Miyavi! The first rule of Brangelunacy is that one must never discuss Angie?s weight!! But it does sound like all of the guys are pretty much in love with her.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Angelina Jolie & Jon Stewart flirted with each other on last night's 'Daily Show' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Angelina Jolie outside of The Daily Show last evening. I always love it when she stops by TDS! She and Jon Stewart have known each other for more than 15 years ? they worked together on Playing By Heart, a weird ensemble film which actually isn?t terrible. And that was back when Stewart was just ?that cute actor who used to have an MTV show.? Angelina usually stops by TDS whenever she has a big project to promote, and last night?s stop was to promote Unbroken, obviously. Jon was super-sweet to her. Here?s the
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.505.508
Photos Online+ 31.724 past week
1.910
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Daisy Edgar-Jones
Photos of Daisy Edgar-Jones will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
32 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
