| | |  | Kate Hudson News & Gossip
|
|
| | Kate Hudson & Baby Bingham: Culver City Cuties | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Spending a nice afternoon out with her darling son, Kate Hudson arrived at a friend?s birthday part with baby Bingham in Culver City, CA on Sunday (November 18).
The 33-year-old actress donned a gorgeous sundress with an orange sweater as she carried her little one on her hip.
In regards to giving birth to her baby boy, Miss Hudson dished to Redbook that she suffered major beauty trauma.
?When I had Ryder, I was 24 and didn?t really experience any changes to my hair or skin,? the blonde beauty explained. ?But with my second child, I got acne, all my hair fell out after he was born, and I definitely had to work out to drop the weight. No pregnancy is easy to bounce back from.?
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson Shows' Cleavage' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Forgive me for being blunt but when did Kate Hudson get boobs? Kate showed up at the amfAR Inspiration Gala honoring Keven Huvane at Milk Studios wearing this low cut red dress showing off cleavage no one ever remembered she had. It was a pleasant surprise. Sort of like when you find extra cheese in your burrito.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Breaking News! Kate Hudson Is Busting Out | | Added 13 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
When I first saw these pictures of Kate Hudson at the amfAR Inspiration Gala, I thought maybe she’d finally been inspired to get that new set of boobs I always used to hear rumors about. I’m not used to seeing this much cleavage from Kate, and I know how girls always like to show off
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson in cleavage-y Prabal Gurung at the amfAR gala: beautiful? | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
These are some photos from last night?s amfAR ?3rd Annual Inspiration Gala? in LA. You?d think with the word ?gala? in the event?s name, most of the women would show up in proper gowns. You would be wrong. Some women act like the words ?red carpet? and ?gala? and ?black tie? are mysterious codes to decipher, in which the answer is evidently ?sack dresses? or ?sack jumpsuits? or ?dated blouses from The Limited circa 1997.? Believe it or not, Kate Hudson was one of the few ladies who actually got it right, at least as far as ?looking appropriate for the occasion.? Kate?s dress is Prabal Gurung Resort 2013. Her body looks amazing, the color is pretty on her, and she looks good in general, even though this dress isn?t my favorite thing. HATE the necklace.
Here?s Chelsea Handler in her ?gala best?. Worst Gala Outfit EVER. Chelsea was the ?host? of the evening too.
Rumer Willis in? God, I don?t even know. Does Rumer know how to style herself? Does she have a stylist who hates her? Because this is just a total mess. The shiny nose ring, the ombre hair, the fug dress? it?s a total disaster.
I thought Octavia Spencer looked the best out of everyone. Her dress is pretty and appropriate, and she looks beautiful.
Sarah Jessica Parker in a sack-y jumpsuit and a fitted blazer. I don?t think the jumpsuit is as ?special? as SJP thinks it is, but I do kind of like the blazer. Is this gala-wear?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Is Kate Hudson worried she won't be as good as Gwyneth Paltrow on 'Glee?' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kate Hudson is trying to change up her career a little bit this year. Instead of wallowing in her persona as the ?Rom-Com Blonde,? Kate has taken a six-episode, guest-starring role in Glee. I thought it would just be a chance for her to sing and dance, but her character seems to be something of a maniacal alcoholic who is out to get Lea Michele?s character. As such, I would expect Kate to, you know, look kind of rough. I mean, ?acting,? you know? But the Enquirer claims that Kate was upset with just how rough she looked in her first episode, so she demanded a better makeup person:
Kate Hudson was so freaked when she saw her face on ?Glee? she paid her own makeup artist to fix it up, say sources.
?Kate thought she had what she called ?Hollywood face?,? an insider told The Enquirer. ?She complained that her makeup was over the top, and she looked more like a wax statue than a person!?
Kate signed on for a plum six-episode guest gig on ?Glee,? playing an alcoholic dance instructor riding roughshod on Lea Michele?s character Rachel. But when Kate saw her face on the small screen during the season premiere, she lost it, revealed the source.
?Kate was horrified by how she looked,? the insider said. ?She usually plays the romantic lead in movies, which means everyone works hard to make her look flawless. But on Glee, it?s not all about her. Besides that, producers wanted Kate?s character to look icy and over the top, and that?s exactly what they got. Kate got the OK to bring in her own makeup artist and paid the tab herself. It was worth it to her to look her best. Everyone on the show wants her to be happy, but most of the team thought she was being ridiculous.?
Kate?s also desperate to measure up to Gwyneth Paltrow, who won an Emmy for her 2011 guest gig on Glee. ?Kate loves singing and dancing, and she?s jealous that some reviewers have compared her less than favorably with Gwyneth,? said the insider. ?She?s out to prove that anything Gwyneth can do, she can do better.?
[From The Enquirer, print edition]
I?m not offended that Kate wanted to look her best. I?m offended that ?looking her best? wasn?t authentic to the character, but Kate is so superficial and NOT-Method that she just wants to always look good, even if she?s playing a hard-worn alcoholic. I?m sure Kate?s hair is perfectly bouncy and her skin glows and her body looks tight? and so how are we supposed to know her character?s hidden demons? Let me guess. Kate?s character announces that she?s an alcoholic? Glee writers and expositional dialogue? While I never!
As for the comparisons to Gwyneth? you know what? I actually like Kate Hudson more than Gwyneth. And Gwyneth?s Glee thing became increasingly insufferable.
Photos courtesy of Fox/Glee and Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson: Pretty In Pink On the "Clear History" Set | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Spotted on the set of her latest film, Kate Hudson was seen working hard on "Clear History" in Andover, MA on Wednesday (September 19).
The 33-year-old actress looked casual, yet beautiful, as she made her way around the multi-million dollar production home in skinny jeans and a Pink button up. She was having a great time, laughing and blowing bubbles with her gum.
In the new Larry David movie set to air on HBO, a disgraced marketing executive plots revenge against his former boss after walking away from an electric car company that ends up being worth millions.
Aside from Miss Hudson, the film's co-stars include Eva Mendes, Michael Keaton, and Jon Hamm. "Clear History" is set to hit the small screen sometime in 2014.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson versus Lea Michele: who looked better at the 'Glee' premiere' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
These are some photos from the Season 4 premiere of Glee last night. Many of the Glee people were there, but I?m choosing to focus solely on Lea Michele and Kate Hudson, who honestly seemed like they were taking part in some kind of Fug-Off. Lea is wearing Versace, Kate is wearing Alexander McQueen. At first I thought this was a case of ?Two not-great looks side-by-side, being less than the sum of the parts.? So I studied the looks separately to see if they looked better? and no go. These outfits are awful. The styling for both women is awful.
Let?s look at Lea first, in this Versace. How cheap does that lace paneling look? How much better would this dress have been if it was just solid black, long-sleeved with a deep V? And once again, to all of the resolute bangs-defenders out there, I apologize ? but this is a horrible hairstyle for Lea. The bangs plus those poorly-executed highlights? everything looks so budget.
For Kate, it does feel a bit more complicated. For one, she?s a ?movie star? who signed on to do a 4-episode arc at the start of this Glee season. By most career theories, she should come out looking great, like she?s showing these TV Girls how it?s done. But are these bunchy McQueen pants the answer? What about subtly showing off her bolt-ons? And the hair and makeup? UGH. Kate has been looking so great lately, but I think she just faltered completely here.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson shows off her 14-month-old baby Bingham in Toronto: adorable? | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some new photos of Kate Hudson and her youngest son Bingham leaving Toronto yesterday. Kate made yet another wonderful (in a fashion sense) appearance at TIFF following her gorgeous outing in Venice last week, both appearances on behalf of Mira Nair?s The Reluctant Fundamentalist. But let?s talk about the baby, okay? Bingham Hawn Bellamy is now 14 months old ? it?s been a while since we?ve had any photos of him, I think. I?m not going to go through our archives to exhaustively check ? my memory is that Kate hasn?t shown off Bingham all that much. Isn?t he adorable? He?s so blonde! He looks more like his mom than his dad, I think. He also seems exceptionally well-behaved considering he?s in a crowded airport and paparazzi are probably shouting at his mom. Very cute.
When I saw these photos, I googled Kate to see if she has any interesting new interviews. There were some new pieces, but nothing really stood out. So instead of trying to pull a story out of nowhere, you really need to read this hilarious interview with Kate?s baby-daddy, Matt Bellamy. Apparently, nobody told him how ?horrible? it is to watch your lady give birth. Matt was pretty grossed out. Matt is a man after my own heart.
Matt Bellamy wishes someone had warned him how “horrible” births are. The Muse frontman was present when his fiancee Kate Hudson delivered their son Bingham in July but he wasn’t prepared for just how gory it would be.
He said: “I don’t understand why no one had warned me about how horrible it would be. The baby’s head was weirdly elongated when it came out. That freaked me out a bit.”
When he and Kate first took Bingham home, the rocker admits he was “petrified” about his new fatherly responsibilities but he quickly bonded with his baby and learnt what to do.
In an interview with German magazine Gala, he said: “I had to learn how to change nappies. It took a while before I got used to it. First I was petrified – I couldn’t believe what was happening. You’re in this kind of bubble where everything feels really far away. Then you just concentrate on the easy stuff – which I’m not very good at to be honest. But somehow nature makes sure you grow into your role as a father.”
Matt, 34, admits nothing has given him as much satisfaction in his life than fatherhood and the love he has for Bingham is limitless.
He said: “I met Kate and fell in love with her. But the best thing that has happened to me since was becoming a father. Being a father changes so much: the way you look at the world and yourself. There’s nothing that’s as much fun as a baby – it’s endless joy. I’m really happy with everything.”
[From TVNZ]
Don?t yell at him too much ? he?s English! You have to take that into consideration when judging the language he used. Or maybe he really just think childbirth is ?horrible?. He?s not alone, people. I think that too. But perhaps the buried lead is that Kate gave birth vaginally? That?s what he?s saying, correct? The baby?s head was elongated because of the narrow birth canal (typing that made me want to throw up)?? Whatever. I?ve never read the Biscuit Manual. No disrespect to those of you who have the manual memorized!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson Says Goodbye Toronto & Hello Sexy "Glee" Performance | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
After a busy weekend at the Toronto Film Festival, Kate Hudson quickly made her way past fans at the airport on Monday afternoon (September 10).
With baby Bingham in tow, the 33-year-old actress asked for assistance to keep the crowd away while she trekked through the bustling terminal.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kate Hudson Lights Up "The Reluctant Fundamentalist" Premiere at TIFF | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Dazzling onlookers on the red carpet, Kate Hudson attended the premiere of her film, "The Reluctant Fundamentalist," at the Toronto International Film Festival on Saturday (September 8).
The 33-year-old actress elegantly wore a long white dress with a slit up the skirt, revealing her long legs and white heels. She carried a white clutch in one hand and put the other around fiance Matthew Bellamy.
Joining the "Almost Famous" star at the event were her "The Reluctant Fundamentalist" costars Kiefer Sutherland and Riz Ahmed.
While her body may have been at the premiere, her mind was on her two sons, Ryder and Bingham. When asked by USA Today how Toronto was going, she replied, "We just got here yesterday. This is the first thing we're doing. The baby is with us. Ryder is in school."
Little Bingham's arrival almost meant that Kate would not get to participate in the film. When asked why she chose this movie of all the options, Ms. Hudson explained, "It's [director] Mira Nair. It was a really interesting script. I was so happy I got the opportunity to do it. I got pregnant. I had the baby and the movie got pushed."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 6.200.803
Photos Online+ 5.187 past week
20.545
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Kim Cloutier
Photos of Kim Cloutier will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
2 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
