| | |  | Gwyneth Paltrow News & Gossip
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow's former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin 'eat nothing' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Gwyneth Paltrow and ?dieting? go together like peanut butter and chocolate. As much as Gwyneth pretends to eat peasant food, she?s never really been a fan. She?s always been a rabid fad-dieter, and she?s constructed an entire Goop-industry and series of cookbooks around her f–ked up relationship with food. She?ll try any diet, especially if it comes wrapped up in fake science and whatever hokey holistic bulls–t you can sell her. She?s always been this way, for as long as she?s been famous. So it is surprising to hear that back when she was with Chris Martin, she ate ?nothing? according to her private chef at the time?
What’s it like to cook for Hollywood’s rich and famous? Celebrity chef Kate McAloon has an idea. In an interview with news.com.au, McAloon, 59, dished on what was it like to cook for former celebrity couples?including Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin, Miranda Kerr and Orlando Bloom and Courteney Cox and David Arquette.
Starting off with Paltrow and Martin, McAloon said she started working for the actress and Coldplay band member around the time Paltrow was filming Iron Man with Robert Downey Jr. The couple announced that they were separating (or “conscious uncoupling,” as they called it) in 2014; however the divorce wasn’t finalized until 2016. Apparently, the Goop leader and her ex had very lean diets.
“I had a brief from their assistants … they eat nothing,” she told news.com.au. “They are very strict. They avoided any sugars, anything sweet, no dairy, just more vegetables. When I got there, I was trying to stick to the brief,” she continued. “And I realized as I started adding more ingredients in, they said, ?Your food is getting better.’ That’s what happens when you eat more than grass.”
McAloon also worked for Kerr while she was still in a relationship with Pirates of the Caribbean actor Bloom?Kerr has since married Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel. It should come as no surprise that the supermodel and her ex had a healthy diet. “[Miranda and Orlando] both love my curries, light chicken or vegetarian curries with coconut, as well as quinoa, salmon and vegetables,” McAloon told the news outlet. “I do a chicken salad with a lot of fresh herbs and chia puddings for breakfast.”
[From E! News]
McAloon worked for Chris and Gwyneth circa 2008 then and yeah, no surprise, they didn?t eat anything. I bet Gwyneth was SHOCKED and APPALLED when she learned that her private chef was, like, sneaking some carbs into their family meals. I truly don?t understand famous people or rich people – if you?re going to actually hire a private chef, why not let the chef do their job and make good food? If I had a private chef, I would demand Chicken Kiev and homemade mashed potatoes and brownies and amazing Caesar salads. Money is wasted on the rich.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow's Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauche | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the funniest things, to me, about Gwyneth Paltrow?s elitism and slavish devotion to her one-percenter brand is that Gwyneth is widely seen as a gauche new-money peasant by those true blue-blood aristocrats. Like, the people who are actually really rich and powerful and old-money don?t really give a crap about Gwyneth and her Goop. Here?s a perfect example: Gwyneth wants to build a huge, gauche mansion in Montecito, one of the wealthiest zip codes in America and home (or second-homed) to many old-money, seriously wealthy and elite people. Gwyneth bought two lots of land and she?s submitted her architectural plans several times to the Montecito Board of Architectural Review. They?ve made Gwyneth?s architect change the plans several times already because, oh right, Gwyneth is gauche and new-money and the house she wants sounds like a McMansion monstrosity which will destroy the neighborhood. So, before Gwyneth even starts building on the land, her neighbors already hate her.
Actress Gwyneth Paltrow?s 14,000-square-foot plans to build a new home on two lots she bought last year in Montecito got a tentative green light from the Montecito Board of Architectural Review despite intense opposition from a neighbor who complained the new structure would block his views. It was the fourth time Paltrow?s Tollis Avenue proposal had gone before the board, and it won?t be the last.
Initially, the board appeared unanimously poised to send the design back to the drawing board for further modification, but after Paltrow?s architect Tony Spann?????former chair of the Montecito Board of Architectural Review?????spoke, three of the five boardmembers changed their minds. Spann argued vigorously that the elevations had already been reduced substantially. The designs?????a two-story home with 12,000-square-feet of living space plus 2,100-square-feet of carport, gazebo, and guest house?????secured conceptual approval last week, but the real detailed plans have yet to be submitted.
Opposing the project is neighbor Michael MacElhenny, son of the late Bernie MacElhenny, one of Santa Barbara?s more legendary and controversial developers. MacElhenny?s agents argued that the roofline of Paltrow?s 22-foot high structure will occlude his views, and they are pushing for further reductions.
[From the Santa Barbara Independent]
Michael MacElhenny?s spokesman Andrew Rice also went to Page Six (which is hysterical to me, that her neighbors are talking sh-t about her to Page Six) and said: ?She?s created an uproar with neighbors on all three sides. Michael and the other neighbors have tried to work with her, and they?ve gotten nowhere.? The neighbors say the home is just ?too big, too tall and incompatible with the adjacent houses, and it blocks their views.? Rice also points out that Gwyneth has left a ?trail of tears? on two continents with her selfish architectural demands, like how she erected an enormous nine-foot-tall gate on her Brentwood property. I remember there were a lot of issues with her London home too. Anyway, Rice says that Gwyneth?s architect is lying about all of the changes that he?s made to the plans that the house will still be a huge f–king eyesore. How gauche. How dclass.
Photos courtesy of PR Photos.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a 'Goop Guide to Fast Food' | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
For a few months now, I?ve gotten the feeling that Gwyneth Paltrow is trying to make her Goop more appealing to the peasants. Even more specifically, I think she?s trying to appeal to those ?flyover states? which she has, historically, written off in previous years. While Gwyneth is just as clueless and ridiculous as ever, now that she?s running Goop like a for-real business, she?s trying to increase her market. That?s how I explain this new Goop post about fast-food. Gwyneth doesn?t even call anyone a fattie or tell anyone to simply NOT eat anything, both of which are her baseline pieces of advice. So what fast-food recommendations is she giving us for ?clean? or ?cleanish? food? You can see the full Goop post here. Some highlights:
Dairy Queen: The Goop recommendation is a ?50-calorie fudge bar,? but if you?re at DQ, how are you not getting a blizzard, for the love of God?
Chipotle: Goop recommends ?A salad bowl, with some brown rice if you?re hungry. Load up on the veggies, skip the dairy, add black beans, and you?re good to go.?
Wendy?s: Surprisingly, Goop seems fine with Wendy?s and she recommends the ?Power Mediterranean Chicken Salad? with no hummus (which is insane because chickpeas are great for you). She also recommends getting the baked potato (with no sour cream) instead of the fries.
Subway: Basically, order a veggie-heavy sandwich and then don?t eat the bread.
Panda Express: get grilled Mandarin chicken with brown rice and no sauce.
[From Goop]
She goes on to list some other places, like McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, KFC, etc, and inevitably she recommends some special order of ?I?d like this salad but take off half the stuff,? which generally defeats the purpose of fast food, but whatever. I feel like Gwyneth just compiled this at gunpoint, actually. It goes against every one of her instincts. Basically, her advice for every fast-food joint is ?JUST ORDER THE SALAD AND DON?T EVEN EAT HALF OF IT.?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Back in my youth (my late teens), I would go braless. Considering I was a C-cup at the age of 13, you can imagine that I?m not the kind of woman who should ever really go braless. When I did it back then, it was mostly out of a belief that no one cared, and why not go free? But these days? no, I can?t do it. Personally, I feel sloppy and that has everything to do with being big-busted and feeling too ?exposed? without a bra. That being said, I don?t have a big bra collection. I?m always looking for the best brands to fit my size and I tend to just stick with the same brand/design in like three different colors. Decent-quality bras are expensive and I tend not to experiment, and I wear a good bra down to the very end.
But as we?ve learned time and time again, we are mere peasants and Gwyneth Paltrow is here to advise us on what we should be doing, bra-wise. According to Goop, we should be burning our bras. I?m shocked that this suggestion doesn?t come with some pseudo-science about bra-wearing leading to an allergy to carbs. No, Gwyneth says that we should burn our bras because of bad relationship vibes. As in, if you?re getting over a bad breakup, you should burn the bras you wore during that relationship.
On Thursday, Goop published an extensive guide to getting rid of your old lingerie, and, spoiler, it?s not just ?throw it in the trash.? Suzannah Galland, a ?life advisor and relationship expert,? says you should burn your bras, not as a feminist gesture, but because the ghosts of your old lovers are hanging out in there. ?The lingerie you wore with past lovers can carry the toxic residue of those relationships, along with painful memories,? she writes. ?While we might not think to trash lingerie that once made us feel so good ? or that we spent a lot of money on ? it?s a powerful, healing gesture to make.?
Here?s how she says to go about it:
1. Find a safe place where you can light a fire. (Why not invite a few close friends to join you, too?)
2. Before you start, you might want to write out a few words, or recite a prayer to help release and forgive.
3. Throw your needs-to-go lingerie into the fire one piece at a time.
4. Shout out the name(s) of the lover(s) you associate with each piece as you go.
5. Watch intently as the pieces burn. Know that your past is recycling into the ethers, liberating your future.
So if you happen to catch several different women screaming ?Brad!? over a pit of flames this weekend, now you know why.
[From NY Mag]
Don?t get me wrong, I understand the symbolism and I?m not opposed to a ritualistic cleansing fire either. I?m all for burning photos, burning love letters, burning his favorite t-shirt that you ?forgot? to return. But burning the bras you wore during the relationship seems like a step too far? Especially if you are one of those elite women who are at the core of Goop?s clientele. Surely they?re spending a lot on their La Perla bras and it?s ridiculous to burn them. WHY NOT JUST WASH THEM??? Wash away the bad boyfriend. It?s probably better for the environment too.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow: your 'toxic' perfume has 'endocrine-disrupting chemicals' | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Gwyneth Paltrow attending the launch for the Frederique Constant Horological Smartwatch. Whenever I see Gwyneth or another big-name celebrity at these kinds of smaller ?launches? of, like, a watch or a lipstick, I always wonder how much they?re getting paid just to do the event. Because you know Gwyneth wouldn?t go to a watch launch if she wasn?t getting paid. When I first glanced through these photos, I thought she looked very ?refreshed,? but as I looked closely? maybe it?s just makeup? Maybe it?s her softer-looking hair too. That?s a good lesson for Goop ? she looks younger when she stops with the center-part and flat-ironed look.
Meanwhile, did you know that there?s a new Goop fragrance? She?s not calling it Goop: The Perfume, because she doesn?t have a sense of humor about herself. The Goop fragrance is called Winter, or Edition 01 or both. And of course Gwyneth ? who has been the face of other fragrance campaigns before ? can?t simply introduce her new perfume. No. She has to pontificate about how horrible every other perfume is because of ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals.? You might as well be spraying yourself with red hot death!!!
Gwyneth Paltrow is on a mission to turn everyone’s beauty routine green. She’s done skincare. She’s done makeup. But, one frontier she had yet to conquer was fragrance, one of the notoriously more difficult products to swap out for organic alternatives. Gwyneth, who at one point admitted her “wardrobe of fragrances” included 50 options (and was also once the face of a perfume), recently came to terms with the fact that there’s a lot of mystery hiding in the scents she knew and loved.
“Fragrance which I’ve used up to this point is actually really at best not transparent at all and at worst very toxic,” she tells ELLE.com, pointing out that the ingredient label “fragrance” can be used to hide a cocktail of proprietary, “endocrine-disrupting chemicals” messing up your hormones. Unsatisfied with having to rely on just patchouli at the health food store, she used her goop powers to create her own elevated take on a “sophisticated, complex, beautiful, and also completely non-harmful fragrance.”
Today, goop introduces Edition 01 fragrance ($165) and candle ($72), the first of what will be a series of fragrances inspired by the four seasons. First up: Winter. Why? “I like the coziness of winter, and the family time that comes with it,” Paltrow explains, “Everyone is inside and together and curled up on sofas reading.”
To that end, she worked with nose Douglas Little to craft a smoky, layered mix of cypress, frankincense, labandum, vanilla, clove leaf, juniper, and styrax tree bark, all of which she hopes will make you “recall sitting by the fire place in a library.” She didn’t hint about what future goop fragrances will smell like, but did disclose which smell she curiously can’t stand, “Other people would think it’s a good scent,” she divulged, “I don’t like things that are heavily citrusy. Like kind of lime-y, citrus scents.”
Paltrow muses that the fragrance is not just about smelling nice, but a “holistic” experience. “One of the most amazing things about all these barks and herbs and things that grow in nature is they do all have, from the mystical point of view, healing properties,” she says. Each ingredient promises a range of effects, from aphrodisiac properties to aiding meditation, to balancing depression, to “bringing inner peace.” It’s basically therapy in a bottle.
[From Elle]
Ha, the peasants have been wearing the wrong perfume all this time. They?ve thought they were just wearing perfume that smelled good to them. How gauche. How irresponsible. How un-holistic. I will give her this though: I too am not a fan of citrus-y perfumes. I don?t mind a citrus-y shampoo or soap, but I want my perfume to smell really clean, light and feminine, like laundry and flowers. Winter By Goop sounds WAY too heavy for my taste. Cloves, frankincense and vanilla? Nope.
Gwyneth also told Elle that she loves candles, and ?It’s part of my evening ritual, having a smell in the house that’s warming. I like to have a demarcation between the day and the nighttime, so I’ll light some candles, have a glass of wine, and I always have a bath.? Is she selling candles or a Williams & Sonoma catalog?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tragic? | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The annual LACMA Art + Film Gala was held this weekend in LA, obviously. It feels like it came early this year. It also feels like the Art + Film gala was a little bit subdued this year, but maybe I?m misremembering previous galas. One of the big A-list names at this year?s event was Gwyneth Paltrow. Gucci was one of the major sponsors of the event, so most of the women wore Gucci, and Goop was one of them. I will never understand the ?big shoulder? movement in womenswear. Shoulder pads are still a mystery to me and the ?linebacker shoulders? on this Gucci dress are a big ?WTF?? Still, this was by far one of the cutest Gucci dresses at this event, so maybe that was the point. Also: my kingdom for a side-part on Goop.
Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in Gucci. I find this shade of Pink sort of garish, but Rosie can pull off some weird stuff. On almost anyone else, this would be kind of twee and cheap-looking, but she comes close to looking good.
Zoe Saldana and her husband Marco Perego. I feel like Zoe lost a bet with someone over at Gucci, because she clearly got one of the worst Gucci gowns, or she got the one intended for Florence Welch. I could totally see this of Florence and it would sort of work on her. On Zoe? I?m just staring at the snake slithering up from her crotch. Gucci should call this the Taylor Swift-Snake Emoji dress.
Kate Upton came to the event with her fianc Justin Verlander. I like her simple gown ? it looks like Dolce & Gabbana to me.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky? | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The look of the day is apparently Gwyneth Paltrow?s lotus dress. _(?)_/
Seriously, so many fashion sites are talking about this dress today. I don?t really get it. Gwyneth made an appearance at Elle Spain?s Style Awards last night, and I guess she was the only A-lister there (sorry, Elizabeth Hurley). Gwyneth has been a big fan of Spain for many years ? she?s traveled through the country extensively and she?s apparently pretty fluent in Spanish. So, I guess it makes sense that she would go out of her way to attend this event, especially since they gave her an award for something.
As for the dress, it?s Gucci. And it has a big velvet lotus flower down the front. Why is this a thing? I mean, is the dress hideous? No, it?s not. It?s just not? Gucci? It?s just not a rich, designer look that I would expect from the fashion house or from Gwyneth.
Also: Gwyneth didn?t go to the event with her boyfriend Brad Falchuk. Is anyone one else wondering if there?s trouble in paradise with Gwyn & Brad 2.0? I think he?s still married. Her ?date? for the event was US Ambassador to Spain James Costos.
Other photos? ordinarily, I think Olivia Palermo has great/interesting style, but not here. Her look is Dior. And I totally thought Monica Cruz was her sister Penelope. Monica wore Moschino and that?s a mess too.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show | | Added 8 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I’m gonna be honest, I’ve never really understood what the big deal was about Gwyneth Paltrow. Personally, I just find her kind of annoying. But then I saw this leggy photoshoot she just did for Harper’s Bazaar, and you know what? Maybe I’ve been wrong about her. Because she’s got legs for days in these […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow thinks she made it cool to try diets, yoga & acupuncture | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Newly divorced steamed-vagina-haver Gwyneth Paltrow is talking again about steamin? up your lady parts. Gwyneth?s Goop site posted their first (and only) story about vagina-steaming back in January 2015, and ever since then, it?s been something a long-standing Goop joke. I mention it because Gwyneth references V-steaming in her new interview with New York Magazine. The whole piece is worth a read, just because Gwyneth?s default setting is always set to ?believe whatever the $1000-an-hour healers tell her.? There?s a lengthy conversation about Eastern medicine versus Western medicine, but I thought the most interesting part was where Gwyneth basically shrugs off the idea that her focus on expensive, ?clean? makeup and vague ?wellness? programs are only for the wealthy. Oh, and Gwyneth takes credit for making yoga cool. And dieting, and juices. She made it cool to talk about wellness, people. Some highlights:
How she defines wellness: ?It?s an interesting question, because there?s a ?wellness movement? people are talking about. For example, Target has a new wellness mandate. The idea is definitely in the Zeitgeist. In the most broad term, it?s this idea that each individual is striving towards a better-feeling version of their physical life. Wellness is the movement towards health, whatever that means to you. [In science,] there are many ideas about medicine, and so many ways of achieving health with Western and Eastern medicine. Honestly, when it comes down to it, it?s very individual. It?s about what each person is hoping to achieve in their next level of health. It?s looking after yourself, being mindful about how you want to feel, and what you can do to achieve that end.
When she started using the word ?wellness?: ?I don?t know. We?ve talked a lot about health and wellness at Goop. I?ve always been interested in alternative ways of achieving this elusive wellness. I?ve been very experimental and I?ve tried all kinds of modalities, diets, and juices. I kind of like being the guinea pig for it all. I remember when I started doing yoga 20 years ago, and people thought I was super weird and didn?t know what I was doing. It?s the same way with organic food or acupuncture. I was always the one saying ?Hey, this is cool,? and people being like, ?You?re super weird.? And now, yoga is ? [Gestures big]. I?ve always been cutting the path in the exploration of how to live a long, healthy life.?
What she can say to people to convince them of ?clean beauty?: ?I feel like it?s not my job to try to convince. When people start to educate themselves people tend to migrate to cleaner products ? that?s what I?ve experienced. I was doing conventional products for my whole life. Then I started mixing it with clean. It was only really recently where I said, ?Okay, that?s it.? I read the last piece of research and I was like, I?m out?.Yes [I do clean beauty], except for hair. Hair I find hard, but for the most part I?m pretty clean. My kind of vanity is clean.?
Whether there?s a luxury aspect to the clean-beauty/wellness conversation: ?Um ? I haven?t really thought about it. Across all nontoxic products, there are all different kinds of price points. From the supply-chain standpoint, the more that nontoxic ingredients are available and made in bulk, the prices will go down. There?s always a luxury and mass market for anything and everything.?
Whether she laughs at herself when she tries out new things: ?Oh, totally. The first time I tried v-steaming, I was like, This is insane. My friend Ben brought me and I was like, ?You are out of your f–king mind. What is this?? But then by the end of it I was like, ?This is so great.? Then I start to do research, and it?s been in Korean medicine for thousands of years and there are real healing properties. If I find benefit to it and it?s getting a lot of page views, it?s a win-win.?
[From New York Magazine]
While I think Gwyneth could and maybe should get credit for destigmatizing some of the diets and fitness crazes that would eventually blow up, I also think she?s humblebragging when she?s like ?I made it cool, yo!? Those classes and diets existed before Gwyneth, she just promoted them. She was a high-profile person and she started following fads just as they were becoming fads. That?s what I always think of Gwyneth ? she?s a person who follows fads. If you tell her about some experimental new diet or fitness craze, she?ll try it, co-opt it and claim she started it and that she made it cool. As for Gwyneth shrugging off the conversation about the price of wellness? yeah. Gwyneth’s idea of wellness and clean-living is only for rich women who can afford it.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow: My dad 'never gave my anything, I never had a trust fund' | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos of Gwyneth Paltrow at the Cannes Lions event last week. I don?t know why we?re only getting this quotes now, but for some reason, a million sites are talking about this story today. Gwyneth did a Q&A session about Goop, conscious uncoupling and raising her daughter surrounded by post-feminist imagery. As it turns out, Gwyneth was also asked about how she?s often at the top of those ?most hated celebrity? lists. Gwyneth acknowledges your scorn and chuckles into a glass of your peasant tears.
Gwyneth Paltrow had a weird 2013. Weeks after People put her on the cover of its annual “World’s Most Beautiful” issue, Star magazine named Gwyneth the “Most Hated Celebrity,” beating out Kristen Stewart (No. 2), John Mayer (No. 4), Madonna (No. 7), Justin Bieber (No. 8), Anne Hathaway (No. 9), Lindsay Lohan (No. 16), Chris Brown (No. 20) and other stars. Speaking to Stephen Sackur, host of BBC News’ Hard Talk, at Cannes Lion, Paltrow said she was confused by the title. “First of all, I was like, ‘I’m the most hated celebrity? More than, like, Chris Brown?’” she asked. “What did I do?”
“I see where you are coming from, but maybe you just make people feel bad sometimes,” Stephen suggested. Gwyneth agreed that it’s possible she puts people off, but it’s never been her “intention” to make anyone feel that way. “All I can do is be my authentic self, and if you know me, then you know who I am, and that I have fun and eat and am so appreciative for my life,” she explained. “But I think there are things about me that make people draw conclusions.”
Gwyneth acknowledged that there is a perception that she grew up “very wealthy” and raised “with a silver spoon” in her mouth?or, as Stephen put it, “a sort of Hollywood princess idea.”
“That inspires a lot of resentment,” Gwyneth said. “My parents did well, and I was able to go to a fantastic school, and we grew up in New York City, but the minute I left my college to try to pursue acting, my father [the late producer Bruce Paltrow] was really supportive. But he said, you know, ‘You are completely on your own.’ So, he never gave me anything. I never had any supplementation, he never helped me with my rent, I never had a trust fund. So the idea that I am spoiled or that I didn’t work for what I have is just not accurate, but I can see how somebody might have that perception.”
Another misconception Paltrow wanted to clear up is that she’s a picky eater. “People tend to think that I eat just seaweed and a bit of air,” she said of her refined tastes. In reality, the actress said, “I have never had a horrible experience with French fries. French fries are my life!”
[From E! News]
We?ve often discussed Gwyneth in the context of the saying ?born on third base and thought she hit a triple,? which is very, very true. But let?s also acknowledge that Gwyneth is a certain kind of incarnation of clueless white privilege. I understand her argument, that she supported herself financially after she dropped out of college and that she built her Goop empire by herself. But she doesn?t acknowledge ? meaning she consistently refuses to discuss ? that she was given extraordinary advantages simply by being Gwyneth Paltrow, a pretty, blonde, slender woman, and the daughter of Bruce Paltrow and Blythe Danner. That she had family connections within the industry, that the name ?Paltrow? opened doors for her, that she never really struggled at all. I mean, ?He never helped me with my rent, I never had a trust fund? is like the embodiment of Gwyneth?s privilege.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.940.855
Photos Online+ 3.130 past week
2.187
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Alaina Huffman
Barbie Blank
Becky G
Brie Bella
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Brittany Snow
Photos of Brittany Snow will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
5 days | | |
| | |
|
