| | |  | Gwyneth Paltrow News & Gossip
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow wonders if men also like crystals, jade eggs & pseudoscience | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Gwyneth Paltrow (@gwynethpaltrow) on Jun 2, 2019 at 5:15pm PDT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow & Brad Falchuk don't live together, only do overnights 4 times a week | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Gwyneth Paltrow?s relationship with Brad Falchuk started as an affair when they were both married to other people. When she secured Brad as her jumpoff, only then did she and Chris Martin consciously uncouple. Post-conscious uncoupling, Brad and Gwyneth still took it relatively slowly after all, he needed to secure a divorce from his wife as well, and the divorce process for both of them took a while (in California-divorce time). Brad and Gwyneth would go out and most people knew they were together, but it wasn?t some ?they?re attached at the hip? deal. Then he proposed, and they got married last year in the Hamptons. And in all that time? they?ve never really moved in together, apparently. Brad still has his own place, and Gwyneth still has her own place (with her kids). She told the Sunday Times Style Magazine that they only spend four nights a week with each other:
Shes a wildly successful Hollywood actress and entrepreneur who is famous for her creative, and sometimes quirky, lifestyle choices. And Gwyneth Paltrow, 46, revealed that she still doesnt live with husband Brad Falchuk in Los Angeles in order to keep polarity in their newly married life. The founder of Goop, who was wed for the second time in September, admitted that Brad only stays with her for four nights a week, spending the rest of the time at his own house.
Speaking to the Sunday Times Style Magazine, the actress said the couples friends think their unorthodox set-up is ideal.
She said: Oh, all my married friends that the way we live sounds ideal and we shouldnt change a thing.
The actress previously revealed she and the TV writer dont live together yet because they are trying to navigate their blended family and be respectful of their children. But the Sliding Doors actress also admitted her intimacy teacher taught her polarity to keep the relationship fresh.
[From The Daily Mail]
I?m such a loner, this is probably the only kind of marriage which would work for me the kind of marriage where I could have my own private space and nights away from my partner. Everybody?s different and some married couples don?t need to or want to spend every waking moment together, or spend every night together by choice. I wonder if people would have a better reaction to this if it was someone other than Gwyneth, though. Because coming from her, it sounds less ?everybody?s different, do what works for you? and more like ?I?m so evolved and special and elitist that my intimacy teacher suggested that Polarity Is The Future, only peasants live together while married.?
Also: I find it curious that there are references to ?we?re being respectful of our children? sprinkled in a lot of stories about Gwyneth and Brad. Gwyneth?s children (Moses and Apple) seem fine with Brad and they both seem to have great relationships with Chris. I wonder if? Brad?s kids have an issue with how everything went down between Brad and their mom? It sort of feels that way, doesn?t it?
Here?s a cute thing which went viral a few days ago. Gwyneth did not remember that she was in Spider-Man: Homecoming.
Gwyneth Paltrow genuinely did not know she was in "Spider-Man: Homecoming" so this adorable interaction from "The Chef Show" is easily my favorite thing on the internet today pic.twitter.com/lc3VlSs1Hp
Jarett Wieselman (@JarettSays) June 7, 2019
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow 'has worked hard to integrate' Dakota Johnson into her family | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
View this post on Instagram
Consciously throupling
A post shared by Derek Blasberg (@derekblasberg) on Apr 23, 2019 at 11:55am PDT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow wore a sad sack Chloe to the Met Gala: creepy doll nightgown? | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a bigger ahole than Gwyneth Paltrow? Chica never follows a theme. What?s weird about it is that it?s almost like she?s making an arrogant effort to go VERY far away from the theme every time she does attend the Met Gala the hot Pink nonsense at the ?punk? themed gala, the nothingburger pale Pink cocktail dress at the Rei Kawakubo/Comme des Garons-themed gala. That last one was in 2017, where she attended after throwing a hissy fit years prior about how much she hates the gala. Well, she?s back. And she wore a Chlo dress which looked like a creepy doll nightgown. If I was being generous, I would say that her camp interpretation was ?1970s Valley of the Dolls? MAYBE, but since I?m never generous to Goop, I?ll say that she just looks like a dumbass.
I friggin? LOVED the fact that Benedict Cumberbatch understood the camp theme. This was not Bendy?s first time at the Met Gala, and I feel like he actually tries to stay on-theme and he really thinks about it. His look was just so? great. Like a pimp Tom Wolfe. His ensemble is Labassa Woolfe. Bendy brought his wife Sophie Hunter who interpreted the theme as ?Renaissance Faire reject.?
For all of the bitching and moaning she?s done about how much she hates the Met Gala, it?s amazing that Lena Dunham manages to face her ahole demons, year after year. This year she and Jemima Kirke went together, and they both wore Christopher Kane. It?s camp and it?s tacky, so they got it right. But just prepare yourselves for more interviews about how Lena is SO OVER it and she?s never going again, only to show up in 2020.
Embed from Getty Images
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow in G. Label at the 'Avengers: Endgame' premiere: cute or blah' | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are more photos from the LA premiere of Avengers: Endgame. They?ve been doing smaller premieres and screenings around the world for weeks now, but the LA premiere last night was the first and only event for the entire cast and every member of the Marvel franchises in total. Endgame really does spell the END for many beloved characters. I would assume Tony Stark and Pepper Potts are not coming back ever again? Gwyneth Paltrow came out for what is probably her last Marvel event. She wore a G. Label tuxedo minidress which showed off her legs and hid her neck. The neck bow is too large and puffy and it makes her look like she?s wearing a black neck brace. Otherwise, she looks good? Her hair is okay.
Benedict Cumberbatch looks AWFUL these days. He recently shaved his head and it looks like he lost weight and he just looks terrible. Sophie Hunter knows it too.
Brie Larson in Celine. I mean? it?s a shiny satin and taken with her cheap-looking dye job, she looks sort of like a game show hostess. It?s just very dated, and she could do so much better.
Danai Gurira in hot Pink great color for her and you can tell she was feeling it.
Robert Downey Jr. and Susan Downey. Tony Stark has made RDJ a rich man, but I suspect he?s happy to be done with this.
Zoe Saldana in Givenchy. The color is great but the dress sucks. She loves some weird sh-t though.
Bradley Cooper didn?t come with Irina Shayk OR Lady Gaga, lmao. He flew solo.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow claims the 'conscious uncoupling' backlash was 'brutal' | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the dumbest brags employed by Gwyneth Paltrow consistently over the years is that she never came from a divorced family. She treats the reality of divorce as some kind of personal failure on the part of every divorced person, and she also speaks of divorce like it?s a disease, or a virus or something, rather than just something that happens and something not
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow on the 'elitist' label: People won't take responsibility for themselves | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?ve believed for a long time now that Goop, as a business, is merely targeting Gwyneth Paltrow as a consumer. Goop is what happens when you live inside your own ass, like Gwyneth. It?s not that Gwyneth Paltrow is consciously making the decision to target rich white women with pseudoscience. It?s that Gwyneth genuinely believes in pseudoscience, just like she genuinely believes that she?s NOT selling snake oil and expensive feelings to rich bitches. Gwyneth Paltrow started a business which targets Gwyneth Paltrow as a consumer. Gwyneth sat down with the New York Times for a long-winded interview about Goop and this piece just serves as another reminder that Gwyneth is the worst. She really believes in all of the fake corporate buzzwords. She talks absolute nonsense about feminine versus masculine business energies. And once again, she claims that the tenets of wellness expensive feelings, whole foods, time and money are all free. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
Her start as an actress: ?My first purview of management was on set, because ? and I think other female actors would agree with me ? part of your role is just to sort of maintain culture. We?re female. So we are kind of channeling the energy for the set and correcting imbalances. If there was ever any discord, especially between men, I felt it was my job to sort of balance the energy a little bit. Also, as in most industries, it?s predominantly male. Sometimes you would be the girl in a male cast, and could bring femininity and temper some of the male stuff.
Learning how to run a business: ?When a start-up starts, it?s full of feminine energy, even if it?s an all male start-up. Right? Because it?s collaborative, it?s emotional, it?s passionate, it?s instinctual. Those are all feminine qualities. And then as it scales, you have to put some rules in place. And so that?s where the masculine comes in. And you have compliance and H.R. and all these things that are putting structure to the business, which is super important. So unlearning some of the old kind of feminine ways, trying to apply the right kind of masculinity, and seeing if it?s possible to really still lead from that feminine place, is what I think about.
What Goop is all about: ?We want to always be moving culture forward with what we do in the content and in the offerings and also create conversations and forums to help eliminate shame. I think a lot of women experience a lot of shame in their lives. The more we talk about things that are sometimes uncomfortable, that are sometimes unknown, it might resonate with somebody. And then we might help them shed a little bit of that feeling.
She invented gluten-free: ?When we talk about something that is incendiary, I always see in six months other people starting to write about it, and 18 months later, businesses popping up around it. It?s always confirmation to me that we?re on the right track. I mean, when I did my gluten-free cookbook in 2015, the press was super negative and there were personal attacks about what I was feeding my children and what kind of mother I am. Now the gluten-free market is huge.
How she views her acting career now: ?I was masquerading as an actor.?
Whether Goop is an elitist brand: A lot of people hear, ?Hey, you could eat a bit better or exercise a bit more.? But they don?t want to take responsibility for themselves. So it?s easier to be critical of an entity or a person who is suggesting that, than it is to start making small, perhaps uncomfortable shifts in their lives. The true tenets of wellness are all free. Being in nature, meditating, eating whole foods. If you told our grandparents that eating whole, natural foods was elitist, they would have thought you were crazy.
[From The NY Times]
I don?t know what pisses me off more, the fact that she still says that whole foods are FREE or that she thinks Goop, as a brand, helps eliminate shame. The latter is tied to this conversation she THINKS she?s having, which is that women aren?t believed by doctors, and that women need to talk about their medical/psychological issues more in the public sphere. That conversation is very important, but I would argue that Gwyneth and Goop are doing nothing nothing to contribute to that conversation. Instead of promoting real education on sexual and reproductive health, Goop muddies the conversation over and over again by pushing her half-baked fake science, some of which will actually hurt women. Also: she TOTALLY shames women. Fat women, overweight women, women who dont want to be told by Gwyneth Paltrow you can eat a bit better.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow countersues the peasant she's accused of crashing into while skiing | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Several weeks ago, Gwyneth Paltrow was sued by a Utah doctor who claimed that in 2016, Gwyneth crashed into him on a ski slope at the Deer Valley Resort. Terry Sanderson described the incident as a ?hit-and-run ski crash? where Gwyneth ?skied out of control and hit? him in the back, and she ?got up, turned and skied away, leaving Sanderson stunned, lying in the snow, seriously injured.? Sanderson also accused Gwyneth of using her connections at the ski resort to have them file a false report about the crash, where the report was like ?Gwyneth did nothing wrong.? Sanderson claims he was seriously injured with broken bones and a head injury because of what happened. The idea that Gwyneth would ski recklessly, crash into someone and then smugly and wordlessly look down her nose at an injured peasant felt? on-brand for Gwyneth. Also on-brand-for Gwyneth? Countersuing the peasant she allegedly crashed into.
Gwyneth Paltrow said Wednesday in a court filing that a man who accused her in a lawsuit of crashing into him at a Utah ski resort was actually the culprit in the collision and is trying to exploit her celebrity and wealth. Paltrow was skiing with her children and friends in 2016 during a family vacation on a beginner run named Bandana at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah, when Terry Sanderson smashed into her from behind and delivered a full body blow, the actress attorney alleged in a counter claim filed in court. Paltrow said she was shaken by the collision and quit skiing for the day.
She said Sanderson apologized to her and said he was fine, her response to Sandersons lawsuit said. Paltrow had previously denied blame for the crash in a statement but had not yet offered a full version of the events.
She did not knock him down, Paltrows court filing said. He knocked her down. He was not knocked out.
Paltrow, known for her roles in Shakespeare in Love and the Iron Man movies and her lifestyle company named goop, said her injuries were minor and that she is seeking symbolic damages of $1 plus costs for her lawyers fees from Sanderson for defending herself against what she called a meritless claim.
[From NBC News]
So, it?s basically he said-she said, only Gwyneth has the accident report to back up her side? maybe? I don?t know the initial Sanderson lawsuit made it sound like the ski resort?s on-site people did a cover-up job on the accident and made it sound like NOTHING happened. But now Gwyneth is saying something did happen, and it just wasn?t her fault because he crashed into her, not vice versa. I wonder? do you think this will turn into a bigger something? It feels like it could.
Also: Gwyneth just can?t help being haughty. Check out her reply on a post about all of this week?s Kardashian drama.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow is being sued for an alleged hit-and-run ski accident | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I have no problem with believing the worst about Gwyneth Paltrow. I believe she?s an ignorant, careless, word-salad-speaking pseudo-intellectual who only cares about fleecing rich women for profit. I believe she?s the kind of rude ahole who tells her friends that they?re fat to their faces, and who bitches out young women who refuse to acknowledge that SHE invented yoga. But do I believe that Gwyneth is the kind of person who would recklessly crash into someone while skiing and not do anything to help the man she injured? Well? actually, I probably would believe that?
Gwyneth Paltrow is facing a lawsuit from a Utah doctor who claims the actress crashed into him while skiing in February 2016. Terry Sanderson, the man suing the Oscar-winning actress, alleged Paltrow, 46, ?was skiing out of control? at the Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah, in court documents obtained by KUTV, a local news station in Utah. Sanderson is asking for damages in excess of $3.1 million.
A rep for Paltrow tells PEOPLE, ?This lawsuit is completely without merit. Anyone who reads the facts will realize that.?
Sanderson described the incident as ?a hit-and-run ski crash at Deer Valley, Utah? where Paltrow allegedly ?skied out of control and hit? him in the back, adding she ?got up, turned and skied away, leaving Sanderson stunned, lying in the snow, seriously injured,? according to his lawsuit. ?Gwyneth Paltrow knew it was wrong to slam into Dr. Sanderson?s back, knocking him down, landing on top of him, knocking him out and then leave the scene of the skit crash she caused, but she did it anyway.?
The doctor also claimed a Deer Valley ski instructor, Eric Christiansen, who accompanied the actress, filed a false report alleging Paltrow did not cause the crash. Christiansen, Deer Valley Resort and two unnamed resort employees are also being sued. A spokesperson for Deer Valley Resort said the resort couldn?t comment on pending legal matters. Sanderson alleged in his lawsuit that he suffered injuries including a ?permanent traumatic brain injury,? four broken ribs, pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress and disfigurement.
[From People]
Does it sound like Gwyneth? I mean? sort of, right? That?s the thing we?re already primed to believe the worst about her. If you told me that Gwyneth promoted the killing of hobos to improve one?s skin tone, I would say ?that?s SO Gwyneth.? I totally believe that she would be the kind of rich person who would get a ski instructor to cover up what she did. That being said? this happened in 2016 and we?re just hearing about it now? I don?t know. If Gwyneth ever ran me over with her skis, I would be giving local, national and international interviews in a neck brace for the next ten months. ?Yes, I saw her straw hair and her look of smug disgust and I knew Gwyneth Paltrow was the one who took my spleen.?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gwyneth Paltrow seems to think whole food, water and good sleep are all free | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
To be clear, I don?t actually believe that Gwyneth Paltrow should be canceled. Any cancellation if it should happen won?t come from me. That?s partly because I halfway enjoy how obliviously awful she is, and it?s fun to cover her sometimes. It?s not a ?cancel Gwyneth y/n? issue. It?s more like: please recognize that she?s terrible. Please recognize that she?s getting rich off of bad science, elitism and expensive feelings. Please recognize that whatever Gwyneth is, she?s not fking harmless. Gwyneth has a newish interview in the Financial Times, and she is just as dangerous clueless and obliviously elitist as ever. Some highlights:
How she started Goop: ?It?s bizarre to think back on. I had such a different life then,? says Paltrow of the ?life crisis? that precipitated Goop. ?I was completely burned out. I had done 40 films in a decade, and even though there were aspects of it that were incredible, it was also pretty lonely. I was on the road alone a lot. And I had had my daughter and I thought, I don?t want to do that any more. And then I started to realise I was very interested in the digital space. I certainly had no idea what I was getting myself into. I was trying to figure out WordPress alone in my kitchen. It was ridiculous.?
She?s still telling that asinine story about bitching out a yoga-studio employee: ?I started writing about this kind of stuff when it was ahead of the curve, and we are still ahead of the curve. Even when I started to do yoga, pre-internet, I remember there being very cynical articles about how yoga was culty and weird and for freaks. It?s been great watching the sea-change. I had this funny experience the other day where I went to a yoga studio in LA and the beautiful 22-year-old girl behind the counter was like, ?Have you ever done yoga before?? And I was like: ?Bitch, you have this job because I?ve done yoga before.???
On her detractors who say ?wellness? is only for privileged, rich white women: ?But this is bullsh-t. This idea that wellness is aspirational, and for rich people, it?s absolutely not true at all. At the crux of it, the true tenets of wellness ? meditation, eating whole foods, drinking a lot of water, sleeping well, thinking good thoughts, trying to be optimistic ? are all free.?
Why people are really mad at her: ?I think the reason why people get pissed off with me is because I?m like, ?No, I actually work my ass off in all areas of my life.? Some people are really inspired by that and some people are annoyed by it.?
Going into to meet with investors for Goop: ?Oh, it?s hilarious. And so brutal. Firstly, every investor will take the meeting. And then, for about the first 90 seconds, I am Gwyneth Paltrow and maybe they want a selfie for their wife and maybe they tell me about how much they loved The Royal Tenenbaums. And then you sit down to do the presentation it?s like: ?Oh sh-t, this is what it?s like to be an entrepreneur.? It?s such a great lesson, because when you?re a famous person?.?.?.?people are always treating you with kid gloves and removing obstacles for you. Investor meetings were a huge wake-up call, in the best way. It was when I realised I?d been treated like a fake person for 20 years.?
On all of the lawsuits & fake science: ?As you grow, you realise you have a lot of responsibility and accountability. We?re getting very buttoned-up about all that stuff now. I think the scariest thing for me is not knowing what I don?t know. I have made huge mistakes because I didn?t know those particular mistakes were even conceivably possible to make.?
[From Financial Times]
First of all, do you enjoy how she glosses over the lawsuits and consumer-advocacy watchdog reports about all of her expensive fake science? It?s only NOW that Goop is starting to get ?buttoned up? about, you know, making sure that they don?t say or suggest that stickers can cure cancer. It?s ?scary? for Gwyneth because of ?not knowing what I don?t know.? *twirls blonde hair* You mean I can?t charge $599 for jade eggs and claim that they cure Crohn?s?? I DIDN?T KNOW THAT. See if that stands up in court.
But really, this is the most offensive part: ?This idea that wellness is aspirational, and for rich people, it?s absolutely not true at all. At the crux of it, the true tenets of wellness ? meditation, eating whole foods, drinking a lot of water, sleeping well, thinking good thoughts, trying to be optimistic ? are all free.? WHOLE FOODS ARE NOT FREE. Flint still doesn?t have clean water. Being able to ?sleep well? if you?re a working parent is not free. Having the time and access to focus on meditation and mental health is not free. Does she honestly think food and water are free and accessible to all people? This is the same woman who tried to ?live on food stamps? for a month, only to blow all her SNAP money on limes and then quit after a few days and go to lunch at a fancy restaurant.
Last thing: someone needs to tell her to stop telling that story about how she invented yoga and bitched out a young woman. That story isnt the charming little tale she thinks it is.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.926.151
Photos Online+ 3.471 past week
1.761
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Alaina Huffman
Barbie Blank
Brie Bella
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Olivia Dunne
Photos of Olivia Dunne will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
5 days | | |
| | |
|
