Verotel Members CLICK HERE
View membership types here
60 free views remaining today
Guest User   [Sign In]
Celebrity News and Gossip
Page 1 of 561  2  3  4  5  6  7  .. 17     Next Page    Jump 10 pages forward

NOV
16
Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: 'I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me'
Added 2 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: 'I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me'
Drew Barrymore gave an interview to US Magazine at the Glamour Celebrates 2017 Women Of The Year Awards. I hope that they asked her leading questions and that all of this is taken out of context, because her comments didn't really sit right with me. It's true that I'm sensitive about the issue of harassment and assault, so many of us are, but I wish she would have phrased some of these things differently. I guess we're all different and we all make sense of things differently. She also may have just been being defensive and didn't want to talk about serious things in a throwaway red carpet interview, which is her right.

'I think it's an extraordinary time for women,' Barrymore, 42, said. 'And you have to encourage all of this strength. And defiance is a tricky word but I feel like there's a way in which women can be pioneers that seems a lot more in keeping with strength rather than anger.'

The Santa Clarita Diet star, who has been in the business since she was a child, told Us Weekly that she has not personally experienced any harassment in Hollywood during her long career.

'No, I was scrappy! Nobody messed with me!' Barrymore explained.

The 50 First Dates actress also opened about how she remains hopeful in the industry despite the recent surge of sexual harassment reports and allegations against Hollywood males like Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey and Jeremy Piven.

'The hope is that women are taking care of themselves,' Barrymore said. 'And taking care of each other inadvertently. For every woman that is brave she's also protecting another woman.'

[From US Magazine]

I know Drew didn't mean to say that women can avoid sexual assault by being 'scrappy,' I know she was just trying to speak to her own experience, but if I was her I would have just said that I'd been lucky. So many 'scrappy' men and women have been assaulted, many in the presence of friends, family members and partners. You can fight back, you can run, you can use weapons, but still get assaulted or murdered anyway. It can be a person you knew and loved who violates you or it can be a stranger at a party where you assume you're safe. Someone can drug you and make it impossible for you to even move. I know I sound so negative going through these depressingly awful scenarios but honestly it's been on my mind since we've heard about all these cases. It's just so prevalent, and there’s often no rhyme or reason to who escapes from a predator.

What did Drew mean by this' 'There's a way in which women can be pioneers that seems a lot more in keeping with strength rather than anger.' Is she telling women we shouldn't be angry about this issue and that we should be 'strong' instead' Because those things aren't mutually exclusive. It's hard to think of something more deserving of anger than this. We don't have to play nice at times like these. Also the whole 'women are taking care of themselves' sentiment reminded me so much of what Matt Damon said about Gwyneth Paltrow and Harvey Weinstein.

Oh and Drew got crap recently for holding up a Starfish for an Instagram selfie, potentially killing the sea creature. Instead of using that as a teaching moment (see: Brie Larson) she called people “haters,” called the comments “mean, cruel, and ugly” (to be fair some of them probably got personal instead of pointing out the facts) and then got a makeover. She posted her retort on a photo of herself getting her hair cut. That’ll show them.

photos credit: Pacific Coast News and WENN

15-Nov-2017 :Ben Affleck is having Thanksgiving with his family, then visiting Damon?s...
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
3-Feb-2017 :Drew Barrymore on getting a divorce ?it was just like my worst nightmare?
9-Jan-2017 :Drew Barrymore in Monique Lhullier at the Golden Globes: avian fab or fug...
7-Nov-2016 :Drew Barrymore lost 20 lbs, is spending the holidays with her ex
Drew Barrymore photos
Drew Barrymore videos
Drew Barrymore news

Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news

Matt Damon photos
Matt Damon news

Click here for more.

NOV
13
Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump 'had harassed Angelina Jolie?'
Added 5 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump 'had harassed Angelina Jolie?'
The last two months has been amazing in one respect: women are being believed. Women are coming forward as named sources, and they're telling their stories of rape, assault and harassment and they're being believed. Much like the Bill Cosby situation, there seems to be strength in numbers, which is a problem: why is it so easy to dismiss one woman's claims' Why does she need back-up from twenty women saying 'oh yeah he did that to me too'' I honestly believed that this was the crux of the problem, that it's not so much about 'believing women' as it is about 'believe an individual woman when she tells her story, give an individual woman the benefit of the doubt.' But is the Harvey Weinstein story about something else: the power of celebrity' That's what Anita Hill thinks. That's what other prominent feminists think too. The New Yorker had an interview with Anita Hill about why the Weinstein stories took hold: because the accusers were celebrity women.

During the 2016 Presidential campaign, eleven women accused Donald Trump of making unwanted sexual advances toward them. Following a well-worn playbook used by other previous accused sexual harassers, Trump dismissed the women as 'horrible, horrible liars' and their allegations as 'pure fiction.' The women's voices swayed very few voters, it would seem. Even after the 'Access Hollywood' tape surfaced, allowing voters to hear Trump boasting about 'grabbing' women 'by the p–sy,' he was elected President. Among those who put his candidacy over the top (at least in the Electoral College) were fifty-three per cent of white female voters.

So why have Harvey Weinstein's alleged transgressions been taken so much more seriously' One answer, it seems, has less to do with the accused than the accuser. Weinstein's sexual-harassment scandal is unlike almost every other in recent memory because many of his accusers are celebrities, with status, fame, and success commensurate to his own. Sexual harassment is about power, not sex, and it has taken women of extraordinary power to overcome the disadvantage that most accusers face. As Susan Faludi, the author of 'Backlash: the Undeclared War Against Women,' put it in an e-mail to me, 'Power belongs only to the celebrities these days. If only Trump had harassed Angelina Jolie. . . .'

Anita Hill, a woman with unusual insight into this topic, agrees that the nature of Weinstein's accusers is the reason that his exposure has proved to be a watershed moment. In a phone interview, Hill emphasized that sexual-harassment cases live and die on the basis of 'believability,' and that, in order for the accusers to prevail, 'they have to fit a narrative' that the public will buy. At least until now, very few women have had that standing.

Hill, who is now a law professor at Brandeis University, told me that what Clarence Thomas possessed, like many accused harassers, and unlike many accusers, was a winning 'narrative.' The lynching story resonated deeply. Without a similarly widely accepted narrative, Hill was vulnerable to detractors supplying their own readings'imputing false motives, insinuating psychological problems, and smearing her, as the American Spectator notoriously did, as 'a bit nutty and a bit slutty.'

In contrast, Hill pointed out, 'the Hollywood-starlet narrative is part of the folklore. The casting couch is a long-standing issue.' In addition, she told me, 'people often believe the myth that only conventionally beautiful women are harassed'and so it didn't seem that far-fetched to people that this would happen to beautiful starlets who we all know and love.'

Hill says she is 'hopeful' that, in light of the Weinstein affair and other recent sexual-harassment revelations against powerful bosses, 'people will revisit the women' who accused Trump. But she fears that the Weinstein lesson 'won't translate to everyday women, or even those in high-profile careers in places like Silicon Valley,' who still don't have the fame, success, and standing of movie stars. 'We need to transfer the believability,' Hill said. She argued that the public needs to understand that Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie 'are just like women down the street. People need to take this moment to make clear that this is not just about Hollywood.'

[From The New Yorker]

I believe that Hill and Faludi are fundamentally right about the 'narratives' of the accusers/victims. But I also think there's something else at play, especially given that Donald Trump actually did have a history of making crude, ridiculous statements to and about celebrity women. During the 2016 election, several A-list, B-list and C-list women came forward to talk about Trump acting like a pig (remember Salma Hayek's stories about him'). Trump actually had a long history of trashing and negging Angelina Jolie specifically, remember that' So, something else is at play – and guess what' That 'something else' is probably racism. White, female Trump voters were fine with looking the other way when Trump's accusers came forward because Trump spoke their language when it came to racist bullsh–t.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Backgrid.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
14-Nov-2017 :Angelina Jolie brought Day of the Dead cookies to Vivienne?s Shaolin kara...
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Lawrence in McQueen at the Governors Awards: overkill or amazing...
10-Nov-2017 :Kate Hudson ?kind of liked? the rumor that she was dating Brad Pitt
10-Nov-2017 :Tom Hiddleston stepped out with a brunette just before Swifty?s album dro...
9-Nov-2017 :Hayley Atwell Drops Some Ginormous Cleavage Action
7-Nov-2017 :Angelina Jolie in a sweater dress & ankle booties: super-cute or not so m...
6-Nov-2017 :Angelina Jolie wore a Jenny Packham robe at the Hollywood Film Awards
6-Nov-2017 :Please try to choose the worst Gucci gown from the LACMA Art + Film Gala
Angelina Jolie photos
Angelina Jolie videos
Angelina Jolie news

Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news

Salma Hayek photos
Salma Hayek videos
Salma Hayek news

Click here for more.

NOV
13
Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and lovely?
Added 5 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and lovely?
The Baby2Baby Gala, presented by Paul Mitchell this year, had an incredible turnout with plenty of celebrity women in beautiful gowns and some in suits. I was impressed with the fashion overall. Baby2Baby is a Los Angeles-based charity that distributes basic necessities to impoverished children and families including diapers, clothing, furniture and school supplies. They have a lot of celebrity support. Last night Gwyneth Paltrow was given “The Giving Tree Award” “for her commitment to low-income children.” I wasn’t familiar with her charity work but apparently she’s done work for non-profit LA Kitchen and she is the “charity ambassador” for a luxury watch brand named Frederique Constant. She’s also on the board of the Robin Hood Foundation, which focuses on poverty in NY City.

I wanted to start with Jennifer Garner as I was so impressed with this white Roland Mouret gown she wore. At first I thought that was a built-in cape but it’s really just two split sleeves. It’s gorgeous and this is a great look for her. She is so strikingly different on the red carpet versus her everyday style.

Here’s Gwyneth in a Tom Ford black tuxedo suit. I love this suit but her smudged blue makeup is awful and I would assume she did it herself. In case you think I’m shading her unnecessarily, she’s admitted she is useless at doing her own makeup. She apparently hasn’t improved in the six years since she said that.

Zoe Saldana was in a bizarre black dress with a wide collar, 3/4 length sleeves and a split skirt with a few buttons thrown in for good measure. This is by The Row, which I guess you can tell by how shapeless it is. Zoe and her husband, Marco Perego, seem solid and I like them together.

A very pregnant Jessica Alba was in a black and lace Brock Collection gown. She and her husband are also so cute! I think he was messing around on her years ago, but hopefully he’s changed.

Nicole Richie and Joel Madden, still going strong after 11 years together. I don’t have an ID on Nicole’s leopard print dress but I assume it’s House of Harlow. It may be this dress, the X-Revolve Lafayette, which retails for $298.

In “what the hell were you thinking'” we have Jessica Biel in a Giambattista Valli with see through honeycomb netting over granny panties and a bra. Just no. Maybe this would fly at an MTV event or the Grammys but not at a charity gala.

Also fug we have Kristen Bell in a regent st. blue (I cheated, I’ve never even heard of that color) Vika Gazinskaya dress with giant structured ruffle sleeves. I would say she looks like a sexy alien from the original Star Trek but she’s too covered up for that.

Poor January Jones was in a flutter sleeve v-neck top that tied at the bust paired with a floor length polka dot skirt. Look at the skirt closely. It’s see-through but only at the top until halfway down her thighs. Awful, but she looks like she doesn’t care, which is halfway toward pulling this off.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
15-Nov-2017 :Ben Affleck is having Thanksgiving with his family, then visiting Damon?s...
14-Nov-2017 :Angelina Jolie brought Day of the Dead cookies to Vivienne?s Shaolin kara...
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Ben Affleck on if he?ll play Batman again: ?we?ll see what the future hol...
13-Nov-2017 :Jessica Biel Looking All Kinds Of Stunningly Sexy In A Revealing Dress
9-Nov-2017 :Jessica Biel Looking Like The Hottest Entrepreneur On The Planet
8-Nov-2017 :Julia Roberts? life advice: ?Marry the right person, give birth to a redh...
8-Nov-2017 :US: Ben Affleck got out of rehab recently, ?Jen refuses to abandon him?
3-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner on her volunteerism: ?Be your own first responder?
Jennifer Garner photos
Jennifer Garner videos
Jennifer Garner news

Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news

Jessica Biel photos
Jessica Biel videos
Jessica Biel news


SEP
21
Gwyneth Paltrow's former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin 'eat nothing'
Added 58 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow's former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin 'eat nothing'
Gwyneth Paltrow and 'dieting' go together like peanut butter and chocolate. As much as Gwyneth pretends to eat peasant food, she's never really been a fan. She's always been a rabid fad-dieter, and she's constructed an entire Goop-industry and series of cookbooks around her f–ked up relationship with food. She'll try any diet, especially if it comes wrapped up in fake science and whatever hokey holistic bulls–t you can sell her. She's always been this way, for as long as she's been famous. So it is surprising to hear that back when she was with Chris Martin, she ate 'nothing' according to her private chef at the time'

What’s it like to cook for Hollywood’s rich and famous' Celebrity chef Kate McAloon has an idea. In an interview with news.com.au, McAloon, 59, dished on what was it like to cook for former celebrity couples'including Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin, Miranda Kerr and Orlando Bloom and Courteney Cox and David Arquette.

Starting off with Paltrow and Martin, McAloon said she started working for the actress and Coldplay band member around the time Paltrow was filming Iron Man with Robert Downey Jr. The couple announced that they were separating (or “conscious uncoupling,” as they called it) in 2014; however the divorce wasn’t finalized until 2016. Apparently, the Goop leader and her ex had very lean diets.

“I had a brief from their assistants … they eat nothing,” she told news.com.au. “They are very strict. They avoided any sugars, anything sweet, no dairy, just more vegetables. When I got there, I was trying to stick to the brief,” she continued. “And I realized as I started adding more ingredients in, they said, 'Your food is getting better.’ That’s what happens when you eat more than grass.”

McAloon also worked for Kerr while she was still in a relationship with Pirates of the Caribbean actor Bloom'Kerr has since married Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel. It should come as no surprise that the supermodel and her ex had a healthy diet. “[Miranda and Orlando] both love my curries, light chicken or vegetarian curries with coconut, as well as quinoa, salmon and vegetables,” McAloon told the news outlet. “I do a chicken salad with a lot of fresh herbs and chia puddings for breakfast.”

[From E! News]

McAloon worked for Chris and Gwyneth circa 2008 then and yeah, no surprise, they didn't eat anything. I bet Gwyneth was SHOCKED and APPALLED when she learned that her private chef was, like, sneaking some carbs into their family meals. I truly don't understand famous people or rich people – if you're going to actually hire a private chef, why not let the chef do their job and make good food' If I had a private chef, I would demand Chicken Kiev and homemade mashed potatoes and brownies and amazing Caesar salads. Money is wasted on the rich.

Photos courtesy of WENN.




More Photos Here
16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


JUL
7
Gwyneth Paltrow's Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauche
Added 134 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow's Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauche
One of the funniest things, to me, about Gwyneth Paltrow's elitism and slavish devotion to her one-percenter brand is that Gwyneth is widely seen as a gauche new-money peasant by those true blue-blood aristocrats. Like, the people who are actually really rich and powerful and old-money don't really give a crap about Gwyneth and her Goop. Here's a perfect example: Gwyneth wants to build a huge, gauche mansion in Montecito, one of the wealthiest zip codes in America and home (or second-homed) to many old-money, seriously wealthy and elite people. Gwyneth bought two lots of land and she's submitted her architectural plans several times to the Montecito Board of Architectural Review. They've made Gwyneth's architect change the plans several times already because, oh right, Gwyneth is gauche and new-money and the house she wants sounds like a McMansion monstrosity which will destroy the neighborhood. So, before Gwyneth even starts building on the land, her neighbors already hate her.

Actress Gwyneth Paltrow's 14,000-square-foot plans to build a new home on two lots she bought last year in Montecito got a tentative green light from the Montecito Board of Architectural Review despite intense opposition from a neighbor who complained the new structure would block his views. It was the fourth time Paltrow's Tollis Avenue proposal had gone before the board, and it won't be the last.

Initially, the board appeared unanimously poised to send the design back to the drawing board for further modification, but after Paltrow's architect Tony Spann'''''former chair of the Montecito Board of Architectural Review'''''spoke, three of the five boardmembers changed their minds. Spann argued vigorously that the elevations had already been reduced substantially. The designs'''''a two-story home with 12,000-square-feet of living space plus 2,100-square-feet of carport, gazebo, and guest house'''''secured conceptual approval last week, but the real detailed plans have yet to be submitted.

Opposing the project is neighbor Michael MacElhenny, son of the late Bernie MacElhenny, one of Santa Barbara's more legendary and controversial developers. MacElhenny's agents argued that the roofline of Paltrow's 22-foot high structure will occlude his views, and they are pushing for further reductions.

[From the Santa Barbara Independent]

Michael MacElhenny's spokesman Andrew Rice also went to Page Six (which is hysterical to me, that her neighbors are talking sh-t about her to Page Six) and said: 'She's created an uproar with neighbors on all three sides. Michael and the other neighbors have tried to work with her, and they've gotten nowhere.' The neighbors say the home is just 'too big, too tall and incompatible with the adjacent houses, and it blocks their views.' Rice also points out that Gwyneth has left a 'trail of tears' on two continents with her selfish architectural demands, like how she erected an enormous nine-foot-tall gate on her Brentwood property. I remember there were a lot of issues with her London home too. Anyway, Rice says that Gwyneth's architect is lying about all of the changes that he's made to the plans that the house will still be a huge f–king eyesore. How gauche. How dclass.

Photos courtesy of PR Photos.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


APR
14
Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a 'Goop Guide to Fast Food'
Added 218 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a 'Goop Guide to Fast Food'
For a few months now, I've gotten the feeling that Gwyneth Paltrow is trying to make her Goop more appealing to the peasants. Even more specifically, I think she's trying to appeal to those 'flyover states' which she has, historically, written off in previous years. While Gwyneth is just as clueless and ridiculous as ever, now that she's running Goop like a for-real business, she's trying to increase her market. That's how I explain this new Goop post about fast-food. Gwyneth doesn't even call anyone a fattie or tell anyone to simply NOT eat anything, both of which are her baseline pieces of advice. So what fast-food recommendations is she giving us for 'clean' or 'cleanish' food' You can see the full Goop post here. Some highlights:

Dairy Queen: The Goop recommendation is a '50-calorie fudge bar,' but if you're at DQ, how are you not getting a blizzard, for the love of God'

Chipotle: Goop recommends 'A salad bowl, with some brown rice if you're hungry. Load up on the veggies, skip the dairy, add black beans, and you're good to go.'

Wendy's: Surprisingly, Goop seems fine with Wendy's and she recommends the 'Power Mediterranean Chicken Salad' with no hummus (which is insane because chickpeas are great for you). She also recommends getting the baked potato (with no sour cream) instead of the fries.

Subway: Basically, order a veggie-heavy sandwich and then don't eat the bread.

Panda Express: get grilled Mandarin chicken with brown rice and no sauce.

[From Goop]

She goes on to list some other places, like McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, KFC, etc, and inevitably she recommends some special order of 'I'd like this salad but take off half the stuff,' which generally defeats the purpose of fast food, but whatever. I feel like Gwyneth just compiled this at gunpoint, actually. It goes against every one of her instincts. Basically, her advice for every fast-food joint is 'JUST ORDER THE SALAD AND DON'T EVEN EAT HALF OF IT.'

Photos courtesy of WENN.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


FEB
7
Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
Added 284 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
Back in my youth (my late teens), I would go braless. Considering I was a C-cup at the age of 13, you can imagine that I'm not the kind of woman who should ever really go braless. When I did it back then, it was mostly out of a belief that no one cared, and why not go free' But these days' no, I can't do it. Personally, I feel sloppy and that has everything to do with being big-busted and feeling too 'exposed' without a bra. That being said, I don't have a big bra collection. I'm always looking for the best brands to fit my size and I tend to just stick with the same brand/design in like three different colors. Decent-quality bras are expensive and I tend not to experiment, and I wear a good bra down to the very end.

But as we've learned time and time again, we are mere peasants and Gwyneth Paltrow is here to advise us on what we should be doing, bra-wise. According to Goop, we should be burning our bras. I'm shocked that this suggestion doesn't come with some pseudo-science about bra-wearing leading to an allergy to carbs. No, Gwyneth says that we should burn our bras because of bad relationship vibes. As in, if you're getting over a bad breakup, you should burn the bras you wore during that relationship.

On Thursday, Goop published an extensive guide to getting rid of your old lingerie, and, spoiler, it's not just 'throw it in the trash.' Suzannah Galland, a 'life advisor and relationship expert,' says you should burn your bras, not as a feminist gesture, but because the ghosts of your old lovers are hanging out in there. 'The lingerie you wore with past lovers can carry the toxic residue of those relationships, along with painful memories,' she writes. 'While we might not think to trash lingerie that once made us feel so good ' or that we spent a lot of money on ' it's a powerful, healing gesture to make.'

Here's how she says to go about it:

1. Find a safe place where you can light a fire. (Why not invite a few close friends to join you, too')

2. Before you start, you might want to write out a few words, or recite a prayer to help release and forgive.

3. Throw your needs-to-go lingerie into the fire one piece at a time.

4. Shout out the name(s) of the lover(s) you associate with each piece as you go.

5. Watch intently as the pieces burn. Know that your past is recycling into the ethers, liberating your future.

So if you happen to catch several different women screaming 'Brad!' over a pit of flames this weekend, now you know why.

[From NY Mag]

Don't get me wrong, I understand the symbolism and I'm not opposed to a ritualistic cleansing fire either. I'm all for burning photos, burning love letters, burning his favorite t-shirt that you 'forgot' to return. But burning the bras you wore during the relationship seems like a step too far' Especially if you are one of those elite women who are at the core of Goop's clientele. Surely they're spending a lot on their La Perla bras and it's ridiculous to burn them. WHY NOT JUST WASH THEM''' Wash away the bad boyfriend. It's probably better for the environment too.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


NOV
4
Gwyneth Paltrow: your 'toxic' perfume has 'endocrine-disrupting chemicals'
Added 379 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow: your 'toxic' perfume has 'endocrine-disrupting chemicals'
Here are some photos of Gwyneth Paltrow attending the launch for the Frederique Constant Horological Smartwatch. Whenever I see Gwyneth or another big-name celebrity at these kinds of smaller 'launches' of, like, a watch or a lipstick, I always wonder how much they're getting paid just to do the event. Because you know Gwyneth wouldn't go to a watch launch if she wasn't getting paid. When I first glanced through these photos, I thought she looked very 'refreshed,' but as I looked closely' maybe it's just makeup' Maybe it's her softer-looking hair too. That's a good lesson for Goop ' she looks younger when she stops with the center-part and flat-ironed look.

Meanwhile, did you know that there's a new Goop fragrance' She's not calling it Goop: The Perfume, because she doesn't have a sense of humor about herself. The Goop fragrance is called Winter, or Edition 01 or both. And of course Gwyneth ' who has been the face of other fragrance campaigns before ' can't simply introduce her new perfume. No. She has to pontificate about how horrible every other perfume is because of 'endocrine-disrupting chemicals.' You might as well be spraying yourself with red hot death!!!

Gwyneth Paltrow is on a mission to turn everyone’s beauty routine green. She’s done skincare. She’s done makeup. But, one frontier she had yet to conquer was fragrance, one of the notoriously more difficult products to swap out for organic alternatives. Gwyneth, who at one point admitted her “wardrobe of fragrances” included 50 options (and was also once the face of a perfume), recently came to terms with the fact that there’s a lot of mystery hiding in the scents she knew and loved.

“Fragrance which I’ve used up to this point is actually really at best not transparent at all and at worst very toxic,” she tells ELLE.com, pointing out that the ingredient label “fragrance” can be used to hide a cocktail of proprietary, “endocrine-disrupting chemicals” messing up your hormones. Unsatisfied with having to rely on just patchouli at the health food store, she used her goop powers to create her own elevated take on a “sophisticated, complex, beautiful, and also completely non-harmful fragrance.”

Today, goop introduces Edition 01 fragrance ($165) and candle ($72), the first of what will be a series of fragrances inspired by the four seasons. First up: Winter. Why' “I like the coziness of winter, and the family time that comes with it,” Paltrow explains, “Everyone is inside and together and curled up on sofas reading.”

To that end, she worked with nose Douglas Little to craft a smoky, layered mix of cypress, frankincense, labandum, vanilla, clove leaf, juniper, and styrax tree bark, all of which she hopes will make you “recall sitting by the fire place in a library.” She didn’t hint about what future goop fragrances will smell like, but did disclose which smell she curiously can’t stand, “Other people would think it’s a good scent,” she divulged, “I don’t like things that are heavily citrusy. Like kind of lime-y, citrus scents.”

Paltrow muses that the fragrance is not just about smelling nice, but a “holistic” experience. “One of the most amazing things about all these barks and herbs and things that grow in nature is they do all have, from the mystical point of view, healing properties,” she says. Each ingredient promises a range of effects, from aphrodisiac properties to aiding meditation, to balancing depression, to “bringing inner peace.” It’s basically therapy in a bottle.

[From Elle]

Ha, the peasants have been wearing the wrong perfume all this time. They've thought they were just wearing perfume that smelled good to them. How gauche. How irresponsible. How un-holistic. I will give her this though: I too am not a fan of citrus-y perfumes. I don't mind a citrus-y shampoo or soap, but I want my perfume to smell really clean, light and feminine, like laundry and flowers. Winter By Goop sounds WAY too heavy for my taste. Cloves, frankincense and vanilla' Nope.

Gwyneth also told Elle that she loves candles, and 'It’s part of my evening ritual, having a smell in the house that’s warming. I like to have a demarcation between the day and the nighttime, so I’ll light some candles, have a glass of wine, and I always have a bath.' Is she selling candles or a Williams & Sonoma catalog'

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.




More Photos Here
16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


OCT
31
Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tragic?
Added 383 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tragic?
The annual LACMA Art + Film Gala was held this weekend in LA, obviously. It feels like it came early this year. It also feels like the Art + Film gala was a little bit subdued this year, but maybe I'm misremembering previous galas. One of the big A-list names at this year's event was Gwyneth Paltrow. Gucci was one of the major sponsors of the event, so most of the women wore Gucci, and Goop was one of them. I will never understand the 'big shoulder' movement in womenswear. Shoulder pads are still a mystery to me and the 'linebacker shoulders' on this Gucci dress are a big 'WTF'' Still, this was by far one of the cutest Gucci dresses at this event, so maybe that was the point. Also: my kingdom for a side-part on Goop.

Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in Gucci. I find this shade of Pink sort of garish, but Rosie can pull off some weird stuff. On almost anyone else, this would be kind of twee and cheap-looking, but she comes close to looking good.

Zoe Saldana and her husband Marco Perego. I feel like Zoe lost a bet with someone over at Gucci, because she clearly got one of the worst Gucci gowns, or she got the one intended for Florence Welch. I could totally see this of Florence and it would sort of work on her. On Zoe' I'm just staring at the snake slithering up from her crotch. Gucci should call this the Taylor Swift-Snake Emoji dress.

Kate Upton came to the event with her fianc Justin Verlander. I like her simple gown ' it looks like Dolce & Gabbana to me.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
27-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news


OCT
27
Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
Added 387 days agoSource: CeleBitchy
Gwyneth Paltrow in a velvet, lotus-flowered Gucci gown: lovely or tacky?
The look of the day is apparently Gwyneth Paltrow's lotus dress. _(')_/

Seriously, so many fashion sites are talking about this dress today. I don't really get it. Gwyneth made an appearance at Elle Spain's Style Awards last night, and I guess she was the only A-lister there (sorry, Elizabeth Hurley). Gwyneth has been a big fan of Spain for many years ' she's traveled through the country extensively and she's apparently pretty fluent in Spanish. So, I guess it makes sense that she would go out of her way to attend this event, especially since they gave her an award for something.

As for the dress, it's Gucci. And it has a big velvet lotus flower down the front. Why is this a thing' I mean, is the dress hideous' No, it's not. It's just not' Gucci' It's just not a rich, designer look that I would expect from the fashion house or from Gwyneth.

Also: Gwyneth didn't go to the event with her boyfriend Brad Falchuk. Is anyone one else wondering if there's trouble in paradise with Gwyn & Brad 2.0' I think he's still married. Her 'date' for the event was US Ambassador to Spain James Costos.

Other photos' ordinarily, I think Olivia Palermo has great/interesting style, but not here. Her look is Dior. And I totally thought Monica Cruz was her sister Penelope. Monica wore Moschino and that's a mess too.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.




More Photos Here
16-Nov-2017 :Drew Barrymore on sexual assault: ?I?m scrappy, nobody messed with me?
13-Nov-2017 :Susan Faludi: If only Donald Trump ?had harassed Angelina Jolie??
13-Nov-2017 :Jennifer Garner in white Roland Mouret at the Baby2Baby gala: classic and...
21-Sep-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s former private chef says Gwyn & Chris Martin ?eat nothi...
7-Jul-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow?s Montecito neighbors think her planned McMansion is gauc...
14-Apr-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow gave the peasants a ?Goop Guide to Fast Food?
7-Feb-2017 :Gwyneth Paltrow wants you to burn your bras, but not for feminist reasons
4-Nov-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow: your ?toxic? perfume has ?endocrine-disrupting chemicals...
31-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow in linebacker-shouldered Gucci at LACMA event: cute or tr...
13-Oct-2016 :Gwyneth Paltrow Attempts The Sexy Leg Show
Gwyneth Paltrow photos
Gwyneth Paltrow videos
Gwyneth Paltrow news

Page 1 of 561  2  3  4  5  6  7  .. 17     Next Page    Jump 10 pages forward




3.669.345
Photos Online
+ 6.265 past week
5.338
Videos Online
410 Users Online
Birthdays Today
Chloe Sevigny (43)
Peta Wilson (47)
Click here for more!
Home | Sign Up | Privacy Statement | Suggest new Gallery | Contact BestEyeCandy.com