 | |  |  | Jennifer Aniston News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux are done after two years of marriage | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?ve been saying for a solid year that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux?s marriage seemed very strange. They barely seemed to spend any time together, and it wasn?t like their time apart was just about competing work schedules at all. Things got even stranger in the past week, with Jennifer celebrating her 49th birthday in Malibu, all while Justin was in New York, hanging out with his dog and not doing anything particularly important. I told you guys I was getting a weird feeling about JustJen. And look, I was right. Justin and Jennifer are over.
Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux have split after two and a half years of marriage ? and seven years as a couple, the Associated Press reports.
The two spent quite a bit of time apart in recent months, with Theroux often spotted in New York City away from their L.A. home. They have also a busy year as Aniston signed on with Reese Witherspoon for a new Apple TV series and filmed Dumplin? in Atlanta, while Theroux, 46, filmed the comedy The Spy Who Dumped Me in Budapest.
The decision comes just days after the actress?s 49th birthday, which she and Theroux spent apart. Aniston celebrated in Malibu, California with a gathering alongside pals Courteney Cox, Andrea Bendewald, Leigh Kilton-Smith and Kristin Hahn on Sunday. Theroux, meanwhile, was spotted out in New York City on Friday walking his dog. Last year, the duo vacationed together in Los Cabos, Mexico with friends.
[From People]
I mean? again, I?ve been thinking for a while that they were barely even together at this point. He was always in New York or traveling for work. She stayed in LA. Was it all that time apart that ultimately destroyed their marriage? Honestly – and I?m not saying this just to be mean – I never believed they had the most solid foundation in the first place. They got together when he was living with his then-longterm girlfriend Heidi Bivens. He hated the idea of moving to LA, and she pretended to move to New York for a short time to make him happy, but she gave that up. And it took forever for them to go through with the wedding, and it was reported in People Magazine that HE was the holdout, that he was always wary of becoming Mr. Jennifer Aniston. I don?t know. It just felt like there was always too much going against them. Anyway, I?m sure we?ll be hearing a lot more in the days, weeks and months to come. So long, bizarre quartz engagement ring!
Update: Here’s the Associate Press’s piece, which includes the statement they made together:
The couple says in a statement released through her publicist Thursday that the decision to split ?was mutual and lovingly made at the end of last year.? The couple says they are making the announcement publicly ?in an effort to reduce any further speculation.?
?Normally we would do this privately, but given that the gossip industry cannot resist an opportunity to speculate and invent, we wanted to convey the truth directly,? says the statement released by longtime Aniston publicist Stephen Huvane. ?Whatever else is printed about us that is not directly from us, is someone else?s fictional narrative. Above all, we are determined to maintain the deep respect and love that we have for one another.?
Aniston and Theroux say they are ?two best friends who have decided to part ways as a couple, but look forward to continuing our cherished friendship.?
In case anyone was wondering if the “Poor Jen” narrative was going to be revived, there’s your answer. Poor Jen, still being hounded by gossip!
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Justin Theroux & Jennifer Aniston are fine, they 'do their own thing a lot of the time' | | Added 6 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
For months – years, really – the tabloids have eagerly claimed that Jennifer Aniston?s marriage to Justin Theroux is in shambles. The stories picked up again this year, because Jennifer?s ex-husband Brad Pitt is now single and ?Brad & Jen: Forever!? stories sell. Personally, I think you can believe that Jennifer?s marriage to Justin isn?t 100% great AND it as nothing to do with Brad. That?s what I believe – Jennifer and Justin?s marriage has issues and it has nothing to do with Brad, and it has everything to do with the fact that Jen and Justin barely see each other. Well, Us Weekly is here to tell us that Jen and Justin are totally fine? and they barely see each other.
For most of last fall, Jennifer Aniston and husband Justin Theroux were weekend lovers. While the pair filmed separate projects in September, a source close to Aniston says the 48-year-old ?would fly to New York? from Atlanta to be with her man, in town filming upcoming Netflix series Maniac with Jonah Hill and Emma Stone. The pal adds the pair ?also spent time together in Austin,? in recent months.
But when shooting wrapped on Aniston?s flick Dumplin?, she headed for sunshine instead of extending her Big Apple stays. And despite the recent rumors of an impending split, an insider says the time apart, ?doesn?t mean they are getting divorced or having problems.? The couple (who wed in 2015) simply ?do their own thing a lot of the time,? reveals the source. ?She prefers L.A. He has a fondness for New York, but they knew that about each other from the beginning and decided it wasn?t an issue. It doesn?t mean they?re splitting up.?
Theroux may love the East Coast, but there?s no place like home for the holidays. By December 21, a source revealed, the 46-year-old Leftovers actor and his love had reunited to spend Christmas together at their Bel Air home. From there, they plan to ring in the New Year with friends in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. ?They are both independent people and don?t spend every minute together,? says the Aniston pal. ?But there is a ton of love and laughter between them.? And as for the whisperings: ?They don?t let all speculation get to them.?
[From Us Weekly]
I think there are many solid marriages and partnerships based on the idea that you don?t have to spend every moment together, and that you should have separate interests and a life apart from your partner and spouse. I get that, I really do, and whatever works for you, go ahead. I just feel like Justin and Jen are living separate lives almost exclusively, and that their marriage is basically just on paper at this point. But we?ll see, of course.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in a Givenchy LBD in Paris: avant-garde or awful? | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux?s magical Parisian holiday continues! They arrived in Paris earlier this week, seemingly to mix business with pleasure by doing a series of appearances in between some relaxing tourist stuff, like shopping and going for romantic dinners. Last night, they attended the eighth annual (?) Series Mania festival at the Grand Rex in Paris. These are photos from the red carpet, where it seemed like Justin and Jennifer were the only stars in attendance.
While I?ve been enjoying Jennifer?s fashion in Paris in her other outings, I can?t say I like or respect this Givenchy dress. Then again, I rarely like Givenchy these days. There are times when a really crazy/architectural Givenchy will end up on a woman who can really carry it off, but those times are few and far between. This Givenchy isn?t even all that special – it?s just a high-neck tube dress with a cheap-looking ruffle. I think the ?cutout? at the knee is supposed to be high-design, but it makes it seem like the dress is falling apart and/or unfinished. Aniston?s jewelry here is by Jennifer Meyer.
Something nice: I do think Justin and Jennifer look nice together. I would like to see Justin wear a flatter heel though? His wife is short, even when she wears heels. There?s no need for him to wear all of these lifts and heeled boots.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's Paris-vacation style: Peak '90s girl or just fabulous' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
For years, Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux?s go-to vacation spot has been Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. They go to Cabo so often that the paparazzi no longer bother to follow them down there. But every so often, Jennifer and Justin do a European vacation. They?ve been in Paris for a few days on what seems like a half-vacation/half-fun-business trip. The business part of the trip was Justin and Jennifer?s attendance at a Louis Vuitton cocktail party on Tuesday night. Jennifer wore an ensemble that this ?90s Girl loves – this was THE LOOK in the ?90s. Slightly flared black pants, a bustier/corset top and a smart jacket. This is how so many ?90s Girls dressed when they wanted to look fancy, down to the chunky heel. So, yeah, I think Jennifer looks great!
The LV party was celebrating Jeff Koons? collab with the brand on a series of fug-as-hell purses. Here?s a shot of JustJen inside the event:
Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux photographed by Patrick Demarchelier at the Louvre in Paris #LouisVuitton #LVxKoons pic.twitter.com/GH1vGkzwcs
— Louis Vuitton (@LouisVuitton) April 12, 2017
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston wore black leather Brandon Maxwell to 'The Leftovers' premiere | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
People are always complaining about how Jennifer Aniston never really changes up her style, so these photos are evidence that? maybe she does change it up SLIGHTLY sometimes. Granted, she?s still wearing a little black dress, and her hair is down and she still loves strappy heels. But I do feel like she?s changed it up a bit. These are photos from last night?s Hollywood premiere event for the The Leftovers Season 3, the final season of the HBO show. Everyone involved with the show is ready to move on, and if you?re a fan of the show? my only hope for you is that I hope you feel satisfied with the conclusion of the series, because writer Damon Lindelof is notorious for sh-tting the bed.
Anyway, Justin Theroux is probably looking forward to the end of the series too – it?s prestige television, obviously, but I?m not sure that The Leftovers was really the career stepping-stone he thought it would be. But his wife came out to support him and all is well. Jennifer?s dress here in Brandon Maxwell and? I?ll say it, doesn?t it seem like something that Angelina Jolie would wear? It?s black leather!! Ha. No, Jolie doesn?t OWN ?black leather dresses,? but I?m still a little bit surprised to see Jennifer attempting a darker look like this. Am I crazy or is Jennifer?s hair a few shades darker too? Is it just the lighting or is she less sunny-blonde? And her makeup is crazy-dark too. It almost looks like her cheeks are bruised, she?s wearing such heavy rouge.
PS? I love the pockets on this Maxwell dress.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in Versace at the Oscars: slinky & surprisingly great? | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Embed from Getty Images
I?m actually a little bit surprised that Jennifer Aniston avoided the Oscars red carpet – she was nowhere to be seen on any of the preshows, I?m pretty sure. Then she just turned up inside. It surprises me because? I actually think this might be the best dress she?s ever worn to the Oscars, and she should have posed in it on the carpet! This gown is Versace and it?s very slinky and sexy and flattering. Not so flattering? The fact that her cheeks seem completely frozen. Yikes.
Embed from Getty Images
Embed from Getty Images
Here?s Karlie Kloss at the Oscars – she wore this half-caped Stella McCartney gown and a blue ACLU ribbon, which is notable because she?s dating Jared Kushner?s brother, after all.
And here?s Karlie Kloss doing the va-va-voom thing at the Vanity Fair party. This dress is Naeem Khan and I love it.
Embed from Getty Images
Photos courtesy of Getty, WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in Cavalli at the 'Office Christmas Party' premiere: too beachy' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos from the premiere of the ?raunchy? holiday movie, Office Christmas Party. The film actually has a decent ensemble including Jason Bateman, Jennifer Aniston, Courtney B. Vance, Olivia Munn, Kate McKinnon and more. I mean, I?m not going to see it, but I bet it will be a decent hit for an R-rated comedy. The star of the premiere was probably Jennifer Aniston in this Roberto Cavalli Spring 2017 gown. I?ve been looking at so many photos from European and New York premieres, I had gotten used to seeing celebrities bundled up in heavier clothes, plus most people are wearing Christmas-y clothes now. So it?s weird to see Jennifer wear a dress that would look at home at a beach party in July. I think it?s a cute enough dress, but just not for a December premiere of a holiday movie? I also don?t understand why Aniston insists on flat-ironing her hair. Ugh.
Olivia Munn in Jonathan Simkhai. This gown is overworked, right? There?s too much going on with the ruffles and the crochet down the front and all of the straps. EDIT. That?s a note to the designer: EDIT. Olivia also just looks so different. And no, it?s really not the potatoes. Chica got a new face.
Katy Perry in the Cinqa Sept “Nahla” halter gown and point de esprit tights/hosiery. What is going on with Katy?s style these days? She?s relying too much on Marchesa and ?90s looks. This dress would have totally looked at home on a red carpet in 1995.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in Valentino at the 'storks' premiere: super-cute or meh' | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
In Hollywood, I think the only bad part about taking part in an animated film is the fact that the premieres are always so early in the day. It makes it especially rough if the press/photo line is outdoors, because the lighting almost always sucks and no one wants to be the a?hole doing the entire red carpet in sunglasses. That?s what I was thinking when I went through these photos of Jennifer Aniston at the Westwood, California premiere of Storks: the lighting is terrible! The sun is too low in the sky.
It?s too bad because Jennifer?s dress is actually cute as hell. Her go-to look for years and years has just been to go with a solid-colored dress, usually black, and usually something that shows off her legs. But she changed it up for this premiere, wearing a really pretty little Valentino cocktail dress. The cut is flattering, it shows off her figure without looking ?extra,? and it feels like we?re seeing her in something really special. My only complaint is that the top seems just a tad too tight, and her girls look a little bit squished. Other details: her sandals are by Gianvito Rossi and her bracelet is by Celine.
Justin Theroux didn?t attend the premiere, from what I can see. It?s possible he was there and just didn?t walk the carpet, although I?m pretty sure that he?s still filming The Leftovers in Australia. That?s what his Instagram seems to indicate too. While I?m sure Justin?s absence from Jennifer?s premiere means nothing in the grand scheme of things, of course the tabloids are still trying to make it sound like something. Radar just did a story last week about Jennifer getting really mad/upset about their near-constant separation.
PS? oooh, the dress has pockets!!!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Booty in a Sexy Bikini on a Sun-soaked Break in Italy | | Added 7 years ago | Source: Dickism |
|
|
|
|
|
Here is Jennifer Aniston looking to be living la dolce vita as she enjoyed the Italian sunshine, sunbathing by the pool in a luxurious hillside accomodation in Ravello.
She appeared to be a dab hand at tanning, and ensured the sun caught her from every angle as she moved around to her front to get the most of the sunshine.
After a good sunbathing session she threw on a short black playsuit and went over to a group of her friends to enjoy a catch-up, laughing and joking as they all caught up.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston writes a scathing HuffPo op-ed about the tabloid media | | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston has written an op-ed for the Huffington Post. It seems to be a delayed reaction to those photos of Aniston looking pregnanty on vacation from last month. There was widespread speculation that Aniston was ?pregnant at 47? with a ?miracle baby,? which is honestly par for the course when it comes to Jennifer Aniston. Still, her rep denied the pregnancy rumor yet again, for the millionth time. Following that speculation, Aniston stepped out all over the place in NYC for weeks, and paparazzi got pap stroll pics of her seemingly every day in a two week span (often while she just happened to be carrying SmartWater). It did feel like Aniston wanted to be seen, and she wanted us to talk about how she definitely wasn?t pregnant. I thought the whole incident was over, or at least over until she had something new to promote. But it?s not over. Aniston?s HuffPo op-ed is about the tabloid media and how she?s fed up with all of it. You can read the full piece here. Here?s part of it:
Let me start by saying that addressing gossip is something I have never done. I don?t like to give energy to the business of lies, but I wanted to participate in a larger conversation that has already begun and needs to continue. Since I?m not on social media, I decided to put my thoughts here in writing. For the record, I am not pregnant. What I am is fed up. I?m fed up with the sport-like scrutiny and body shaming that occurs daily under the guise of ?journalism,? the ?First Amendment? and ?celebrity news.?
If I am some kind of symbol to some people out there, then clearly I am an example of the lens through which we, as a society, view our mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, female friends and colleagues. The objectification and scrutiny we put women through is absurd and disturbing. The way I am portrayed by the media is simply a reflection of how we see and portray women in general, measured against some warped standard of beauty.
?The message that girls are not pretty unless they?re incredibly thin, that they?re not worthy of our attention unless they look like a supermodel or an actress on the cover of a magazine is something we?re all willingly buying into. This conditioning is something girls then carry into womanhood. We use celebrity ?news? to perpetuate this dehumanizing view of females, focused solely on one?s physical appearance, which tabloids turn into a sporting event of speculation. Is she pregnant? Is she eating too much? Has she let herself go? Is her marriage on the rocks because the camera detects some physical ?imperfection??
I used to tell myself that tabloids were like comic books, not to be taken seriously, just a soap opera for people to follow when they need a distraction. But I really can?t tell myself that anymore because the reality is the stalking and objectification I?ve experienced first-hand, going on decades now, reflects the warped way we calculate a woman?s worth.
This past month in particular has illuminated for me how much we define a woman?s value based on her marital and maternal status. The sheer amount of resources being spent right now by press trying to simply uncover whether or not I am pregnant (for the bajillionth time… but who?s counting) points to the perpetuation of this notion that women are somehow incomplete, unsuccessful, or unhappy if they?re not married with children.
Here?s where I come out on this topic: we are complete with or without a mate, with or without a child. We get to decide for ourselves what is beautiful when it comes to our bodies. That decision is ours and ours alone. Let?s make that decision for ourselves and for the young women in this world who look to us as examples. Let?s make that decision consciously, outside of the tabloid noise. We don?t need to be married or mothers to be complete. We get to determine our own ?happily ever after? for ourselves.
I have grown tired of being part of this narrative. Yes, I may become a mother some day, and since I?m laying it all out there, if I ever do, I will be the first to let you know. But I?m not in pursuit of motherhood because I feel incomplete in some way, as our celebrity news culture would lead us all to believe. I resent being made to feel ?less than? because my body is changing and/or I had a burger for lunch and was photographed from a weird angle and therefore deemed one of two things: ?pregnant? or ?fat.? Not to mention the painful awkwardness that comes with being congratulated by friends, coworkers and strangers alike on one?s fictional pregnancy (often a dozen times in a single day).
From years of experience, I?ve learned tabloid practices, however dangerous, will not change, at least not any time soon. What can change is our awareness and reaction to the toxic messages buried within these seemingly harmless stories served up as truth and shaping our ideas of who we are. We get to decide how much we buy into what?s being served up, and maybe some day the tabloids will be forced to see the world through a different, more humanized lens because consumers have just stopped buying the bullsh-t.
[From HuffPo]
I agree, in a general sense, that tabloids perpetuate a ridiculous, pearl-clutchy, 1950s-era standard of relationships, marriage, beauty and more. I also believe that ?the well is dry? when it comes to many tabloid narratives, many of which surround Aniston?s personal life. Do we need another story speculating about her womb? Of course not. Do women need to have children and/or be married to be complete human beings? No, and she makes a very valid and important point about women’s choices and the narrative surrounding that.
As I was reading this, I had a sense of ?right message, wrong messenger.? Aniston has spent years dealing with the aftermath of the narrative she herself pushed in the media (which the tabloids picked up after she led them down the primrose path): that she was the wronged woman, that she was ?the good girl,? that she was the victim. She invited us to speculate about her love life and her womb the moment she cried about all of it to Vanity Fair in 2005. She did a People cover,”Five Years After Brad,” in which she said “People… just want to see me as a mom and married and barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. And I just want to say, ?Everybody, relax! It?s going to happen.‘” (Later she changed her perspective on children, which is understandable.) If she didn’t want us to talk about her then-engagement to Justin Theroux, why did she organize those ring-debut photos?
Also as she builds up product endorsements and lifestyle/beauty brands, increasingly what she’s selling is her lifestyle. Either she just happened to be followed to the Bahamas by paparazzi or she set up and posed for those bikini photos on the beach. She didn’t deserve the body scrutiny by any means, but she may have arranged for the photos to get out there. That?s the celebrity-media-fan/consumer ecosystem. If you?re selling your life as aspirational, people want to know about your life. Even Gwyneth Paltrow recognizes that.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.317.571
Photos Online+ 3.959 past week
1.554
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Rihanna
Photos of Rihanna will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
3 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
