 | |  |  | Jennifer Aniston News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston and Ed Sheeran: Thanksgiving Buddies | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Making for a surprising friendship, Jennifer Aniston and Ed Sheeran spent the Thanksgiving holiday together.
The "Friends" actress posed with the red-headed Brit and her manager Aleen Keshishian last night (November 28) in the social media post.
In addition to the pic, Keshishian wrote, "?#happythanksgiving #jenniferaniston @aleenkeshishian#edsheeran"
Meanwhile, it looks like Ed is taking a break from Twitter as he recently shared, "Leaving twittersphere til things repair, il be back on to tweet updates on only music until the new year"
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Enquirer: Jennifer Aniston plans to go topless in new film | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This new National Enquirer story does not really mesh with yesterday?s In Touch Weekly cover story, all about how Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux are having major relationship drama and the more Jennifer clings, the more she pushes him away. The Enquirer?s story makes it sound like Justin and Jennifer are okay, but that Jennifer has given up on fertility treatments and now she just wants to focus on her career. Which I guess I believe, considering Jennifer has been doing several projects back-to-back this year? Sure. What?s funny though is that instead of making this a story about ?Jen giving up on pregnancy,? it?s a story about how she?s going to go topless in We’re the Millers 2.
JEN ready to bare ALL as pregnancy dreams just?fade away. AFTER failing to conceive with her fianc Justin Theroux, Jennifer Aniston is finally giving up on her dream of getting pregnant and instead refocusing on her career, say sources.
In fact, the former ?Friends? beauty is said to be considering going topless in the sequel to her hit comedy ?We?re the Millers.?
?If Jennifer thought there was any chance that she?d be getting pregnant, there?s no way she?d prepare for a project in which she?ll have to strip down,? said a source. ?The truth is that Jen and Justin have been trying all year to conceive with no luck.
?She tried every fertility treatment available, which is why she packed on the pounds over the summer and was sporting what some people thought was a baby bump at the New York premiere of ?We?re the Millers.??
Jennifer, 44, recently changed her looks by chopping off her trademark locks ? and now she?s said to be wrestling with an image makeover.
?Jen?s completely torn over the prospects of going topless because she?s made $45 million from her ?America?s Sweetheart? persona,? a longtime friend of the actress told The ENQUIRER. ?But with Justin encouraging her to go for it, she?s seriously considering revealing her breasts in ?Millers 2? before she gets too old!?
An insider says that Jen has all but signed on to reprise her role as stripper Rose, and that she wants filming to be done in six months ? as soon as possible after she wraps ?Horrible Bosses 2.?
?Jen?s in her best shape ever and can?t wait to show it off,? revealed the source. ?She says she loved playing a stripper in her 40s, and Justin?s been urging her to get edgier with her roles.?
Still, Jennifer is said to be weighing various options to keep it tasteful.
?It?s possible the topless shot will be from a distance and Jen will be wearing a body stocking or even body art, but she?s also discussed with the studio the possibility of a close-up with her breasts pixilated or covered with a funny blooper motif,? noted the source. ?She thinks that could be funny but still provocative.?
Meanwhile, Jennifer and Justin have not been seen together in public recently, sparking whispers that the two are drifting apart. But her pal says that they are just immersed in their careers and are still committed to each other ? and even to starting a family someday.
?Since they haven?t been able to conceive naturally, Jen and Justin are now looking at adoption or hiring a surrogate,? said the source. ?She?s not going to let anything get in the way of starting a family with Justin.?
[From The National Enquirer]
How many times are we going to have to hear that Jennifer is in ?the best shape ever?? I?m not shading Jennifer for keeping in shape ? she works out and does yoga like a boss, and she?s super-toned and good for her. But she?s been in ?the best shape ever? for going on 17 years, right? Ever since she lost weight in the first few seasons of Friends. And how many times are we going to hear about her ?scandalous? and ?sexy? scenes where she?s being so brave and showing off her body? She?s dropped trou in so many movies! AND photo-shoots! It would be like making a big deal about Kate Winslet?s nudity ? we?ve seen it all before.
As for the pregnancy/surrogacy/adoption stuff? whatever they want. I?m not sure I believe that Jennifer was doing fertility treatments this year, but if she was and it didn?t take, that?s sad news for them.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston plans to go topless in new film because she can't get pregnant' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This new National Enquirer story does not really mesh with yesterday?s In Touch Weekly cover story, all about how Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux are having major relationship drama and the more Jennifer clings, the more she pushes him away. The Enquirer?s story makes it sound like Justin and Jennifer are okay, but that Jennifer has given up on fertility treatments and now she just wants to focus on her career. Which I guess I believe, considering Jennifer has been doing several projects back-to-back this year? Sure. What?s funny though is that instead of making this a story about ?Jen giving up on pregnancy,? it?s a story about how she?s going to go topless in We’re the Millers 2.
JEN ready to bare ALL as pregnancy dreams just?fade away. AFTER failing to conceive with her fianc Justin Theroux, Jennifer Aniston is finally giving up on her dream of getting pregnant and instead refocusing on her career, say sources.
In fact, the former ?Friends? beauty is said to be considering going topless in the sequel to her hit comedy ?We?re the Millers.?
?If Jennifer thought there was any chance that she?d be getting pregnant, there?s no way she?d prepare for a project in which she?ll have to strip down,? said a source. ?The truth is that Jen and Justin have been trying all year to conceive with no luck.
?She tried every fertility treatment available, which is why she packed on the pounds over the summer and was sporting what some people thought was a baby bump at the New York premiere of ?We?re the Millers.??
Jennifer, 44, recently changed her looks by chopping off her trademark locks ? and now she?s said to be wrestling with an image makeover.
?Jen?s completely torn over the prospects of going topless because she?s made $45 million from her ?America?s Sweetheart? persona,? a longtime friend of the actress told The ENQUIRER. ?But with Justin encouraging her to go for it, she?s seriously considering revealing her breasts in ?Millers 2? before she gets too old!?
An insider says that Jen has all but signed on to reprise her role as stripper Rose, and that she wants filming to be done in six months ? as soon as possible after she wraps ?Horrible Bosses 2.?
?Jen?s in her best shape ever and can?t wait to show it off,? revealed the source. ?She says she loved playing a stripper in her 40s, and Justin?s been urging her to get edgier with her roles.?
Still, Jennifer is said to be weighing various options to keep it tasteful.
?It?s possible the topless shot will be from a distance and Jen will be wearing a body stocking or even body art, but she?s also discussed with the studio the possibility of a close-up with her breasts pixilated or covered with a funny blooper motif,? noted the source. ?She thinks that could be funny but still provocative.?
Meanwhile, Jennifer and Justin have not been seen together in public recently, sparking whispers that the two are drifting apart. But her pal says that they are just immersed in their careers and are still committed to each other ? and even to starting a family someday.
?Since they haven?t been able to conceive naturally, Jen and Justin are now looking at adoption or hiring a surrogate,? said the source. ?She?s not going to let anything get in the way of starting a family with Justin.?
[From The National Enquirer]
How many times are we going to have to hear that Jennifer is in ?the best shape ever?? I?m not shading Jennifer for keeping in shape ? she works out and does yoga like a boss, and she?s super-toned and good for her. But she?s been in ?the best shape ever? for going on 17 years, right? Ever since she lost weight in the first few seasons of Friends. And how many times are we going to hear about her ?scandalous? and ?sexy? scenes where she?s being so brave and showing off her body? She?s dropped trou in so many movies! AND photo-shoots! It would be like making a big deal about Kate Winslet?s nudity ? we?ve seen it all before.
As for the pregnancy/surrogacy/adoption stuff? whatever they want. I?m not sure I believe that Jennifer was doing fertility treatments this year, but if she was and it didn?t take, that?s sad news for them.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston shows off her bob haircut, engagement ring in LA: improved? | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston is super-busy, you guys. She?s busy with endless hair appointments and spa treatments! These are new pics of Jennifer going into a spa on Friday. The spa? Mila Moursi Skin Care Institute in West Hollywood. These photos have everything you need for your Aniston fan-fiction: the quartz-looking engagement ring, the new bob hair style, the hint of Cheshire-cat smile (why is she smiling?!) and a bulky sweater jacket which will fuel another round of endless pregnancy rumors.
What should we tackle first? Let?s do hair. Her hair looks much better in these photos than in the first photos immediately following her hair catastrophe. I really do wonder if that formaldehyde ?Brazilian? hair treatment might have burned off a lot of her hair, but here we can see that it looks reasonably healthy. Kind of thin. Hm. I?ve come around to the idea that Jennifer, like Duchess Kate, has always worn a lot of hair pieces, but I?ve always believed that if Jennifer stopped messing with her hair, she would have naturally curly/wavy, thick hair. Which is awesome. Why does she hate her natural hair so much?!
As for the ring and the bulky sweater? well, obviously, it?s an invitation to Bump Watch her for the twenty-bajillionth time, and obviously she wants us to know that the engagement is still very much on. Good. I don?t have the strength to withstand another breakup, pity party and YEARS of Jennifer doing rent-a-dates with B-list models and C-list actors. Please, Jesus, let Justin be The One. PLEASE.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's hair guy posts photo of Aniston's new bob: cute or disastrous' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week we heard the sorrowful tale of how Jennifer Aniston had chopped off her golden locks, thus losing her magical powers. She?s like the Samson of TV actresses! While it would have been news no matter what (Aniston?s hair is always news, believe it or not), what I found particularly interesting is WHY she needed to cut her hair. Apparently, Jennifer was trying an experimental and very dangerous ?Brazilian? chemical treatment involving formaldehyde and keratin to chemically straighten your hair, giving you that oh-so desirable 1990s ?just flat-ironed? look.
While you?d think Aniston would be old enough to know that she should put formaldehyde on her hair (WTF!), it?s even more interesting because she?s an investor and profit participant in Living Proof, a haircare line that is supposed to be able to manage her hair naturally, without all of the chemical bulls?t. Aniston has been shilling Living Proof for a year, swearing by it up and down. And now it turns out that she felt the need for experimental chemical straighteners? Interesting.
Anyway, Aniston?s long-time hair guy and BFF Christopher McMillan posted the header photo to his Instagram with the hashtags: ?LOVE! “#JenniferAniston #bobhaircut #LivingProofInc #Flex #PerfectHairDay?. Well, that answers one question I had: whether this CODE RED HAIR DISASTER would ruin Aniston?s longest-standing relationship with a man. It hasn?t. Us Weekly even ran a story yesterday about Jennifer’s color treatment and how Chris is still putting the “finishing touches” on her look. But let me ask you something ladies: if your BFF hair guy ruined your hair with chemicals to the point where you had to chop nearly everything off, would that guy still be your friend?
Interestingly enough, just before Jennifer?s chemical disaster, she got her ear cartilage pierced with her new BFF Gucci Westman. Gucci posted this photo on her Instagram:
Photos courtesy of Instagram, WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston chopped off her hair after 'Brazilian' chemical treatment disaster | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston cut her hair! This is big news. I guess. I?ve actually been wondering why there has been little to no Aniston news the past few weeks, and as it turns out, it?s because she?s recovering from a bad ?Brazilian? and she had to cut off most of her hair. You can see the exclusive photos here and here ? it looks like her hair is now just a choppy bob, and I don?t know if her hair is wet or greasy in those pics, but it looks awful. Aniston confirmed the ?Brazilian? disaster when she spoke to Elle UK recently:
On Friday night ELLE exclusively chatted with Jennifer Aniston, she of the we-want-it hair and former owner of the now infamous Rachel haircut. When putting to her the question of whether she would consider cutting her hair for a role she revealed that she has just gone for the chop.
?Funny you say that. I actually just cut all my hair off two days ago,? the star told ELLEuk.com exclusively. The haircut is so new, freshly cut last Wednesday, that the actress is yet to step out with her newly cropped hair.
So why the change? ?It wasn?t for a role. My hair went through a phase – I did this thing called a Brazilian and my hair did not react really well to it. It?s about 2-inches above my shoulders now,? Aniston revealed.
It?s not the worst timing for the star to feel compelled to cut her hair, this season mid-length hair, or as ELLE called it in our AW13 trend report ?The Rebel Cut?, is every where. In fact, numerous members of team ELLE including our editor-in-chief Lorraine, fashion features director Rebecca Lowthorpe and news editor Leisa Barnett have all gone for the chop (and we?re not exaggerating when we say there are too many ELLE staffers to list them all here).
But not one to follow trends, the actress isn?t too sure about her new shorter haircut.
?The minute I cut my hair I want it back. Always. It?s a guarantee. I?m trying really hard to love this one,? she said.
It’s not the first time the star has sported a bob; her hairdresser and longtime friend Chris Macmillan (who also cut off Miley Cyrus’s hair) tends to crop Aniston’s hair every few years to keep it looking healthy.
[From Elle UK]
I had no idea what this ?Brazilian? treatment was until I read this story at The Daily Mail ? apparently, it?s like a hardcore chemical straightening process using ?formaldehyde and keratin? to keep your hair straight for three months. You know what?s funny about this? SO MUCH. For one, I think many women would love to have Jennifer?s naturally curly Greek hair, but she?s spent most of her adult life trying to look like Gwyneth Paltrow, complete with straight, flat-ironed, damaged-looking blonde hair.
This is also amusing because Jennifer has been shilling her MIT-produced haircare line Living Proof as the ?answer? to all of your hair needs. What?s that, Aniston? The Living Proof haircare line is insufficient for your needs so you had to go in for a sketchy and controversial chemical treatment? Well, I?ll be damned. Jennifer Aniston?s hair is MADE OF LIES.
Here are some photos from the last time Aniston had shorter hair, in early 2011:
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Hot or Not: Jennifer Aniston's Christian Dior Dress And Other News | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston arrived at the “We’re the Millers” premiere last night in a Christian Dior dress that looked like an apron in the front and a Raggedy Ann Halloween costume from the back. It’s waaaay too young for her. Taylor Swift I could see wearing this dress, or Selena Gomez. NOT 44-year-old Jennifer Aniston. On the plus side, I really like her hair like that. It’s a welcome change from the straight center-parted route she almost always goes. So what’s your verdict… hot, or not?
Interwebbing so you don’t have to:
True story: Britney Spears spent seven million dollars on fast food and dollar stores. (Celebitchy)
Kristen Stewart is going back to school, but it’s not closed-mouth breathing or acting school, so I don’t know that it’s gonna do her any good. (Celeb Slam)
“That Seventies Show” star Lisa Robin Kelly died today at the age of 43. (The Blemish)
The most brilliant thing I’ve ever heard — send in your old wardrobe and get $20 towards a whole new wardrobe! (Modavanti)
Five celebrities who’ve taken a public tumble while drunk, because laughing at others’ misfortunes is what our people do best. (Daily Stab)
Strong is NOT the new skinny. (Jezebel)
Who’s going to be Ziva’s predecessor on “NCIS?” More importantly, will their still be quips and zany banter and sexual tension? (Huffington Post)
The craziest things ever found on the subway. I’m a bus girl from here on out. (Mandatory)
Let the breast-feeding debates begin: Selma Blair nurses her baby in public. (Evil Beet)
Prince joins Twitter and I still don’t care. (Bitten & Bound)
Katie Couric says she thinks the Kardashians are a wart on the butt of humanity. I’m paraphrasing, of course, but you get the gist. (Amy Grindhouse)
Brad and Angelina bought son Maddox a $6,000 guitar, which he promptly smashed over the head of his little brother Pax. Probably. (ICYDK)
Gwyneth Paltrow looks like a rangy plucked chicken in her Stella McCartney bikini. (DS)
Twenty things you didn’t know about Apple and Steve Jobs. (COED Magazine)
Darren Young comes out as the first young openly gay WWE wrestler. (popbytes)
If you want skin like Cate Blanchett, they’ve got her regimen on tap! (Fab Over 40)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux to 'live separately,' bicoastal for six months' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Did you see LaineyGossip?s post yesterday about Jennifer Aniston?s possible baby bump? Aniston made a surprise appearance Monday night at a tribute for famed director James Burrows (he directed more than a dozen episodes of Friends). Jennifer wore a really ugly, unflattering double-breasted suit thing and now people are wondering if she was hiding a baby bump. I?m included the video below ? skip ahead to about the 43:20 mark.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston 'flipped out' when a character in her last film was named 'Angie' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As we covered exhaustively over the summer, Jennifer Aniston was in NYC for most of the summer working on Squirrels to the Nuts, an ensemble film directed by Peter Bogdanovich. Bogdanovich has apparently tried to make this film a few other times, but financing always fell through. So, it?s a small-budget comedy-drama. Which is code for ?we don?t have the time, money or patience to deal with some diva actress.? But that was before they met Aniston, I guess. According to Star Magazine, Aniston pitched a hissy fit when she read the script (at the last minute) and discovered that one of the major characters was named ?Angie?. Nooooo. Doesn?t every single person in the world know that Jennifer Aniston could never be in the same movie where a fictional character shares the name as her arch-nemesis?!
All it took was one little word to turn Jennifer Aniston from America?s Sweetheart into a director?s nightmare: ANGIE. A set insider has informed Star that, while filming Squirrels to the Nuts in NYC this summer, Jen flipped out when she learned that the film?s other main character had the same first name as her archnemesis, Angelina Jolie.
?The original script had a role named Angie, and it infuriated Jen,? shared a set insider. ?She cringed whenever she heard it. Production was scheduled to start on a Monday but Jen didn?t arrive until Wednesday because the scripts had to be revised first.?
The character now goes by Izzy and will be played by Imogen Poots.
But Jen?s diva behavior didn?t stop with the script, adds the tipster: ?Jen wanted all of her personal expenses paid, even though she knew that she was signing onto a lower budget film, and most actors take that into consideration.? Not Jen, claims the source. Jennifer insisted not only on a five-star hotel but that her team?s expenses be covered too!
?Jen took full advantage by treated her entourage to fancy dinners every night? of all the people I?ve worked with in the film industry, Jen was the most annoying.?
[From Star Magazine, print edition]
See, it?s not even Jennifer?s character!!! Jennifer pitched a fit about a character?s name which another actress would have played. I might have been more sympathetic if Aniston?s character was named Angie. But pulling rank about this? It?s weird. As for the part about Jennifer requiring the producers to pick up the tab for her entourage ? that?s a common enough thing? on a big studio movie. On a small budget film, not so much. One of the most outrageous things about Jennifer?s ?diva demands? that I?ve ever heard is that she makes the studios pay for her hair guy, Chris McMillan, to travel with her during promotional tours, often at a cost of $50,000 per week. I imagine she?ll probably do that again when she?s promoting Squirrels to the Nuts.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Spends her Friday Getting Pampered | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Finishing off her week with a pamper session, Jennifer Aniston was spotted out and about in Los Angeles, CA on Friday (September 27).
The "We're the Millers" actress looked casually chic in boyfriend jeans, black wedges and a plaid button up as she sipped on a refreshing beverage.
In other news, as previously reported by GossipCenter, Jen's fiance Justin Theroux is gracing the cover of GQ magazine's October issue, where he slightly opened up about his relationship with one of America's hottest women.
Speaking about the chaos surrounding their high profile love life, Theroux says, "It's a bit like going to a slightly different altitude, you know? [The paparazzi]... I call them photojournalists, actually [can be a drag]. When I get complimented on the street because I'm having twins... [that's weird, too]."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.357.213
Photos Online+ 7.915 past week
1.162
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Olga Kurylenko
Photos of Olga Kurylenko will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
3 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
