| | | | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
| Emma Stone in Louis Vuitton at the 'Battle' premiere: cute or unflattering' | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some photos from Saturday night?s premiere of Battle of the Sexes, the true story of the exhibition match/feminist sports event between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. I will never NOT think that it?s odd to have a big premiere on a Saturday night, but what do I know? Enjoy the photos! Emma Stone was obviously the star of the premiere, and she wore an odd Louis Vuitton number which I don?t really care for. I would be interested in seeing the shirtdress without the jacket, but I get that the whole thing is probably a straight-off-the-runway look. In general, I don?t completely hate the actual clothes. But I?m shocked by the terrible shade of blonde that Emma is going with these days. It?s standard at this point to say that I miss her as a redhead, but honestly: if she?s going to be a blonde, can she go a bit darker? Now all that being said, even though Emma looks so washed out, it?s cool that she?s owning her paleness. It would be so much worse if she was orange.
I?m also including photos of Emma with her costar Steve Carell (who plays Bobby Riggs) as well as Sarah Silverman and Andrea Riseborough. Billie Jean was there too, looking amazing. Billie was obviously a consultant on the film, and she approved of Emma?s casting. Some current tennis players also came out for the premiere, including? Maria Sharapova. Ugh. If Serena Williams didn?t just give birth, I?m sure she would have gone to the premiere. Serena and Billie are tight in real life.
As for Emma and her chance at another Oscar or Oscar nomination for this role? critics love the film and they love Emma?s performance. I think Emma will be nominated for this but she won?t win, mostly because the Academy gave her the Oscar for stupid La La Land. Vulture has a breakdown of what Emma?s Oscar chances would be – go here to read.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Amber Tamblyn wrote a NYT op-ed about the need to believe female victims | Added 7 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week, ancient pervert James Woods decided to get on his high horse and moralize about the romance at the center of Armie Hammer?s latest film, Call Me By Your Name. The film features a romance between a 20-something dude and a 17-year-old guy. The film is set in Italy, where that kind of iffy statutory situation would not be illegal (or even frowned upon, one would assume). Of course Woods was ridiculous to call out the age difference, and Armie Hammer slapped back at him, pointing out that James Woods dated teenagers when he was 60-something. Amber Tamblyn backed up Armie?s facts with a story of her own: James Woods hit on her when she was 16 years old, and he invited her to go to Las Vegas. She ended up writing an essay in Teen Vogue about all of it, and how Woods called her a liar and how he needs to come to Jesus. Now she?s written an op-ed for the New York Times called ?I?m Done with Not Being Believed.?
This is less about what just happened with Woods and more about Woods Culture and how we can end it. https://t.co/oc3IRbVk8e
— Amber Tamblyn (@ambertamblyn) September 16, 2017
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.461.666 Photos Online+ 3.022 past week 2.052 Users Online | | |
| | | | | | We Salute Charisma Carpenter
Photos of Charisma Carpenter will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in 6 hours | | |
| | | |
|