| | |  | Kristen Stewart News & Gossip
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart Seethru to Bra at the Met Gala Afterparty | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Dickism |
|
|
|
|
|
Here is Kristen Stewart and Riley Keough looked thick as thieves as they headed to a Met Gala after party.
She had slipped into her favourite casual jeans to continue the A List fun after representing Chanel for the red carpet segment of Anna Wintour’s big night.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart At Charles James: Beyond Fashion Costume Institute Gala | | Added 10 years ago | Source: Dickism |
|
|
|
|
|
Here is Kristen Stewart attending The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute benefit gala celebrating “Charles James: Beyond Fashion”.
She sported her signature glum expression, that didn’t stop the outfit from dazzling us. Featuring a multi-colour short skirt with a long sheer layer over top, a golden cinched-in waist and a vibrant Pink top, the elaborate dress fit the actress’ eclectic style perfectly. Bright orange hair swept to the side and black pumps complemented the shimmering dress.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart in Chanel couture at the 2014 Met Gala: great or too gimmicky? | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?m not sure that the House of Chanel really had the best night at last night?s Met Gala. Their standard-bearer was? Kristen Stewart. K-Stew wore Chanel Couture (as opposed to that dreadful Dallas collection which she now represents in an ad campaign). Thoughts? Let?s go head to toe. First, I don?t blame her for having bad hair. Her hair is dyed that stupid Manic Panic shade because she?s working on a film in NOLA. The hair couldn?t be helped, and she did the best (?the best?) she could with it.
As for the dress? there?s just too much going on. Too many tricks, too many gimmicks. I tried looking at the dress in just waist-up photos, and I actually kind of liked it. So, I basically want to rejigger this dress into something cleaner and less feathery. I also want to teach Kristen how to pose on a red carpet without making tight fists as a way to self-comfort. PS? I love the shoes.
Lily Allen wore Chanel Couture as well. God, this is so ugly and ancient. It makes Lily look like she?s 50 years old. The hair isn?t helping.
Anna Wintour wore Chanel as well. Wintour kept playing fast and loose with the theme, and many people believed the theme was strictly black-and-white. And then Anna showed up in this colorful frock. I don?t even like it.
#488317731 / gettyimages.com
Photos courtesy of Getty, Fame/Flynet and WENN.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart shows off a new look on 'American Ultra' set: '90s grunge/stoner' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?m going to date myself so much in this post, but that?s the way it goes. I came of age in the era of grunge. I think I was 13 or 14 when I first heard Pearl Jam and Nirvana. And at that time, I was friends with all of the flannel-wearing, Patchouli-smelling, Manic-Panic-hair-dyeing grunge kids. And right now, Kristen Stewart looks exactly like all of my friends at that time.
These are pics of Kristen on the NOLA set of American Ultra, the action/comedy she?s doing with Jesse Eisenberg. Is this film set in 1993? Because this entire outfit/vibe looks like 1993 to me. We actually had a preview of Kristen?s hair change a few weeks ago ? back then, it looked like she dyed her hair a light orange, but I guess the orange was just a base for the Manic Panic look. God, this makes me nostalgic. I want to get high for the first time and listen to The Cure. The only difference is that in 1993/94, we were all wearing Doc Martens, not Timberlands.
A bunch of late editions have joined the cast of this film too ? in addition to Jesse Eisenberg, Kristen will be joined with Topher Grace, Sharon Stone, Tony Hale, Bill Pullman and John Leguizamo. The basic plot: ?Eisenberg is a small-town stoner who doesn?t realize he?s a highly trained killer. Stewart plays his girlfriend.? She looks the part. But I still want to know if this is set in the early ?90s.
PS? Sources say Kristen is sad that Sparkles went to Coachella without her. But I think she?s probably just happy to be working ? she?s been doing back-to-back projects for months after not working for like two years.
PPS? Yes, she?s still smoking. I think she quit on-and-off when she was with Sparkles, but she?s been a steady smoker for more than a year, I believe.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart's Chanel Paris-Dallas ads revealed: interesting or awful' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Back in December, Kristen Stewart was named as the new ?face? of Chanel?s Paris-Dallas Collection. She actually went to Dallas for the announcement, and she got to hang out with Karl Lagerfeld (again). Following that, Kristen took some friends to Paris for a few days while she (presumably) shot the campaign and did some shopping ? she was spotted around Paris carrying a $3400 Chanel bag, so it was totally a business trip for her.
Anyway, these are some of the first images from the campaign. Thoughts? First of all, these aren?t the official leaks from the campaign, at least I don?t think so. They come via Instagram, and I would imagine they are photos of the print ad campaign, just because the images don?t seem to be the best quality. Or maybe this is how the ads really look ? sort of blurry and gritty.
Regarding the clothes? very fringy, very ?Southwest?. Personally, I don?t care for that look ? I?ve never been into ?cowboy chic? or whatever and I don?t think I?ve ever owned anything with a fringe. But if you like that look, I would imagine that this is probably okay, or even wonderful. I do kind of love those black and white cowboy boots in the one shot. As for how Kristen looks? it?s not bad. I actually think she looks much better in these shots than she ever did for her Balenciaga campaigns.
Photos courtesy of Instagram.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart is not pregnant, she gained weight on purpose for her new film | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some assorted photos of Kristen Stewart out and about in YC last week, and filming in Lido Beach last Friday. She?s still filming Still Alice, where she has a supporting part as Julianne Moore and Alec Baldwin?s daughter. As I?ve said, I wouldn?t have really chosen Kristen to play Julianne?s daughter (Emma Stone would have been a better fit), but in these photos, I can see some sort of resemblance. Maybe it will work.
The last time we discussed Kristen, the tabloids claimed she was being ?snippy? and unpleasant on the set of this film because she was on some kind of extreme juice diet/detox. But some people have pointed out that Kristen actually looks like she?s gained a little weight recently. Nothing significant or anything ? Kristen is now and has always been a small young woman. But her skinny jeans just look a little extra snug. Twihards even theorized that Robert Pattinson has secretly impregnated her, because OF COURSE. Robsten Forever! Well, Hollywood Life (Twihard Central) says that Kristen was trying to gain weight for her character:
Kristen Stewart, 23, wasn?t told by her director to gain weight for her new movie Still Alice ? it was actually the actress herself who decided that putting on some extra weight would ?add to her character? and make her appear more youthful, a source tells HollywoodLife.com EXCLUSIVELY. In the movie Still Alice, Kristen plays the part of Julianne Moore?s teenage daughter, who bonds with her mother after she is diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer?s disease.
?It was actually Kristen?s decision to gain weight for her role in Still Alice. She thought it would add to her character, who is the youngest of three. She plays a teenager and teenagers can be a little heavier while going through puberty. She thought the extra weight would make her look a little younger,? a friend of Kristen?s tells HollywoodLife.com EXCLUSIVELY.
We spoke with celebrity dietician Lisa DeFazio, who applauded the Camp X-Ray star for her weight gain, saying she ?looks healthy, happy and has some curves.?
?She gained weight in a healthy way, working with a dietician, and she?s not upset at all about it ? it was her decision,? the friend explains.
As HollywoodLife.com previously reported, Kristen?s weight gain sparked rumors that the actress was pregnant with Robert Pattinson?s baby.
?Kristen is absolutely not pregnant. She has put on a few extra pounds for a movie role and that?s it,? an insider told HollywoodLife.com EXCLUSIVELY. ?She?s already so thin so a few more pounds makes a noticeable difference, she?s still thin.?
[From Hollywood Life]
Oh, that actually makes sense. And Kristen is right, a little extra weight does make her look younger ? she looks very apple-cheeked and yes, like a teenager. This also explains why People Magazine detailed all of the food and beverages Kristen consumed while recently out to dinner:
For Kristen Stewart, there?s nothing like a peppery cocktail or two to chase down dinner. On Thursday night, the actress ? dressed casually in jeans and a tee ? was spotted at Beauty & Essex, a popular restaurant on New York City?s Lower East Side. She ordered up house favorites like the grilled cheese, smoked bacon and tomato soup dumplings, made with five different cheeses ?for maximum melty cheese goodness,? chef Chris Santos told PEOPLE.
But the Twilight star didn?t eat alone.
?It appeared to be a family night out as Kristen came in with her dad and another woman,? said a source. ?She was very laid back and was especially nice and polite to their server.?
After a round of the dining spot?s signature cocktail, the Masterly Touch (made with vodka, lemon-thyme nectar and Campari pearls), the actress requested a different libation that packed some heat. So Beauty & Essex?s mixologist created a custom drink for her, made with vodka, muddled cucumber, jalapeos, lime, simple syrup and a splash of Grand Marnier.
?It was a hit with Stewart and she drank a few of them,? the source added.
[From People]
I?m not a cheese person (sacrilegious, I know), so the description of the grilled cheese stuff did nothing for me. But the description of the cocktails? Intriguing. I don?t think I?ve ever had a cocktail with ?spice? or any kind of peppery kick. I would probably need a chaser of something plain to dull the heat though. Anyway, that?s what?s going on with K-Stew. She?s not knocked up, she?s drinking alcoholic beverages and she gained weight on purpose to look younger.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart is possibly in talks for a very lucrative contract with Nike | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This ^^ is a photo of Kristen Stewart on the set of Still Alice in NYC. No joke. That?s Kristen. She?s been hiding behind umbrellas almost exclusively since she arrived in NYC. I don?t get why it would be that big of a deal to get pap?d on set in New York, especially considering she pretty much poses for candid photos when she?s in LA. Anyway, the important thing ? I guess? ? is that we always get a clear view of Kristen?s shoes. Kristen is known for hating heels and for constantly wearing her beloved Chucks, Vans, or whatever else the hipsters are wearing. But wearing hipster labels almost exclusively doesn?t pay as well as you?d think, so Kristen is apparently looking to take her sneaker game to the next level: a Nike endorsement! Well, this is according to Radar, who claims that Nike wants Kristen.
Nike bigwigs are pulling out all stops to persuade Kristen Stewart ? a huge fan of the shoemaker ? to sign a celebrity endorsement deal, RadarOnline.com has been told.
?It?s no secret how much Kristen loves Nikes,? a source dished. ?She often changes into a pair of Nikes after walking the red carpet in heels.?
But Nike is facing an uphill battle as the Twilight star, 23, who is notoriously private, shudders at the thought of having her face on advertisements!
?It?s not the easiest deal to make, as Kristen has shunned dozens of offers to endorse products since her rise to fame in the Twilight films. Also, Kristen already makes a ton of money because she gets a little piece of the Twilight merchandise. She?s terribly self-conscious about seeing her face on products.?
In the past, Nike has had success with such celebrity endorsers as Michael Jordan and Lance Armstrong before the brand cut ties with the cyclist after his doping scandal.
?But the company obviously wants to broaden its base from athletes to actors, and, in particular, appeal to young women,? the source said. ?Nike execs believe that with her tomboy cool image, Kristen would be the perfect celebrity spokeswoman to create some new excitement about the brand.?
However, if Stewart does decide to get past her hatred of fame and sign on, it will cost Nike big time, the source predicted.
They said: ?Nike will have to roll out some serious money if they?re going to be able to close a deal with her.?
[From Radar]
It wouldn?t surprise me at all if Kristen had gotten some offers to be the face of various shoe brands, but I just don?t believe that Nike is SO hard up for Kristen to represent their company. Especially given the fact that Kristen is the one who seems a bit desperate to sell out these days ? her recent interviews on behalf of her Balenciaga fragrance endorsement have read like pleas for cosmetics and beauty companies to consider her for their campaigns. She was even shilling for Proactiv (without getting paid). I believe Kristen is looking to feather her nest and organize some partnerships with some bigger companies, or in hipster terms, she?s looking to sell out. Maybe this is her trying to get a big sneaker company to bite. Maybe it would help if she was actually photographed wearing Nikes in some pap photos?? Because she?s only been wearing Chucks and Vans lately. Oh, and Chanel. I forgot that, she?s also the new face of Chanel?s Dallas line or whatever. Yep ? she wants a big shoe contract!
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart: 'I stand by every mistake I?ve ever made, so judge away' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As I previewed yesterday, Kristen Stewart covers the March issue of Marie Claire, and it?s a doozy of a cover interview. Kristen has been much more press-friendly as of late, giving longer interviews on behalf of her Balenciaga contract and seeming more? loose, I guess. Not so grumpy, more willing to play. Anyway, yesterday I just had some early highlights from the interview, but now Marie Claire has released the whole piece online ? you can read it here. She smokes Camel filters. She fidgets constantly. She curses a lot and talks like a Valley Girl. She also gave Marie Claire one of her poems. For real! You can read it here. Some additional highlights:
On making choices based on what frightens her: ?Dude, I have no idea what I?m doing, and that?s kind of how I love it. I had no idea Twilight was going to be huge. Certain movies I?ve done I thought were going to be amazing did nothing. So it?s fun not having so much control. It?s kind of a fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants lifestyle ? it?s fun, but it?s scary as f–k. If it?s not scary, it?s usually ? you kind of have to step back and go, ?You?re probably making this decision because it?s right on paper.? But unless you get that irking fear, it?s not right.?
On being thrown into the unknown: ?I really like being thrown into the unknown and then finding my way. I don?t want to show someone something. I want people to watch me find something.?
On her M.O: ?I?m kind of, like, an extremist. I really don?t want to be working unless I?m bleeding it. And if I?m not working, then don?t ever try to make a plan with me.?
On being judged as a peril of fame: ?I stand by every mistake I?ve ever made, so judge away.?
On Drugs: “I’m such a control freak. I’m glad I grew up in this era because I think if I grew up in my parents’ age of drugs and discovery and crazy sh-t, I don’t think I would do drugs well.”
The Snow White sequel: While a Snow White & the Huntsman sequel is far-off, “it’s not where I thrive,” she says. “I really like being thrown into the unknown and then finding my way. I don’t want to show someone something. I want people to watch me find something.”
On doing press to promote her latest projects: ?I have an embarrassing inability, seriously, of summoning fake energy?I?m just not very good on TV, and it?s not my main goal in life to get good at it. People are like, ?She just can?t handle? ? for lack of a better word ? ?the spotlight?. No, actually, I can?t, and that is totally who I am. I love being an actor, but I?m the last person to want to have a birthday party. I don?t try to force it or turn it into something else or fabricate this personality?so I totally agree when people say I?m, like, the most awkward person. If you’re operating from a genuine place, then you can’t really regret anything.?
On her poetry: ?I don?t want to sound so f–king utterly pretentious?but after I write something, I go, ?Holy f–k, that?s crazy.? It?s the same thing with acting: If I do a good scene, I?m always like, ?Whoa, that?s really dope.??
She?s a reader but she wishes she had a college education: “The biggest struggle I’ve ever had has been about not going to school and working instead. I was worried about turning down specific individual experiences. Like each movie was, ‘F–k, I have to do that movie.’ I just did a movie with Tim Blake Nelson [Anesthesia, which recently wrapped], and he is brilliant. If I were as smart as he is, I could have the most killer conversation with anyone because I know I have it in me. I just don’t have the tools necessarily as well-developed as he does. I play this character who is getting her master’s degree in philosophy at Columbia, and I think I’m smart, but I’m definitely not book smart in that way.”
[From Marie Claire]
Eh. What do you want me to say? I can?t really bash the girl for this interview. Does she sound like a pretentious hipster at times? For sure. But that?s her age and her self-aware, self-acknowledged awkwardness. And quite honestly, I?d rather read an enjoyable interview with her where she?s reading poetry to the Marie Claire journalist and answering every question directly than, say, someone who just sits there muttering incoherently. Compared to someone like Shia Labeouf, Kristen comes across as interesting and cool.
Photos courtesy of Tesh/Marie Claire.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart: 'You don't know who you will fall in love with, you don't control it' | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kristen Stewart covers the March issue of Marie Claire Mag. This is her first major magazine cover in a long time. I?m not even going to try to backtrack and figure out when her last American cover was, but I trust that it?s been a good year. K-Stew has been giving more interviews recently ? mostly as part of promotional, contractual duties with Balenciaga, and I guess this might be the same? I was going to say that she might be promoting Camp X-Ray, but that doesn?t even have a release date yet. So yeah, she?s just promoting Balenciaga. As for the shoot? I think she looks blandly pretty. Kristen is capable of doing some surprisingly strong editorials, but I guess they were going for ?pretty? and ?not hardcore? here. She?s sort of dead-eyed, but I tend to blame the photographer for that. Some highlights from the cover story:
Kristen on love: “You don’t know who you will fall in love with. You just don’t. You don’t control it. Some people have certain things, like, ‘That’s what I’m going for,’ and I have a subjective version of that. I don’t pressure myself… if you fall in love with someone, you want to own them – but really why would you want that. You want them to be what you love.”
She doesn?t want to plan anything: “I mean, at this point, I can’t even tell you if I want to hang out on Saturday.”
She wants kids because she had such a happy childhood: “I had it too good, to not have that, too. If I were to put money on it, definitely, yeah. But you earn that, like, that’s so not here yet.”
[From Marie Claire via Starpulse]
?You don’t know who you will fall in love with. You just don’t.? Is that the explanation we?re going to get for the Rupert Sanders stuff? I mean, she doesn?t OWE us an explanation, and after all this time, I didn?t think we were going to get an explanation, but I kind of wonder if Kristen is going to talk about the incident more in the coming year as she promotes her movies and her modeling contracts. Will the explanation be along these lines? ?I couldn?t help falling in love with a married man???? See, I don?t think it was love. I really don?t. I think she was just getting some, for fun, because she was young and didn?t think it through.
Apparently, Kristen also recently told German Vogue: “I like to be a muse. You meet so many talented people who inspire me. I like the creative energy at photo shoots.” Is it bad form to refer to yourself as a designer?s muse? I think it is.
Photos courtesy of Marie Claire via TFS & Fashion Scans Remastered.
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart gets pap?d with a $3400 Chanel backpack in Paris: tacky or cute? | | Added 10 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by your lack of interest in yesterday?s Kristen Stewart story, I?m doubting many people will care about this, but I?m still covering it because I think it?s interesting. Kristen Stewart is changing! She really is. She?s trying out a slightly different public persona ? less grumpy, more talkative and sharing, and now she?s the kind of girl who jets off to Paris with some girlfriends just to go shopping at Chanel (and to do a photoshoot, of course). So, these are new photos of Kristen running around Paris in her new Chanel ensemble. Of course she got a Chanel sweatshirt, plus a Chanel backpack AND a Chanel purse. She is, after all, the newest face of Chanel. So, here?s the question: was this all some carefully planned promotional trip so Kristen could get pap?d and hawk some Chanel stuff? Probably. Us Weekly even ran a story about her Chanel backpack:
A JanSport backpack, this is not. Kristen Stewart was spotted heading into Karl Lagerfeld’s 7L Bookshop in Paris on Feb. 4, wearing a custom Chanel sweatshirt and double-fisting Chanel bags. In one hand, she carried the fashion house’s Boy bag, and over her other shoulder she slung a Chanel backpack that costs $3400 — equivalent to more than 113 JanSport bags.
The black distressed bag from the spring 2014 collection is spray-painted and adorned with knotted strings and a carabiner clip. Lagerfeld’s inspiration for the Pop Art collection of real-life wear was young artists. “Life is not a red carpet,” the designer and Chanel creative director told Vogue. “This is for daily life. I wanted color, and a fraicheur. It’s a very happy mood.”
Stewart, the latest face of Chanel, arrived in Paris on Feb. 3 and headed to the Chanel store for a photo shoot. Before her campaign with Chanel for the Metiers d’Art Paris-Dallas collection debuts in the spring, Stewart went topless for her ad for Balenciaga Rosabotanica, for which she’s also a spokeswoman.
[From Us Weekly]
$3400 for a BACKPACK?! That?s Olsen-esque. And to quote my favorite line from Working Girl: ?IT?S NOT EVEN LEATHA!? Would you pay $3400 for a non-leather (it looks like run-of-the-mill plastic to me) Chanel bag? No. But would you carry it if you got it for free, and Chanel was paying you to carry it around to promote the label? Yeah, probably. And I do like her Chanel sweatshirt. It?s cute. Not for me, though. But for an 18-year-old heiress? Sure.
PS… I really can’t wait for Karl Lagerfeld’s inevitably bitchy interview about Kristen Stewart. It should be gold. I’m imagining a diatribe about her greasy hair.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.461.764
Photos Online+ 3.055 past week
1.941
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Charisma Carpenter
Photos of Charisma Carpenter will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
1 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
