| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Hilary Rhoda Will Blow Your Pants Off | | Added 8 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t know a lot about Hilary Rhoda here, other than the fact that she’s been featured in theSports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue a couple times, and she’s going to be featured heavily in my dreams and/or fantasies from now on. Because this cover shoot shejust did for lui is hands down one of the hottest […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Hilary Duff's dinner date with ex following split with boyfriend: reconciliation' | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Does Hilary Duff look like Crystal Bernard from Wings in this ^^ photo to anyone else??? The photo was taken on Saturday as Hilary stepped out for a dinner date with her ex husband Mike Comrey, right on the heels of her split with Rise Nation’s Jason Walsh. Although Mike was shady during their off-again, on-again divorce, the two have remained friendly post-split and are co-parenting their four-year old son Luca amicably. Hilary, who admitted to giving Tinder a try, has only been single for a few weeks. Some outlets are trying to make this ?date? a thing but I wouldn?t count on it. Hilary was back on The Talk last Friday and although she said she is grateful for her marriage and son, she thinks she was just too young to get married. According to Hilary, they weren?t emotionally ready to go the distance.
?Looking back, do you think you were too young when you got married??
That was the question audiences, and celebrity guest Hilary Duff, were asked on Friday?s episode of The Talk.
The Younger star, 29, didn?t hesitate in providing her response: ?I do.?
?I was 22 when I got married. I?m now divorced, I have a 4-year-old ? I wouldn?t change any of it for the world,? Duff admitted to the co-hosts.
Duff explained that in her early 20s, she had ?so much so young? which made her ?feel really ready to get married.? In August 2010, she married Mike Comrie ? with whom she shares 4-year-old son Luca ? but later divorced in February of this year.
?However, I don?t think we were mature enough to stick it out,? Duff revealed.
Just a month ago, Duff, who recently split with ex-boyfriend Jason Walsh, said that she doesn?t ?feel the need? to tie the knot in the future.
?I don?t feel the need to get married again. As much as I was ready and excited, you?re like, ?Oh, next step. We get married.? That is the traditional person that I?m talking about that?s inside of me or however I was raised,? said the mother of one. ?I don?t feel the need. I got to have the experience and it was awesome. I guess if it mattered to someone else that much, I would consider it.?
[From People]
Slightly off topic but I didn?t realize Aisha Tyler and her husband split up after 25 years (she mentioned it in the clip). That kind of bums me out. My husband and I didn?t meet until I was 27 but we’ve discussed whether we would have made it work if we’d met in our early 20s. I?m inclined to think I was so far from getting my act together that I would have sabotaged the relationship like I did all my others at that age. I love what Hilary said about getting married again. She’s talked bout not needing to be married to have a kid. It sounds like what she took from her marriage was an understanding that what she called her “traditional” ideas of relationship are not what they once were so she won’t rush into anything. She’s been in the spotlight since she was 12, she deserves to live her life her way. Good for her for looking past what went wrong with Mike and making a positive environment for Luca.
Is anyone watching Younger? I checked it out after I wrote about Hilary this summer. I loved season one. Although season two and three weren’t quite as good, I’m still watching. If anyone wants to discuss the finale in the comments, I’ll join you. Plus, I came across this this weekend and it made me smile.
Hilary and Luca hit up the Farmers’ Market on Sunday
Photo credit: Fame/Flynet Photos
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Sofia Vergara & Nick Loeb's embryo drama has a creepy new chapter | | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
A few weeks ago, I tried to discuss the creepy saga of Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb?s embryo drama. This situation has been going on for a few years and there?s enough backstory to fill a book, so let me summarize: Nick Loeb wants ?custody? of the embryos he created with Sofia when they were together. He wants to implant them in another woman, then raise those daughters on his own, because he?s ?pro-life.? Sofia refuses to sign off on the scheme, and Nick is suing her. The latest issue involves a radical anti-choice organization in Louisiana filing suit against Sofia as well, claiming that these embryos have a constitutional ?right to live.? That lawsuit even names the embryos, calling them Emma and Isabella. Basically, Emma and Isabella have ?sued? Sofia. It?s all very dystopian and disgusting and I have so much sympathy for Sofia. Loeb comes across like such a manipulative douchebag. So, what?s the latest?
In the latest twist in the wild battle over Sofa Vergara and Nick Loeb?s frozen embryos, Page Six has learned that lawyers are gearing up to file a lawsuit demanding that the embryos be shipped from California to Louisiana. Earlier this month a stunning suit was filed against Vergara on behalf of the fertilized eggs ? which are named in the papers as ?Emma? and ?Isabella? and listed as plaintiffs. The embryos? ?trustee,? James Charbonnet, was also listed as a plaintiff.
But insiders tell us that in the new year, attorneys will ask the ART Reproductive Center in Beverly Hills, Calif. ? where the embryos have been cryogenically frozen since the former couple?s IVF treatment was completed in 2013 ? to transfer them to a facility in Louisiana. The legal team is hopeful that ART will agree because it will consider the embryos a ?legal hot potato? that it would like to be rid of. But if ART ? or Vergara ? declines permission for the embryos to be moved, Charbonnet intends to sue in federal court for the right to move the embryos.
Insiders say that the choice of Louisiana as their new home is significant because it?s the only state where embryos have legal rights of their own, rather than being considered the belongings, or ?chattels? of their parents. The embryos would be sent by courier.
?Although Nick Loeb is not a party to the existing litigation or [this] subsequently contemplated litigation, he may be a beneficiary if the court adjudicates that the embryos are not chattels but entities with constitutional rights of survival,? Loeb?s attorney Mark J. Heller told us. ?Such a ruling would defeat [Vergara?s] intention to keep her daughters? embryos frozen in perpetuity and endorse the irrevocable right of parenthood granted to donors when they contribute to the creation of an embryo.?
Loeb already sued for custody of ?Emma? and ?Isabella? in 2014 but dropped the suit this month after a California judge demanded Loeb identify women with whom he?d had aborted pregnancies. Loeb said he would rather ?go to jail? than give up the names. Vergara?s rep didn?t get back to us.
[From Page Six]
This is just INSANE. Sofia?s legal argument has been simple throughout: custody or possession of the embryos belongs to both herself and Nick. As in, they both have to sign off on anything involving the embryos. So, no, the Beverly Hills clinic isn?t going to shrug and send the embryos off to Louisiana, nor will Sofia sign off on that. And the legal implications for this are stunning across the board. Basically, what happens when couples undergo IVF treatments and freeze a number of embryos, some of which don?t get used? This could set a precedent for all of those unused embryos to ?sue? their parents. It could be used to legally force women to carry children.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.792.637
Photos Online+ 56.397 past week
3.159
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Emily Blunt
Photos of Emily Blunt will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
5 days | | |
| | |
|
