 | |  |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Kaley Cuoco won't move in with her husband until 21 months after their wedding | | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kaley Cuoco married Karl Cook in early July 2018. They had a quieter wedding, perhaps because they?re both super-rich and doing a ?quiet wedding? is a flex at this point. Karl?s family is very wealthy, and Kaley?s wealth is self-made. But they met doing that favorite pursuit of the wealthy: horse stuff. My point is that they have a lot of money, and the super-rich live differently. My point is also that after marrying nearly two years ago, they still haven?t ?moved in? together, in the same house and all of that. In August of last year, Kaley talked about how they still weren?t living together because their house was still being built, and until then, they both had their separate homes. Well, that?s continued until? now. Or next month.
Kaley Cuoco is going to have a brand-new roomate next month: her husband Karl Cook. The actress, who has been living in New York City filming her upcoming HBO Max series The Flight Attendant, told Access Hollywood on Monday that she and Cook are moving into their first home together in April.
?We are built, we are so excited,? said Cuoco, 34. ?We haven?t spent an evening in it yet. Actually Karl has been at home and I said ?Why don?t you stay at the house?? but he?s waiting for me to get there and have all the animals there.?
?When I wrap in April, that will be our first time in our new house,? she added. ?We are going steady. He gave me his letterman jacket and we are moving in together.?
The Big Bang Theory alumna revealed last year that she and her husband, a professional equestrian and son of billionaire Scott Cook, were not living under the same roof.
?Everyone was like so crazed that we didn?t live together, they couldn?t believe,? Cuoco recalled. ?I was like ?Why do you care?? Didn?t understand it.?
During an appearance on The View in November, Cuoco explained that she and Cook were living apart ?because of work and his business and his horses are a few hours away from where I was currently living. We just haven?t been under the same roof. But by the way, it?s been working great and we love it. We love it, so I don?t know why people have such an issue.?
[From People]
You might remember that Gwyneth Paltrow also did the ?not living with her husband for a year? thing, but as we later learned, that living arrangement was not some high-minded, elitist scheme for a healthy marriage. There?s some kind of drama between Gwyneth and Brad Falchuk?s kids from his first marriage, and I think the living situation issue was custodial. So? a different situation from the Kaley-Karl thing entirely. I just can?t believe that two (rich) people would choose not to cohabitate for some-odd 21 months after they got married. But I do get that horse people are just DIFFERENT. The horses come first, the marriage second.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | DM: Duchess Kate overtakes Meghan as 'the biggest royal fashion influencer' | | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the day, I don?t think the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge?s Irish struggle-tour really did that much, especially when their newscycle was immediately overtaken by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex?s You Coulda Had A Bad Bitch farewell tour. The comparison between Meghan and Kate?s fashion on their back-to-back tours was stark. Kate had been wandering around Ireland in flag-colors and vintage clown ruffles, while Meghan stepped out in a series of jewel-tone, sleek, body-con ensembles which basically crashed Royal Twitter. But not according to the Daily Mail! According to the data compiled by the DM and LovetheSales.com, Kate is finally back to being the ?biggest royal fashion influencer? of the year. For the clown ruffles, really?
Kate Middleton has officially overtaken Meghan Markle as the biggest royal fashion influencer of this year. When the Duchess of Sussex, 38, first joined The Firm in 2017, the Meghan Effect saw shoppers go wild for anything she wore; but since Megxit, her fashion influence has dramatically declined, according to data compiled by LovetheSales.com. Based on the popularity of her outfits from 2017 to 2019, Meghans fashion choices lead to an average increase of 216 per cent in online demand. However, since the announcement that she and Prince Harry are stepping down as senior royals, Meghans influence on online fashion searches has dropped to just 31 per cent.
In stark contrast, Kates 2020 looks so far have sparked a 159 per cent increase a noticeable uplift from the 119 per cent average increase in searches for her outfits between 2017 and 2019. In January, both Kate, 38, and Meghan stepped out wearing coats by Spanish brand Massimo Dutti and while both proved popular, Kates was searched for online eight times more than Meghans.
From 2017 to 2019, the Meghan Effect had officially outshone the Kate Effect but since Harry and Meghan announced their move to North America, her outfits havent performed as well as previous years. The decrease in the effect is particularly noticeable when it comes to the Duchess of Sussexs signature gowns notably the red dress by London-born designer Safiyaa on Saturday. The statement gown worn by Meghan to the Royal Albert Hall was very similar to a blue dress from the same designer which she wore in Fiji in 2018. The blue gown had a much bigger impact on shoppers, with searches going up for Safiyaa gowns by 223 per cent in the days after the state dinner. By comparison, the red gown only sparked a 38 per cent uplift in searches for it over the last week.
[From The Daily Mail]
There?s a lot more evidence compiled in that piece that in 2020, Kate?s outfits are being searched for more than Meg?s ensembles. But? for a two-month block of time (the second week in January to the first week of March), Meghan wasn?t doing any big public events. She did some quiet charity visits and she posted those photos on Instagram, but the visits weren?t some big ?what is she wearing? thing. And it?s a joke to think that Meghan?s incredible fashion for the farewell tour had less of an impact than Kate?s sad Irish flag cosplay. ?Impact? can?t be judged by only searches (and searches according to this one site).
Anyway, none of that is the point. The point is that we as royal watchers are now stuck with clown ruffles, buttons, Victorian cosplay and shoulder pads from here on out. That?s why Kate?s tragic fashion is being embiggened because it?s all ?we? have got now.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, WENN, Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jenna Elfman is so bored that her cult commits human rights abuses | | Added 4 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that Jenna Elfman was a Scientologist really bummed me out when I learned it because I was such a huge Dharma and Greg fan. Since then, however, her adherence to the religions party line has eroded any allegiance I once held to her. And her latest ignorantly programmed comments don?t sound like she?s any closer to getting out. Jenna recently told Us Magazine that she knows about the controversies surrounding the Church of Scientology but doesn?t worry too much about them because they ?bore? her.
Jenna Elfman doesn?t have time for anyone?s negativity when it comes to Scientology, she exclusively reveals in the latest issue of Us Weekly.
The Fear the Walking Dead star, 48, credits the religion with helping her ?stay grounded? over the past 30 years ? and won?t stand for skepticism about the unique points of view promoted by the Church of Scientology.
?The controversy is boring,? Elfman says while speaking to Us at the NASCAR Auto Club 400 race in Fontana, California. ?It?s nothing to me. I know what I know, and how much it helps me.?
[From Us]
On the one hand, Jenna speaks like a proper cult member. She?s been indoctrinated to believe that everything good in her life is a result of CoS and that she owes them her fealty because of it. On the other hand, she?s validating that there are controversies with CoS but they don?t matter because she?s benefitting from it. Just remember, some of the controversies of which the cult is accused are coercion, stalking, reckless endangerment of human life, prohibiting psychology or psychiatry to aid mental health, child abuse, trafficking and forced labor. And those are just the ones for which we have first-hand accounts. Let?s not forget the possible shadow of kidnapping hangs over the church as well. But sure, Jenna, let?s turn a blind eye to *waves hands* all that because it?s kept your husband from cheating on you.
Photo credit: WENN/Avalon and Getty images
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 5.315.298
Photos Online+ 5.270 past week
1.683
Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Kylie Jenner
Photos of Kylie Jenner will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
7 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
