 | |  |  | Celebrity News and Gossip
|
|
| | Princess Beatrice & Eugenie have a hard time dealing with style & weight criticism | | Added 6 hours ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here?s a better look at Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice and their ensembles at Royal Ascot this week. Both York princesses looked kind of terrible, to be honest. I sort of defend them and their style most of the time, because they experiment with ?riskier? fashion choices and they sometimes wear more off-beat designers, but these looks were just bad for both of them. Beatrice?s dress was by Maje, and it looks super-cheap, from the fabric to the design to the fit. Eugenie?s bad darts ruined what could have been an okay look.
Eugenie and Beatrice tend to come out for Royal Ascot every year to support their grandmother. They do many of these ?big events? on the social calendar, and they do some charity work too. But they?re not full-time working royals, and they?re supposed to have other jobs. Eugenie works for a gallery in London now, after several years working for an auction house in New York. Beatrice? well, I?m still not entirely sure what she does. Anyway, People Magazine ran this piece about Bea and Genie and how the criticism gets to them, especially when they?re criticized over their work lives.
Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice have found their royal footing. As Queen Elizabeth?s granddaughters, the sisters have been in the spotlight since their births ? and the public didn?t always treat them kindly. They were mocked for their style choices ? most famously their whimsical fascinators at Kate Middleton and Prince William?s 2011 royal wedding ? and ridiculed for balancing their royal duties with their everyday careers. (Eugenie is an art gallery director in London, while Beatrice is vice president of a data and software firm in New York City.)
?Being role models has always been a hard one for them to deal with, and being criticized for their weight, fashion and work lives has always been hard for them to swallow,? an insider tells PEOPLE in this week?s issue. ?But in the last couple of years both girls have come around to the fact they?re women now, and they can do a lot of good with their status.?
Despite glamorous appearances at events like Trooping the Colour and Royal Ascot, the royal sisters want to make the most of their unique positions while maintaining normal lives.
?Yes, their grandmother is Queen, and they ride in carriages and live in this bubble,? a friend says of the princesses. ?But they?re human beings who want to fall in love, have a good time, make a difference and just live.?
?They are independent, working women but are also aware of their position and where they can help,? says the family friend.
[From People]
People Mag also notes that they do charity work often enough, and they come out to support the Queen at events throughout the year, and I agree they have the right kind of public schedule for two princesses who are not considered full-time royals. Prince Charles doesn?t want Eugenie and Beatrice to contribute, so they basically just do whatever the Queen wants them to do, all while maintaining full-time jobs (or at least that?s the idea). I also feel like people unfairly bash the York princesses for? looking like normal young women. I find them relatable they don?t always look perfect, they have tacky style, they have weight struggles. Why is that a bad thing? I thought royals were supposed to be Just Like Us? Also: Beatrice works for a software firm in New York now? Really?
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The Sussexes' exit from the Royal Foundation will likely be announced this week | | Added 31 hours ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As we discussed earlier, this week there?s a lot of talk about the Royal Foundation, which is/was shared by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The ground-zero gossip for this round of rumors seems to have originated in the Sunday Times, the same publication which broke the ?William wants to exile Meghan and Harry to Africa? story a few months ago. It?s not a tabloid, and I feel like someone important is leaking some interesting stuff to them. So, yeah, it feels like the Sunday Times got things moving and now other sites are picking up the story. It seems there are several gossip morsels which the tabloids have run with, like Prince Philip didn?t want Harry marrying an actress, and William was happiest when he could control Harry. But the big story is that the Sussexes will exit the Royal Foundation THIS WEEK.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle?s split from the Royal Foundation ? the charitable initiative they ran with Prince William and Kate Middleton ? will come Wednesday, sources told Page Six. It was rumored that Harry and Meghan will exit the foundation after reports of a royal rift between the couples. The foundation will continue without them, and the news will be announced after a board meeting this week.
A source told us: ?It?s not an easy time right now at the foundation .?.?. Everybody is massively stressed ahead of this meeting.?
A spokesperson said: ?We announced earlier this year the Royal Foundation was reviewing its structures .?.?. Any announcement regarding this review will be made in due course.?
[From Page Six]
Just three weeks ago, the Sun broke the news about the Royal Foundation split, only their sources said at the time that William and Kate were basically pushing the Sussexes out. A source said at the time: ?The couples have been given two options ? the first is to leave things as they are and the second a complete split. Nothing has been formally ratified but all the mood music is suggesting the Sussexes will break away. The Sussexes weren?t in a rush to make any changes, but the Cambridges were.? Which means that the next month of reporting will be about how DIVA MEG and Hen-pecked Harry demanded to leave the Royal Foundation, I?m absolutely sure. Speaking of, the Sunday Times also had this item:
Meghan Markle has been nicknamed ?the degree wife? by a senior royal, as they think her marriage to Prince Harry will ?only last three years?. According to The Sunday Times, this is the latest unflattering moniker given to the Duchess of Sussex, 37, since she married Harry last May.
It was previously reported that Meghan was given the nickname ?Me-Gain? at Kensington Palace due to rubbing staff up the wrong way. She has been called ?Duchess Difficult? for sending emails in the early hours of the morning and for ?yelling at someone for suggesting she wear ?garbage? tights from M&S?.
A palace source is also said to have commented on why Harry?s long-time pals ? such as Eton pal Tom ?Skippy? Inskip and PR guru Astrid Harbord ? have been excluded from Harry?s circle. The insider told the publication: ?Anybody who voiced any kind of reservation about Meghan has been sidelined.?
[From The Sun]
I laughed out loud at the idea of Meghan ?yelling at someone for suggesting she wear ?garbage? tights from M&S.? I?m sorry, that?s one of the funniest quotes I?ve ever read. Clutch your pearls if you want, but I sort of hope Meghan has actually bitched out some staffer for daring to suggest she wear ?garbage tights from M&S.? As for Meghan being a Degree Wife? well, here in America, it generally takes four years to get a degree. We won?t know until we know, but I think it continues to be really rude and nasty that all of these publications and ?sources? continue to push this narrative that Meghan will eventually leave Harry, and all they have to do is bully her out of the country and out of her marriage.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Backgrid and Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The Middleton family's business, Party Pieces, is apparently firing a lot of employees | | Added 90 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Even before then-Kate Middleton married Prince William, I was convinced that there was some shady stuff happening with the Middleton finances. The Middletons made their fortune with Party Pieces, at least that?s the official story. I never doubted that Party Pieces was a profitable start-up company from Carole Middleton, just as I never doubted that Carole has a true entrepreneurial spirit. What I doubted was this idea that the Middletons amassed a reported 40-million-pound fortune from selling cheap party supplies. I think they probably made enough for a comfortable middle-class life, but this whole ?the Middletons are rich AF because of Party Pieces? idea was just PR. I still believe that the Middletons? keeping-up-with-the-Joneses lifestyle was supplemented quite heavily by shady Uncle Gary. Well, now the Daily Mail (and The Sun) has an interesting story about how Party Pieces might be facing some hardships. Huh.
The party supplies company run by the Duchess of Cambridges mother has dismissed some of its staff amid fears for its future, it was claimed last night. Party Pieces, run by Carole Middleton, is said to have laid off at least three of its staff on Wednesday and a fourth worker was told they were at risk, although there were claims up to half of staff members were let go. The abrupt dismissals come months after three warehouse employees were laid off before Christmas.
The companys web designer, PR agent and search engine optimisation employee were among the recent firings. A shocked source told The Sun: There is a terrible air of doom and gloom about the place.
Another source told The Sun: There wasnt so much as a Christmas tree or festive decorations in the office. Morale is at rock bottom.
[From The Daily Mail]
Well, that?s certainly interesting, isn?t it? I always thought James Middleton noted supplier of Nazi marshmallows was the black sheep of the family because he has no head for business. But maybe Party Pieces was always something of a shell game. I?m being too harsh, I know it?s more than possible that Party Pieces was a well-run and profitable business for years and years and because of the changing dynamics of this particular niche market, Party Pieces is failing right now. I wonder if Party Pieces does go under, will royal reporters start telling the truth about the Middleton family?s finances though? They were never as rich as they claimed. Prince William even gave the Middletons a significant chunk of money to buy their upgraded home in Bucklebury.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Avalon Red and WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Duchess Kate 'has no issue with Meghan,' is making 'a real effort' to get along | | Added 98 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The Cambridges and Sussexes? joint appearances at the Commonwealth Day church service at Westminster ended up being kind of non-story from a gossip perspective. Sure, we talked about Meghan?s fug nurse?s hat and Kate?s buttons, but there was no real scandalous or controversial moment between the couples. It reminded me a lot of the Christmas Day walk at Sandringham Kate and Meghan were doing all of the heavy lifting of going along and getting along, and they were both definitely trying to be SEEN getting along. Meanwhile, the vibe between Harry and William seemed similar to Christmas too like Will and Harry have had a serious falling out and it?s still not okay between them. Anyway, Meghan and Kate greeted each other with a friendly cheek-kiss at Westminster, which was enough for Katie Nicholl at Vanity Fair to point out that ?sources? insist that Kate and Meghan have completely buried the hatchet.
The kissy greeting at Westminster: According to a Palace source, Kate Middleton?s unusual public gesture was deliberate?she hoped the warm embrace would be captured by the world?s media and finally put an end to the rumors of an ongoing feud.
Meghan?s last event? Vanity Fair has been told that the Commonwealth Day service was the last official royal engagement that Meghan Markle, who is believed to be eight months pregnant, will carry out before she gives birth, although she will continue to take private meetings, and Kate was keen to send out the right message before Meghan and Prince Harry have their baby.
A source claims Kate wants to keep everything professional: ?They might not have a huge amount in common but Kate has no issue with Meghan. She wants them to get along, not just for Harry?s sake but because two royal sisters-in-law at loggerheads wouldn?t be good, and Kate knows that. For Kate, it?s about keeping their relationship professional and putting on a show of togetherness.?
The Sussexes & Cambridges have been getting along better: As Meghan nears her due date, she and Kate have apparently been in regular touch. There has long been reason to doubt the reports of a feud between the two women, though there was indication last fall that Harry and Prince William were experiencing some tensions. Now they?re said to be getting along well, and there were no sign of any distance between William and Harry on Monday. However, joint appearances between the ?Fab Four,?? as they have been known, won?t be frequent from now on.
Kate has been making the effort: ?It?s not always been easy, there have been issues behind the scenes, but Harry and Meghan want to leave on good terms and Kate especially has been making a real effort,? says a second source. ?There are no bad feelings and I think Kate was keen to put an end to these rift rumors. She has no problem with Meghan and she has made it clear to Meghan that she?s there for advice or whatever Meghan might need.?
[From Vanity Fair]
I enjoy this story for the subtext most of all ?Harry and Meghan want to leave on good terms and Kate especially has been making a real effort.? I suspect William has not been making a similar effort. Possibly because it was never really about ?the duchesses at war!? as much as it was about William and Harry?s falling out. That being said, this is such a dumb way to position this story, like Magnanimous Future Queen Kate is a brilliant internal-politics diplomat who is the only one who understands that she has to get along with her sister-in-law. I guess Meghan didn?t have any agency in the whole ?duchess feud? thing, huh?
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | The Queen 'sees Meghan as a very useful tool' for securing the future of the monarchy | | Added 173 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Before the smear campaign, before the Royal Sussex Tour, before all of it collided into shambles, I said that it was notable to see how quickly Meghan Markle was being folded into the royal family. Meghan and Prince Harry?s courtship was fast for royalty, and the Queen seemed especially keen to accept Meghan quickly, and to show her the ropes and do events with her. I said at the time that the Queen was making a point of accepting Meghan and being SEEN accepting Meghan. The Queen is crafty and smart she knows that there will be hell to pay long-term if the royal family wages a racist and hateful campaign against the first woman of color to marry a blood prince. The Queen also knows that it?s good for the monarchy, long-term, if the family actually starts to look like the racially diverse people who recognize the Queen as THEIR Queen. It sounds obvious. But ?royal experts? get paid to say this sh-t on camera.
The Queen sees Meghan Markle as a very useful tool for the monarchy, a royal expert has claimed. Her Maj is said to be very fond of the Duchess of Sussex despite reports of a seething rift between Meghan and sister-in-law Kate Middleton.
But a royal expert says that the Queen also views Meghan, 37, as a useful tool for modernising the royal family. And she claims in a new documentary that the former Hollywood actress who married Prince Harry in May may have helped secure the House of Windsor for decades.
Imogen Lloyd, Royal Contributor for US station ABC, appears in the new documentary Meghan?s New Life: The Real Princess Diaries. In the programme, Ms Lloyd says: The Queen is incredibly smart. The Queen sees Meghan as a very useful tool in securing and symbolising the future of the monarchy for decades to come.?
[From The Sun]
I think this is true and also? it?s going to be more difficult than the Queen initially thought. It seems like it?s going to be a more delicate balance than previously believed, with the racist press smearing Meghan at every turn, and Work-Shy Will throwing tantrums and the Keen Defenders wanting to classify Meghan and Harry as ?minor royals? now. Oh, well. The Queen did what she could.
Meanwhile, this clip has gone viral allegedly, William is giving Meghan the cold shoulder here. I don?t doubt that he?s given her the cold shoulder in general, but I don?t think that?s what?s happening in this video.
View this post on Instagram
???| December 25 | 2018 | the royal family arrives for Christmas morning church service at St Mary Magdalene ????? #katemiddleton #princegeorge #princesscharlotte #princewilliam #duchessofcambridge #meghanmarkle #replikate #royalfamily #brunette #womancrush #loveher #princess #queen #theprincess #britishroyals #princesscatherine #catherinemiddleton #duchesscatherine #duchesskate #buckinghampalace #buckingham #redcoat #london #theroyals #hairgoals #iloveherhair #styleicon #princeLouis #merrychristmas
A post shared by ??????? ?? ????????? (@katemiddletonvideos) on Dec 25, 2018 at 5:49am PST
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | VF: Seven years on, Duchess Kate's 'golden era' is finally upon us, or something | | Added 233 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Vanity Fair published a very interesting and slightly suspicious article about the Duchess of Cambridge. The article is called ?Welcome to the Golden Era of Kate Middleton,? and the point of it seems to be that Kate is coming ?back? from six months of maternity leave, and she?s ready to queen this bitch. After more than seven years of watching her duchessing, I can?t say that I really buy any of this. Is it true that Kate has seemed more relaxed in general? Sure. Is it true that the sense of ?competition? has made Kate more keen? Perhaps. But if you take away Meghan?s entrance into the royal fold, what are we really left with? Yet another story about how Kate *plans* to be super-keen very soon. These stories crop up about three times a year, on average. We?re always hearing about how this time, she really means it, she?s totally going to be keen now. She never is. You can read the full Vanity Fair piece here. Some highlights (yes, this is a really long piece, so I?m editing out some of the dumb fluff):
Kate?s turning point: Post-maternity leave and with Meghan around, ?It?s a huge turning point,? said Susan E. Kelley, the owner, editor, and Middletonian obsessive behind What Kate Wore. ?I think this is where Kate gets to make her markA couple of years ago, you might still have seen her being a little bit timid. Now, she seems like she?s in a more take-charge position. I?m beginning to see the person who?s going to be the queen emerging.?
Kate is a senior royal now: Kate is ?no longer the ?commoner? who married into the family but the future Queen Consort and mother of the future King. The role of princess-in-training has been passed on to Meghan?who, as a former actress and longtime humanitarian, is already perfectly comfortable in the public eye, but is just getting started with her own royal family and working with her chosen causes, including girls? education. Kate has graduated to an unspoken Level Two, where she is more free to pursue her own passions?including mental-health issues, underprivileged children, and art?in a more targeted way.
Kate finally knows what she wants to do: ?She found her role as a working member of the royal family through bringing up her own children and realizing what?s important to her,? said ABC News royal commentator Omid Scobie. ?One of the things that we?ll see her really focusing on for the months ahead is working to help support disadvantaged children in the U.K. . . . Kate has this plan in place to really work with a number of organizations, including the Royal FoundationIf you look at Queen Elizabeth, she has that strength without really saying much, that has held this country together through some of the the fiercest wars and times that we?ve faced. I think Kate has the ability to do the same.?
Katie Nicholl?s take on Kate?s ?work-shy? label: ?She?s a mother, first and foremost. Her children are going to be her priority while they are young, and she will juggle her work commitments around the kids. The Duchess of Cambridge has been labeled work-shy in the past. But, actually, she?s taken on just a few patronages, things where she?s really made a difference. Early intervention with young children in primary schools, putting mental health on the map with Heads Together, was her idea. She?s been very instrumental.
Nicholl believes Kate is ?quite grateful? to Meghan, not jealous: ?People who are often saying ?Well, is she jealous of Meghan?? She?s really not. Kate is happier in her life now than she ever has been. She has everything she wants. She has William, she has three beautiful children . . . she is where she always wanted to be,? Nicholl said. ?The fact that there is a new glamorous sister-in-law in tow is not going to worry her one bit. I think Meghan came at the right time for her, because it was at a time when Kate wanted to step out of the spotlight.?
[From Vanity Fair]
Sigh? I understand that Kate is more conservative and she has to be more conservative, because she?ll be a Queen Consort eventually. But I?ve never understood the point of waiting around and doing next to nothing just to avoid controversy because you?re going to be queen in 25 years. The argument seems to be ?well, different people are different, and Kate just wants to have a quiet life with her kids and her shopping, she doesn?t want to change the world.? And maybe that?s good enough for some of the British subjects. But if you?re paying for all of this upkeep, don?t you want a bit more? Don?t you want someone who understands their soft power and has passions beyond her kids? I don?t know. Anyway, we?ll be back here in another five months with another story about how Kate plans to be super-keen eventually.
Embed from Getty Images
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Duchess Kate will make her first post-summer maternity leave outing next week | | Added 265 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
In case you forgot, Prince William is in Africa this week. Kensington Palace?s Twitter has been full of photos of William doing work mostly conservation work in Namibia, Kenya and Tanzania. It feels like William?s trip has been mostly ignored by the British and American press, which is both a good and bad thing. It?s a bad thing because William also has a vein of ?don?t forget about meeeee? in the wake of the Duchess of Sussex?s entrance into the royal fold, and I bet he?s irritated that his trip is barely being covered. It?s a good thing because William is still William, and he actually doesn?t want to provide a full accounting of what he?s actually doing every day during his trip, which is why the KP Twitter is stage-managing the rollout of information to make William look consistently busy (when he?s probably hanging out with Jecca Craig as we speak).
Anyway, I bring up William?s trip because his wife made a point of stepping on his messaging. While William was away, Kate announced her first big event since her summer-long maternity leave. Kate will visit Sayers Croft Trust Forest School and Wildlife Garden next week, on Tuesday October 2nd. Don?t forget about meeee?.! Quite honestly though, I think Kate is genuinely feeling more relaxed than ever. Yes, there was the Don?t Forget About Me Tour late last year and earlier this year. But I think Kate also realizes that with Meghan on the scene, Kate doesn?t have to worry about ?getting her numbers up? by the end of the year. Everyone is focused on Meghan?s events now, which means Kate feels free to still be on partial maternity leave until next year.
Kate Middleton is getting back to work ? now of three! After stepping away from royal duties ahead of the birth of Prince Louis on April 23, the Duchess of Cambridge will visit the Sayers Croft Forest School and Wildlife Garden at Paddington Recreation Ground on Tuesday, marking the end of her maternity leave. Kate will learn how the school exposes thousands of urban students each year to nature and meet children participating in outdoor activities.
The 36-year-old royal is set to take part in sporadic engagements during October and through to the end of the year. She will return to her usual busy schedule come January.
[From People]
?Her usual busy schedule? LMAO. After seven years of duchessing, we know that Kate?s schedule has always been ?sporadic.? The only difference now is that Kate isn?t this year?s big show, so there?s less pressure and expectation for her to be anything other than what we already know: someone who really couldn?t care less about duchessing.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | People: Prince Harry & Meghan are used to being 'touchy-feely,' protocols be damned | | Added 334 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I?m just using this story as an excuse to post as many photos as I can find of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex touching each other. Would that be so wrong??? This week?s People Magazine cover story is all about Meghan and how she?s adjusting to royal life after two months. The first part of the cover story was about how Meghan gets frustrated with all of the dumbass ?rules? and ?protocols? she?s supposed to follow, for example the whole ?women must wear skirts or dresses? thing. It?s not actually a rule or a protocol, it?s merely a preference of the Queen and the only people who care about that preference are nitpickers in the British media. Anyway, another part of the cover story is apparently about how tactile Harry and Meghan are with each other. Which I?m sure involves many lustful, sweaty broken protocols.
As soon as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle went public with their romance last year, it was clear that they were not afraid to show PDA. And those displays of affection have continued since Meghan became an official royal two months ago.
?They are not afraid to hold hands. They don?t mind showing their emotions,? veteran royal photographer, Mark Stewart, tells PEOPLE in this week?s cover story.
Harry and Meghan memorably walked hand-in-hand at the Invictus Games in Toronto in September 2017 (their first public event!). The moment was a big deal to royal fans as members of the royal family (like Harry?s brother Prince William and Kate Middleton) rarely show PDA ? especially at official outings. Those moments of intimacy have been on display at almost every event they?ve attended together (aside from their appearance alongside the Queen!).
?Meghan is used to being touchy-feely, and Harry is the same,? former palace spokesman, Dickie Arbiter, tells PEOPLE. ?Harry has always been tactile.?
?While Prince Harry and Meghan holding hands is atypical for royal engagements, it is a seemingly welcomed gesture to show unity and celebration of their engagement period,? royal etiquette expert Myka Meier, founder and director of Beaumont Etiquette, told PEOPLE. ?There is no protocol that says they can not show affection on official engagements, and this gesture makes them relatable and lovable to the public. Meghan and Prince Harry holding hands at a royal engagement is a refreshingly modern approach to their new role both as a couple and as representatives of the royal family.?
[From People]
People always talk about how Meghan specifically is doing the wrong thing or breaking some rule by holding Harry?s hand, but it?s not said enough: Harry is touchy-feely too. Not just with Meghan, with everybody. He?s his mother?s son in that way Diana was very tactile and she loved to hug, embrace, hold hands and simply be close to people. Harry is the same. He was always going to end up with a woman who would touch him and hold his hand and want to be physically close to him. And yes, it is refreshing and I wish we would get more of it.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Duchess Kate is especially keen on Victorian photography of children | | Added 484 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are more photos of the Duchess of Cambridge at this year?s BAFTAs. There?s some question about her emeralds and what they ?mean.? I personally think Kate is so basic that she just thought ?I?m wearing a green dress, I should wear emeralds to match? and that was the end of her thought process. But according to the Daily Mail, Kate wore the emeralds as a signal of ?support? for Time?s Up. You know how she could have supported Time?s Up? By wearing any of the black or black-patterned gowns in her closet. I don?t get why people are bending over backwards to look for ?signals? and make excuses for why she didn?t wear black or why she couldn?t. She could have. She didn?t. Did it matter? _(?)_/
But the real reason for this post? Kate is keen about Victorian-era photographs of children. Keen Kate wrote a foreward for the National Portrait Gallery exhibition catalogue about her keenness:
Kate Middleton is putting pen to paper ? to talk about her love of art! Princess Kate, who is the patron for London?s National Portrait Gallery, is set to open the exhibition Victorian Giants: The Birth of Art Photography, on Feb. 28. And ahead of the exhibition?s opening, she penned the foreword to the exhibition catalog, where she talks about her passion for the subject of photography ? and her love of pictures of children, in particular.
The exhibition will explore ?the birth of art photography in England,? Kate writes in the page-long foreword and will contain photos from Julia Margaret Cameron, Lewis Carroll, Oscar Rejlander, Clementina Hawarden and more photographers from the Victorian era. It will also focus on photographs of children, a subject Kate, who frequently snaps official photos of her kids, Prince George and Princess Charlotte, is well familiar with.
?Children held a special place in the Victorian imagination and were celebrated for their seemingly boundless potential,? Kate writes. ?This notion still rings true for us today and it underpins much of my official work and the charities I have chosen to support, and, indeed, my role as a young mother.?
Kate, who dubbed herself an ?enthusiastic amateur photographer,? is something of an art buff: She studied art history at the University of St. Andrews ? where she met Prince William in the their shared freshman dorm. This exhibition in particular has a special connection for Kate, as this era of photography was the focus of her thesis in school.
?As a student at the University of St. Andrews, I chose it as the subject of my undergraduate thesis and photographs of children in particular, which feature prominently in the exhibition, are of real interest to me,? she wrote.
The opening of the exhibition is set for Feb. 28, and Kate will attend the event at the National Portrait Gallery solo. It?s a reminder of her pregnancy with Prince George ? just a few months before giving birth to her eldest child, she attended an event at the National Portrait Gallery in April 2013.
[From People]
I?ve spent how many years writing about Kate and this is the first time I?ve read that her university thesis was about Victorian photographs of children. This actually explains a lot about Kate – she?s always had a sort of throwback vibe, sometimes a throwback to the 1950s ideal of the role of womanhood. But she?s also had that Victorian vibe too, in her clothing and her view of her ?role? as a duchess and wife of the heir?s heir. I often called this her Downton Abbey cosplay, but Downton Abbey was actually set in the Edwardian era, not Victorian. Kate would prefer to be buttoned up and bustled and to just think of children and the empire, thank you very much.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Duchess Kate repeats a blue Seraphine coat in London: super-cute? | | Added 511 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Man, I have not been keeping up with the Duchess of Cambridge?s schedule. Usually, her schedule is so sparse that her events are announced a month in advance, and they?re spaced out to, like, twice a month. But Kate is actually doing more work in January than she?s ever done in before. And I can?t keep up! Today, Kate was in London for two events highlighting postpartum mental health for moms. Her first stop was the Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, and her second stop was the Mother and Baby Unit at the Bethlehem Royal Hospital.
As she rounds the corner into her third trimester, Kate Middleton is highlighting an issue that affects millions of mothers. The royal mom, 36, stepped out in London on Wednesday for back-to-back engagements focusing on postpartum illnesses ? the day after she gave a rare speech highlighting the need for children?s mental health support.
Today?s schedule kicked off with a visit to King?s College London, where Kate ? wearing a blue Sraphine coat and the same floral print Sraphine dress she has worn twice before ? stopped by the Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute. Her agenda included visiting the on-site laboratory to receive a briefing on its work on perinatal research before meeting with experts conducting research in perinatal psychiatry.
Kate?s next stop is set for the Mother and Baby Unit at the Bethlehem Royal Hospital, part of South London Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. The unit specializes in the treatment of postnatal depression and postpartum psychosis.
[From People]
Sometimes I have great recall for Kate?s clothing, but this was not one of those times. I completely forgot about this Seraphine coat, which she?s worn before. Looking at the old photos, it feels like Kate took an off-the-rack piece and had it awkwardly tailored, and she definitely moved the hemline up. I still think that she did that in these new photos? Then again, all of Kate?s Shades of Blue coats have all started to blend together for me.
All that being said, I think she looks super-cute here. I love it when she wears a ponytail, and I always think pregnancy ?softens? her so much. She?s one of those women who will look ?suddenly? pregnant too – like she?s barely showing for months and then all of a sudden, she?s waddling around with a sizeable bump. She?s got months to go though!
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|  | | 4.305.557
Photos Online+ 7.162 past week
5.362
Videos Online
309 Users Online | |  |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Minka Kelly
Photos of Minka Kelly will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
25 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
