| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Kaley Cuoco filed for divorce from Karl Cook after three years of marriage | | Added 3 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
To me, Kaley Cuoco has always seemed to have a bit of that ?J.Lo Syndrome.? It?s not even that she has a terrible picker, it?s that she hates being alone, like J.Lo hates being alone. Being afraid to be alone means settling down with some weird guys. And so here it is, the news we?ve been waiting for: Kaley and her second husband Karl Cook are getting a divorce. On Friday (the Friday before a three-day holiday weekend), Kaley and Karl first announced that they were separating, then hours later came the confirmation that Kaley filed for divorce in LA Superior Court. Kaley and Karl issued an exclusive joint statement to People Magazine and everything:
Kaley Cuoco and her husband Karl Cook are going their separate ways. The Flight Attendant star, 35, and Cook, 30, announced the news Friday in a joint statement shared exclusively with PEOPLE.
Despite a deep love and respect for one another, we have realized that our current paths have taken us in opposite directions, they said. We have both shared so much of our journey publicly so while we would prefer to keep this aspect of our personal life private, we wanted to be forthcoming in our truth together. There is no anger or animosity, quite the contrary.
Their statement continued, We have made this decision together through an immense amount of respect and consideration for one another and request that you do the same in understanding that we will not be sharing any additional details or commenting further.
Cuoco, an avid equestrian, started dating Cook, also an equestrian, in 2016. They got engaged on her birthday in November 2017. They tied the knot on June 30, 2018, in a ceremony at a horse stable near San Diego, California, with close friends and family in attendance.
[From People]
Karl comes from money, but Kaley is rich AF on her own, and I would be willing to bet that she is at least smart enough to have an iron-clad prenup. I suspect the biggest fights will be about who gets the horses and the dogs. They have a lot of horses and dogs. Their love of horses and dogs was what brought them together in the first place.
An unnamed source who is probably Kaley?s publicist told People Magazine that Kaley and Karl appeared very happy together at the beginning of the summer and ?They were affectionate and seemed great.? Something went bad this summer then, and the source said: ?The split seems very sudden. Its pretty shocking. Sure!
I looked through our archives because I couldn?t remember what I?d written about Karl before, all I remembered was that I had a vague dislike of him. I guess I never had a reason, I only had a vibe. I did see this story from last year they never technically lived together until what was probably late 2020. They can afford to maintain multiple homes,of course, but it was kind of strange that they spent two full years of marriage never cohabitating full-time.
Embed from Getty Images
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kristen Stewart wore Chanel for the Venice 'spencer' premiere: ugh or fine' | | Added 3 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last Friday, Kristen Stewart walked the Venice Film Festival premiere of Spencer, the historical drama about Princess Diana in 1990. I wondered if Kristen would perhaps channel Diana in some way for her tour through the film festivals, but she really hasn?t. I mean, maybe her Chanel blazer at the photocall was Diana-esque, but she paired it with hot pants. And Diana would not have ever stepped onto a red carpet wearing this ugly negligee. This is Chanel and it?s really terrible that they sent her out in this mess. This looks like some cheap thrift-store nylon pajama set from the 1980s!! Ugh. I hate that Chanel did her dirty. I?m not saying that I expected to see Kristen in a ballgown, looking like a princess. But find a middle ground, or at the very least, find a really great pantsuit. One nice thing: her hair looks so much better in these photos. The color looks less orange-y.
As for the Venice reviews of Spencer? almost all of them are positive, and most critics completely loved Kristen in this role and they believe she absolutely nailed it, and that she?ll receive an Oscar nomination for it. The bad news is that after Season 4 of The Crown, I?m not sure the royal establishment is ready for how Spencer continues to make them look like petty, moronic clowns. The Guardian?s review (written by Xan Brooks) is the one being widely quoted:
Working off a sharp script by Steven Knight, Chilean director Pablo Larran spins the headlines and scandals into a full-blown Gothic nightmare, an opulent ice palace of a movie with shades of Rebecca at the edges and a pleasing bat-squeak of absurdity in its portrayal of the royals. Larran?s approach to the material is rich and intoxicating and altogether magnificent. I won?t call it majestic. That would do this implicitly republican film a disservice.
Jetted in from California, Kristen Stewart proves entirely compelling in the title role? Stewart effectively captures the agony of a woman so programmed and insulated that she feels she has no escape and has lost sight of who she is. The servants (well played by Sally Hawkins and Sean Harris) want to help but they are part of the very machine that she hates. They know that if Diana breaks down, the mechanism does too. What matters above all else is to keep the woman up and running.
No doubt it took an outsider to make a film that?s as unreverential as Spencer, which dares to examine the royals as if they were specimens under glass. At heart, of course, Larran and Knight?s tale is utterly preposterous. It?s a tragedy about a spoiled princess who lashes out at the servants; a thriller about a woman who has only 10 minutes to get into her dress before Christmas dinner is served. But how else do you play it? The monarchy itself is preposterous. Spencer presents the whole institution as little more than a silly ongoing game of dress-up, a farce that depends for its survival on everyone playing along and propping up the illusion, the old moth-eaten brocade. Anybody who doesn?t is ostracised, crushed or cast out in the cold, with the scarecrow and the pheasants and the shivering security men. ?Will they kill me, do you think?? says Diana, half-joking, and such is the level of fury and tension that just for a moment we believe that they might.
[From The Guardian]
I was already going to see Spencer, but reading through the reviews has convinced me that I will genuinely enjoy it. Apparently, Diana sees Anne Boleyn?s ghost too, and Anne tells to GTFO while she still can? Amazing.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.455.607
Photos Online+ 3.250 past week
712
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Alexandra Daddario
Photos of Alexandra Daddario will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
22 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
