| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Brad Pitt's 'pal' whines about Maddox Jolie's name change & Angelina | | Added 3 hours ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week, we learned that Angelina Jolie?s eldest child has dropped ?Pitt? from his surname in a film?s credits. Since graduating from Yonsei University in Seoul, Maddox Jolie has been working steadily behind-the-scenes in various films. Both Maddox and Pax worked as production assistants on Maria, and Maddox worked as an assistant director on Couture, the French film Angelina worked on in 2024. In Couture?s credits, he?s listed as Maddox Jolie. Which was his original name when Angelina adopted him, then ?Pitt? was added later when Brad adopted him too. Going back to 2016, Brad first targeted Maddox on the private plane, and Maddox reportedly tried to get in between Angelina and Brad when Brad was getting violent and abusive. Over the years, we?ve heard that the 2016 domestic violence/plane terror incident was where many (if not all) of the kids cut their ties with Brad. But in the past ten years, Brad has played the only card he really has: having unnamed sources whine about how Angelina ?alienated? the kids from Brad.
Brad Pitts close friend is fuming after the actors son, Maddox Jolie-Pitt, dropped his fathers last name in the credits for Angelina Jolies new movie and the friend is pointing the finger squarely at her.
Brads pal tells TMZ It?s sad this is a textbook example of what a successful campaign to separate a family looks like.
Maddox, the son of Jolie and Pitt, worked as an assistant director on Angelinas upcoming movie, Couture, and in the credits, hes reportedly listed as Maddox Jolie.
Brad and Angelinas eldest son joins his sister, Shiloh, in removing the Pitt surname while keeping Jolie something she did legally in August 2024, just three days after her 18th birthday. Zahara Marley Jolie-Pitt and Vivienne Jolie-Pitt have also distanced themselves from the Pitt name.
[From TMZ]
I truly wonder if there are genuinely people still out there who buy this. I believe there are a lot of people who simply weren?t paying attention to Angelina?s FBI statements (where she spoke at length about what Brad did to her and their children) which came out via her FOIA actions four years ago. I believe there are people out there who simply never stopped believing that Brad is a ?cool guy.? But for those of us paying attention, it?s completely insane that Brad and his crisis managers are still pulling this same gaslighting bullsh-t nearly a decade after Brad terrorized his family on that plane. The kids are not being manipulated by Angelina they?ve spent the past decade defending their mom, showing up for Angie, and distancing themselves completely from Brad.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Justin Timberlake is suing Sag Harbor to keep his DWI arrest video confidential | | Added 3 hours ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2024, Justin Timberlake was partying in Sag Harbor while his wife, Jessica Biel, was working in New York. Justin was apparently with some friends and he had a lot to drink. The problem: he got behind the wheel after several hours of boozing at a local bar. A cop pulled him over, and Justin obviously flunked the breathalyzer. Justin was kept in police custody overnight (giving him the chance to sober up) and he was ultimately charged with a DWI. After Justin?s crisis management team tried and failed to smear his arresting officer, Justin ended up taking a plea deal. The story of drunk driving is awful, full-stop. But there was one funny part of the story. Apparently, a visibly drunk Justin complained, mid-arrest, that ?this is going to ruin the tour.? When the cop (who had no idea who he was arresting) asked ?what tour?? Justin said ?the world tour.? LMAO. Well, now Justin is trying to keep the public from seeing how he behaved and what he said during his arrest. Journalists have been FOIA-requesting Justin?s arrest video for a year and a half. Now Justin is suing Sag Harbor to keep the video out of public view.
Justin Timberlake has sued the ritzy Long Island town of Sag Harbor in an attempt to stop the public release of bodycam footage from his infamous drunk driving arrest. According to court documents obtained by Page Six on Monday, the ?SexyBack? singer wants an order from a Suffolk County Supreme Court judge to block the video?s release.
The recording, captured by officers during Timberlake?s traffic stop and arrest in June 2024, is currently part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by members of the media, per the filing.
Timberlake, 45, argues in the lawsuit that he is depicted ?in an acutely vulnerable state during a roadside encounter with law enforcement.? The court documents also claimed that the bodycam video captured ?intimate details? of Timberlake?s ?physical appearance, demeanor, speech, and conduct? during his field sobriety test, arrest and confinement.
Michael Del Piano, the NSYNC alum?s lawyer, claimed the release of the bodycam footage would cause ?severe and irreparable harm? to Timberlake?s ?personal and professional reputation? and subject the singer to ?public ridicule and harassment.? Del Piano added that the video?s release served ?no legitimate public interest in understanding the operations of government? and ?disclosure of this footage would constitute an unwarranted invasion? of the pop superstar?s privacy.
The ?Cry Me a River? hitmaker was named the petitioner in the new filing. The Village of Sag Harbor, the Sag Harbor Village Police Department and Chief of Police Robert Drake were named as respondents. Reps for Timberlake and the Village of Sag Harbor did not immediately respond to Page Six?s requests for comment.
Timberlake was arrested on June 18, 2024, after he allegedly ran a stop sign and swerved between lanes while driving his 2025 BMW after a night out with friends. Although the singer claimed he only had one martini, the responding officer alleged that Timberlake failed his field sobriety tests. Timberlake also showed signs of poor balance and an inability to follow instructions, according to the police report. He appeared to have bloodshot and glassy eyes in his mugshot. Insiders told Page Six at the time that the officer who pulled Timberlake over ?was so young that he didn?t even know? who the Grammy winner was.
[From Page Six]
First of all, Streisand Effect much?? I totally forgot that the bodycam video had never been released, and I just assumed (at the time) that New York state or local ordinances had different rules about whether dashcam or bodycam footage gets released, especially after someone takes a plea deal. Second of all? Justin?s drunken buffoonery must have been really bad for his lawyers to take this approach. Like, this was probably Reese Witherspoon?s ?I?m an American citizen?-level messiness. I also have to say this Justin has, in my opinion, been really poorly served by his lawyer(s). This Del Piano guy especially, who seems like he?s trying to become famous for representing Justin.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Will King Charles offer the Sussexes use of Royal Lodge during their UK visits? | | Added 3 hours ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Just months after he acceded to the throne in 2022, King Charles hatched a particularly stupid plan. That plan? He would punish his son, Prince Harry, and his brother, Prince Andrew, all in one. Charles evicted the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from Frogmore Cottage and he wanted to ?force? Andrew out of Royal Lodge, and make Andrew live in Frogmore free and clear. The Sussexes were officially out of Frogmore around May 2023, but Andrew lingered at Royal Lodge for years longer, and was only forced to move out last month. Now, according to this week?s very stupid royal gossip, Charles has a new plan. He?s thinking about offering the Sussexes the use of Royal Lodge when they visit the UK this year and next. Not only that, but royal gossips are already obsessing over what the Duchess of Sussex might wear if and when she visits. Why aren?t they focused on what Kitty wears and where she lives?
Meghan Markle is reportedly gearing up for a carefully orchestrated return to the UK amid fresh claims King Charles III is considering offering the Sussexes a base at Royal Lodge. The 44-year-old Duchess of Sussex is described by friends as newly energised about stepping back onto British soil alongside Prince Harry, 41, amid ongoing royal tensions that have, insiders say, only strengthened her resolve.
She (Meghan) wants to show the British public what they threw away, a source told celebrity reporter Rob Shuter.
While the trip is expected to coincide with Prince Harrys one-year-to-go Invictus Games event in Birmingham on July 10, those close to Meghan insist the visit carries a deeper meaning. Shuter reports that the former actress is already collaborating with high-profile stylists and designers to craft what one insider described as the best wardrobe ever seen on a British royal.
Shes not going back quietly if she returns, it will be on her terms, a second source said.
The couple are believed to have looked into hotel options in Birmingham but ultimately chose a private residence for their stay.
That decision comes as speculation grows that King Charles may offer them Royal Lodge the sprawling former Windsor home of disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Andrew and his ex wife, Sarah Fergie Ferguson, left the 30-room mansion in January following intense scrutiny over their associations with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
The Grade II-listed estate in Windsor Great Park is now understood to be empty, after police confirmed searches at the ex-Duke of Yorks residence had concluded. Although relations between Prince Harry and his father have been strained since the Sussexes stepped down from royal duties and relocated to the US six years ago, insiders suggest that offering a significant Windsor property would represent a powerful gesture.
This would be the ultimate olive branch, one royal insider said. Charles wants unity. Offering Harry a significant Windsor property would send a powerful message that the door is still open.
However, not everyone believes the Sussexes would accept. A palace source pointed to the potential drawbacks of moving into a residence so closely associated with scandal.
Moving Harry and Meghan into Andrews old house ties them to a property thats become synonymous with scandal. Thats a lot of baggage, the source said.
Earlier reports also said the King had floated the possibility of the Sussexes staying at Highgrove House one of his most cherished private estates should they return to Britain. Theres a good chance that they will stay at a royal residence during a U.K. stay that includes Invictus events if the current thaw in family relations continues, an insider told the Mail in January, referring to Highgrove.
[From Sky News]
This is seemingly speculation about what will happen around the ?One Year To Go? Invictus events which are likely scheduled for late June or early July in Birmingham. Birmingham won the bid to host the 2027 Invictus Games and I would argue that the British government has the duty to ensure the Sussexes? safety around the games AND the ?One Year to Go? events this year. I will say it again: the government has the duty. Not the Windsors. While King Charles might offer the Sussexes a place to stay which I think is likely, especially if Meghan and the kids come he won?t offer them Royal Lodge. Especially not when Frogmore Cottage is still vacant. And especially not when? the Sussexes will largely be in Birmingham, not London and not Windsor. As for all of the stuff about Meghan?s fashion? lol. Meghan is going to wear her own clothes and look like a million bucks and Princess Kate will copy it and everyone will fall all over themselves to claim that Kate wore it first!
PS? I?m also not entirely sure that the police will be done with Royal Lodge by this summer. A lot of crimes were committed there, and they searched RL for like a full week.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Netflix. 2023 cover courtesy of the Sun.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 6.160.469
Photos Online+ 4.236 past week
5.990
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Belen Rodriguez
Bethany Joy Lenz
Cristy Ren
Daniella Sarahyba
Dominique Swain
Emma Caulfield
Emma Willis
Iliza Shlesinger
Izabella Scorupco
Jennifer Lamiraqui
Jessika Power
Joy Bryant
Kim Cloutier
Kwon Eun-bi
Michelle Yeoh
Saffron Burrows
Zuri Hall
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Sydney Sweeney
Photos of Sydney Sweeney will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
40 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
