| | |  | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
|
| | Liam Neeson says his proudest moment is working with Pamela Anderson | | Added 6 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
About a week or so ago, we heard that Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson were dating. They make sense together and have been hamming it up on the red carpet. They even showed up to the Naked Gun premiere with all of their sons! (They have two adult sons each.) Liam is doing his part, too. During a press junket, MTV UK asked Liam what his proudest moment was. His response? Working with Pamela!
Liam Neeson appears quite taken with Pamela Anderson. The two costars of this year?s remake of ?The Naked Gun? continued to fuel romance rumors during an interview with MTV UK, posted Thursday on TikTok. The video clip involved a reporter asking the pair questions about one another. The interviewer asked Anderson, ?What is Liam?s proudest career moment to date??
The ?Baywatch? star wasn?t sure, noting that Neeson has done ?over 100 movies? along with plenty of theater roles.
?I don?t know, what is your proudest moment?? she asked, turning to the ?Schindler?s List? star.
Neeson replied in a quiet voice, his expression serious, ?Working with you.?
?Working with me? Aw,? Anderson replied. ?Taking me under his wing.?
Looking at the camera, Neeson repeated, this time with a smile, ?Yeah, working with Pamela.?
Speculation began to swirl last month around Anderson, 58, and Neeson, 73. The Hollywood duo made flirtatious appearances on the red carpet and then the ?Today? show, and an anonymous source told ?People? that the duo is ?smitten? with each other.
Meanwhile, Anderson said in a New York Times profile of the Northern Irish actor that he has ?so much charm and so much charisma that you just kind of fall into it,? a quality she said she has ?never experienced? before.
[From HuffPo]
?[My proudest moment is] working with you.? LMAO, what a line.That?s very sweet and all, but it?s also super cringe. For the record, I do not think Liam?s response was planned ahead of time. I think Pamela was trying to feed him a real answer, and that?s where his brain took him because, for better or for worse, it was programmed for ?Don?t forget to remind people that you?re together? mode. Poor Liam. He tried! I bet the Neeson boys are giving their dad a lot of sh-t for that answer. FWIW, I like this coupling and hope it?s real. Natasha Richardson?s (RIP) family approves. Pam has looked beautiful and happy during this entire tour. She deserves it.
photos credit: Avalon.red
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Mail: Duchess Meghan hated Nottingham Cottage & the way Harry's fam treated him | | Added 6 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the central themes of Prince Harry?s Spare is of neglect. Physical neglect, emotional neglect, financial neglect, all of it starting when he was just a child. He was always treated differently than his brother, and the entire royal institution reinforced it at every step of Harry?s life, that he was unworthy of care. That Harry had to be convinced that he was less than his brother so that William would feel more important. Why else would a 32-year-old prince be housed in a tiny little rundown cottage adjacent to Kensington Palace, where his brother had a 20-room mansion-within-a-palace? The point of how Harry was treated was always to reinforce his neglect, his fundamental spare-ness. And when Harry began dating then-Meghan Markle, Meghan noticed how he was treated differently. And yes, we?re still talking about all of this because of The Mail Remembers series, where they recycle through years-old stories in a failed attempt to explain why Meghan and Harry said sayonara five and a half years ago.
A royal insider has claimed that Meghans dislike for her living arrangements at Kensington Palace were the start of her troubles with royal life and set the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the path to Megxit. Its Meghans 44th birthday on Monday and following the so-called peace summit last month, it appears at long last that the animosities between the Sussexes and the other royals may soon be thawing. But years before Megxit had entered the vocabulary it was already becoming clear that the Duchess of Sussex was unhappy with her life as a working royal.
Writing in his royal bestseller Yes Maam, Tom Quinn claimed that the first sign that all was not well with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex became apparent while they were living at Nottingham Cottage within the grounds of Kensington Palace. Quinn said: Starting life as a member of the royal family in Nottingham Cottage was the beginning of all Meghan?s troubles she felt it was so small that it must be a reflection on how the royal family were belittling her husband. She just didn?t understand that real royals don?t care much about houses and material possessions because having always had them they take them for granted.
According to Quinn, Meghan not only believed the home was too small for her larger standards but she was compounded by a vague feeling that the Kensington Palace staff tended to treat Harry as less important than his brother.
At the time, Prince William and Kate Middleton lived in the much larger apartment 1A inside the palace itself. A member of the comms team who was particularly close to Meghan told Quinn: Meghan spotted immediately that Harry wasn?t quite as central to things as his brother William. This was the start of the whole grievance thing about being the spare. I don?t think Harry had even thought much about the fact that he was a spare until well into his marriage. Meghan managed to give him more perspective because she could see the family from the outside.
[From The Daily Mail]
Something I?d like to remind everyone about is that Meghan was a 30-something woman who had built a life for herself, with her own home, in Toronto and she uprooted that life to move to England in 2017. Like, she had all of the possessions, wardrobe and accumulated STUFF that comes with being a woman in her 30s with a well-paid job. There simply wasn?t room for Meghan and her life in the tiny Nottingham Cottage. But even then, she was happy because she was with Harry. Still, I agree that Meghan clocked how the family treated Harry. They always blame Meghan for Harry?s self-actualization, like without Meghan, Harry would have been fine just staying in a rundown shack and being mistreated forever. They actually say that (in so many words) outloud, like HOW DARE MEGHAN!
Also: She just didn?t understand that real royals don?t care much about houses and material possessions because having always had them they take them for granted. Yeah, thats why all of the other royals she met were living in grand mansions, palaces and castles??
Photos courtesy of Netflix.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.920.067
Photos Online+ 6.260 past week
1.692
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | Coming Up Soon
Alaina Huffman
Barbie Blank
Brie Bella
| | |
| | | | | We Salute
Brooks Nader
Photos of Brooks Nader will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
3 days | | |
| | |
|
