| | |  | Jennifer Aniston News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's hair guy posts photo of Aniston's new bob: cute or disastrous' | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week we heard the sorrowful tale of how Jennifer Aniston had chopped off her golden locks, thus losing her magical powers. She?s like the Samson of TV actresses! While it would have been news no matter what (Aniston?s hair is always news, believe it or not), what I found particularly interesting is WHY she needed to cut her hair. Apparently, Jennifer was trying an experimental and very dangerous ?Brazilian? chemical treatment involving formaldehyde and keratin to chemically straighten your hair, giving you that oh-so desirable 1990s ?just flat-ironed? look.
While you?d think Aniston would be old enough to know that she should put formaldehyde on her hair (WTF!), it?s even more interesting because she?s an investor and profit participant in Living Proof, a haircare line that is supposed to be able to manage her hair naturally, without all of the chemical bulls?t. Aniston has been shilling Living Proof for a year, swearing by it up and down. And now it turns out that she felt the need for experimental chemical straighteners? Interesting.
Anyway, Aniston?s long-time hair guy and BFF Christopher McMillan posted the header photo to his Instagram with the hashtags: ?LOVE! “#JenniferAniston #bobhaircut #LivingProofInc #Flex #PerfectHairDay?. Well, that answers one question I had: whether this CODE RED HAIR DISASTER would ruin Aniston?s longest-standing relationship with a man. It hasn?t. Us Weekly even ran a story yesterday about Jennifer’s color treatment and how Chris is still putting the “finishing touches” on her look. But let me ask you something ladies: if your BFF hair guy ruined your hair with chemicals to the point where you had to chop nearly everything off, would that guy still be your friend?
Interestingly enough, just before Jennifer?s chemical disaster, she got her ear cartilage pierced with her new BFF Gucci Westman. Gucci posted this photo on her Instagram:
Photos courtesy of Instagram, WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston chopped off her hair after 'Brazilian' chemical treatment disaster | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston cut her hair! This is big news. I guess. I?ve actually been wondering why there has been little to no Aniston news the past few weeks, and as it turns out, it?s because she?s recovering from a bad ?Brazilian? and she had to cut off most of her hair. You can see the exclusive photos here and here ? it looks like her hair is now just a choppy bob, and I don?t know if her hair is wet or greasy in those pics, but it looks awful. Aniston confirmed the ?Brazilian? disaster when she spoke to Elle UK recently:
On Friday night ELLE exclusively chatted with Jennifer Aniston, she of the we-want-it hair and former owner of the now infamous Rachel haircut. When putting to her the question of whether she would consider cutting her hair for a role she revealed that she has just gone for the chop.
?Funny you say that. I actually just cut all my hair off two days ago,? the star told ELLEuk.com exclusively. The haircut is so new, freshly cut last Wednesday, that the actress is yet to step out with her newly cropped hair.
So why the change? ?It wasn?t for a role. My hair went through a phase – I did this thing called a Brazilian and my hair did not react really well to it. It?s about 2-inches above my shoulders now,? Aniston revealed.
It?s not the worst timing for the star to feel compelled to cut her hair, this season mid-length hair, or as ELLE called it in our AW13 trend report ?The Rebel Cut?, is every where. In fact, numerous members of team ELLE including our editor-in-chief Lorraine, fashion features director Rebecca Lowthorpe and news editor Leisa Barnett have all gone for the chop (and we?re not exaggerating when we say there are too many ELLE staffers to list them all here).
But not one to follow trends, the actress isn?t too sure about her new shorter haircut.
?The minute I cut my hair I want it back. Always. It?s a guarantee. I?m trying really hard to love this one,? she said.
It’s not the first time the star has sported a bob; her hairdresser and longtime friend Chris Macmillan (who also cut off Miley Cyrus’s hair) tends to crop Aniston’s hair every few years to keep it looking healthy.
[From Elle UK]
I had no idea what this ?Brazilian? treatment was until I read this story at The Daily Mail ? apparently, it?s like a hardcore chemical straightening process using ?formaldehyde and keratin? to keep your hair straight for three months. You know what?s funny about this? SO MUCH. For one, I think many women would love to have Jennifer?s naturally curly Greek hair, but she?s spent most of her adult life trying to look like Gwyneth Paltrow, complete with straight, flat-ironed, damaged-looking blonde hair.
This is also amusing because Jennifer has been shilling her MIT-produced haircare line Living Proof as the ?answer? to all of your hair needs. What?s that, Aniston? The Living Proof haircare line is insufficient for your needs so you had to go in for a sketchy and controversial chemical treatment? Well, I?ll be damned. Jennifer Aniston?s hair is MADE OF LIES.
Here are some photos from the last time Aniston had shorter hair, in early 2011:
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Hot or Not: Jennifer Aniston's Christian Dior Dress And Other News | | Added 11 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston arrived at the “We’re the Millers” premiere last night in a Christian Dior dress that looked like an apron in the front and a Raggedy Ann Halloween costume from the back. It’s waaaay too young for her. Taylor Swift I could see wearing this dress, or Selena Gomez. NOT 44-year-old Jennifer Aniston. On the plus side, I really like her hair like that. It’s a welcome change from the straight center-parted route she almost always goes. So what’s your verdict… hot, or not?
Interwebbing so you don’t have to:
True story: Britney Spears spent seven million dollars on fast food and dollar stores. (Celebitchy)
Kristen Stewart is going back to school, but it’s not closed-mouth breathing or acting school, so I don’t know that it’s gonna do her any good. (Celeb Slam)
“That Seventies Show” star Lisa Robin Kelly died today at the age of 43. (The Blemish)
The most brilliant thing I’ve ever heard — send in your old wardrobe and get $20 towards a whole new wardrobe! (Modavanti)
Five celebrities who’ve taken a public tumble while drunk, because laughing at others’ misfortunes is what our people do best. (Daily Stab)
Strong is NOT the new skinny. (Jezebel)
Who’s going to be Ziva’s predecessor on “NCIS?” More importantly, will their still be quips and zany banter and sexual tension? (Huffington Post)
The craziest things ever found on the subway. I’m a bus girl from here on out. (Mandatory)
Let the breast-feeding debates begin: Selma Blair nurses her baby in public. (Evil Beet)
Prince joins Twitter and I still don’t care. (Bitten & Bound)
Katie Couric says she thinks the Kardashians are a wart on the butt of humanity. I’m paraphrasing, of course, but you get the gist. (Amy Grindhouse)
Brad and Angelina bought son Maddox a $6,000 guitar, which he promptly smashed over the head of his little brother Pax. Probably. (ICYDK)
Gwyneth Paltrow looks like a rangy plucked chicken in her Stella McCartney bikini. (DS)
Twenty things you didn’t know about Apple and Steve Jobs. (COED Magazine)
Darren Young comes out as the first young openly gay WWE wrestler. (popbytes)
If you want skin like Cate Blanchett, they’ve got her regimen on tap! (Fab Over 40)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux to 'live separately,' bicoastal for six months' | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Did you see LaineyGossip?s post yesterday about Jennifer Aniston?s possible baby bump? Aniston made a surprise appearance Monday night at a tribute for famed director James Burrows (he directed more than a dozen episodes of Friends). Jennifer wore a really ugly, unflattering double-breasted suit thing and now people are wondering if she was hiding a baby bump. I?m included the video below ? skip ahead to about the 43:20 mark.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston 'flipped out' when a character in her last film was named 'Angie' | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As we covered exhaustively over the summer, Jennifer Aniston was in NYC for most of the summer working on Squirrels to the Nuts, an ensemble film directed by Peter Bogdanovich. Bogdanovich has apparently tried to make this film a few other times, but financing always fell through. So, it?s a small-budget comedy-drama. Which is code for ?we don?t have the time, money or patience to deal with some diva actress.? But that was before they met Aniston, I guess. According to Star Magazine, Aniston pitched a hissy fit when she read the script (at the last minute) and discovered that one of the major characters was named ?Angie?. Nooooo. Doesn?t every single person in the world know that Jennifer Aniston could never be in the same movie where a fictional character shares the name as her arch-nemesis?!
All it took was one little word to turn Jennifer Aniston from America?s Sweetheart into a director?s nightmare: ANGIE. A set insider has informed Star that, while filming Squirrels to the Nuts in NYC this summer, Jen flipped out when she learned that the film?s other main character had the same first name as her archnemesis, Angelina Jolie.
?The original script had a role named Angie, and it infuriated Jen,? shared a set insider. ?She cringed whenever she heard it. Production was scheduled to start on a Monday but Jen didn?t arrive until Wednesday because the scripts had to be revised first.?
The character now goes by Izzy and will be played by Imogen Poots.
But Jen?s diva behavior didn?t stop with the script, adds the tipster: ?Jen wanted all of her personal expenses paid, even though she knew that she was signing onto a lower budget film, and most actors take that into consideration.? Not Jen, claims the source. Jennifer insisted not only on a five-star hotel but that her team?s expenses be covered too!
?Jen took full advantage by treated her entourage to fancy dinners every night? of all the people I?ve worked with in the film industry, Jen was the most annoying.?
[From Star Magazine, print edition]
See, it?s not even Jennifer?s character!!! Jennifer pitched a fit about a character?s name which another actress would have played. I might have been more sympathetic if Aniston?s character was named Angie. But pulling rank about this? It?s weird. As for the part about Jennifer requiring the producers to pick up the tab for her entourage ? that?s a common enough thing? on a big studio movie. On a small budget film, not so much. One of the most outrageous things about Jennifer?s ?diva demands? that I?ve ever heard is that she makes the studios pay for her hair guy, Chris McMillan, to travel with her during promotional tours, often at a cost of $50,000 per week. I imagine she?ll probably do that again when she?s promoting Squirrels to the Nuts.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Spends her Friday Getting Pampered | | Added 11 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Finishing off her week with a pamper session, Jennifer Aniston was spotted out and about in Los Angeles, CA on Friday (September 27).
The "We're the Millers" actress looked casually chic in boyfriend jeans, black wedges and a plaid button up as she sipped on a refreshing beverage.
In other news, as previously reported by GossipCenter, Jen's fiance Justin Theroux is gracing the cover of GQ magazine's October issue, where he slightly opened up about his relationship with one of America's hottest women.
Speaking about the chaos surrounding their high profile love life, Theroux says, "It's a bit like going to a slightly different altitude, you know? [The paparazzi]... I call them photojournalists, actually [can be a drag]. When I get complimented on the street because I'm having twins... [that's weird, too]."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Justin Theroux's friends 'joke' & wager money on how he?ll never marry Aniston | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of conspiracy theories for why Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux haven?t gotten married yet, and lots of legitimate reasons too. The conspiracies involve stuff like ?Jennifer wants to milk this for maximum attention? and ?Justin doesn?t want to be Mr. Aniston.? The legit reasons involve stuff like ?Jennifer?s been surprisingly busy lately? and ?they couldn?t agree on where to have the wedding.? All I know is that it?s been more than a year and there have been several People Mag cover stories about this wedding that?s never happened and people are starting to wonder. Well, Star has a funny story about all that ? apparently, Justin?s friends are taking bets on whether the wedding will EVER happen.
Jennifer Aniston seems to have found true love with fianc Justin Theroux, but the actor?s friends are a different story ? they?ve started placing bets on whether the two will ever marry!
?It?s a joke among Justin?s friends,? a source tells Star. ?There?s about $100,000 riding on it.?
While Jen claims there?s no rush because they ?already feel married,? some fear the constant indecision is due to Justin?s cold feet.
?His friends are adamant he won?t ever marry? Justin finds weddings embarrassing. He can?t stand the idea of being on display, not to mention the pressure that comes with marrying Jennifer Aniston.?
[From Star Magazine, print edition]
Justin has friends with $100,000 to throw around on a bet about whether he?ll get married? Who are these friends? Like, Terry Richardson and Ben Stiller? Anyway, I tend to believe some version of this ? I?ll believe that Justin isn?t jazzed about having some fancy, expensive, LOOK AT US wedding and that he?s told friends in the past that he hated weddings. But I have to ask? if he really feels that way, why did he propose to Jennifer? Why give your lady a ring (even if the ring looks like quartz) if you?re not jazzed about the idea of weddings in general? Or could it be that the real conspiracy is still about that whole engagement story?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is still drinking booze, so there goes those pregnancy rumors | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week we had an old-fashioned Womb Watch on Jennifer Aniston following Us Weekly?s surprise cover story that Aniston and Justin Theroux were allegedly expecting their first kid. As I said last week, I knew Us Weekly was full of it when they didn?t even publish excerpts from their cover story online, plus Jennifer?s rep was sending strongly-worded denials all over the place. I?m still confused as to why Us Weekly did the cover, and why the denials were so intense this particular time, but those are questions for another day. Because now we have even further confirmation that Jennifer isn?t pregnant and she?s probably not even trying to get pregnant: Jennifer still loves booze. Because a mojito will never grow up to resent you!!
Pregnancy buzz is surrounding Jennifer Aniston, but Life & Style can reveal the actress was spotted drinking wine on Tuesday. An eyewitness at Cecconi?s in West Hollywood tells Life & Style that Jen ?had white wine? with her meal.
?She looked really good and didn?t look pregnant,? a second onlooker tells the mag. ?She was with friends. Jen came in the back door with lots of security and bodyguards.?
A new report claims this week that Jen, 44, and her fianc, Justin Theroux, 42, are expecting a baby (“Jennifer is not pregnant,” says her rep), but by the looks of her recent outing, they?re not prepping to become parents in the near future.
While promoting her film We?re the Millers in August, Jen revealed she was fed up about being asked if she?s ever going to have a child.
?I surround myself with my amazing work, my amazing partner, my beautiful dogs, and I tune that noise out,? she explained.
In 2011, the actress said there was ?no desperation? to start a family.
?If it?s meant to be, it?s meant to be,? she told Elle at the time. ?I?m at peace with whatever the plan is.?
[From Life & Style]
I really do wish Jennifer would just come out with a swaddled bottle of vodka and announce to the world, ?I?m going to call her Jennifer Junior!? Still, this isn?t breaking news of anything. Even though Jennifer?s biggest fan-girls always yell at me for calling Jennifer a boozehound, can we at least agree that she loves to drink in general? A little wine with lunch, a little martini before dinner, a mojito for an after dinner treat. Plus some shots before awards shows and TV appearances. A drink for every occasion!
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux 'have been trying for a baby' since August 2012 | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
We?ve been all up in Jennifer Aniston?s womb this week, and I don?t know about you, but I?m kind of over it. I?ll say what I?ve always said: she?s a woman of significant means, time and connections, and if she really wanted to be a mother, she would have done so by now (in my opinion). But still, every time she has a movie to promote, we go through this same pattern again. The Jen-Haters claiming she never wanted kids and she uses the lure of babies to placate her fans. The Jen-Fans, placated, claim she always wanted kids and it?s just never happened for her and isn?t that sad?
Well, Us Weekly claimed this week that yes, it had finally happened for Jen and Justin Theroux and happy, happy days. Then Jennifer?s rep went ballistic, denying the story to every outlet who would quote him. So now what?s left? I don?t even know any more. But considering people are still interested in talking about Jennifer?s womb, I thought I would bring you this added wrinkle from The Daily Mail:
Hollywood beauty Jennifer Aniston is ‘irritated’ by constant rumours that she is pregnant – after secretly trying for a baby for more than a year, MailOnline can reveal. The blonde, 44, initially joked with pals every time there was a fresh rumour that she was expecting – but today a source revealed: ‘It’s starting to be a source of irritation for Jen.’
The source claimed that Jennifer and her fianc Justin Theroux have been trying for a baby ever since they got engaged in August 2012, saying: ‘Jen purposely left her work slate clean for the next few months to prepare for motherhood. She puts a brave face on the rumors, but it masks her desperate desire to be a mother.’
After Us Weekly’s magazine cover declaring Jennifer’s ‘pregnancy’ yesterday, a representative for the actress told MailOnline: ‘Jennifer is not pregnant.’
Meanwhile, the friend said that that pals are already pondering whether Jennifer and Justin may push back their wedding yet again – as it looks likely that HBO will opt to order a full series of Damon Lindelof’s HBO series The Leftovers which has Justin in his first high-profile leading man role alongside Liv Tyler.
Planning in fall for the wedding – which was looking set for Christmas – has gone out of the window and now the couple are discussing a date for spring 2014. MailOnline had previously how the pair cancelled a summer wedding as both their work schedules became overwhelmed.
The source said: ‘Jen’s completely understanding of Justin’s opportunity to elevate his career to another level and prepared to wait though friends are starting to question whether they’ll never make it down the aisle!’
Last month, Jennifer insisted: ‘We just want to do it when it?s perfect, and we?re not rushed, and no one is rushing from a job or rushing to a job. And, you know, we already feel married. There have been no canceled weddings. There have been no postponed weddings. There have been no arguments about where to get married. Just clearing all that up.’
[From The Mail]
?It’s STARTING to be a source of irritation for Jen?? But these rumors ? some (not all, but some) of them by her own design ? have been around for literally DECADES. And she?s just now starting to be annoyed? Also ? that?s very interesting about Justin?s show probably getting picked up. If it gets picked up, HBO?s standard ?season? for an hour-long drama would probably be ten episodes. Which means a significant amount of time for Justin in New York, where the show is filmed. And while Jennifer might be supportive of Justin?s career, she?s not going to be happy about spending that much time in NYC. So, what will come first for JustJen? A baby or a breakup?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is totally pregnant except her rep denied it, says Us Weekly | | Added 11 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea how many ?Is Jennifer Aniston pregnant?? stories I?ve written over the course of five years. It comes in phases ? when Jennifer is laying low, she tends to gain a few pounds and then the ?pregnancy rumors? begin because everyone assumes she?s laying low because she?s pregnant and she?s gained weight because she?s pregnant. At this point, my rule is to ignore all of the pregnancy rumors that come from Star, In Touch, Life & Style and especially OK! Mag. Maybe I?ll discuss it if comes from the Daily Mail. But I will definitely discuss it if it comes from People Mag or Us Weekly, because those are the two publications with close relationships to Aniston and her team ? when Aniston wants to leak certain information or combat a certain story, she goes to Us Weekly and People.
So, it?s odd that Us Weekly is running a ?Aniston is pregnant? cover this week. Do they have the sources to back it up?
Jennifer Aniston has been engaged to her fiance Justin Theroux since Aug. 2012 ? but the pair are already expanding their family with a baby!. A new report reveals that Jen is ?thrilled beyond belief,? about her pregnancy news.
Jen, 44, is reportedly expecting her first baby, but she?s not jumping to announce her news. She is reportedly waiting to announce the news until she has passed those crucial first months.
?She is scared of having a miscarriage, given her age, so they are not saying anything until she is six months along,? an insider told Us Weekly.
Justin, 42, and Jen are happy in love and are thrilled for their news. ?They?re extremely happy. This is the baby Jen always wanted,? the source said.
Jennifer has been spotted at parties drinking only water, reveals the mag. She has also been wearing looser fitting dresses with strategic rouching to her We?re The Millers premieres. In order to camouflage her tiny bump, ?her stylists had to redo her whole press tour wardrobe,? the insider tells Us.
Jen and Justin?s wedding plans are on hold for the time being, as a source also revealed that ?the baby is taking priority.?
A rep denied the pregnancy to Us Weekly. HollywoodLife.com is waiting for separate confirmation.
[From Hollywood Life]
So, her rep denied it to Us Weekly but they still ran with the story and put it on the cover? That is just? weird. I suspect that this is The Classic Aniston Game for when she?s promoting a film ? someone, somewhere will report that she?s pregnant based on photos of Aniston massaging her stomach area on a red carpet, then Aniston gets to spend the publicity tour talking about the state of her womb and how she?s not pregnant and we?re so invasive but yes, she wants kids of course she does.
Or she could really be pregnant this time and her rep is just lying like he does often enough. You choose your version of the story. I will say this ? if she?s pregnant, really and truly pregnant, that might go a long way to explaining why she looked so ill and barfy during TIFF.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.881.016
Photos Online+ 3.573 past week
3.443
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Amy Adams
Photos of Amy Adams will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
2 days | | |
| | |
|
