| | |  | Jennifer Aniston News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Taking a Year Off From Acting | | Added 13 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
An insider tells Us Weekly that Jennifer Aniston won’t be subjecting us to any more of her romcoms for a while because she’s taking a year off from work. The say, “Jen’s taking a year off from work to enjoy herself.”
Another source confirms the report saying that after the release of Horrible Bosses and Wanderlust, the only thing on her plate is The Goree Girls, an old project from her production company. Oh and about The Goree Girls. Guess who’s touching up the script? Her new boyfriend. A source tells Us, “She’s impressed by his ability to find humor in dry material.”
*Looks around, hides one side of mouth from Jennifer Aniston, looks at random person standing beside him, points to Aniston and then says in a strained whisper: “I think she’s talking about herself.”*
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is Going Away for a Year | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Hope you’ve had your fill of second-rate shitty romantic comedies, because Jennifer Aniston is taking a year off from acting! Us Magazine says:
Jennifer Aniston is turning love into a full-time job!
“Jen’s taking a year off from work to enjoy herself,” an Aniston insider [reveals].
Indeed, a second source familiar with her schedule confirms that after Horrible Bosses and the October release of Wanderlust, the only thing on her plate is… [spending time with] new beau Justin Theroux.
There’s nothing men find sexier than you up and quitting your job after a month of dating so that you can focus on your new relationship together. Trust me, they don’t find that creepy or smothering or desperate at all. Just remember, restraining orders are just his way of reaching out to you. Men sometimes have a hard time communicating.
Arriving at The Daily Show last month:
PHOTO SOURCE: Fame Pictures
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is taking a year off, if you wondered why she's not in another romcom | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Cue the adoption and pregnancy rumors, Jennifer Aniston just announced through a “source,” aka her publicist, that she’s taking a year off work starting this fall. Doesn’t it seem like celebrity actors make this announcement whenever they have some unplanned-for down time, and then reneg once a half decent project comes along? I predict a similar outcome for Aniston.
There are a few of things that I took away from this brief article. 1. Aniston wants us to know how happy she is, as usual. 2. Her people want us to think she’s planned the fact that she isn’t in another romcom right after her Horrible Bosses gig. And 3. it’s clear that US has been running publicist-planted stories from her camp for some time. I mean, we didn’t need even more confirmation of that, but it’s just painfully obvious now. (Revisit some of their past articles trumpeting her new relationship and fabulous lifestyle.)
So Aniston meant to do this with her career, and Huvane is giving us the heads up on it. (Note: Kaiser just reminded me after I wrote all this that this blurb was in last week’s US Weekly print edition and we mentioned it in an earlier post. Everyone was focusing on the potential cheating/homewrecking angle so I’d rather run this article though and not scrap it.)
Jennifer Aniston is turning love into a full-time job!
“Jen’s taking a year off from work to enjoy herself,” an Aniston insider tells the current issue of Us Weekly (out now).
Indeed, a second source familiar with her schedule confirms that after Horrible Bosses and the October release of Wanderlust, the only thing on her plate is developing The Goree Girls, her production company’s years-old project about singers in a women’s prison.
And guess who she’s picked to juice up the script? “She wants to collaborate with [Justin Theroux],” a source says of Aniston’s latest beau, who won screenwriter cred with Tropic Thunder and Iron Man 2.
“She’s impressed by his ability to find humor in dry material,” the source tells Us.
[From US Weekly]
I just want Aniston’s team to stop hitting us over the head. She happy and in love, we get it, and they don’t want the public to forget about her. Maybe they’re also hoping that all this news will help advance her projects within the industry as well. Goree Girls was announced in the summer of 2009 and filming was supposed to take place in January of 2010, but it was supposedly delayed so that Aniston could film Just Go With It. Now she’s done yet another movie and has all this down time where nothing is scheduled. It seems like the project is on hold indefinitely for some reason. IMDB has the release date for Goree Girls listed as 2013.
Photo credit: WENN.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston at the Horrible Bosses Premiere | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston wore a little black dress with sparkles to the premiere of “Horrible Bosses” in L.A. last night, a shocking departure from her usual fare of little black dress with collar, little black dress with ruching, little black dress with ruffles, and little black dress with one shoulder. I agree with Jen, though — trying new things is overrated. If there’s one thing old people have taught me, it’s that change is dangerous and scary and inherently evil. Much like computers and specialty coffees.
PHOTO SOURCE: Fame Pictures
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston in a Balenciaga LBD: cute or boring? | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last night was the big LA premiere of Horrible Bosses, and Jennifer Aniston ruled the red carpet. I seriously could only find a handful of photos of the actual leads of the film - Jason Sudeikis, Jason Bateman and Charlie Day. And I don?t even think Kevin Spacey and Colin Farrell (the other ?horrible bosses? in the film) even showed up for the premiere. They must have been like ?Meh, it?s just going to be the Aniston Show.? So here is the lady of the hour, in a little black Balenciaga dress. I don?t hate the dress at all. It?s very cute, and very versatile. It?s short but not too short, it?s the kind of cut that Aniston usually wears, and it?s got just enough sparkle to be interesting. My verdict: pretty cute. Sidenote: Seriously, WTF is going on with her lips?!
So where was Aniston?s homewrecked lover, Justin Theroux? Well, you see, their love is so tender and new, he didn?t want to walk the red carpet with her lest they put too much pressure on the relationship. That?s the excuse I imagine he used - according to The Mail, Theroux was in the car with her, arrived with her, and he just waited in the car while she worked the red carpet. I guess he joined her inside later?
Here?s someone who did walk the red carpet for Aniston: Chelsea Handler. Bitch looked beyond beat, though. This dress? Jesus. You know what?s funny? In this week?s National Enquirer, there?s a gossip piece about Aniston trying to give Chelsea a makeover. According to the Enquirer?s Mike Walker, Aniston went to Chelsea?s place and started pitching a great deal of Chelsea?s wardrobe, then Aniston took Chelsea on a shopping spree because, in Aniston?s alleged words, ?Your star?s rising and you?ve got to look the part.? This is the alleged ?total remake?? it?s still pretty damn ghastly:
Photos courtesy of WENN.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Premieres 'Horrible Bosses' in LA | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
She?s no stranger to red carpet affairs, and earlier tonight (June 30) Jennifer Aniston made her big arrival at the Los Angeles premiere of her new movie ?Horrible Bosses.?
The ?He?s Just Not That Into You? actress was looking mighty fine in a stylish black frock as she hammed it up for the shutterbugs outside Grauman?s Chinese Theatre.
And according to a FOX Pop Tarts source, Jen has been exhibiting some very Angelina Jolie-like tendencies as of late, including getting a tattoo and stealing her new boyfriend Justin Theroux out of a 14-year relationship.
?Jennifer Aniston definitely seems to be taking a page out of the Angelina Jolie book! She's savvy and she knows what people want to see from her. She just wanted Justin no matter what and went after him. It seems like she doesn't care about the fact that he had a girlfriend. He might have told her they were broken up but Heidi didn't seem to know. Jen once said Brad was missing a sensitivity chip but it seems like she's the one now who is missing the sensitivity chip."
Dr. Patrick Wanis, a human behavior expert agrees. ?Jennifer may be subconsciously modeling and matching Angelina because she sees that Angelina has what Jennifer always wanted ? stability in love, success on and off screen and meaningful goals that unite and deepen the bonds between Angelina and Brad.?
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is making big changes now that she's got herself a man | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Us Weekly has an interesting piece about all of the changes Jennifer Aniston is making now that she?s got a man (as opposed to a pillow boyfriend, I guess). Some of it is obvious stuff that we already know - Justin Theroux is a New York boy, and Aniston sudden itch to buy New York real estate was easily explained retroactively once we found out that Aniston was preparing a love nest for her homewrecked boyfriend. Justin?s also into tattoos, thus Aniston got a tattoo. But some of the ?changes? Aniston is making aren?t so obvious, and they?re totally worth noting:
*Jennifer Aniston isn?t taking her eyes off Justin Theroux. ?She only wants to be with Justin,? says a source, adding, ?She has a pattern of doing this with guys.? Much like her transformation into ?groupie? for John Mayer, Aniston is now constantly with her man in downtown NYC, whether it?s browsing through the Maccarone Gallery or strolling arm in arm after a June 25 dinner at Il Cantinori.
*She’s got new friends! Jennifer has traded in her California friends for her hipster beau?s favorite downtown bar, the Smile. And on June 22, Theroux?s BFF, controversial photographer Terry Richardson, released a pic of the pair taken after the trio dined in NYC?s SoHo. Aniston said cheese for a man who is notorious for his grungy, hypersexual imagery. But perhaps controversy is part of her new image. - with pals like there, expect rowdy bashes at the pad she bough just a stone?s throw from Theroux?s. She is, after all, in the mood to celebrate.
*She?s talking babies! ?Jennifer really wants children,? says an Aniston confidant. ?It?s something she talks about openly.? Since her split with Brad Pitt in 2005, she?s seen more duds than potential dads. ?Everyone is rooting for Justin to be Mr. Right,? says the pal. ?She hasn?t loved anyone as much as Brad. And she deserves a fresh start so she can have a family.?
*She?s going on hiatus! The actress is turning love into a full-time job! ?jen?s taking a year off from work to enjoy herself,? says an Aniston insider. Indeed, a second source familiar with her schedule confirms that after Horrible Bosses and the October release of Wanderlust, the only thing on her plate is developing The Goree Girls, her production company?s years-old project about singers in a women?s prison. And guess who she?s picked to juice up the script? ?She wants to collaborate with him,? a source says of Theroux. ?She?s impressed by his ability to find humor in dry material.?
[From Us Weekly, print edition]
She wants to collaborate with Justin on the script? ?Make sure you add ?and then she touches her hair? in every scene. And add something about wedges and scarves! There, we collaborated! Time for another bottle of tequila!?
Also - ?Jennifer really wants children. It?s something she talks about openly.? First of all: OF COURSE she?s talking about children. Because that?s what every woman has learned to do when they?ve only been dating a guy for six weeks, right? What?s that? They?ve been seeing each other a lot longer? Shocking! Secondly: ?She?s seen more duds than potential dads.? That?s on the dudes? Why is that not on Aniston? She?s the one who would rather date some racist, misogynistic closet case child like John Mayer than someone stable, well-adjusted and family-oriented. Thirdly: If Aniston had wanted to be a mom before now, she would have found a way to be a mom. Obviously, judging her from her actions, motherhood isn?t a big priority for her and I just don?t buy that she?s pulling the ?baby crazy? thing with Justin. I just don?t.
Sidenote: The restaurant Il Cantinori was name-checked, and I?d just like to point out that Aniston seems to take all of her boyfriends or would-be boyfriends there. I remember reading about her and Mayer, and her and Bradley Cooper at Il Cantinori. Is that weird? Or is it just her favorite place to eat? If Clive Owen and Michael Fassbender come to town separately, I?d probably take them both to The Olive Garden.
By the way, Justin?s ex Heidi Bivens gave an exclusive statement to Star Mag, after they asked her about the end of her relationship with Justin: “It’s unfortunate. I’m not going to comment unless they comment first.” That?s so? NOT how Aniston would have handled the situation. Now I feel for Heidi even more.
Photos courtesy of WENN & Terry?s Place.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston: 'Don't confront your man w/ things you?re not happy about' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I got this story lead from Fark, where they titled it “Jennifer Aniston reveals the secret to a successful relationship. That’s like Rosie O’Donnell revealing the secret to a successful weight-loss program.” I would counter that it’s more like Kirstie Alley revealing the secret to a successful weight loss program. A lot of yo-yoing followed by a recent and as-of-yet quite short-lived success that they’re publicizing every way to Sunday. So ShowbizSpy has a bunch of quotes from Jennifer Aniston in which she deigns to give relationship advice. They offer these with no context or source, but it sounds like her.
The Horrible Bosses star ? who is dating actor Justin Theroux ? insists it is crucial to be able to talk openly and honestly to your partner in order for love to last.
?You need to talk to each other and you have to say what you want,? said Jennifer, who was previously married to Brad Pitt.
?You don?t confront your man about things which you?re not happy about, you approach it in a much more constructive way. You never want to be in an adversarial situation where it?s you versus him. All couples face those kinds of difficulties, but you?ve got to be able to talk about your problems and your needs and do it in a positive way. That?s easier said than done, of course.?
As well as sharing her advice on relationships, the 42-year-old actress has also revealed her philosophy on life.
Jennifer insists she doesn?t ?waste time being negative? and tries to be an ?optimistic? person at all times.
?It?s important to live openly and with hope; I try to be open and look forward to tomorrow. I consider myself a very optimistic and positive person. I want to be caring and understanding of the people I love and enjoy their company and spend good time with them,? she said.
?It?s so easy to find things to worry about or complain about and I?ve learned over the years that you don?t need to waste time being negative. Having a good conversation over a bottle of wine is about as magical an experience as you can have when you?re in the moment and allowing yourself to enjoy things.?
[From ShowbizSpy]
Other outlets attribute these quotes to an interview with New! Magazine, which sounds suspect. It may be important to reserve judgment until we know whether they’re accurate, although you know I’m not going to do that.
Look, I get what she’s saying about how you need to approach things from a win-win perspective and work in a relationship as a team instead of as an individual ego fighting for your way. (Not that she would ever phrase it that coherently.) I disagree with her opener that “you don’t confront your man about things which you’re not happy about.” I’ve been married for six years, not that it makes me an expert in any way, but I know that if you don’t bring up things that bother you they will sit there under the surface, fester and affect your relationship until you resolve them. Even if you think you can forget about something, in my case it’s hard not to and communication is necessary to resolve things. Usually it’s a totally different situation than I assumed and just talking to the other person about it will help clear the air and get me to understand that it’s not what I thought. So it would be dumb not to bring up something. But there’s a way to bring it up so that it’s framed in a positive way and that’s probably what she meant.
Photo credit: Fame
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's Sweet Tanned Legs | | Added 13 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I could tell you that the dress Jennifer Aniston is wearing was see through, but it’s Jennifer Aniston so even if it was nobody would believe me. The woman is just that boring. Don’t get me wrong, she’s still pretty damn gorgeous, but she never really does anything all that sexy. She could
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston is uncool: 'I?m extremely lucky, and I?m extremely happy' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
These are some new photos of Jennifer Aniston arriving at The Daily Show last night. I dislike the dress, and I have literally NO idea why Aniston insisted on wearing dresses and skirts with some kind of dust ruffle attached at the hem when she looks so good in pencil skirts. I also have no idea why she’s flashing that gold ring like it’s some kind of diamond or something. She really wants her ring to be photographed…? I guess it’s the ring that caused so much “controversy” because she and Justin Theroux seemed to be wearing matching rings a few weeks ago, but that “controversy” was so, so dumb, especially considering the real controversy was that Aniston is an uncool homewrecker.
Anyway… ordinarily, I find Jennifer Aniston?s interviews somewhere between tediously boring and outright horrible. CB always says that Aniston is a horrible speaker, as in Jennifer simply has issues communicating whatever it is she?s feeling or talking about in any kind of interesting or thought-provoking way, I guess. I just think that Aniston simply isn?t a ?deep? person, and she?s only really comfortable talking about her pity parties and her hair and clothes and such. Which is fine, I guess. There are lots of people like that, and they manage. Anyway, I bring up Aniston?s sketchy interview history just to say that I didn?t hate her Good Morning America interview yesterday morning. I wasn?t charmed by it or anything, but Aniston was cognizant and lucid and she had some funny little quips. Maybe she gives a better interview when she?s all loved up?
So, when asked about her love life, Aniston says, ?Yes, I’m very happy. I’m extremely lucky, and I’m extremely happy.” SO UNCOOL. Imagine how Heidi Bivens feels right now, hearing this HOMEWRECKER declare how ?happy? and ?lucky? she is with her STOLEN man. Ah, I love how the chickens have come home to roost on this one.
Anyway, moving on. In yet another interview, Aniston confirmed that her foot tattoo (her first tatt) is definitely ?Norman? for her dead dog. She told ET Canada, ?That’s my dog. My baby who just passed away. I never thought that would ever happen,” she said. “It’s just my way to pay homage to him … forever.”
Meanwhile, the Red Band trailer for Horrible Bosses was just released and it?s? really funny. It looks filthy, and now I kind of want to see it, but I?ll only watch if someone can tell me if they only put the really funny parts in the trailer. And yes, that?s an awesome cameo by Ioan Gruffudd.
Photos courtesy of WENN and Pacific Coast News.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.539.621
Photos Online+ 13.821 past week
2.800
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Elizabeth Olsen
Photos of Elizabeth Olsen will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
6 days | | |
| | |
|
