| | |  | Jennifer Aniston News & Gossip
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux are 'pre-engaged,' friends say | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
People are still talking about Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux?s rings. It seemed like as soon as they got together, officially and publicly, they were wearing matching gold rings. I didn?t really think anything of it, because, really, who cares? Rings don?t mean much, and I rarely look at them on anyone. It?s possible for two people to just have similar rings, or to give someone a ring and not have it mean anything important. Anyway, this ring-obsession is the focus of a new story. Apparently, the giant diamond ring Aniston sported for several of her Horrible Bosses appearances means that she and Justin are ?pre-engaged.? It also means, in my opinion, that they are 13 years old. Pre-engaged? Seriously? You?re in your 40s. Stop with the cutesy high school crap.
Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux are intoxicated with their love for each other. Ok Magazine reports that friends close to the 42-year-old actress have never seen her so happy and that the happy couple may wed by ?summer?s end?!
?They?re kind of pre-engaged,? a friend of Jen?s tells the magazine. ?We keep saying, ?whats with the rings? It?s only been a few weeks!? But she says it feels right.?
Jen was spotted wearing a gold ring with her name on it in June and shortly after Justin was sporting the exact same one! Then at the Horrible Bosses premiere, Jen wore a huge diamond ring ? she hadn?t worn a ring on her left hand since her divorce from Brad Pitt in 2005!
The freshly shaven and newly clean cut actor has reportedly been transformed inside and out by Jen.
?He has always been somewhat cynical and pessimistic,? the source adds. ?But he has a happy, upbeat vibe now, like he?s a better version of himself ? Justin shaved his scruffy beard; he?s gone from looking like a dirty biker to a leading man. The motorcycle boots have been replaced by Gucci shoes. Jen has been spoiling him with facials and pedicures.?
The wedding might happen at Justin?s favorite secret getaway ? the Hawaiian island of Kauai.
?It?s the place Justin?s always dreams of getting married ? it?s the perfect place to tie the knot.?
[From Hollywood Life]
First: this is not the first time Aniston has worn a big diamond ring on her left hand since her divorce. She did this with Vince Vaughn during the promotion of The Break-Up. Allegedly, Vince was pissed that she was trying to start engagement rumors.
Second: ?Jen has been spoiling him with facials and pedicures.? Hahaha SELLOUT. What happened to Justin? I thought he was SO HARDCORE. Now he?s Aniston?s spa buddy and they gossip about Brangelina as they do each other?s hair. It also sounds like Aniston might want a girlfriend more than a boyfriend, right?
Third: It actually wouldn?t surprise me if they were engaged, pre or otherwise. I don?t think this is going to last longterm, but I think they?ll make it through the year, and at least past the Oscars, and if they?re going on that long, I suspect we?ll be hearing many more ?engagement rumors?.
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston: 'Horrible Bosses' UK Photo Call | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Taking her new film overseas, Jennifer Aniston was spotted at a photo call for ?Horrible Bosses? in London, England today (July 20).
The ?Rumor Has It? actress was in good spirits as she posed for the press at the Dorchester Hotel in a sexy black leggy dress teamed with black high heels.
In a recent interview, Jen confessed that she?s determined to have kids at some point in her life, even if she happens to be single.
Aniston explained, "I'd love to have children one day. And it'll happen. I am open to being a single mother, to adopting. I'm just fine with it."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | John Mayer is trying to win Jennifer Aniston back, since she's taken now | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Isn’t this what douchebags always do? They can’t commit but tell you what a wonderful person you are and how they’ll miss you. Then once you’re well over them and happy in another relationship, (or happy on your own and finally realizing how much better off you are, take your pick) they come crawling back asking for another chance. It’s lame, it’s manipulative and it’s predictable. Anyway John Mayer is supposedly doing this to Jennifer Aniston. This is in the National Enquirer, but they’ve run a few exclusives before about Aniston’s lovelife (or they made them up, but they rang true) and I believe it. Here’s the story.
Jennifer Aniston is happily dating [Justin Theroux] but being barraged with text messages from [John Mayer] say sources.
“Jennifer is totally involved with Justin, and wants absolutely nothing to do with John,” revealed a friend.
“John broke Jen’s heart, but that doesn’t seem to faze him.
“He’s been relentless in his pursuit of Jennifer lately - texting her witty messages, sending love poems and calling to ask her out. But it’s been two years since they were together and Jen sees it as far too little too late.
“She feels she’s found a better, more responsible and reliable man.”
[From The National Enquirer, print edition, July 25, 2011]
I guess you can’t blame Mayer for trying, since Aniston took him back even after he blabbed to the paparazzi about how he broke up with her. It’s worth noting that Mayer gained some weight, not that there’s anything wrong with that since he’s an attractive guy either way before he opens his mouth. He’s not cutting his hair or shaving though and just looks like fresh hell lately. Meanwhile Aniston is frozen in time and remains very bangable, by most guys’ estimations. Like we may mock her for not switching it up much but she’s got a good formula going. Now she has a hot man by her side and can’t be bothered by Mayer. I hope she told him to f#ck off but you know that’s not her style. She probably just blinked a lot, called him back (since I doubt she texts) and engaged in small talk before she let him down easy, making some excuse that she was busy.
I have to give Mayer some credit for laying low lately. He hasn’t tweeted or blogged in months (from my quick look-over) and is just going about his business. Maybe he’s matured behind the scenes. We’ll see when he inevitably comes back. I give him four months, but seriously props to him for going this long.
Aniston and Theroux are shown on 7/7/11. Header image from 2/22/09. Credit: WENN.com. Mayer is shown on 7/13/11. Credit: Matt Smith, PacificCoastNews.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston On All Fours! | | Added 13 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
The idea of Jennifer Aniston on all fours is a lot more appealing than her actually on all fours in these shots. Here she is getting her handprints immortalized at Grauman’s Chinese Theater for some reason. Apparently they’ll give these things to anyone these days. Anyhow, she’s at least trying to give us a peek
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Gets a Star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Aniston brought her new boyfriend Justin Theroux and new bestie Cheslea Handler to her Hand and Footprint ceremony at the Hollywood Walk of Fame this morning, and noticeably absent was her best friend of 20 years Courteney Cox. Also noticeably absent? Gratuitous cleavage and shots of her underpants. But thanks to these screen caps from “Horrible Bosses,” that’s one wrong I won’t let go un-righted. I’m no hero — I’m just a girl with a computer and a dream. The tights and the cape are entirely coincidental.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston brings clean-cut Justin Theroux to her Grauman's event | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, goodness. I could analyze these photos for a very long time. On Thursday, Jennifer Aniston attended her Grauman?s Chinese Theater hand-and-footprint event. On hand to celebrate? The two most important people in her life, her publicist, Stephen Huvane, and her boyfriend, Justin Theroux. Anyone from Friends? Nope. But her BFF Chelsea Handler was there (mother of God), as was Jason Bateman (cute). So? where should we start? Let?s do fashion first. Aniston wore this cute, flirty little Prada dress that was pretty short, but not too low-cut - she only flashed minimal cleavage when she was bent over, doing her handprints. My guess is that she flashed her biscuits to everyone behind her, though. BUT! We should give thanks that it?s not black, and that she chose a summery frock in the middle of summer (you?d be surprised with how few Hollywood ladies make that choice).
As for her homewrecked lover, Justin? um, I think he looks nice. He looks like an ?edgy boy? used to wearing leather and punk rock studs and mangy beards, who somehow managed to find a nice pair of pants, a lovely, clean dress shirt and a snappy tie, and he put it all together. Two things?he?s wearing dress shoes, not boots! That?s love, people. When I man puts away his beloved boots to wear fancy dress shoes to your event, that means that he cares (or that you dressed him yourself). Second: his grooming. Clean shaven, hair freshly cut, a nice comb over for his bald spot. Not bad at all. Methinks that Justin is totally game for whatever is going down, you know? I?ll say it again: he?s not John Mayer. He?s not some boy who is going to get overwhelmed by ?the process? of being Jennifer Aniston?s Boyfriend. Theroux knows what?s up, he knows what?s expected of him, and he?s meeting those expectations. Maybe he has his own agenda, or maybe he actually cares about Jennifer. I don?t know. But he?s playing the game, and he?s doing really well.
I also enjoy the interplay between Justin and Jennifer in the photos - even though they didn?t pose together, he was still seated close enough to the staging area so as to be in the same frame in many of the photos. His eyes rarely leave Aniston - it?s kind of sexy. She, in turn, seems to be looking at him a lot to, making faces and ?performing? for him, even blowing him a kiss. It?s kind of cute, I?ll admit. I think it might even be ?love?. I KNOW for a fact that it?s ?Aniston?s 2012 Oscar Date?.
As for Huvane - he?s the dark-haired guy in the light plaid shirt, the one who is often in between Jennifer and Justin in the frame. I swear, I can almost make out the strings going from Jennifer and Justin?s backs to Huvane?s hands. Machiavellian bastard. What?s his Aniston Endgame?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's Hollywood Hand/Footprint Ceremony | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Stepping out for quite the honorary event, Jennifer Aniston attended her Hand and Footprint Ceremony in Los Angeles, CA on Thursday (July 7).
With friends including Jason Bateman and Chelsea Handler also in attendance, the ?Just Go With It? beauty looked adorable in a flirty dress and heels as she pressed her hands and feet into the cement block assigned just for her.
Aside from making her mark in Tinseltown, Jen recently opened up to FOX Pop Tarts about her role in the upcoming comedy, ?Horrible Bosses.?
She told, ?I loved the script, I thought it was extremely unique idea that everybody universally would be able to relate to, in terms of having a boss that?s a little difficult. The part was irresistible.?
?It was fun, over way too fast. I loved her (Julia) and was sad to see her go. I loved her, I fell for her,? Aniston added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston Talks Brad Pitt Split | | Added 13 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
It was the heartbreak heard ?round the world when Brad Pitt ditched Jennifer Aniston for Angelina Jolie back in 2005, and Jennifer recently told press she took refuge in her work.
The ?Rumor Has It? babe, who is now happily attached to actor Justin Theroux, explained that her film ?The Break Up? starring Vince Vaughn was key in helping her get back on her feet.
Aniston noted, "It was a beautiful human story about a couple breaking up...You know, I was slightly familiar on the topic and the issue. I honestly felt like, what a great way to sort of exorcise some of that."
She added that the film?s producers were hesitant to offer her the role given her recent divorce. "I was like, why not? Turn the page, let's move on. I enjoyed it! You'd think otherwise."
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's odd appearance on 'Inside the Actor's Studio' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Lately, Jennifer Aniston is working very hard to shed her tabloid-shaped, “good girl” image, which I suspect is part of her publicity team’s plan to make audiences comfortable with the fact that she plays a not-so-nice character in the upcoming Horrible Bosses. Strangely enough, however, the focus of Aniston’s visit to “Inside the Actor’s Studio” (where she was accompanied by new love Justin Theroux wasn’t as much about the new movie as about rehashing the past. Again.
On The End Of “Friends”: It’s one of the greatest jobs I ever had. It gave me everything. It gave me this ridiculously blessed life and career and taught me so much, and it’s the best time I ever had.
On The Break-Up (Slight Reference to Brad):It was just a beautiful story about a couple breaking up. And I was slightly familiar on the topic and the issue. And I sort of honestly felt like, what a great way to sort of exercise some of that. I enjoyed it. It really enjoyed it. You would think otherwise, because even the producers were like, “I don’t know if we should ask you to do this,” but I was like, why not? Turn the page, let’s move on.
Well, at least she slightly acknowledges what “Friends” has done for her career, but I’d like to point out that, in my opinion, it was not “one of” her best jobs but solely “the best” job she’s ever had when one considers the indeterminable void comprising the whole of Aniston’s movie career. But still, Horrible Bosses is totally worth your hard-earned money and is totally different than any other indistingishable Aniston movie because she’s wearing a brunette wig and, therefore, deserves to be treated like Meryl Streep. Or, at the very least, like Nicole Kidman for wearing that prosthetic nose in The Hours, right?
Here are the relevant clips from Aniston’s appearance on “Inside the Actor’s Studio,” and it’s rather amusing how Aniston uncontrollably commits the following offenses: (1) Plays with her hair too much; and (2) Still relies on the instant gratification of live audience reaction, which (much to Jen’s dismay) is only forthcoming when the “Clap!” notice appears.
[Video clips courtesy of HuffPo]
On the topic of Jen’s new movie, she reportedly plays a very villainous character who utters the “F-word” (one of them, anyway) as part of her dialogue. Of course, this seems rather inconsistent with her GLAAD Vanguard Award (presented in 2007 by Jake Gyllenhaal) for her contribution to a positive outlook in regard to alternative families and lifestyles (for her tangential association to the lesbian couple on “Friends” and for making out with Courteney Cox on Dirt). Nonetheless, she’s just an actress delivering dialogue, right?
In the new comedy Horrible Bosses, Jennifer Aniston plays an overbearing dentist named Julia who tortures her assistant Dale (Charlie Day) by sexually harassing him. She?s one of three managers (along with Colin Farrell and Kevin Spacey) meant to be so detestable that their underlings plot to murder them. She constantly corners Dale, asking him to perform lewd sexual acts. In one scene, Aniston?s character calls him into her office, wearing nothing but a white lab coat. When he expresses discomfort, she taunts him like a high-school bully. “You?re starting to sound like a little fa–ot there, Dale,” she says.
What?s going to happen when millions of people watch an actress who is supposed to be America’s Sweetheart say a word like that?
[From Daily Beast]
LMAO at the notion of Aniston as “America’s Sweetheart,” who has spent the past, what, month attempting to shed said reputation of the spurned wife by hanging with the sketchy Terry Richardson and banging a man with a 14-year live-in girlfriend. Score another point for Aniston’s PR team.
Horrible Bosses movie stills courtesy of AllMoviePhoto
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Jennifer Aniston's character uses anti-gay slur in 'Horrible Bosses' | | Added 13 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Back in 2007, Jennifer Aniston received the GLAAD Vanguard Award (presented by none other than Jake Gyllenhaal) for her supposed contribution to a positive outlook in regard to alternative families and lifestyles (seemingly for her tangential association to the lesbian couple on “Friends”, and for making out with Courteney Cox on Dirt). Four year later and strangely enough, Aniston’s upcoming movie features a so-called “villainous” incarnation of the actress uttering a very non-subtle, anti-gay slur. What would GLAAD think?
In the new comedy Horrible Bosses, Jennifer Aniston plays an overbearing dentist named Julia who tortures her assistant Dale (Charlie Day) by sexually harassing him. She?s one of three managers (along with Colin Farrell and Kevin Spacey) meant to be so detestable that their underlings plot to murder them. She constantly corners Dale, asking him to perform lewd sexual acts. In one scene, Aniston?s character calls him into her office, wearing nothing but a white lab coat. When he expresses discomfort, she taunts him like a high-school bully. “You?re starting to sound like a little fa–ot there, Dale,” she says.
So why is the other F-word coming out of Jennifer Aniston?s mouth? To hear the film’s writers tell it, the word illustrates how awful Aniston?s character is supposed to be. “She is a horrible person, so I think when it is coming out of her mouth, it is understandably offensive,” says John Francis Daley, the former star of “Freaks and Geeks,” who co-wrote Horrible Bosses.
His writing partner, Jonathan Goldstein, said: “It’s indefensible. I think part of the challenge is to, in a fairly short amount of time, get these guys to a place where an audience can empathize….To shorthand that, we tried to think: what are the most offensive things they can say? Using a word like that I think is one of them. It says this woman is irredeemable.”
A few openly gay screenwriters, producers, and publicists said that a high-profile star like Aniston using that word, even in character, seemed like it could backfire. Others argued that the word could have been replaced by one that is less volatile–and still made the same point. “I just don?t know if everybody is thinking about the collateral damage they are creating,” says Dan Bucatinsky, the executive producer for the Showtime series “Web Therapy” headlined by another “Friends” star, Lisa Kudrow. “That?s a harder question for a screenplay writer. What?s going to happen when millions of people watch an actress who is supposed to be America’s Sweetheart say a word like that?”
[From Daily Beast]
First off, Aniston has probably rationalized her use of the “F word” in terms of the “art” involved with her very important feature film that has inexplicably earned her a multimillion-dollar paycheck even before the box-office results have arrived. Secondly, LMAO at the notion of Aniston as “America’s Sweetheart,” who has spent the past, what, month attempting to shed said reputation of the “spurned wife” by hanging with the reprehensible Terry Richardson, banging a man (Justin Theroux) with a 14-year live-in girlfriend, and even enlisting the guy to accompany her to her unprecedented (and highly unwarranted) taping of “Inside the Actor’s Studio” to deliver the following wisdom:
On The End Of “Friends”: It’s one of the greatest jobs I ever had. It gave me everything. It gave me this ridiculously blessed life and career and taught me so much, and it’s the best time I ever had.
On The Break-Up (Slight Reference to Brad):It was just a beautiful story about a couple breaking up. And I was slightly familiar on the topic and the issue. And I sort of honestly felt like, what a great way to sort of exercise some of that. I enjoyed it. It really enjoyed it. You would think otherwise, because even the producers were like, “I don’t know if we should ask you to do this,” but I was like, why not? Turn the page, let’s move on.
Well, at least she slightly acknowledges what “Friends” has done for her career, but I’d like to point out that, in my opinion, it was not “one of” her best jobs but solely “the best” job she’s ever had when one considers the indeterminable void comprising the whole of Aniston’s movie career. But still, Horrible Bosses is totally worth your hard-earned money and is totally different than any other indistingishable Aniston movie because she’s wearing a brunette wig and, therefore, deserves to be treated like Meryl Streep. Or, at the very least, like Nicole Kidman for wearing that prosthetic nose in The Hours, right?
Here are the relevant clips from Aniston’s appearance on “Inside the Actor’s Studio,” and it’s rather amusing how Aniston uncontrollably commits the following offenses: (1) Plays with her hair too much; and (2) Still relies on the instant gratification of live audience reaction, which (much to Jen’s dismay) is only forthcoming when the “Clap!” notice appears.
[Video clips courtesy of HuffPo]
Horrible Bosses movie stills courtesy of AllMoviePhoto
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.537.775
Photos Online+ 12.122 past week
1.814
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Nicole Kidman
Photos of Nicole Kidman will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
7 hours | | |
| | |
|
