| | |  | Gisele Bundchen News & Gossip
|
|
| | Gisele talks babies, her 'big husband' being an 'adoptive mother' | | Added 15 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last week, People Magazine got the honor of officially declaring Gisele Bundchen pregnant. The general consensus is that when People says it (and I?m paraphrasing Jaybird), it?s like the People editors are holding the pregnancy test in their hands. People?s sources even gave a vague due date, saying that Gisele would give birth sometime?early next year?. In this week?s new Life & Style magazine, however, they?re claiming that Gisele?s baby is due in December. December 14th, to be exact. Suffice to say, when Life & Style prints something, it?s like the editor is just jotting down bullsh-t in the toilet.
Gisele sat down for an television and web interview with Brazil?s Fantastico. You can see the interview here, but you?ll need a translator. But there are two bonuses - first, Gisele?s voice is quite nice when she?s speaking in her mother tongue - while her English is very good, her voice is different (and annoying) when she?s speaking English. She sounds a lot better on Fantastico. Secondly, her face has started to fill out, and she actually looks adorable with rosy pregnancy cheeks.
People has a translation of some of the highlights from the interview. Gisele talks mostly about how she is ?crazy about children? (I believe that) and how she?s totally head-over-heels in love with Tom (those are the hormones talking). She calls Tom her ?big husband? which could just be a weird translation. Another weird translation - I think - is when she refers to herself as baby John Moynahan?s ?adoptive mother?. Um? no, Gisele, you are his step-mom, not his adoptive mother. Bridget might end up cutting this girl:
Pregnant with her first child, supermodel Gisele Bundchen is focusing on family and home life these days.
“I am crazy about children … I am an adoptive mother … I’ve already had this experience for two years,” she says in a recent TV interview with Brazil’s Fantastico, of her relationship with husband Tom Brady?s 21-month-old son John Brady, whose mother is actress Bridget Moynahan.
Bndchen also raves about getting hitched this past Spring. “I think I’ve met the right person, my partner, my companion,” she says. “I already knew that we would get married a year and a half before we got married. We felt it. The heart spoke louder.”
When the heart speaks, priorities change, she adds. “Before … I had to go out, had to work. Now I think about it twice, three times, four times. So I only do the things that I really want to do,” Bndchen says. “I prefer to stay at home. The big husband wins. Because of this relationship, what is most important to me is the family. Now I am creating my other family.”
And, in addition to preparing for her new baby, she wants to prepare … dinner. Says Bndchen, who turns 29 in July, “I am Cancer. I want to stay at home, cooking, relaxing. You have to follow the heart.”
[From People]
Gisele usually plucks my last nerve, but I find myself hoping she stays safe and stays happy with Tom. That was her plan all along - all of these celebrity women become more popular when they get knocked up. The moms amongst us feel sorry for what she?s going through during her pregnancy, and the child-free amongst us have a great time seeing all of the weight she gains. I have a feeling that Gisele is going to have a Heidi Klum-type pregnancy? meaning, Gisele is just going to look prettier pregnant. Because that?s just how the cookie crumbles.
Gisele Bundchen is shown in Sao Paulo, Brazil at fashion week on 6/15/09. Credit: WENN.com
More Photos Here
   |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gisele Bundchen is pregnant | | Added 15 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, another Gisele Bundchen is pregnant rumor. Sources tell PEOPLE that Gisele is “ecstatic” about her pregnancy. She’s supposedly due next year. The rumors this time might be true, however. Gisele was in Brazil over the weekend with a baby bump. That or she came from an amazing buffet.
“Gisele will be an excellent mother,” a source tells PEOPLE. “She’s always wanted kids.” Reps for Bndchen reached by PEOPLE for confirmation refused to comment.
This is probably the tenth time Gisele Bundchen is rumored to be pregnant so I’m not going to believe this until that baby slithers out of her womb genetically perfect. You’ll know she’ll have given birth because harps will start playing and angels will sing. By the time the kid turns 10, they’ll either already be throwing 60 yard touchdown passes or walking the runway in eight inch heels like a pro.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | People confirms Gisele Bundchen's pregnancy, she's due next year | | Added 15 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
There have been rumors swirling around Gisele Bundchen?s womb for months, and now People is confirming her pregnancy. Hm… looks like Tom Brady was lying when he denied it a few weeks ago. According to People?s sources, Gisele is due ?early next year?. Let me do my math? ?early? in my mind means she?s due in January or early February. Which, backtracking nine months mean that she probably got pregnant sometime in April, which means she probably got pregnant within two months of being married to Tom Brady. It also means she?s probably at most at the end of her first trimester. This will be the first child for Gisele, and the second for Tom Brady, who has a son with ex-girlfriend Bridget Moynahan.
Gisele Bundchen is expecting and “ecstatic,” sources tell PEOPLE. She is due early next year.
Speculation has grown since pictures showing the supermodel in Brazil this week surfaced showing what seems to be a perceptible bump. Bndchen and New England Patriots quarterback husband Tom Brady were married twice this Spring ? first in a ceremony in Los Angeles Feb. 26, then exchanging vows before friends in early April at Bndchen’s Costa Rica home.
“Gisele will be an excellent mother,” a source tells PEOPLE. “She’s always wanted kids.” Reps for Bndchen reached by PEOPLE for confirmation refused to comment.
?Family is everything,” Bndchen, who turns 29 next month, told PEOPLE last month. “I think family is the base to everything. I think that is one of the things I?m most grateful for. I have a lot to be grateful for but I think that’s definitely number one.?
Another source close to the couple says, “You know Gisele and Tom are just enjoying themselves, being married and just doing their thing … Gisele has been talking about it with friends. She says she’s ready for a family.”
This is her first child; Brady has a son, John, with ex-girlfriend Bridget Moynahan.
[From People]
Yeah, I?m not surprised that Gisele is pregnant, or that she got knocked up right away. She strikes me as that kind of woman, and she probably will be an utterly devoted mother. This is some good news for Gisele, publicity-wise. Earlier this week, a rep for Vanity Fair made a bad ?joke? about how Gisele is losing her looks, all coming from recent evidence that Gisele?s face on the cover of a magazine equals really low sales. But everybody will want to see pictures of Gisele?s ?bump? so she?ll get some good press from it. Congratulations to Tom and Gisele!
Here?s Gisele attending the opening day of Sao Paulo fashion week on Wednesday. Images thanks to WENN.com .
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Vanity Fair on Gisele's semi-naked low-selling cover: she's losing her looks | | Added 15 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Gisele was Vanity Fair?s May cover girl, and for the honor of a Vanity Fair cover (that wasn?t ?The Fashion Issue? or whatever), Gisele dished big-time about her husband Tom Brady, Tom?s ex Bridget Moynahan, and the son Bridget and Tom share custody of, John Moynahan. There were a couple of now infamous quotes from that article, including Gisele referring to John as ?my son? and calling Bridget?s pregnancy ?a wake-up call?. All of that juicy gossip ?twas all for naught, however. Because that issue of Vanity Fair was the lowest-selling issue of the magazine in two years.
That, in itself, is just a media story, or even an economic story, because who really buys Vanity Fair on the newsstands during a recession, after all? But unfortunately for Gisele, a Vanity Fair spokeswoman decided to ?joke? and give a ?reason? for the slumped May sales. Spokeswoman Beth Kseniak told the New York Observer, “It might be that she’s losing her looks.? Oh, snap! I guess Beth is Team Moynahan all the way:
Gisele, it turns out, doesn?t sell.
Vanity Fair and Harper?s Bazaar each put Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen on covers this year, and both promptly had their worst-selling issues off the newsstand in 2009.
The May Vanity Fair, which featured a bare-bodied Gisele, standing sideways with a come-hither look, sold only 280,000 single sale copies, the lowest total for the magazine in nearly two years, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations Rapid Report.
Harper?s Bazaar?s April issue, meanwhile sold only 132,000 copies, its lowest total of the year and its lowest since November 2008, when Drew Barrymore was on the cover.
Harper?s Bazaar has averaged about 155,000 single copy sales this year, and Vanity Fair has averaged 342,000.
“It might be that she’s losing her looks,” quipped Vanity Fair spokeswoman Beth Kseniak.
Considering the number of covers that Gisele Bundchen has graced this year?including the July issue of German Glamour and German Elle?magazine publishers and editors are crossing their fingers that she has more appeal overseas.
Ms. Kseniak also pointed out that when Gisele graced the Vanity Fair cover in September 2007, it was the third-biggest seller that year.
One industry source said that some newsstand sales were affected in earlier this year after Anderson News, a major distributor, suspended its business operations, though publishers feel that all distribution problems have been ironed out.
[From The New York Observer]
If someone was asking me for my response to why people didn?t pick up a Vanity Fair magazine with Gisele on the cover, I would just say: ?Women buy the magazines, and women generally don?t care for or about Gisele, no matter what she wears, does or says.? It?s totally true (anecdotally, at least) - I?ve found most women are either utterly ambivalent about Gisele, or they really, really dislike her.
But was the Vanity Fair?s spokeswoman out of line, even if it was a ?joke?? The guy at Cover Awards thinks the comment makes Vanity Fair look ?mean and pathetic? and says that Vanity Fair should be offering Gisele an apology right now. I?m not sure if Gisele will get an apology, but I know she?s not going to get any more covers for any of the Conde Nast publications.
Gisele Bundchen is shown on 6/15/09. Credit: WENN.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gisele Bundchen is Naked and Nobody Cares | | Added 15 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, boys and girls! It’s Abby. I’d like to take this opportunity to welcome myself back into the fold and thank all of you for your prayers and kind comments last week. And thanks especially to Sarah, who somehow manages to raise the bar even higher every time I go away and makes it look effortless in the process.
But now it’s time to take the bar and fuck yourself in the ass with it, because I’m the one writing today. God, it’s good to be back! MSNBC says
Supermodel Gisele Bundchen?s star is fading.
The May issue of Vanity Fair, in which Bundchen appears nearly naked on the cover (and inside the magazine), is the lowest-selling issue of the publication in nearly two years.
Vanity Fair [confirms] that the issue sold only 280,000 single-sale copies.
?It might be that she?s losing her looks,? spokeswoman Beth Kseniak joked to the New York Observer.
Um, no. She’s not losing her looks. It’s that thanks to the internet, naked ladies are now a dime a dozen. I see approximately 3,583 naked ladies a day without even trying. I can’t not see naked ladies when I’m on the computer. The scientific term for this phenomenon is “desensitization.” You might know it better as “if she’s not wearing a pair of plastic panties she just shat in and tethered to a one-eyed ostrich in a gimp mask, I’m not buying.” Thanks for the good times, Information Superhighway!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | After hours club: Gisele Bundchen's behind the scenes shoot | | Added 15 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure why I’m up at this godforsaken hour on a Saturday, but here’s Gisele Bundchen doing a Victoria’s Secret photo shoot. These are old since she split with Victoria’s Secret two years ago. Unless this isn’t a behind the scenes VS shoot at all, in which case, hey, what’s that behind you!
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gisele Bundchen - Nude in Photo Magazine | | Added 15 years ago | Source: Feed Me Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing off her fine figure, the lovely Gisele Bundchen posed in the buff for the brand new June issue of Photo magazine.The Brazilian beauty got all body-painted up for the seductive spread, which is sure to turn into a big seller at the newsstands.This isn’t the first time that Gisele Bundchen showing off her naked body in public. Most recently, she went topless for the May issue of Vanity Fair. Then, earlier this year, her raunchy pics for Rampage’s Spring/Summer 2009 ad campaign were unveiled. At that time, she replaced model Petra Nemcova to pose for the ads.Gisele Bundchen - Nude Body Paint Pictures - Photo Magazine
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gisele Bundchen in a Very Sexy Photoshoot | | Added 15 years ago | Source: Newstoob |
|
|
|
|
|
Just when I had decided that Bar Refaeli was my favorite Victoria's Secret hottie, Gisele Bundchen has come back with this very sexy photoshoot to almost blow my mind. I say almost because if the model was topless, that would definitely put it over the top! Still, these photos of Gisele are some of the sexiest I have seen from her. The photographer and his assistants really liked to get up close and personal. Might as well bent over and motorboated that awesome cleavage! I would have. Where can I apply for that job? I want to get up close and dry hump Gisele Bundchen myself!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Gisele isn't pregnant | | Added 15 years ago | Source: The Blemish |
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Brady yesterday shot down reports that he and Gisele Bundchen are expecting. Brady said, “One is enough. I have dogs and that’s all I need.”
Brady has the right idea. I’ll never understand why people impregnate their supermodel girlfriends right after they marry. You’d think they’d not want them to get fat for almost a year and squeeze out a little demon that makes said supermodel too tired for sex. It’s like winning the lottery and putting all that money into a CD. Normal people don’t do that. They blow it on hookers and risky investments.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Tom Brady denies Gisele's pregnancy while Bridget Moynahan fumes | | Added 15 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I was really looking forward to reporting on the rumors of Gisele Bundchen?s pregnancy, but alas, Gisele?s husband Tom Brady denied the pregnancy rumors Thursday night after a practice session with the New England Patriots. Apparently an Associated Press journalist waltzed right up to Tom and was all ?So, dude, is your wife knocked up?? And Tom was all ?No.? And then Tom added, ?One is enough.? Ouch. Take that Gisele, with your biological clock and stuff.
Unfortunately for Tom ?One Is Enough? Brady, many gossipy sources have Gisele coming to the end of her first trimester. Which would have meant that she was already pregnant before she and Tom Brady married in April… which I don?t buy. I think Gisele is traditional in the way that she would wait to get pregnant until after she gets married Just my opinion. So, by my rationale, Gisele is at most two months pregnant, if that. In which case it would be silly for Gisele or Tom to confirm the pregnancy - traditionally, you don?t announce until the end of third month, or into the fourth.
So let?s play the game - say Tom was just denying the pregnancy for the hell of it, but Gisele really was less than two months pregnant. If that was/is the case, then this report from In Touch is really juicy. Not only do they have Gisele?s pregnancy cravings (pizza), they have a really bitchy quote from an unnamed friend of Bridget Moynahan. Apparently, it?s totally a catfight over everything between Bridget and Gisele - ever since Gisele called Bridget?s son ?my child? and Bridget sent all of her friends out to bash Gisele. Now Bridget?s getting nasty about how Tom isn?t man enough to tell her about Gisele?s pregnancy face-to-face or something:
Gisele Bundchen has gotten plenty of practice with her husband Tom Brady?s son, John, but she?ll soon become a mom for real!
The supermodel and the New England quarterback told their families that they are expecting their first child together.
?Gisele is about three months along and over the moon about it because this is all she?s ever wanted,? says a family insider.
?Tom is equally happy and making sure she has anything she needs. She?s been craving pizza and eating it like crazy. They haven?t decided if they?re going to find out the sex but don?t care either way. Everyone is so happy about it.?
But they didn?t exactly break the news the right way to Bridget Moynahan, Tom?s ex-girlfriend and the mother of his 21-month-old son.
?Bridget found out about Gisele?s pregnancy through someone else,? says a friend of the actress?. ?Any man not willing to make a call to tell an ex that his current wife is pregnant is not right.?
But no one is going to take away the 28-year-old Brazilian beauty?s happiness.
?I would like a big family. I love children,? Gisele, who wed Tom in February, has said. ?This is why you get married - you want to create those roots together. You want to give that to your kids.?
[From In Touch, print edition, June 9 2009]
?Any man not willing to make a call to tell an ex that his current wife is pregnant is not right.? Uh… maybe that didn?t come straight from Bridget, maybe it did. But am I alone in thinking that if and when Gisele does get pregnant, it?s none of Bridget?s business? Yes, it will affect Bridget in as much as she lets her son spend time with his father and his father?s wife, but Bridget doesn?t get a say or any kind of first notification on the state of Gisele?s womb.
Tom and Gisele are shown at the Costume Institute Gala on 5/3/09 and outside an OB/GYN on 5/4/09. Credit: Fame Pictures and WENN.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.458.644
Photos Online+ 3.333 past week
1.384
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Sandra Bullock
Photos of Sandra Bullock will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
6 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
