| | |  | Kimberly Kardashian News & Gossip
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian is paying for private security at her kids' school because of Kanye | | Added 782 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Say what you want about Kim Kardashian, but she cares about her kids and she?s a hands-on parent in a traditional sense. As in, the kids go to a private school, she spends money on special tutors for art and music, she spends a lot of time with the kids, etc. Kim and Kanye West share custody, although the kids are primarily with Kim. It was that way when Kim and Kanye were married too Kanye would go off for weeks and months at a time and Kim was the primary parent. Well, Kanye has learned what all abusive men learn when they?re getting a divorce: he can hurt his ex through the kids. He can throw big public tantrums about access to the kids and the kids? education. Well, in the past six weeks or so, Kanye has been focused on how the four Kardashian-West children need to spend half of their time at Kanye?s Donda Academy, his half-assed, cult-like ?school.? Kim has refused. The kids go to a good private school and it would be completely absurd for the kids to spend half the time at Kanye?s dumbfk narcissism school. Well, Kanye?s so mad about it that he announced the name of the kids? private school and now Kim is paying for extra security at the school:
Kim Kardashian isn?t taking any risks when it comes to the safety of her children. The Skims founder recently hired additional security to guard her kids? private school after her ex-husband Kanye West revealed its name in numerous social media rants, TMZ reported.
Kardashian is paying for the additional security, though to be clear it?s not to protect her progeny from their dad; the ?Kardashians? star is concerned that because the Yeezy designer revealed the school?s name anyone can show up and potentially harm the students.
West, 45, has been on a full self-guided press tour ranting about how he would prefer his four kids ? North, 9, Saint, 6, Chicago, 4, and Psalm, 3 ? to attend his newly opened Donda Academy, where parents reportedly have to sign NDAs despite the fact that the school has yet to be accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
In early September, the ?All of the Lights? rapper said he and Kardashian, 41, had a ?good conversation? about their kids? education. The ?Heartless? rapper proposed his ?idea? that the children should change their schooling to three days at their current private school and two days at Donda Academy in Simi Valley, Calif. ?This is co-parenting,? West captioned the screenshot of the text message via Instagram.
However, it appears any headway the former pair had made has come to a screeching halt, as West told Tucker Carlson that he isn?t willing to ?compromise? when it comes to education.
?All they do is take all the celebs kids and throw them into this same school,? the rapper said about his kids? current school, claiming that the administration tries to ?indoctrinate them.?
?Right now we?ve come to a compromise ? but I?m not finished because I don?t compromise ? but we?ve come to a compromise that my kids come to my school after school and they learn choir.?
[From Page Six]
Yeah, Kim needs to go to family court and have the lawyers sort this sh-t out. I realize that Kim is trying to keep the peace while also disentangling herself from Kanye, but this has been completely dangerous for a while. Kanye directly targeted Pete Davidson and he would not think twice about targeting the kids to make some kind of point. He already is Kanye is trying to make it too dangerous for HIS CHILDREN to go to school. Kim really needs to involve the family court and the lawyers in this because it?s so bad.
Photos courtesy of Instagram, Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian got booed by a stadium full of people at the Rams game | | Added 785 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Football season is here, which means that every weekend, the most random people trend on Twitter and people get really shouty about men and balls. I?m not judging football lovers, but it?s like watching people speak another language in front of me. Anyway, on Sunday, there was a big game in LA, at the SoFi Stadium. The Rams versus the Dallas Cowboys. Lots of celebrities came out for the football game in their backyard, including people like John Legend and Kim Kardashian. Kim was there with some of her kids. When she was shown on the Jumbotron, a whole-ass stadium full of football fans booed her.
Kim Kardashian was just booed at SoFi Stadium during #Cowboys vs #Rams
John Legend and ?Steve? received a neutral response pic.twitter.com/H3ZmzldG1P
Natasha Dye (@natashadye) October 9, 2022
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian walked the Dolce & Gabbana runway during Milan Fashion Week | | Added 799 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
In the past year, Kim Kardashian scored a print ad campaign for Balenciaga, she collaborated with Fendi on a collection for Skims, and she turned up to Milan Fashion Week back in February, wearing head-to-toe Prada on multiple days. Kim is absolutely leaning into big-name brands, and here?s another one: she?s been co-opted by Dolce & Gabbana. Kim arrived in Milan last week to host a special VIP party on behalf of D&G. She also walked the runway of D&G?s show, and she was seen out and about in Milan with the designers.
I hope Kim is being paid for all of this Dolce & Gabbana support, and I hope she?s not in contractual breach of any of her other campaigns and collabs. Stefano Gabbana and Domenico Dolce are massively problematic, with a long history of being anti-IVF, anti-gay rights and pro-racism against Asian people. All of that usually gets covered up because celebrities aren?t paying attention to the designers? politics, so celebrities wear D&G on red carpets all the time. The designers also hosted Kourtney Kardashian?s wedding to Travis Barker, so clearly the Kardashian clan is just the kind of American tackiness they?re looking to procure, long-term.
Meanwhile, last week we heard that Kim had purchased a $60 million home in Malibu. People Mag confirmed the purchase, but sources stress that Kim isn?t moving out of the Hidden Hills home she and Kanye renovated extensively. Kanye signed that home over to Kim as part of their divorce, although he bought a house right across the street, because he?s still stalking her. That?s what the People Mag confirmation said the new Malibu home is ?just a beach house. She is not selling her Hidden Hills house,? but ?Kanyes home is very close [to the Hidden Hills house] and this is another way for her to have her autonomy.
Her roots look so bad, but I hope she?s actually ditching the blonde. It never suited her!
Photos courtesy of Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian steps out in Malibu in a slick catsuit & itty-bitty Balenciaga bag | | Added 836 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
It occurred to me as I looked through these photos that Kim Kardashian might be moving into a new era. These pics are of Kim last night in Malibu, entering and leaving a party for Kendall Jenner?s 818 Tequila. Kim wore a silver-grey sleeveless catsuit, I guess we?re calling it? Her tiny little baby bag is Balenciaga, but I don?t have an ID on the catsuit. Anyway, as I said, it feels like Kim might be shifting into a new era. No more Pete Davidson, no more Kanye West. Her divorce was bifurcated and she?s legally single. She?s a billionaire. What?s going to happen next for Kim? Who will she date next? You know what would be really funny? If after all of the drama and conspiracies, Kim just started openly dating Drake. I think she?s ?too old? for him, but it would still be gossip chaos and I?m halfway rooting for it.
Meanwhile, after Kim and Pete broke up, it looks like Kim went on a girls? trip to? Idaho?? It?s always a little bit crazy to me when Kim turns up in ?middle America.? She went to Idaho with her kids and some girlfriends and they apparently rented a lake house and did all kinds of watersports and such. It looks like fun you can see some videos here.
As for the photos in this post? Kim finally has the ?doll body? she?s always dreamed of. And that?s what she looks like too her body looks hard and plastic.
Photos courtesy of Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian didn't want to get serious with Pete, she 'wants to be single & date' | | Added 847 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I sort of enjoy the after-action gossip following a celebrity breakup. I really want to know what unnamed sources think about the celebrity split and who those sources are blaming! So far, the Kim Kardashian-Pete Davidson split hasn?t given us a ton of high-level drama. My take is still that Pete did the dumping, but I actually think that Kim might have been a little bit tired of this relationship overall? She doesn?t seem broken up about it, and there?s no big ?she?s hates him? or ?he was exhausted by her bullsh-t? narrative. From Entertainment Tonight:
Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson broke up after nine months of dating because the spark between them faded.
A source tells ET that, yes, the former Saturday Night Live star is so sweet, but she didnt feel ready for something serious with him. The source added, They had tons of chemistry, and still do, but she kind of wants to be single and date. Kim still adores Pete and will always be friends with him. She still thinks hes the nicest and sweetest guy in the world and theres no drama or anything weird between them now.
She felt like Pete was the extreme opposite of Kanye and it was good for her then, the source continued. She initially thought it would be a fun fling, but then it got more serious when they were spending so much time together. Kim wasnt feeling like she was willing to settle down with him just yet.
[From ET]
Okay, that actually makes some sense to me? The whole ?I thought this would be a fun fling but then I developed feelings? is something that feels real. Kim had just been through the wringer with Kanye (and their divorce still isn?t completed) and she wanted something light and easy, someone who would just be fun. And Pete is out there, talking about how he wants to be a father and he wants to settle down? Kim was like ?nope, I?m not in that place.? Anyway, I am curious to see who the next guy will be. Before Pete, I thought she would end up dating some lawyer in LA. I still say that?s on the table.
Meanwhile, Kanye returned to Instagram to post this mess. This is his version of a victory lap.
Kanye West is back on IG pic.twitter.com/5GZK1Cg3tt
RapTV (@Rap) August 8, 2022
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian & Pete Davidson broke up after nine months together | | Added 848 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday evening, People Magazine published a story online: ?Kim Kardashian Cant Wait to Have Pete Davidson Home from Australia: Theyre Still Very Happy.? Sources said that Kim loved visiting Pete in Australia last month and she couldn?t wait for him to come back to America in a few weeks. Sources said that ?the long distance hasnt been easy for Kim, but they are making it work. They are still very happy. They are very much a serious couple.? That was one of People?s top stories throughout the day on Friday, and still featured near the top of the page for most of Friday. Then, by Friday evening, E! News broke the news that Pete and Kim had called it quits:
Its time to keep up with a newly single Kim Kardashian. The Kardashians star and Pete Davidson have broken up and decided to just be friends, sources close to the couple exclusively tell E! News.
The insiders share that while the pair has a lot of love and respect for each other, they found that the long distance dynamic and their demanding schedules made it really difficult to maintain a relationship. The split occurred sometime this week.
Pete has been spending part of the summer in Australia working on the movie Wizards!. As for Kim, she continues to raise four kids?North, Psalm, Chicago and Saint, with her ex Kanye West.
The divorce is moving ahead with Kanye, another insider shares with E! News. They are happily co-parenting.
[From E! News]
TMZ and People Mag followed up with their own confirmations, and it seems someone (Kim/Kris) parroted the ?decided to just be friends? thing to every outlet. My question: the People Mag story was so clearly a cutesy PR hit from the Kardashian-Jenner operation, so what changed so quickly? Thursday they were just fine and then Friday evening, they weren?t. It?s not that Pete was afraid of commitment that?s not it. My guess is that one of them cheated. Page Six?s sources said it was a different issue though:
Kim Kardashian and Pete Davidson?s age difference caused them to split earlier this week, sources exclusively tell Page Six.
?Pete is 28 and Kim is 41 ? they are just in very different places at the moment,? the insider says. ?Pete is totally spontaneous and impulsive and wants her to fly to New York, or wherever he is on a moment?s notice. But Kim has four kids and it isn?t that easy. She needs to focus on the kids.?
The source also tells us that Kardashian ? who runs multiple businesses and stars on a reality show ? was ?totally exhausted by this relationship and other things going on in her life.?
The ?Kardashians? star has recently had a tumultuous relationship with ex Kanye West, which caused strife while she was dating the ?SNL? alum.
The insider explained, ?When Kim is with someone else, Kanye can cause problems with the kids. He tries to divide and conquer. He can?t help it. Kim is a really dedicated mother, and her kids will always come first. She wants and needs harmony at home and in her life.?
[From Page Six]
I don?t doubt the Kanye stuff, and I think it?s pretty likely that Kanye is still making Kim?s life hellish behind-the-scenes, even though he seems to have taken it down a notch publicly. Kim might simply need less drama overall and she was tired of fighting with Kanye over Pete. As for the age difference stuff? I mean, yeah, I can see how that would be a problem, especially with Pete talking about how his ultimate goal is fatherhood. But this whole situation really does feel sudden, idk.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Instar, Instagram and Backgrid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Delusional Kim Kardashian brags about her bone density & decreasing body fat | | Added 850 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
As many people have noted, it definitely feels like the Kardashians are now rejecting the ?curvier body image? which made them famous. They used to be all about big boobs, big butts, hourglass figures? but over the past few years, Kim and Khloe Kardashian have remade their bodies. Slim, blonde, ?90s waif-era is suddenly back ?in? style. My theory is that both Kim and Khloe have gotten a lot of surgical ?help? to get their bodies this way. Kim especially has gone buckwild with this idea that she needs to get as tiny as possible through crash dieting (and surgery). Kim notably ?lost? a lot of weight to ?fit? into Marilyn Monroe?s dress for the Met Gala. Kim has continued to document her weight loss on social media in recent months, and then this week, Kim decided to brag about her? bone density??
Kim Kardashian shared her body scan with 327 million Instagram followers on Wednesday. The 41-year-old entrepreneur had her bone density and body fat measured by BodySpec, a company that uses mobile scanning vans to provide a detailed full-body composition report. According to one of the Instagram stories posted by Kardashian, the scan takes approximately seven minutes.
YOU HEAR THAT?!?!!! MY BONES ARE STRONGER THAN 93-97% OF PEOPLE, she wrote on her Instagram story as she shared her Bone Report.
The report also showed that Kardashian has lost weight in the last year. In May 2021, Kardashian had a total body fat percentage of 25% body fat but now has gone down to 18.8%.
Body fat percentage distinguishes fat from muscle and calculates the percentage of body fat in the body. This is different from Body Mass Index (BMI), which is is calculated based on a persons height and weight, and used by the healthcare system to sort people into four categories: underweight, healthy, overweight or obese. The ideal measurements for BMI are based on problematic racial and societal biases that do not consider a persons ethnicity, gender or body makeup, and were created by using a sample of only white, European men.
On Wednesday, the Keeping Up with the Kardashians alum also shared a candid photo of her stomach after undergoing a tightening treatment. This is a game changer!!! she wrote over the snap on her Instagram Story. She praised it as her fave laser but also confessed, its painful lol but worth it!
[From People]
First of all, if Kim is naming the scans and procedures she?s having done on her Instagram, then she?s getting paid. These are sponsored posts/stories. She?s getting paid to hype BodySpec and whatever this laser tightening treatment is. Second of all, Kim really doesn?t give a fk about her younger fans and followers. She dgaf about triggering people with body dysmorphia. Kim has profound body dysmorphia too.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Kim Kardashian (@kimkardashian)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian claims she only had Marilyn Monroe's dress for 'three minutes' | | Added 894 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Kardashian wore Marilyn Monroe?s famous Jean Louis dress to this year?s Met Gala. Kim borrowed it from Ripley?s Believe It Or Not Museum. The museum purchased the dress at auction in 2016 and, to my knowledge, this was the first time the dress had been lent out for someone to wear at a public event. Kim wore the dress solely for the Met Gala red carpet, then changed into a replica for the gala. All that and Marilyn?s dress didn?t even look good on her. Additionally, the Marilyn Monroe Collection has accused Kim of doing irreparable harm to the dress. The MM Collection has been doing extensive documentation of what happened to the dress and they blame Kim, Ripley?s and Anna Wintour (who likely signed off on this mess). Ripleys denied it. Now Kim is speaking out about those accusations that she harmed the dress:
In an interview with Today, which aired on Tuesday, June 21, Kardashian, 41, told anchors Hoda Kotb and Savannah Guthrie: ?I respect [Marilyn]. I understand how much this dress means to American history and with the [Met] theme being American, I thought what is more American than Marilyn Monroe singing ?Happy Birthday? to the President of the United States.?
The reality star continued, ?It was such a process. I showed up to the red carpet in a robe and slippers and I put the dress on at the bottom of the carpet, went up the stairs ? I probably had it on for three minutes, four minutes, and then I changed at the top of the stairs.?
When Kotb, 57, asked Kardashian to address claims the dress was ?ruined,? the Skims founder shook her head and said, ?No ? Ripley?s [and I] worked together so well. There were handlers and gloves that put it on me.?
Kardashian also opened up about her weight loss and the backlash she received after revealing she lost 16 pounds just to fit into the look. ?I looked at it like a role, and I really wanted to wear this dress. It was really important to me? Since then, I?ve continued to eat really healthy. I?m down 21 pounds now. I?m not trying to lose any more weight, but I have more energy than ever. I cut out so much sugar, a lot of junk food I was eating ? I just completely changed my lifestyle.
[From Us Weekly]
I don?t know how many times Kim is going to claim that she?s suddenly found a new, restrictive diet and the diet is working wonders for her. She makes those claims every two years or so. It?s ridiculous. And no one believes she just naturally dropped 16 pounds in a matter of weeks either. I believe all of these ?new diets? are just cover stories for liposuction.
As for what Kim says about only having the dress on for a few minutes?I actually believe her and I think it was mostly the Ripley?s people handling the dress, and we know Kim only wore it for the red carpet. That being said, four minutes is plenty of time for the damage to be done to the dress. The dress was clearly strained on Kim?s body, especially as she was walking up steps and putting it on and taking it off. Come on.
Kim Kardashian talks about wearing Marilyn Monroe?s iconic dress to the #MetGala and responds to accusations that she ruined it. pic.twitter.com/AVo1sSltUb
TODAY (@TODAYshow) June 21, 2022
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ripley's Museum claims Kim Kardashian didn't damage Marilyn Monroe's dress | | Added 899 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier this week, the Marilyn Monroe collection posted before-and-after photos of Marilyn?s famous Jean Louis dress, the one she wore to sing ?Happy Birthday, Mr. President? to JFK. Kim Kardashian borrowed the dress from the Ripley?s Believe It Or Not Museum in Florida. Ripley?s purchased the dress at auction in 2016, and the dress had already been bought and sold a few times before then. Ripley?s lent out the dress to Kim Kardashian for the Met Gala, despite the fact that she couldn?t fit her ass, thighs or boobs in it. Kim reportedly left the dress unzipped for the red carpet, then changed into a replica for the actual gala (once the red carpet was done).
I wondered how the MM Collection even got their hands on the dress to monitor it for damage, considering one would think that Ripley?s has their own in-house restorers/costume-repairers. But the MM Collection did seem to get a look at the dress after Kim wore it and they were beyond pissed at the damage Kim did to it. Several of the crystals were lost/popped off. The fabric was stretched and frayed. The zipper was fked. But now Ripley?s claims that actually, it?s fine? Ripley?s posted this press release ?debunking? the MM Collection?s claims:
Kim Kardashian?s walk up the Metropolitan Museum?s stairs at this year?s Met Gala caused quite the stir, but one thing Ripley?s Believe It or Not! can say with confidence is that it did not cause damage to Marilyn Monroe?s famed ?Happy Birthday? dress from 1962.
Ripley?s Believe It or Not! is not the first owner of this dress. It was acquired at a Julien?s Auctions event in 2016 for $4.8 million. A report written on the dress?s condition in early 2017 states, ?a number of the seams are pulled and worn. This is not surprising given how delicate the material is. There is puckering at the back by the hooks and eyes,? among other instances of damage.
Kim Kardashian wearing the ?Happy Birthday? dress has been hotly contested, but the fact remains that she did not, in any way, damage the garment in the short amount of time it was worn at the Met Gala.
?From the bottom of the Met steps, where Kim got into the dress, to the top where it was returned, the dress was in the same condition it started in,? noted Ripley?s VP of Publishing and Licensing, Amanda Joiner, who was continuously with the dress the day of the Gala and during transport from Orlando to New York.
A recent social media post asked, ?Was it worth it?? Kim Kardashian did not pay Ripley?s Believe It or Not! to wear the dress, nor did the company pay her. Rather, Kardashian made a charitable donation to two charities in the greater Orlando area on behalf of the company. Ripley?s Believe It or Not! will continue to exhibit the dress ? in as-is condition ? at Ripley?s Believe It or Not! Hollywood through Fall 2022.
[From Ripley?s]
Yeah? what?? ?Ripley?s VP of Publishing and Licensing, Amanda Joiner?? Is Ms. Joiner a costuming expert or professional fashion archivist? Does she have a professional background in seamstressing, fabric preservation or clothing repair? When you?ve got your VP of Publishing swearing up and down that the dress wasn?t compromised in the least, you?re panicking.
The MM Collection responded with a lengthy IG statement and the before-and-after photos, which they say were taken 52 days apart, before and after the gala. Kim damaged the gown.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by The Marilyn Monroe Collection (@marilynmonroecollection)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Kim Kardashian irreparably harmed the Marilyn Monroe dress at the Met Gala | | Added 902 days ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?m confused about something involving Marilyn Monroe?s iconic Jean Louis dress. Marilyn wore the dress for one of her last public appearances, and after she passed away, the dress likely traded hands a few times. Then in 2016, the Ripley?s Believe It Or Not Museum purchased the dress at auction for a historic price: $4.8 million. The museum obviously keeps the dress in one of their permanent exhibitions, and they only lent it out for the first time for the Met Gala, for Kim Kardashian to wear (she only wore it briefly on the carpet, then changed into a replica for the dinner). Following the gala, I assumed the dress was returned to the museum.
That was all the long-winded backstory, so here?s my question: the Ripley?s museum is in charge of the dress, correct? They have their own museum people looking after the dress, right? It does not appear so. It appears that while Ripley?s OWNS the dress, they allow the Marilyn Monroe Collection to look after the dress or make repairs as needed. And the MM Collection is NOT happy. The MM Collection?s social media posted several Instagrams about the damage done to the fragile dress by Kim and her team. Several crystals are missing/popped off, the zipper is fked and the fabric around the zipper is ripped and frayed.
The MM Collection notes that Ripley?s did try to ensure that the dress was not damaged and that Kim was not alone with the dress, and that the museum could pull the plug on it at any time. But that doesn?t change the fact that the fragile dress never should have been lent out for the Met Gala, especially not for Kim. I?m not criticizing Kim?s figure, but her figure is NOTHING like Marilyn?s. Of course Kim couldn?t fit her giant ass in the dress. Though Marilyn wasn?t as assy as Kim, even Marilyn had to be sewn into the dress! Anyway, a whole mess.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by The Marilyn Monroe Collection (@marilynmonroecollection)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.469.808
Photos Online+ 4.395 past week
1.892
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Robin Tunney
Photos of Robin Tunney will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
2 days | | |
| | | | | |
|
