| | |  | Demi Moore News & Gossip
|
|
| | Demi Moore gave Rumer a pole-dancing lesson at a party | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
This story is so gross, so hilarious, so ridiculous, I?m kind of thinking it just might be true. According to Life & Style Magazine, Demi Moore was attending a party at the Chateau Marmont recently. She brought her purse-holder Ashton Kutcher and her oldest daughter Rumer. While at the party, Demi decided to do a pole dance. Which is funny enough because, I mean, isn?t Demi afraid a strong wind will bust something on her face? But I digress. So, Demi did a pole dance, and then? she ?encouraged Rumer to join her.? Gawd, MOM, stop embarrassing me!!!
Mothers and daughters like to shop together ? but pole dancing? That?s what Striptease star Demi Moore, 47, and daughter Rumer Willis, 21, did for fun at a party at the Chateau Marmont in LA on Feb. 27.
?There was a pole at the bash, and Demi thought it would be fun to show everyone she still has what it takes,? a partygoer tells Life & Style. ?Demi even spun around the pole upside down. It was incredible.?
Then it was Rumer?s turn, as stepdad Ashton Kutcher and A-listers Jennifer Aniston and Leonardo DiCaprio, among others, looked on.
?It was strange, but Demi encouraged Rumer to join her,? says the partygoer. ?Everyone was cheering, and Leo gave Ashton a high-five. Ashton put his arms around both Demi and Rumer and looked like the proudest man in the room.?
[From Life & Style]
If my mother ever pole danced, I would check her into the hospital for fear she had a personality-altering brain tumor. If my mother even mentioned a wayward desire to pole dance, I would ask her to be quiet, lest I need to bleach my brain. But this could be the answer to many questions I have about Rumer, and why she is the way she is. Not that she?s a bad kid or anything, she just seems a little full of herself with very little actual talent to back up that ego. But if you had that mother, you would have some personality quirks too.
Demi and Rumer on September 3, 2009 and August 20. Credit: WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore Teaches Rumer How to Strip | | Added 14 years ago | Source: Yeeeah |
|
|
|
|
|
Demi Moore is the classic “cool mom” — dating a guy fifteen years her junior, wearing hip designer clothes, and publicly teaching her daughters how to strip at a Hollywood party. All my stupid mom ever did was make brownies. According to Page Six
Demi Moore gave daughter Rumer Willis a pole-dancing lesson at a party at the Chateau Marmont hotel. A partygoer [said] that the “Striptease” star “even spun around the pole upside down.” Then Rumer gave it a whirl as Ashton Kutcher, Jennifer Aniston and Leonardo DiCaprio cheered her on. “Everyone was cheering, and Leo gave Ashton a high-five,” the source added.
I bet it was easy for Rumer to swing around the pole like that once she really got going. When you’ve got a head that big, inertia kind of kicks in and does its thing for you. There’s a lot of complex physics and kinematics involved in having a jaw the size of Texas. If Einstein were still alive today, he’d probably write a whole book about it.
Demi practicing her mothering skills in Striptease:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looking for a mid-afternoon pick-me-up, Demi Moore was spotted at Starbucks in Beverly Hills with her daughter Tallulah Willis yesterday (February 22).
The “Charlie’s Angels” actress looked cute and casual in a green coat with a black top, cuffed jeans, and black boots as she chatted with her teenage girl.
In a recent interview, Demi’s “Happy Tears” costar Parker Posey told press that working with Moore was one of the highlights of the project.
Posey explained, “One of the best parts about filming ‘Happy Tears’ was working with Demi Moore. We are very similar in our work ethic. When we were at Ashton Kutcher’s birthday party, we just couldn’t wait to play sisters in this movie. We attempted to expose a side of sisterhood that people just don’t see. The interesting part is that I’m more like her character and she is more like mine. She helped me with my wardrobe and I helped her with hers.”
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher: 'Happy Tears' Pals | | Added 14 years ago | Source: Celebrity Gossip |
|
|
|
|
|
Always up for a good flick, Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher were spotted at the premiere of “Happy Tears” in New York City last night (February 16).
The “Butterfly Effect” stud supported his “Charlie’s Angels” wife as she promoted her new film at the Museum of Modern Art, sponsored by The Cinema Society and Donna Karan.
When asked if she’d talked to costar Rip Torn since his arrest last month, Demi quickly answered, “No, I haven’t. But he’s wonderful in the movie.”
“Happy Tears” is about sisters who return home to their ailing father and face new family challenges while trying to juggle their own, very different lives.
More Photos Here
    |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | ?Valentine's Day' premiere: hot messes fashion hits | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
With a big ensemble cast of Valentine?s Day, you knew there were going to be some fashion hits and misses. What?s kind of surprising to me is how few fashion misses there were - which is probably why the few bad fashion choices stuck out so much. First, let me ask all of you - what do you think is appropriate for a female star to wear to the premiere of an ensemble romantic comedy? My choice would be a cute cocktail dress or just some sort of simple, elegant outfit that didn?t pull too much focus. Much like what Julia Roberts is wearing (above). Simple, pretty black dress that looks great but isn?t screaming ?Look at me, I?m the star of this bitch!?
Then, of course, there?s Jessica Biel. Is Jessica the star? No. She?s a small part of a large ensemble. But you would never know that because she decked herself out in a big, dramatic gown like she?s the only star. She looks like she?s going to the Golden Globes (where she wasn?t invited). Over-dressed much? And the dress is fug, in my opinion.
I didn?t really like Jessica Alba?s dress, but at least it was appropriate for the occasion. She looks young and cute, even though the dress is kind of meh.
Jennifer Garner shows how should dress for the premiere of an ensemble rom-com. Gorgeous cocktail dress, simple hair and makeup, understated yet beautiful.
Ugh. Anne Hathaway needs to fire Rachel Zoe as her stylist, for real. I get that Hathaway?s coloring makes it a little harder to find great clothes that work, but this dress isn?t working for me. It looks cheap, in my opinion, and it?s too short.
Bradley Cooper: Bronzer much? I like that his forehead is a completely different color than his neck.
And then we have two of the men in the film who came with their higher-profile significant others. Eric Dane brought his very pregnant wife Rebecca Gayheart, who looks very cute in my opinion.
Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher look good. I kind of think Demi is trying to pull focus, but at least she?s not wearing a damn ball gown, you know? I actually love her dress.
Jessica Biel, Bradley Cooper, and others at the ?Valentine?s Day? premiere in LA on February 8, 2010. Credit: Fame Pictures.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore got a new face for her 'Wanted' perfume ads | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Of course Demi Moore is never Photoshopped. Of course not. Why would we think that? How could we? Why are people so cruel? Why can?t we just acknowledge that Demi Moore grows a new face every year - NATURALLY, damn it. It is always Demi?s natural face and her natural body and her natural no-hip and her natural skin and she just photographs this way naturally! Anyone who doesn?t acknowledge it is just a jealous hater waiting to get sued by the almighty Demi.
So, anyway - here is Demi in the new ad for ?Helena Rubenstein - Wanted?. That?s the perfume that Demi is the ?face? of. God knows what kind of modeling contract it is, or how much it pays, but you?d think that if Helena Rubenstein is laying out the serious money for Demi, they?d want to actually use her real face. This sh-t isn?t just ?Oh, someone got a little heavy-handed and made her skin look flawless and ridiculous.? This sh-t is like ?Oh my God, who shaved Demi?s cheeks down and made her look like a cartoon?!?? This is some Jessica Rabbit looking stuff. But she?s never Photoshopped, and of course Demi really looks like that, right?
The behind-the-scenes commercial thing is crazy too - Demi looks? her age. Ridiculous!
?Wanted? ad courtesy of Dlisted and Photoshop Disasters.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore's lawyer threatens photographer who claims she was airbrushed | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Last month, photographer Anthony Citrano pointed out that Demi Moore’s December W cover was Photoshopped clumsily and that she looked like she was missing a chunk of her left hip. In response, Moore called the allegation “bullsh*t” on Twitter and posted what she claimed was the original, unretouched photo. W Magazine admitted that the photo had been altered but that it was “nothing out of the ordinary.” They later confirmed that “no one at the magazine did any retouching of the image of Demi Moore that was sent to us [by the photographers].” The photographers, Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott said there was “absolutely no retouching on her hips, waist or legs.” That might be partially honest - it looks like Demi’s head was just pasted on to a 26 year-old model’s body. In that case, they didn’t retouch Demi’s body, they retouched model Anja Rubik’s body with Demi’s head pasted on it. (See image below.)
Fast forward to a month later, and Demi’s lawyer has sent a threatening letter to Citrano (link leads to PDF file) telling him that he must remove “all the false and defamatory statements about my client and the cover photo as well as any accompanying pictures of the W cover” and issue a “retraction and apology” or “be exposed to substantial liability.” In response, Citrano points out that there are subtle differences between even the photo Moore claims is the original and the resulting W cover. He says he’s not backing down and that it’s ridiculous to go after him for stating the obvious. It’s also pretty ripe that Demi Moore, who regularly Tweets about her personal life, including foreplay with her husband, would try to shut down one guy’s opinion on the Internet. Is her lawyer going to go after all the commenters on her “original” Twitpic who say it’s fake?
On Tuesday night, I received an aggressive and threatening letter from Martin Singer, Demi Moore?s attorney. It is marked ?Confidential Legal Notice ? Publication or Dissemination is Prohibited?. However, since Mr. Singer and I have no confidentiality agreement, and it provides essential context to the matter at hand, I have decided to publish it.
I?ll start by expressing how bizarre it feels to be immersed in a controversy that should be no controversy at all. The question of whether a celebrity was over-retouched is not one I am particularly proud of spending my mental cycles on.
When I originally pointed out (in a friendly, lighthearted way) a simple retouching blooper, I had no inkling of the total shitstorm that would follow. It gained momentum quickly, and I commented to several media outlets on the matter, always sure to frame it fairly: I have no problem with digital retouching (do it all the time), no problem with Demi Moore (she?s a beautiful woman), think the image is a great shot (kudos, Mert and Marcus) ? I simply thought the missing hip-chunk was funny. I thought we could all laugh about it for the day (maybe tack it up on a retoucher?s wall of shame) and move on to the far more important things. We are all human; we all make mistakes (me, more than my fair share.)
On Tuesday night, I received an aggressive and threatening letter from Martin Singer, Demi Moore?s attorney. It is marked ?Confidential Legal Notice ? Publication or Dissemination is Prohibited?. However, since Mr. Singer and I have no confidentiality agreement, and it provides essential context to the matter at hand, I have decided to publish it.
I?ll start by expressing how bizarre it feels to be immersed in a controversy that should be no controversy at all. The question of whether a celebrity was over-retouched is not one I am particularly proud of spending my mental cycles on.
When I originally pointed out (in a friendly, lighthearted way) a simple retouching blooper, I had no inkling of the total shitstorm that would follow. It gained momentum quickly, and I commented to several media outlets on the matter, always sure to frame it fairly: I have no problem with digital retouching (do it all the time), no problem with Demi Moore (she?s a beautiful woman), think the image is a great shot (kudos, Mert and Marcus) ? I simply thought the missing hip-chunk was funny. I thought we could all laugh about it for the day (maybe tack it up on a retoucher?s wall of shame) and move on to the far more important things. We are all human; we all make mistakes (me, more than my fair share.)
[From ZigZagLens]
If you don’t like getting called out on the Internet, don’t go posting all your personal information online. This woman says she’s never had any plastic surgery whatsoever. Maybe her assertion is like the photographers claiming they didn’t retouch “her hips, waist or legs.” It all depends on what your definition of plastic surgery/retouching is.
Photo below thanks to PopCultureMadness
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore twit-pics photo of herself, gets called old and ugly | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
For f-ck?s sake. I?m starting to think Demi Moore is part of some conspiracy to make people care about Twitter and herself, in that order. So, here?s the latest bullsh-t controversy: yesterday, Demi posted a photo of herself with a giraffe on Twitter (photo above), taken while she was doing a photo shoot for Harper?s Bazaar. Apparently, after Demi posted the photo on Twitter?s Twitpics, a couple of douchey commenters began heckling her and calling her ?old? and making fun of her neck or whatever. So she responded, on Twitter. And now the sh-t is being reported by Us Weekly. Gah!
Demi Moore has feelings, too.
On Wednesday, frequent Twitter-er Moore shared an outtake from a Tuesday photo shoot on a Santa Monica beach for Harper’s Bazaar. “Had the priviledge [sic] of working with a giraffe yesterday he was beautiful gentle and so amazing!” the 47 year-old actress wrote.
Immediately, Twitter followers chimed in with critiques: “sorrydemi that your self esteem is so low you can’t admit to a little Photoshopping,” one follower sniped, adding “And Ghost sucked.” (Retweeting the dig, Moore wrote “Thank you”).
A few hours later, another follower wrote, “sorry but you look old. specially your neck & cheecks at the second shot..”
This time, Moore posted a more pointed retort: “I’m 47 how am I supposed to look?”
In between the insults, the actress and wife to Ashton Kutcher received words of support. “WOW you look beautiful!!” wrote one fan.
A friend named “earthhealer” soothingly said, “never let those who try 2hurt U in..we all feel small sometimes Know UR fabulous loveable &Wanted!”
Moore has frequently denied that she’s resorted to plastic surgery to retain her youthful appearance. She also fought charges that, for a recent W magazine cover, editors Photoshopped her head on the body of a younger model with slimmer hips.
[From Us Weekly]
Look, I think Demi is crazy, I think she?s had a lot of work done, I think she?s a liar, and I think she?s delusional to think we won?t notice. That being said, the picture that she posted was rather beautiful, and I don?t get why anyone would heckle her for it. What makes it worse is that she responded and gave those losers the attention they wanted. And, of course, she got some attention herself. Which is what it?s all about.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | W photographer to Demi Moore: that's not the original photo (update) | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
There was a lot of buzz over the fact that Demi Moore seemed to be missing a chunk of her thigh in her photo on the cover of W Magazine. Demi is a very thin woman, but her hip is probably not a few inches smaller than her thigh. In her defense, Moore posted a photo to Twitter that she claimed was the original, unretouched version used for W. It showed her hip pushed in like on the cover picture, and she wrote “Here is the original image people my hips were not touched don’t let these people bullshit you!” Moore also retweeted a response from a fan that said “its just the way u have ur hip kinda swung to one side..y can noone see this!?”
W Magazine admitted the image was altered but said it was “nothing out of the ordinary.” The photographer that shot Demi for W who first spotted the flub says that of course the
photo is retouched, and calls it a “blooper” that belongs on the “art department wall of shame.” Photographer Anthony Citrano was kind enough to e-mail us with his comments and says that he’ll donate $5,000 to the charity of Demi’s choice if she can prove that the photo she posted is the original.
I saw your article on the Demi Moore photoshop flub - I’m the photographer who started the whole thing - and after giving it a lot of thought (and being accused of “bullshit” by Demi overnight), I’m raising the stakes: http://twitter.com/acitrano/status/5894990728
While I really feel bad that Demi is on defense over this, I also don’t like being accused of “bullshit.” So, let’s find out who’s bullshitting. This isn’t about her and it isn’t about retouching (I’ve no problem with either). It’s about a blooper, basically. The cover is a blooper; it goes on the art department’s wall of shame. So what? We
all make mistakes. That’s got *nothing* to do with Demi. She’s a beautiful woman with or without retouching. And where the hell is W Magazine on this? Why are they forcing Demi to address it? It’s not fair to her.
[From Anthony Citrano, received via e-mail]
In a follow-up e-mail, Citrano explained “I have no problem with Demi nor with Photoshopping - but I don’t like her accusation of ‘bullshit’ toward me, and then posting what she claims is the original as if it’s some kind of ‘proof’ - while most of her bazillion twitter fans take it as gospel.” Demi probably isn’t missing a piece of her thigh, then. Even if her thigh was somehow pushed in by the way she was standing to the side, it’s not like that’s her everyday face, and her body looks unnaturally thin. So why is she so defensive about the photo? Why doesn’t she just admit she was retouched and be done with it? It’s not like all the other celebrity cover photos aren’t airbrushed into oblivion. This must be a sore spot for Demi, and seems to tie in with all the times she’s denied any kind of plastic surgery. Demi is so naturally beautiful even her cover photos are all natural!
Update: Anthony Citrano is not the photographer who shot Demi for W, but his photos have run in W and he is the one who first noticed the blatant missing hip.
It appears as if Moore’s entire body may have been replaced. Popculturemadness points out that Demi’s body looks like it was replaced with a supermodel in that same dress and exact same pose on the catwalk. (Thanks taya for the tip!)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Demi Moore's hip airbrushed out on W Cover | | Added 14 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
The heavy-handed Photoshop retoucher strikes again. This time he?s gone after Demi Moore ? gnawing away at about an inch of flesh from the hip area of Demi?s outer thigh. It takes an eagle-eyed viewer to notice it, but once you do, there?s no debating it. In the cover shot above, look at Demi?s left thigh. The area of visible thigh between the upper and lower sarong has had quite a bit removed. Once you look lower, you?ll notice that the next part of visible thigh sticks out about an inch more ? where it should be smaller than the upper thigh.
When Demi Moore appeared on the December cover of W magazine, she drew admiring glances for her slender figure and flawless skin. But while most readers are used to a little airbrushing and touch-up on the covers, it appears the 47-year-old has fallen foul of an over-enthusiastic Photoshopper.
A chunk of her thigh appears to have been digitally removed from the cover between her hip bone and a casually draped sarong. There is a good chunk missing from what was her left thigh (our right). Underneath the sarong, the thigh continues but appears to be bulging out an inch more than the photoshopped area.
The section of thigh between the folds of green material appears to have a chunk of flesh missing. The mistake was pointed out by eagle-eye commentators and has been the subject of hot discussion on the internet. According to Jezebel.com, W magazine claimed any retouching was done in-house by the staff of photographers Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott.
And a spokesperson added the photographers ‘did not do anything unusual or out of the ordinary on Demi Moore for the photo on the cover of W. ‘Demi is an extraordinary beautiful woman and we feel our cover reflects that.’ The actress, who is wearing a Balmain metal mesh and leather dress, was labelled a Demi Goddess in the accompanying article. And, as many internet bloggers and commentators have pointed out, Demi looks so slender on the red carpet that there has been speculation that she had gone under the knife. So why the designers cut out a section of her hip remains a mystery.
[From the Daily Mail]
It is truly a strange decision to make. By most accounts, Demi?s had so much plastic surgery you?d think she?d require next to no retouching. The Mail makes it sound like whatever happened, it wasn?t by Demi?s request. But it?s hard to figure out what was going through the retoucher?s head. Maybe he just really, really hates thighs. Or hates Demi Moore. I?ve heard she?s super unpleasant.
W definitely did appeal to Demi?s vanity in their article about her. They described her legs as ?chopsticks,? and talked about how she was aging naturally. Then they went on about her teeny, tiny imperfections that were supposed to be proof that she doesn?t go under the knife as often as I eat lunch. Her eyes wrinkle at the corners when she smiles! That means everything on her must be au natural! Still, once you notice the lack of thigh, it doesn?t look good. I doubt they did it because they thought too much flesh was showing ? if that were the case, you could just make the sarong cover more flesh, and you wouldn?t be left with the strange problem of leaving too much thigh down below.
Although? given how much surgery she?s had, maybe Demi really is just missing a chunk of thigh. Maybe that?s just how her legs are.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.458.644
Photos Online+ 3.333 past week
1.495
Users Online | | |
| | | | | | | | We Salute
Sandra Bullock
Photos of Sandra Bullock will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in
6 hours | | |
| | | | | |
|
