| | | | Celebrity News & Gossip
|
| Kendall Jenner's Booty Profile | Added 8 years ago | Source: HollywoodTuna |
|
|
|
|
|
We always knew Kendall Jenner cleaned up good, that’s why she became a model, right? Well, that and the fact herfamily’s loaded. So the shots of her looking nice and leggy at the 2015 Fragrance Foundation Awards (whatever the hell those are) aren’t too surprising. But seeing her in a pair of tight jeans on […]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kendall Jenner 'rebels' & decides not to follow Kim's 'no-tattoo' advice | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
GQ n' it #hillsongnyc #jonboytattoo
A photo posted by c/s Jon Boy p/v (@jonboytattoo) on Jun 18, 2015 at 1:18am PDT
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Taylor Swift says goodbye to her kitties as she heads to Europe: adorable? | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
At the airport about to leave for Europe, listening to 'See You Again' and thinking about how much I'll miss my cats. pic.twitter.com/3yDZo3TPLA
— Taylor Swift (@taylorswift13) June 17, 2015
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Zoe Saldana believes that Hollywood should pay for her childcare | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
Here’s Zoe Saldana at the LA premiere of Infinitely Polar Bear. She wore a one-sleeved, Louis Vuitton throw rug. I think this would have been a passable dress with no sleeves. It’s notable that Zoe took a break from her beloved Dolce & Gabbana.
Zoe has a new interview about juggling parenting and work. From the moment Zoe thanked the media for invading her privacy by noticing her pregnancy, I knew she’d be full of opinions. Zoe has not disappointed. Since giving birth, Zoe’s given her thoughts on “archaic” sleeptraining, “frustrating” body struggles, and how it’s okay to be a self-focused mom. My take is that Zoe thought motherhood would be much less difficult than the reality.
Zoe’s latest crusade involves the high cost of childcare, which is common knowledge for anyone with kids. Zoe thinks we don’t know this already. She told USA Today about how she argued with studios over who should pay for her nannies. This is amazing:
She nearly lost jobs by getting pregnant: “Let me tell you something, it will never be the right time for anybody in your life that you get pregnant. The productions I was slated to work on sort of had a panic. I heard through the grapevine there was even a conversation of me being written off of one of the projects. I was like, ‘Oh, my God, are you kidding me? It’s this bad?’ Right when I just feel super-duper happy, is that inconvenient for you? That me, as a woman in my thirties, I finally am in love and I am finally starting my life? And it’s (screwing) your schedule up? Really?”
Zoe thinks studios should pay for nannies: Studios “spend more money sometimes ‘perking’ up male superstars in a movie [with] a really phat penthouse or them staying in a yacht instead of them staying on land. But then a woman comes in going, ‘OK, I have a child. You’re taking me away from my home. You’re taking my children away from their home. And you’re going to make me work a lot more hours than I usually would if I was home. Therefore, I would have to pay for this nanny for more hours — so I kind of need that. And they go, ‘Nope, we don’t pay for nannies.’”
[From USA Today]
The paper got ahold of Paramount, the studio behind the new Star Trek movies. Paramount wouldn’t talk, so Zoe’s rep clarified: “The issue had been resolved prior to when this interview was conducted.” It sounds like Zoe doesn’t consider the issue resolved. Either the studio refused to pay for nannies (and Zoe’s mentioning it to shame them), or the studio gave in (and she still wants to talk about it).
Zoe does sound a little entitled by insisting employers should pay for her nannies because most women don’t receive any such perk. USA Today did the legwork on employers who do pay for childcare. They quote a study that says only 5% of companies contribute (even just a tiny bit) towards these expenses. Some people think that actresses who make millions shouldn’t complain, but thinking of this in terms of equality changes the argument. If male actors are getting crazy perks too (like penthouses and yachts), nannies aren’t too unreasonable of a request for an actress.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet & WENN
More Photos Here
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Emma Stone talks Andrew Garfield, Woody Allen & more with WSJ. Magazine | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
I?m really enjoying WSJ. Magazine these days. The NYT?s T Magazine used to be great, they used to do these in-depth profiles of interesting celebrities or up-and-coming actors, but T Magazine has sort of stopped doing that so much and WSJ. Magazine has taken up the mantel. Emma Stone covers the newest issue and this is honestly one of the best profiles I?ve ever read with Emma. Emma is smarter than the average starlet and in most interviews, she?s able to successfully withhold and deflect when it comes to personal information. But in this piece, she actually ends up talking about Andrew Garfield, Woody Allen (she?s promoting Irrational Man) and more. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:
Moving back to LA after several years in NYC: ?It feels different being by the water. You?d be surprised at how much of life can be taken up by doing yoga and nothing.?
She had panic attacks as a kid: ?It was really bad. The first time I had a panic attack I was sitting in my friend?s house, and I thought the house was burning down. I called my mom and she brought me home, and for the next three years it just would not stop. I would go to the nurse at lunch most days and just wring my hands. I would ask my mom to tell me exactly how the day was going to be, then ask again 30 seconds later. I just needed to know that no one was going to die and nothing was going to change.?
She didn?t write a speech when she was nominated for an Oscar: ?Are you out of your mind? Are you actually insane? Patricia Arquette had that thing locked up!?
The rumors about her breakup with Andrew Garfield: ?See, I never talk about this stuff for this exact reason?because it?s all so speculative and baseless. Once you start responding?once you?re like, ?No, that?s not true??then they?re like, ?Well, if we push enough, we?ll get a comment, so let?s see what else we can make up.? I understand the interest in it completely because I?ve had it, too. But it?s so special to me that it never feels good to talk about, so I just continually don?t talk about it.?
When she walked around LA with a bad with Andrew?s name on it: ?When I picked up the bag, I was like, ?This is kind of funny if there are any [paparazzi] out there.? There?s probably some rebelliousness that comes out in me after all these stories and people texting you for weeks about something that, for the most part, is not true. But even when it?s false, I would rather just let it be false.?
Her pet peeves: Animals dressed in outfits, people who send eight texts instead of one (?Just take a second!?), classic names intentionally misspelled. ?Like Emily being E-M-A-L-I-E. Drives me crazy.?
Working with Woody Allen: ?It?s terrifying. He doesn?t do table reads or any rehearsal. You can?t even ask questions about your character, because he?ll be like: ?You know this is a movie, right?? ?
Why she turned down the all-female Ghostbusters reboot. ?The script was really funny. It just didn?t feel like the right time for me. A franchise is a big commitment?it?s a whole thing. I think maybe I need a minute before I dive back into that water.?
[From WSJ. Magazine]
The Andrew Garfield section is interesting. I see her point about not giving in to false reports, but she IS still reacting those reports, she?s just not issuing a statement. It?s like she?s making it more complicated than it needs to be ? when People, E! News, Us Weekly and Star all agree that Andrew and Emma had broken up, a simple ?No, they?re still together? from her rep would have been the easiest path. Except that I still believe they probably were on a break and they just got back together when they were finally back in the same city together.
There?s also a lengthy part where she talks about the Sony Hack and her personal information ending on Wikileaks, and how she got all these weird emails from fans. What else? There?s a part where she talks about having insomnia while doing Cabaret on stage and she would go online at 3 am and buy stuff to make her own lotions. She also confesses to being a lurker on mom blogs and baking blogs, and she even met one of her favorite baking bloggers and they made apple-cider donuts together in real life. Emma is? quirky.
Photos courtesy of Angelo Pennetta for WSJ. Magazine.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Charlize Theron & Sean Penn apparently split sometime in May, after Cannes | Added 8 years ago | Source: CeleBitchy |
|
|
|
|
|
If I?m being honest, I always believed that Charlize Theron and Sean Penn would never make it as a couple long-term. What surprised me was that they actually did make it work for a year and a half and that Charlize truly seemed to make Sean into less of an a–hole. Now sources are whispering to Us Weekly (they broke the story) and People Magazine that Charlize and Sean are done, and that Charlize was the one to break things off. Interesting.
Sad news. Sean Penn and his fiancee Charlize Theron have a called it quits after nearly a year and a half together, multiple sources exclusively confirm to Us Weekly. One insider tells Us that the high-profile pair, who got together in December 2013, decided that their romance was over following their most recent jaunt to the Cannes Film Festival in the south of France. The source tells Us that Theron, 39, was the one to break things off with the fellow Oscar winner.
Theron and Penn, 54, had known each other for decades before their friendship blossomed into romance. A year into their relationship, Us exclusively reported in December 2014 that they had gotten secretly engaged during a trip to Paris. There was, however, no elaborate proposal. “There’s no ring, but they are committed,” an insider told Us at the time.
[From Us Weekly]
People Magazine points out that they haven?t been seen together since Cannes in mid-May and sources tell People that in the last month, Charlize stayed at her Hollywood home (with Jackson) and Penn has been staying at his Malibu home. Charlize is apparently in England now, filming The Huntsman and Sean is staying put in California. Hm. It does seem rather sudden, doesn?t it? I mean, they were completely loved up throughout the spring, appearing on multiple red carpets together and talking about their relationship in interviews. It seems like Cannes was the breaking point. But why?
Photos courtesy of WENN.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | 5.155.481 Photos Online+ 64.069 past week 1.155 Users Online | | |
| | | | | | We Salute Katie Holmes
Photos of Katie Holmes will not count in your daily view limit, if you are a registered member
Tribute ends in 6 days | | |
| | | |
|